Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why is the Irish Labour party such a failure ?

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Trouble is where's that next crop is coming from? The Greens recovered after 2011 because they still had no rival ecology-like party for their vote to migrate to, whereas Labour is competing with the SDs and to a lesser extent the PBP/AAA lot.

    Think I gave Jo Costello 3rd or 4th preference back in 2020 but at the time my feeling was "why are you still around?"..



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    They've a few young Senators knocking around. Annie Hoey, Rebecca Moynihan etc and some young councillors as well.

    It will probably be another 10 years or so before they have any real prominance again. SF will lead the next government but when they inevitably make a holy show of themselves then those voters who want to give them a chance will go elsewhere, and by then those who aren't old enough to remember 2011 to 2016 will be eligible to vote.

    Until then they'll still have a base strong enough to keep hold of 5-7 seats.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Your talking roughly 1 million or so electorate,which will amount to circa 10% of electorate....the labour party stragedy is to capture the entirity of that vote?



    Theres a strong risk pbp,shinners and indo lefts could squeeze their present TDs and they may not make the 5% vote to allow annual leaders speech be broadcast.....they may get to work building straight away and not be counting on someone else to fcuk up and pick up scraps



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Plausible but it'll be an uphill struggle. I don't see Labour making many gains unless the SocDems implode.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I'd say Marie Sherlock will be on the ballot next time

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Soc Dems and Labour are not really that different from each other and should probably just merge. Gary Gannon was even trying to join the European group that Labour would be part of in European Parliament.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Watched her on TV being presented to the media as the new Labour leader and I think the first thing she said was "women are still paid less than men". What women Ivana? Are you speaking from personal experience, academic staff in Trinity, Senators, TDs?

    If this is an indication of where she's taking the Labour Party, identity politics, then they haven't a hope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Such mergers can often end up with LESS support and representation than the two individual parties had before the merger. I'm not sure who a merger would help?


    I'm surprised Smith didn't go forward this time. It would be a high-risk strategy for him to choose to 'bide his time', as there may not be much of a party left by the time he's ready to go forward.

    I'd guess that's the old gender pay gap she's talking about there, still a very real issue for many women in many industries.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "I'd guess that's the old gender pay gap she's talking about there, still a very real issue for many women in many industries."

    What industries?

    If you do a statistical survey of wage/salary levels in any area of employment you will always find a 'gender pay gap' because men and women have in general different priorities, different interests, different responsibilities, different abilities. No doubt there are some areas where the gap is tiny or favour females but I doubt Ivana will be highlighting them. Maybe she will be more interested in industries like construction or agriculture?

    Good luck if this is going to one of the main points of focus for her tenure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Ham_Sandwich




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Could you give any examples of sexist or misandrist statements from her please? Preferably something that hasn’t been debunked in previous discussions here on this topic,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So no examples then, that’s what I reckoned.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    She lost any chance of a Labour bounce, from me, 10 years ago.

    On a national radio show she stated that men are not discriminated against in family court, stating the fact that family courts are sealed to show there being no evidence of it.

    A fellow family law practitioner was audibly stuck for words, that she would say that, and called her to task after a few seconds.

    She's toxic and will start courting that very vocal Twitter minority, assuming it will equate to general votes.

    The Soc Dems are falling into the same trap, playing to identity politics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    i was 'meh' about Alan Kelly but at least he had the common touch and was never given time to prove himself - wonder will he support her or did she oust him? love to know what happened behind close doors



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Cal4567


    You can be as smug as you like. She's a nonentity but treated with kid gloves by a media fearful of SF's prominence and will be pushed repeatedly by RTE and the IT as some sort of leader of the opposition. As a previous poster said, outside of her supporter cohort of white, middle class, universally educated left leaning women, she's an irrelevance.

    All party leaders need to be able to reach out to as many parts of the electorate as possible. She doesn't. I cannot see her even getting re-elected.

    The Labour movement have spent the last 40 years focusing on identity politics, with a resulting decrease year on year of their core support. Fine, let her carry on dictating to us about correct pronoun use or which statues to tear down. Just don't expect most of us to be listening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,139 ✭✭✭Augme



    Alan Kelly was never wanted as leader by the parliamentary party by all accounts. He was ousted by his fellow TDs at the first opportunity and Ivana helped come along to present that opportunity. By all accounts she wasn't the one who initiated it or leading it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If you heard the Sarah McInerney interview, you’ll realise how very far from reality your suggestion that RTE will handle her with kid gloves is.

    I’m not sure she’s the best choice for Labour, but if your going to have a go, at least keep it vaguely real.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You've never posted here to support the people of Ukraine. You never advocating for the people of Ukraine, is the exclusion of them, exclusion of them is discrimination and in this case exclusion because of where they come from.

    That's how the game works, right? She's been a public figure for thirty years and you can't find a single thing that she actually said to complain about, so you're now whinging about what she didn't say.

    She's on the Six O'Clock News on RTE today supporting the (mostly male) P&O workers down the docks, btw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011



    You were the one asked the question, "put your own work in" is an admission of failure to be able to answer it.



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Bobtheman


    Can't delete text above



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That's a rant, not an answer.

    You were asked a very basic question and you can't answer it; and are instead dodging and trying to evade it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    She wants legally binding gender quotas… https://www.ivanabacik.com/latest/women-on-boards-legally-binding-quotas-needed/

    so she would advocate that the law as relates to equality and giving everyone a fair and equal opportunity should be ditched in favour of choosing people based on gender… discrimination based on gender..

    that is a reason that Labour, who I have voted for previously, will never see a vote from me again, as long as she or someone of her ilk is in charge…who advocates actively discriminatory practices against one section of society to enable wellbeing of others…not democratic not legal, not principled not suitable…



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Cal4567


    Vaguely real?

    Will you just quit the keyboard warrior put downs please.

    I just present my case with the diminishing support of all the ordinary people who have deserted the labour movement. This has been continuously in process for decades and as far as The Labour Party is concerned, we're now heading towards endgame and Bacik will be its cheerleader heading you all over a cliff. She'll keep you in the idealogical bubble modern day Labour and it's identity politics has become.

    It will never get you into power, and if you think it will, you are utter delusional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You "answered" with a question and no actual incidents, which is what you were asked for. So you didn't actually answer.

    You have no evidence, and you aren't going to find any evidence as this is entirely in your head.

    You don't get to demand counter-evidence when you've nothing yourself. But what you're demanding wouldn't actually prove your point anyway

    You know you can just admit you don't like someone just because you don't like them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I already gave you one example

    She's on the Six O'Clock News on RTE today supporting the (mostly male) P&O workers down the docks, btw.

     




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    What you provided was not an answer to the question that you were asked, it was a pathetic deflection. I'm not going to Paxman on this, but you haven't answered the question - and you never will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So if everyone has a fair and equal opportunity at present, why are women just 1 in 5 board members?

    Are you telling us that the lads are four times better at being board members than women?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I’m not telling you anything….but to argue the point you’d need to know what gender percentages applied for and we’re qualified for these positions.

    but the way to tackle one facet of possible unfairness is not to engage in whataboutery…or discriminate against others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There's no application process for board posts like these. If you move in the right circles, golf in the right clubs, you might get the invite,

    It is obvious to anyone that there is huge discrimination built into the current system. Positive action measures are an appropriate response to such discrimination.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Are you continuing to ignore the example given?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    interesting that you might equate something illegal as ‘positive action’. :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Interesting that you think you know better about the illegality of something than a Trinity professor of law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,456 ✭✭✭jmcc


    It appears that Bacik wasn't expecting this from RTE. Sarah McInerney is a good journalist and she didn't leave Bacik off the hook.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    being qualified as a professor of law doesn’t equate to agreeing with or adherence with the law… it’s bull and bluster on her behalf.. do some research yourself and come back and tell us what you think. It’s illegal.

    Best most suitable and qualified candidates as opposed to… “ ohhh, errr we should get a person of X gender “

    great job by McInerney…. Bacik tried to absolutely bully her in the above interview, a disgraceful performance and attitude …refusing to answer questions almost as if she felt she was above accountability but with kind of an arrogant and aggressive manner and off-handing intonation in reply to some very excellent, straightforward, persistent and pertinent questioning…

    Poor Ivana is not off to a great start. Labour’s small bounce may very well transfer into a further sinking of the ships for them in a short time… she’s unlikely to be the lifeboat that core labour people sought… and hoped for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You do understand the difference between board positions and actual employment, right? And you do understand that we've had a quota in place for public sector board positions for years now, right? And you did see how she mentioned the other countries that passed legislation to enable similar measures, yeah?

    I think I'll stick with the professor of law over the outraged on Boards when it comes to legality assessment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,456 ✭✭✭jmcc


    There's that Croppies Lie Down attitude about Trinity coming to the fore again. Labour also has a wider problem in that it has failed to take ownership of the Austerity it gleeflully imposed on Irish people during the 2011-2016 FG/Labour government. Bacik, as a Labour member of the anti-democratic Seanad, voted for these Austerity measures including the Irish Water tax. The electorate remembers and does not trust Labour. That's why Labour is on 5% in the latest RedC and between 3% and 4% in others. There was no Bacik bounce as RedC's sample is drawn from a panel of 40K voters that it thinks represents the electorate rather than being a random sample of the electorate. The 1% movement was just background noise within the Margin of Error.

    The funny thing is how Labour's Stickie friends in RTE still try to present Labour as being a major political party rather than the mere fringe party that it is in reality.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,774 ✭✭✭donaghs


    There's a variety of reasons. As you mention there are traditional male networking old boy networks and golf clubs, etc.

    But you can also look at large workplaces where women make up 50% of middle management, then drop off as you reach the top position. Sometimes men (in general) are more single-minded about things like career success, board positions etc, and are willing to neglect friends and family, etc to achieve it.


    Going back to the OP, and the Labour Party. Terry Prone (someone I sometimes find insufferable) was on Newstalk last week being asked about how to make the Labour Party relevant again. She basically said the drop the "woke" stuff from their image. She called it the "liberal agenda". She said it was all very worthy stuff, but the big campaigns (divorce, gay marriage, etc etc ) had been won, and they needed to get back to bread and butter issues, like workers rights , the cost of living etc. Not intricasies of transgender athletes of colour. I think its sensible advice, but I cant see it happening. The Labour party was too weded to performative placard waving , rather than their original mission of making life better for all people, especially the worse off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,857 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    she basically said the drop the "woke" stuff from their image...they needed to get back to bread and butter issues, like workers rights , the cost of living etc.

    They've hardly elected the right leader if they want to go down that road, have they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Terry has zero credibility. The "liberal agenda " wasn't done at the expense of bread and butter issues like low wages.

    And much as Terry might like to stymie future progress, the liberal agenda is far from a done deal.

    Nice stereotyping on the women though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I never said she was an employee, what I’m saying is her appointment would have been partially influenced by gender, therefore discriminatory …the national womens council wish to bring in gender quotas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,774 ✭✭✭eire4


    Excellent post and I very much agree with your assessment there. It truly is very sad how far away from their origins Labour have strayed and the country is IMHO the worse off for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ahh FFS.

    I see you are now getting hot and bothered about Labour, well Ivana anyway.

    I guest it is a quite week as FGers and Leo hasn't shat the bed of late. 🙄

    You kow damn well why there aren't more women on boards, why there aren't more women in top management roles in industry, etc.

    It has to do with how women often take career breaks to raise families, decide not to spend long hours in work either really working hard and/or ar**licking to climb the old career ladder.

    But no it is because when it comes time to select the board "the misogynists get together and only pick the men."


    To answer the OP's thread title question:

    "if you think the Labour party have failed ?

    You aint seen nothing yet."

    Bacik is the worse leader possible, she hasn't been able to get elected until recently, she was only able ever to get "selected" to Seanad using her university.

    I won't even grace it with the term "elected" as it is a closed shop of sorts.

    She is the exact opposite of what the labour party needs to make it relevant and electable.

    She is the definition of the well to do champagne socialist, although the socialist bit is even debatable as her entire political career if you want to even call it that, has been based around women's rights with a few other modern liberal agendas thrown in.

    Her latest big drive has been to revoke the constitutional amendment that an overwhelming majority of the Irish electorate voted in favour of in 2004.

    Bullcrap - Daffy fecking duck would have got a good result in 2017.

    Corbyn was a huge problem as he was unpalatable to huge chunk of electorate, even long time labour voters.

    Hell Labour lost seats they never lost before in primarily working class constituencies under his leadership.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I'm not getting not and bothered about Labour or Ivana. I've said that I don't think she's the right person to lead Labour at present.

    I'm getting mildly warm about BS attacks on Ivana or Labour that aren't based on facts, like saying that the person who's won 3 or 4 very tightly contested Seanad contests 'hasn't been able to get elected'. That's just BS, as she absolutely HAS been elected. There are very few politicians that get elected on their first go. It is not unusual at all for politicians to take a number of attempts to get elected, whether to Council or Seanad or Dail. But it seems that the lads decided that Ivana is 'unelectable' despite the fact that she's been winning elections for about 15 years now.

    As for blaming women for taking maternity leave, what has that got to do with Board appointments? Does it really matter whether you have 20 years expertise or 25 years expertise in what you can bring to a Board? You might be right on the arse licking though, perhaps they have more sense in general than to play those games.

    'Women aren't generally interested in' board positions? Seriously? Where did you get that from?

    I'm genuinely lost now. I don't know who the specific 'she' is that you're talking about here.

    You indicated that her proposal for gender quota for PLC board positions was illegal. I'm trying to check how you worked this out, given that board positions are not employee posts.

    Again, I can only suggest that you reconsider whether you know more about the legality or otherwise of her proposal than a Trinity professor of law would know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    She got "elected" by the electorate of Dublin University i.e. all Irish citizen graduates (and some undergrads) of Trinity College and as far as I know ones that were also granted degrees on behalf of Trinity but in DIT.

    It "elects" 3 senators so not as if she was the only one at any one time.

    And for quite a while it has been a case where the senators are actual lecturers in Trinity e.g herself and David Norris.

    So trying to spin it that she is this seasoned election winner is stretching it, when the electorate are just linked to the college that employs her.

    Up until recently any time she stood before the normal electorate of this state she landed flat on her face.

    And it wasn't just maternity leave I meant, but women actually giving up their jobs for a number of years.

    Women taking maternity leave and continuing their careers I would say is a more recent thing over the last 2 decades or so.

    Before that a lot of women would have left the workforce for a number of years and then returned.

    And even a few years off in the wrong time of your career can have massive bearing on it.

    Hell it was even worse a number of decades before when you had ridiculous situation where women were forced out of employment when they married.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Norris hasn't worked in Trinity since he got the Seanad seat. He's been on a disability payment from Trinity, strangely enough, while working as a Senator and even running for President. There is no requirement for Seanad candidates to be working in Trinity, as you can see from someone like Lynn Ruane. They need to be proposed by Trinity academics, but they don't need to be Trinity academics. There were 11 candidates when she first won her seat in 2007, so this isn't some tidy closed shop. It is a very competitive election. Try it yourself some day and see how easy it is to get yourself elected. She won again in 2011,2016 and 2020, a huge achievement.

    Yes, lots of women WERE forced out of the workforce whether by their employers or because childcare was non-existent. And you think we should just sit back and say 'ah well, hey ho, that's why only 20% of PLC board members are women' what a shame, never mind?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Labours stickie friends in RTE? Are you living in the 1980s

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jesus.......ivana is on the tonight show now......trying to 'sell' the " new cuddly labour" message...... i cant see it boding well into an election... there's no substance there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,269 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Bacik is a disastrous choice for Labour Party leader, she's a female supremacist that showed her colours as such during her shameful misrepresentation of her electorate during her time in Student Union politics, that had to be called out by David Norris for her sexist actions in the Seanad and that couldn't even win a Dáil seat when riding on the coat-tails of Eamon Gilmore's poll-topping performance in 2011. Labour won't be getting a vote from me as long as she's leader and it wouldn't surprise me at all if she failed to retain her seat tbh.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭crossman47


    I do agree she is the final naoil in the coffin of Labour because her primary campaign will be on liberal issues. That space is already taken and the abandonment of bread and butter issues means they will never reclaim seats in places they used to have them e.g. Kerry, Wicklow, Limerick, Cork city.



Advertisement