What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

During the referendum on marriage a lad I worked with was claiming that Ann and Barry books would have to have two dads after the referendum, this is the problem he heard that on the radio or saw it on Facebook and grabbed onto it.

conservatives often push the thin end of the wedge argument.

This thing will lead to this, kids under 8 being told that it’s okay that Billy has two dads will lead to grooming, because they want to link homosexuality with pedophilia, careful not to say it too clearly though just hint so as to put a veneer of goodness over whatever they are trying to justify.

Right, @salmocab, because their edge case is valid, but when you mention you know more than a few same sex couples, scoff, well that's just a tiny drop in the bucket! etc. they don't matter!

Abominations!

"I mean ... - they're abnormal."

Naturally, it's why he teased running years and years ago, why he ran in 2016, etc. he always has behind him lawsuits and unpaid debts etc. hounding him before he even announces. He had already ran out the Statute of Limitations on many potential crimes just by sitting in office for 4 years while SOL burnt up.

Can we make this a sticky?

It'll be easier to spot those not interested in debating.

I see a lawsuit was reportedly filed but cannot find the lawsuit itself, nor any evidence that it's gone to trial or that a verdict has been rendered. So this was a completely kneejerk law? Great! Those always work out the best.

In your expert, professional opinion no doubt, but why must a child who is not heteronormal be groomed by the school to present as heteronormal 'until they are older?'

Which only tells us it's an election year and that they are all working in an extremely hamfisted and reactionary political manner to capture the phobias of their base once again. Fetuses, Illegals, and the Liberal Agenda, the Triumvirate of GOP wedge issue politics, which is all about being reactionary. Migrant Invasions, Selling Baby Parts, and Grooming Children to Kill Themselves now, of course.

Just on that topic of the empirical proof or otherwise of Trump's wealth.

That'd be his tax returns. Those things that he keeps putting off releasing. His own accounting of personal assets, liabilities and in the US, his carried forward losses.

Releasing those?

That'd scupper that pesky NY civil tax case. It'd probably also scupper the SDNY case because his declarations would surely tally with all the loan and consolidation paperwork. The values and assets declared would be consistent across all his paperwork wouldn't it?

That's empirical enough for Uncle Sam, wonder why he is always so reticent about them?

This just in - the biggest ****ing loser in American electoral history is still banging on about being hard done by, despite suffering a legitimate defeat in a race he cheated multiple times in...

How is he the biggest loser in American electoral history ?

He got at least 74m votes, the highest of any President in history and increased his vote on the 2016 election.

Give the hyperbole a rest for a while.

How much did he lose by? Considering he considered his victory in 2016 over Hillary Clinton the biggest landslide ever

Incredible that during days of arguments on here regarding 45 and policy you've stayed silent, but heaven forbid you insult the machismo of the chosen one. This is the time you chose to chime in!!

To answer your question, he, as another poster has mentioned, lost the house, the senate and the WH all in 4 years.

This was in and of itself, quite the feat, but considering also that he cheated on multiple fronts, from the Hatch Act violations, to stacking the postal system, to welcoming interference from a foreign country (China), to extorting a foreign country regarding military aid, he *still lost*. Incredible, when you put it into that context.

And as another poster here might say "But wait! There's more!"

As of April 2021, 65 cases were brought in an effort to overturn the election by Trump and his cronies, and ALL of them lost.

So not only did he lose once, despite cheating, he lost dozens of more times, getting thrown out of courts in every land, even by judges *he* appointed! He lost "bigly" in court too, one might say.

The final indignity of course is that he continues to mouth off lie after lie, that it was stolen, blah blah blah. Such behaviour is more evidence that he is a "loser", albeit in a more modern parlance way.

So yes, there's your proof. He's the biggest loser in American political history.

the bigliest loser.

Still waiting for him to be revealed on the masked singer.

What a fall from grace.

Reputation in tatters.

just went you think he has reached rock bottom he starts digging.

that is the way organised crime cases normally go.

Voter fraud you say?

Why is it always with the projection.....