Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1109610971099110111023691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Forbes lists civilian deaths at nearly 3,000 not 1,000 and states that:

    "The number of people killed and injured in the conflict is likely to be “considerably higher” as the number does not include figures from areas with intense hostilities like Mariupol."


    So the question is, do you just read headlines when posting links or do you lie for the Motherland?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    These are short-term "tricks" really. In the medium and long-term the rouble is under significant pressure.

    The Vatican bought peanuts worth. The G7 countries have rejected paying in roubles, so there's a game of chicken going on. Russia gets about 400mm eur per day from gas sales to the EU, as much as it's going to hurt EU countries (especially Germany) and create an energy crisis, it's going to hurt Russia much more. Personally I suspect they'll come to some deal in the short-term.

    Do you think EU should capitulate to Putin breaking the contracts and pay in roubles?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Literally, the first line of the article:

    Nearly 3,000 civilians have been killed or injured in Ukraine

    Killed OR injured, i.e. thats the combined figure. I listed both figures separately in my post. The only one lying here is you.

    I await your retraction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    Oh, but the Russian civilians are responsible for the war. They are the ones who have enabled this situation with their support for Putin. I just hope western governments have woken up to the reality of the way Russia is. We need to have a long term plan to make sure they would find it difficult to do this again. Losing a lot of equipment and troops will certainly help in this direction, but it needs to be followed up with longer term strategy from western governments:

    • Move away from buying Gas and Oil from Russia.
    • Facilitate the demographic decline by encouraging highly educated young people to migrate to the EU.
    • Discourage FDI (either officially or unofficially) to slow/disrupt Russian economic growth.
    • Make it difficult for them to re-arm by restricting access to certain technologies, computer chips and other things.
    • Create an EU defensive military that would work with NATO (but not in overseas missions).
    • Help rebuild a democratic Ukraine which would also be a source of stable energy supplies.

    We certainly can't change the fact that we have a malignant neighbour, but we can make it difficult for it to cause problems in the future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In a perfect world we would refuse to pay at all.

    This is not a perfect world, and due to short sighted energy policy in the EU we are now heavily reliant on Russian oil and gas. Trying to cut it off totally would cripple several EU members in ways you would not believe. While all efforts should be made to become energy independent in the union, now is not the time to play chicken as we have far more to lose.

    At the end of the day russia is the one with the resources (oil & gas), net exporter of food, and still has close trade links with china. They can survive without euros, but we will really struggle without their resources.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Yeah, but what's he going to say? "We got no food. We got no ammo. OUR GENERALS' HEADS ARE FALLIN' OFF!"?



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Makes it so it makes even more sense to borrow and keep fuelling it. On the small/individual level I mean. If you can borrow at a rate 10% below inflation that's an instant profit.

    ECB need to get off their arses, some kind of hardship is coming but they don't seem to want to act. This goes back to the end of 2020 when demand had rebounded but things were still well behind. For a year til the Russians invaded all the people who "should" know were claiming it was just a little bump in the road and things would go back to normal. Not realising that in real life prices were going up, rents have massively increased leaving less disposable income for people and self-employed people in a lot of cases hadn't put up prices in 5-10 years while absorbing those higher costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭Economics101



    If Western countries were to pay for Russian oil and gas in Roubles, then somewhere they must first pay € or $ for these Roubles. The sellers of said Roubles are likely to be Russian financial or trading entities of some sort (no sane Western institution would hold significant stocks of Roubles).

    So directly or indirectly Russian entities acquire € or $ for oil/gas. There might be a very short time lag when Western importers hold depreciating Roubles. I assume that oil and gas are prices in $; it would be insane for the Russians to denominate their exports in terms of their own rubbish currency.

    So maybe there is no harm in giving in to Vlad on this one, as the whole thing is either window-dressing, macho-nonsense, or sheer financial illiteracy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I heard a commentator on the BBC say that to get an idea of Russias true thinking you only have to look at how the state media are potraying things where a couple nights ago they were going big with pushing the views of a Russian philosopher, who about 90 years ago said that the very idea of a Russia that didn't include Ukraine was unthinkable and to think it possible was to make a huge mistake - essentially saying Russia couldn't be considered to properly be Russsia without the inclusion of Ukraine.

    Which is depressing in that it means Putin's aim is to take the whole of Ukraine. There is no point saying it can't be done and it's impossible if Putin thinks otherwise. Why wouldn't he? He has successfully eliminated all opposition voices within Russia, he has an overwhelming ability to quash dissent through employing 2 million special police who descend on any and all outbreaks of protest with overwhelming numbers and quash them. Why wouldn't he think he can do the same to Ukraine given RUssia is such a good example of what can be achieved? The main key is to get rid of the leaders of Ukraine's civil society - the 2 million hit list I have mentioned previously. That plan is currently underway and it's been noted in the media that civil officials, politicians and their families are being aprehended and being disappeared together with journalists.

    "Kremlin denies it is forcibly disappearing civilians despite CNN and UN reports

    From CNN’s Eliza Mackintosh and Lindsay Isaac

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said he is not aware of cases of missing Ukrainian journalists and activists, or of reports of arrested officials in Russian-held territories of Ukraine.

    Peskov's comments come after CNN reported that local Ukrainian officials had been arrested, and journalists and civil society members had disappeared and are still missing. ... At least 45 cases of civilian detentions have been recorded by the HRMMU since the war began on February 24, according to a HRMMU spokesperson.

    On Monday the mission said it had so far documented 24 cases of conflict-related detentions of local officials in Russian-occupied regions, 13 of whom have subsequently been released. 

    Its monitors have also recorded the disappearances of 21 journalists, civil society activists, protesters and civilians, who "vocally opposed the invasion in Kyiv, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions." https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-putin-news-03-29-22/h_a35aaffc56bcf888261b7212ae4ecd19

    I think the talks of retreats and scaled back objectives are most likely a smokescreen to delay while Putin tries to desperately work out how to fix things so he can still acquire all of Ukraine in the face of the underestimated resistance. I don't think he's going to really come to a negotiatiang table until Russia's military is truly broken and rendered incapable of achieving his original objectives and that he is made to see that by someone brave enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Okay but do you think the EU should capitulate to Putin's demand and pay in roubles?

    "They can survive without euros, but we will really struggle without their resources."

    Modern Russia can't really persist without export revenue. Half a billion dollars a day is significant revenue, not to be sniffed at, certainly not by a country locked in a very expensive war and an even more expensive economic crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,890 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I thought that the Ukrainians were destroying most of the captured Russian tanks/APCs? There was mention of it in that article about the Russian 4th armoured division being wiped out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,537 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I presume the energy consumers would go to money markets to exchange e.g. EUR for RUB, increasing the demand for RUB and driving it's value higher.

    Regardless, if Europe decides to cut Russia oil/gas, that will hurt Putin a lot but EU people will blame their governments for the energy crisis. In this scenario, it's straight up Putin's fault for breaking contracts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I'd rather they not kill civillians in Crimea and just hold a referendum and say 'hey guys, we are going to be joining the EU and Ukraine is going to become a a democratic and significant world power unhindered by bad behavour and constant western sanctions. Do you guys want to be part of that or would you like your children's life opportunities to be ever restricted and to stay under Putins thumb?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its the russian way of saying,we are doing a special retreat and wont admit we lost operation, back to Donbas to regroup ,for then to continue.

    Putins reinforcements have arrived



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If the alternative is no gas (EU serious recession) then yes, they should pay in roubles.

    Its significant revenue but already most of their usual imports from EU are banned so you'd wonder what use the use for euros is at all - at least if EU countries have to buy roubles to pay for gas, it raises value of the rouble giving russia more purchasing power from other markets (China, India etc).

    If Russian gas is shut off to Europe we slide into economic recession - german gas reserves are so low that they have already acknowledged demand shedding will be necessary to stretch the reserves enough.

    If entire EU denies Russian gas imports, the equivalent in LNG imports is around 130 LNG ships per month. Thats most of the worldwide fleet of LNG class ships.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    "As we discussed before, payments and delivery is a time consuming process ... This does not mean that a tomorrow's delivery should be paid (in roubles). From a technological point of view, this is a more prolonged process," he said.

    So not on April 1st, but they plan on bringing it in as soon as payment systems are in place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'd thought about that as a solution myself, in regards to Crimea. The main potential sticking point would be Russia saying, "We already had referendum. 110 percent of people voted in favour of uniting with Russia. We see no reason to conduct a second."

    To be fair, Crimea has had two referendums previous to the dodgy 2014 one, in 1991 and 1994. The 1991 asked the people of Crimea if they wished to be independent from Ukraine and they voted in favour of this. In 1994, they voted for greater autonomy within Ukraine. Neither referendum was ever enacted by the Ukrainian government. I expect that if you put it to Russian negotiators about another referendum in Crimea to decide its status, they'd start talking about the question being asked until the 'right' answer was given. Maybe, though, they may still agree, on the basis of it being for the sake of peace, but it would be a fair old climbdown.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They wouldn't be allowed a say in Crimea like Putin will allow it . remember last time 8 years ago 110% of the population voted to rejoin Russia , despite less than half the actual population casting a vote.

    Turn Crimea into a artillery range and hit it every day of the year ,

    What's the point in saying it's ok for Russia to bomb ukraine back to the stone age but the Ukrainians shouldn't return the favor



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Forbes is off by a huge margin. The death toll in Mariupol alone - let alone all of Ukraine - is almost double that figure in all liklihood:

    "Nearly 5,000 people killed in siege of Ukraine's Mariupol - mayor's office" https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nearly-5000-people-killed-siege-ukraines-mariupol-mayors-office-2022-03-28/



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Mike3549




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Oh well the G7 stated they aren't going to break the contracts and pay in roubles, if they stick to that and Putin doesn't blink, economic recession and energy crisis it is then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    This AW139 took off from Constanta about 20 minutes. It's flightpath appears to take it to Sevastapol, which is highly unusual in itself. However, even more suspicious is the fact that it switched off It's transponder ( which gives air-traffic controllers, and other aircraft, the aircrafts position, height, speed and flightpath).

    One would assume that, given its a civilian heli, it would keep its transponder switched on when entering contested airspace. I'd love to know who's on that flight...




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    fun times ahead so

    article is behind a paywall - is the 5k figure civilians only or include Ukrainian national guard?



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Are the people in Crimea , Ukrainian citizens or Russian citizens in the eyes of Ukraine?

    so you want Ukraine to flatten Crimea and the people it considers it’s own citizens?

    you think that Ukraine should flatten Crimea so the citizens of Crimea see Russia can’t protect them and will change their tune and push to be with Ukraine ? The country that will have supposedly flattened them?

    you need to go to sleep, sounds like you have been up all night on the vodka



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Ethically, it's not cool to kill innocent civilians of any nation, first of all, which would almost certainly happen in an indiscriminate bombing/shelling campaign such as Russia have conducted against Mariupol. Secondly, doing so would muddy the moral waters of the conflict and promote cynicism in the West toward the conflict, potentially depriving the Ukrainians of much needed support. Finally, if you thought the Russians have been brutal in their campaign so far, it would seem a bit quaint compared to what they would do if they had this moral justification of protecting their own citizens from bombardment.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement