Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1115111521154115611573691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 798 ✭✭✭Glenomra


    What a wonderful post. And yes continual and ineffective howling is what's going on and on in this forum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭JoChervil




  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Finished my 4th watch of it last year/start of this year. As you say, it should be shown to absolutely everyone, the episode on the Holocaust at a minimum should be shown to every 1st year in secondary school.

    For your later points though, I'd argue somewhat. There's a world of difference between the dissonance required to eat meat and the dissonance required to start killing people. I think the German psyche at the time was far more open to it. Primo Levi was on The World At War, if anyone hasn't read If This is a Man then they've missed one of the key books of the last century. Anyway he makes the point that for all of the "it could have been anywhere" stuff it's very, very important to note that it wasn't anywhere. It was the Germans. There were collaborators elsewhere but it was the Germans. The later writings about getting home and experiences in Russia are humorous at times, even having smashed through Germany they weren't exactly an efficient or well-organised bunch of lads.

    Similarly, I question the rationality and awareness of most of the Russian psyche today and it seems like it hasn't changed much in the last century. From the top to the bottom, there are shrugs at war crimes (because surely everyone just does it as bad and on the same scale?), there's fatalism, cynicism and ignorance. I mean they were planning to wheel through and just slaughter Ukrainian civil society and expect no resistance because well, why would anyone bother to resist the inevitable?

    I sometimes wind up my ould lad with comparisons to the North, "See? Brits weren't so bad were they?" :D But really, the difference is night and day. And it was mostly done with the ignorance of the British population. Meanwhile there was anti-Irish sentiment growing in England (apparently) yet my dad and plenty of others could travel freely (apart from being profiled, imagine the horror!) and work and make a living and save/send money home (didn't work out for him for other reasons). For all the **** that was going on and all the differences, just imagine Russia in charge of Westminster. There'd have been no Catholics left within a few years' partition. If it happened later "Free Derry" with their socialistic stuff would have learned that the biggest threat to a socialist movement is another socialist movement with bigger weapons. :P

    None of the above is to excuse the Brits and the nonsense they performed and allowed to happen. The point being though that if someone came in and tried to compare the Troubles and the Brits' role and the current war in Ukraine then I think most people would rightly **** them off. And it's similar with Ukraine, I'm absolutely and more than willing to turn a blind eye to small-scale issues. I'd be putting more resources into figuring out what idiot-fools are letting the videos out tbh. When someone hasn't (or rarely) posted on the thread and they come in with "I dunno..." and focus on Ukrainian issues it comes across as more than a bit insincere, and I'm being generous. There are contrarians of course (saw a mate for the first time in a while last week, every subject he'll admit he doesn't know much but will start straight into both-sides because he thinks that means he's being "balanced" or "fair") and some who simply aren't bright but went to a couple of philosophy lectures and have decided that everything is a "thought exercise".

    I don't put you into either camp btw, and I do think you've been jumped on unfairly more than once on the thread, but that's my reading on it and I suspect why people are quick to jump. Could argue it's a failing on their part to see the subtlety and a rush to categorise but with emotions high and 90%+ of the time those judgments being correct I can't blame them. A willingness for people to walk/row back a little bit or to accept that their posts are coming across to people in a way that wasn't intended would make for a much happier and fruitful experience for all I would think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭circadian



    Alright, so you posted this in the middle of the night, diligently sowing those tankie seeds. Let's put this into context.

    Should Ukranians be taking part in war crimes? No, of course not. Regardless of the horrors of what the Russians have brought to a civilian population there's no excusing breaking convention.

    However, and there is a huge difference here, the Ukranian authorities already declared that they would not tolerate their military taking part in war crimes. This was back when the Russians manufactured a video of Russian soldiers being killed in cold blood. So even when it wasn't confirmed, the first response from the Ukranian authorities was to state that they should not be engaging in this behaviour and anyone found to be doing so would face legal punishment for it.


    Has anyone in Russia said anything at all about any single crime they've committed? No. Of course not.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I never once said they only sold baby food.

    I have a feeling you are going to bring up Easter Eggs and stray dogs again so I will leave you to it.

    No point in allowing you to drag an important thread off topic to score some imaginary points, dishonestly referencing an imagined conversation, attributing imagined motive to my innocuous opinion, just to show how much more you care about Ukrainian people than others.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭circadian


    I thought we already concluded this argument lads?



    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/118828365#Comment_118828365



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So did I.

    Apparently not though. It seemingly needs to be dishonestly brought up every now and again.

    As far as I am concerned, it's settled.

    Sorry for my part in allowing it to continue. I won't reference it again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭circadian


    **** getting weird when I'm agreeing with someone I'm diametrically opposed to!



  • Registered Users Posts: 242 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    An incredible bit of footage featuring a Ukrainian Anti-Tank Missile shooting down a Russian KA-52 Alligator Helicopter.



    Post edited by Perseverance The Second on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭circadian


    Honestly though, I hope something to come out of all this is for people to ease off each other with differing views. The last 6 or so years have seen everyone becoming more polarised and reducing debate to hardline talking points for many, we've all been at each others throats. This is what the likes of Russia have been sowing and cultivating during that time and the media has their part to play with the whole clickbait model.


    Democracy isn't a democracy if opposing views cannot be discussed. Let's make sure we don't loose that.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I absolutely agree.

    The last few years have been an absolutely shocking time for public discussion. Anything that doesn't completely align with an opinion is immediately discounted as either propaganda, fake news, bigoted, an attempt to push an agenda or an insult.

    I'm as guilty as the next man (perhaps even more guilty) of getting caught up in that way of thinking and it needs to stop. There is plenty of room in the world for counter opinions, once they are coming from an honest, thought out and reasoned place and not one based on hatred, malice or mean spiritedness.

    I'm all for heated debates, they should be encouraged, but more often than not, it just turns into two diametrically opposed echo chambers who only recognise identical opinions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Putting aside the absolute brutality of the Russian military the out and out thievery by them is mind boggling and permeates all ranks. Here is the haul from a lieutenant!





  • Registered Users Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    If it's at all possible we should boot out the diplomats and then Nationalise the embassy. Just like the planes they are not giving back to the Irish companies.


    You could house a lot of Ukrainians in that compound.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Northernlily


    These guys are **** idiots and anyone who believes them should be sectioned.

    The stupidity of some of the stuff they are coming out with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,908 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    You did read one article about baby foods... One article and spent days going on about baby foods. ..


    Im not sure why we ended up back here. Bizarre though. But here we are.

    And yes companies should be criticized for supporting this regime.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Not sure why they even bother to call them "diplomats" anymore




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭Longing


    We need to follow ASAP. Our Government need to show more support for Ukraine that Irish people condemn this brutality. Today we see that the ordinary people of Ireland are doing there bit by refusing to supply fuel to the Russian Embassy.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    We could allow "diplomats" from other embassies a look around as well. I'm sure they'd pick up on some "design features" etc from the compound 😉



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    For your later points though, I'd argue somewhat. There's a world of difference between the dissonance required to eat meat and the dissonance required to start killing people.

    I take your point Button, but I'm not so sure there is that wide a difference. If you reduce groups of peoples to vermin in the eyes of your population, they become animals and that gap considerably narrows. Remember too that Hitler was an animal lover who rarely ate meat, lectured all around him on animal welfare, brought in laws that restricted hunting, increased the reach of animal welfare laws and banned vivisection, yet at the same time was happily engineering and lecturing to the same people the destruction of all those millions of men women and children he saw as sub humans. All wars dehumanise the enemy. It's a near requirement for those fighting them, no matter how just the cause. At this very moment in the horror of Ukraine it's easier to live with pulling the trigger on an "orc" or a "Khokhol" rather than a person. Especially a person you could well be related to and your grandfathers could have shared beers with. Facists like putin and Hitler and Stalin use that near requirement and take it to another level where all of a people are dehumanised.

    I think the German psyche at the time was far more open to it. Primo Levi was on The World At War, if anyone hasn't read If This is a Man then they've missed one of the key books of the last century. Anyway he makes the point that for all of the "it could have been anywhere" stuff it's very, very important to note that it wasn't anywhere. It was the Germans. There were collaborators elsewhere but it was the Germans.

    Very good book alright. Another incredible documentary on the Holocaust is Shoah. Roaul Hilberg(who is featured in Shoah) another must read too and one of the very first to academically examine and write on the subject after the war and Germany had become a useful buffer against the Soviet Union. It's forgotten today but for a period from the end of the war into the 1960's the Holocaust was off the radar in the public eye and media because of the new politics to keep Germany looking like and being an ally. For a generation in the West if it was mentioned Belsen was the horror, Treblinka and Auschwitz were rarely if ever mentioned. The World At War documentary was one of the first in the West to talk widely about what happened in those places.

    I would question Levi's position on it being the Germans, though a very understandable one for him to take. If you'd asked a hundred people in 1900 which nation in Europe would seek to destroy Jews I'd be shocked if ten would have pointed towards Germany. Places like Russia, yes, Ukraine, certainly, even France. The first language of late 19th and early 20th century Zionism was German and it had been proposed that German would be one of the main languages in any reborn Israel. Literally just before Hitler's rise to power we had an explosion of culture and liberalism in the Weimar Republic in the arts and sciences and politics, much of it Jewish too. Jews were so integrated in German society from the top to the bottom the nazis had to invent blood laws to work out who was "truly Jewish" and restricted the reach to a couple of generations lest too many Germans including some in the party were outed as Jewish. That's how quickly a national psyche can be shifted. And look how quickly it shifted back after 1945 and Hitler had done the one decent thing in his life.

    We can see similar regarding Russians and Ukrainians. Go back fifteen years and you would find a different attitude to Ukrainians from average Russians*. Their cultural and blood links run very very deep in both directions. Even putin who engineered that shift of attitudes has referred to Ukrainians as "brothers". When Ukraine was a puppet state of Russia and their "nazis" were in power and a lot more power with it Ukraine was mysteriously nazi free in Russian rhetoric. Now, today when the Far Right can't even get one of their candidates into parliament it has magically become a nest of nazis. Funny how that works... It would be as daft as the Americans and British invading Germany in 1950 to de-nazify the place.



    *Though it didn't fully solidify in my thoughts at the time, I even noticed that shift in the few Russians and Ukrainians I've known in Ireland.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There can't actually be many Western companies left in Russia at this stage? Can anyone put a % on what's left since pre-war?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,884 ✭✭✭✭josip


    It's depressing though. You can imagine a meeting with Putin and his advisors.


    "Ok so after the last few weeks of executing Ukrainian civilians and raping their women and children, what have the West done?"

    "They've expelled some of our diplomats"

    "Germany has taken control of a Gazprom unit"

    "People are shouting on the internet"

    "Anything else? They're still buying our oil and gas, da?"

    "Da, $2 billion last week. And Orban and Vucic got re-elected with landslides on Sunday."

    "Otlicno, keep it going in Ukraine"



  • Registered Users Posts: 692 ✭✭✭cheezums


    I wonder were Russian soldiers given specific orders to commit war crimes, or whether there is just a complete lack of discipline, oversight and accountability?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    I’m as pro-freedom of speech as they come.

    Yet I can fully understand, and personally fully support, the keeping of certain topics out of bounds by statute, if only to ensure that their relevance and meaning never gets attenuated, diminished or otherwise excused by the passing of time, aided as that may be by vested interests.

    Chiefly in that lot, any revisionist take on the Holocaust. Quid of fines and potentially imprisonment, that should be an insta-hall pass by the magistrature about giving the culprit a good seeing-to in the car park.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    A Brit serving with the Ukranian Marines. 501st Marine Battalion troops surrendering it seems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,006 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Very much doubt a battalion of marines surrendered. What would be the point?

    Ukrainians denying it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 54,184 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Kyiv pies.


    Ukraine's Ministry of Defence Intelligence announced on Saturday that local residents of the Izium district that's located in the Kharkiv region, have "treated" Russian soldiers with poisoned pies. "As a result, two occupiers died at once, another 28 were taken to the intensive care unit. Their current state is being clarified."


    Ukraine's ministry of defense wrote that Ukrainians resist Russia by "all available means", with reports stating that hundreds of Russian troops suffer "severe illness" from various poisoned food and drink. The intelligence agency wrote that there at least "500 more servicemen of the Motorized Rifle Division of the Russian Federation are in hospitals due to severe alcohol poisoning of unknown origin."


    The news of the poisoned pies follows Ukraine's announcement that it had reclaimed more than 30 towns after Russia has seemingly pulled its forces back.


       "The whole Kyiv region is liberated from the invader," Ukrainian Deputy Defence Minister Hanna Malyar wrote on Facebook.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement