Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to join Nato

Options
14647495152152

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Ah the Putinversteher impulse comes to the surface again. It's never far away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Pathetic again. Criticise NATO and you are a fan of Putin. Maybe you should study this Yurt, start with the lead up to the COld War and work from there. Russia is as good/bad at playing the games too BTW.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "All wars are terrible" "security policy is game playing" "everything was always like this and will always be like like this"

    You're in pixieland and appear to be hitting a crackpipe.

    Yes, you're stance on NATO is so close to that of someone who follows Le Pen, Putin etc as to be indistinguishable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well I don't support either Putin LePen or NATO Yurt. If you are calling people in Ireland who don't want to join NATO Putin supporters you won't get far.

    Are all wars not 'terrible'? Your stance seems to imply you think there is some kind of glory in war. That notion is long died out. They are all a failure of humankind and despicable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭indioblack


    Britain does it for it's own self-interest - and also because Ireland doesn't do it.

    Remove the cause and it ceases to be an issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If there was nothing here Britain would still be sending jets to intercept at this range.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    The best policy the Irish government ever had was underfunding the military, congratulations we pulled it off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Your tiresome "all war bad" stance in the face of the most dangerous security situation and horrific war Europe has seen in two generations is so meaningless as to be filed alongside "I'm against drowning" when watching a boat sink while smoking a cigarette on a pier and refusing to countenance doing anything about it.

    You suffer badly from something that. Adam Curtis called "oh dearism", which is to tut-tut about something calamitous happening that has a human hand behind it, and refuse to recognise where it comes from. Curtis accurately links this to Putinism, and recognises that Putin is the world's chief political exponent of it. He consistently and slowly pushes the boundaries of what's acceptable, and cultivates fellow travelers in what he sees as "enemy countries" to do his communicating for him.

    War in Georgia? "Oh dear that's terrible. But aren't all wars terrible? And what about those NATO fellows? Aren't they up to all sorts as well with their political games?"

    You are that fellow traveler Francie. Congratulations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭indioblack


    That's true - but it wasn't the point being made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    My concerns are not just about European wars Yurt. So less of the 'reds under the bed' please and do some research on geo political gameplaying over the years. Good night.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "Geopolitical gameplaying"

    Suitability opaque, evasive, meaningless and Putinist.

    Enjoy the marshmallow cloud and gumdrop dreamland where Europe and by extension Ireland isn't protected and secured by NATO Francie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3 DS86DS.


    I would say no. As a small country, our traditional neutrality has served us well in world affairs.

    Would it also not be the case that we'd become a legitimate military and nuclear target were we to involve ourselves in conflicts such as those within the Ukraine?



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    I get the sentiment of your point, but Malta is a poor example because they enjoy "partnership for peace" status (also known as half membership), and regularly have NATO aircraft there (partially for OPS in the med and N.Africa, but I imagine also as deterrence) ...

    It's actually hard to find a neutral country, with the geographical weaknesses (not land locked by friendly nations), which doesn't have a substantial defence force, or membership of some sort of security group...

    you're probably looking at the likes of Costa Rica or something for similar comparison..



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,689 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Absurd stuff now. Your anti-EU sentiments are driving this stance.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Purely looking at it from a how would they carry out such an invasion perspective, not political alliances.

    Russia can't get to Ireland in any meaningful way for a military invasion as they are surrounded by hostile other countries who whilst maybe not directly signed up to defend Ireland, are highly unlikely to sit by and do nothing. Even just a repeat of the ban on use of airspace that has happened in response to the Ukraine invasion and blockading use of the only two narrow sea routes from Russia to the Atlantic and it make supplying any invading forces impossible.


    You also have one boot, boat or plane going the wrong side of the rather complicated NI border, waters or airspace and that is the chance of NATO response triggered.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    You're assuming a few things here:

    -That international sea law would just simply not be adhered to (similar to stopping the present Baltic fleet craft currently in the Black sea, which loitered around Gotland in Jan, which didn't happen, and they travelled through 4 easy pinch points, Denmark Straights, English Channel, Gibralter Straight, Turkish Straights)

    -That the invading force would be coming from Northern/Baltic Russia

    -That this would be well telegraphed, so airspace closures/blockades could be in place

    -That other countries would blockade on our behalf

    As I said previously, Ireland does have agreements with the UK on airspace protection, but the details have never been explicitly detailed..

    It has been documented that they simply shadow unknown threats in Irish controlled and Oceanic airspace (international airspace), with any threats from the QRA's only being issued when the vector and close in on UK airspace ...

    Naval wise, we're on our own from 12 miles inwards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Putin doesn't want to invade Ireland, it's illogical nonsense. What Putin wants is to get inside the heads of westerners and EUers. That's what he has been doing for years on the internet, it's clearly worked if you read this thread, look at the finger pointing, it's like the days when suspected witches were burned.😁 If he can get them pointing fingers at others calling them pro- Putin or Anti EU, Vlad wins, he sows division and thereby achieves his aims.

    As we can see he is already in the crowded space under some peoples beds and living rent free in some heads.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Your assuming that the UK, EU and NATO sit around and do less to assist an attack on Ireland than they have for Ukraine. There is a reason for the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a totally stupid one, but still there are Russians in Ukraine and they have already taken part of Ukraine before this year.


    There is zero reason for Russia to invade Ireland other than to then attack the UK and EU. But people think that the UK and EU would just sit and wait?



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    I think with Sweden/Finland looking to join NATO... two neutral, EU countries with substantial forces...

    It shows they don't have a lot of faith on the EU responding in any substantial manner...

    As for the UK responding, I'd like to hope they would, but it's not a guarantee..

    edit: re: the US.... I'd like to think that every person in the US, claiming Irish nationality from a century ago, would finally find the need to "come home"... again though, not guaranteed...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Thinking about it, they would not need to take Ireland, rather just Cork's Harbour?

    That harbour is the strategic point on the island, for them, I would imagine. Their Atlantic fleet would not need to go past all the countries of Europe to find a friendly port.

    Last February did show just how easily they could lump a big naval force on our backyard. Yeah landing troops would, generally be difficult, but how could we honestly repel even a limited beachhead?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Yes, Ireland can't prevent a very minor Russian force landing and easily taking control of the country ... But then what does Russia do? Where do they go next? How do they resupply?


    Or would it just be to show that they can, do a bit of war crimes and leave again?


    Cork Harbour might be useful, but only if they can get other supplies there.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    But they are both right next door to Russia. Ireland isn't.


    The only point that Russia wastes their time with Ireland is after they have already opened an attack on NATO in the east, by which point Ireland being in NATO or not is totally irrelevant as it's already a world war by that point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    I think the opposite.... stalemate in Ukraine... no direct route to Serbia created, Russia declares victory for something...

    Baltic and northern fleet ships start exiting the Black sea heading home....

    split in bay of Biscay, northern fleet transit west coast, Baltic fleet point towards English channel...

    Detour to Irish south coast... **** all anyone can do.

    Why would they bother? to piss NATO off and show they can take somewhere for propaganda reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That sounds like something a Putin-bot would say in fairness. Sure, its all a ploy of the West to sell more arms, blah blah blah...


    I guess 1939-1945 was hyperbole as well? ROFL



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Generic arguments at this stage. Sure the world will keep on turning.... and Ireland will remain Neutral, because God wills it, or something.

    Sure, maybe in your world nothing changes, because you choose to not read or open your mind to any new ideas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Has there always been these tensions mark? Yeh or nay? Who benefits from them being maintained?



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,697 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No mark, no need to bring god into it, the people 'will' it. That is all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    It is why we don't want any part in it, we had it here.

    Odd when you try and portray yourself as a peace-loving man, when in fact if it suits you are more than willing to send (other) men to die for causes deep to your own heart. Like invading the North in 1970, and again in 1923. Never mind your staunch defence of the murderous actions of the PIRA, including the defence of their own war crimes in killing civilians and children which you have never condemned with a 'whatabout' statement pegged on.

    See, if you were consistent maybe we would have more respect for your viewpoint. However, we all know that you are a bloodthirsty warmonger when it suits and a dove when it suits. So in essence you have no credibility here, nor have any right to go on your high horse and preach morality to the rest of us, about the horrors of war when you made fun of innocent men, women and children killed by war in the past.

    God only knows why you continue to repeat the same tired arguments in this thread when all you have done is bury your head in the sand and dismiss any notion that things have changed in Europe, and the next few decades are not going to be like the next few.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Maybe you can save your pretentious and glib response and visit your local national school which will probably have a few Ukrainian kids there, whose fathers are in Ukraine fighting against a neo-imperial fascist force, and preach to them about it...... rather than bore us all with your nonsense.

    Are you that brave, I doubt it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16 holodomor


    Is it time to join NATO yes it is or will you join after half of the country is going to be destroyed smart people are proactive stupid people are reactive. Why small countries like Estonia with 0.5 million population or Latvia or Lietua are not attacked by russia? Because they are NATO members.



Advertisement