Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1125312541256125812593691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Yeah I don't see Russia cutting off German supply over a few old vehicles; just suggesting that even the very low risk of that happening might be enough to put off the German government. I mean I'm no expert on any of this either; just trying to think out loud really.

    As for other nations it's very hard to know what to think; but eastern European nations have begun sending heavier weapons and nothing has happened so presumably the threat of military repercussions is off the table. Also we now have the US and UK doing it so I would have thought Germany wouldn't really be able to use the "we won't do it unilaterally" excuse anymore.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Look at this **** Ukrainian pows taken to a cemetery and made kneel In front of a memorial , while being filmed by Russian media




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,883 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    No you're right, they can't if the "heavier" stuff (artlllery, vehicles, air defence etc.) from other countries (US/UK/Eastern Europe others) starts to go in there.

    On your comment "There are some suggestions on Twitter that he will also approve purchases from German industry if Ukraine makes them: but I don't see any mention of that in the official reports."

    I think that is happening with anti tank weapons and things like that isn't it? Germany (and others through EU fund) paying for it new from weapons makers and it going to Ukraine (i.e. not coming out of military stocks etc. - which Germany doesn't seem to have much of).



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,097 ✭✭✭threeball


    If they weren't defined as KIA they're not subject to a higher grade of compensation either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Freedom of speech Astro. If people do not like other peoples opinions fair enough, but to deny or censor 100% factual truths or get upset or deny them is not great IMO.

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,518 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Numbers of survivors are believed to be very low. One estimate is that 50 sailors survived but another suggests it could be as low as 10 or 12 men rescued.

    This is definitely a PR disaster for the regime and one they haven't been able to keep secret from the Russian public.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    sorry to break it to you Brickster, but your fake news isn’t truth and should be (and is being) called out



  • Registered Users Posts: 136 ✭✭RedCardKid


    This is no defence of the German government, however people on our wee island should consider the effects to the European economy if the Germans were to stop taking Russian gas tomorrow. As per German (also European) law, it would mean the first to go off the grid would be industrial consumers. This would mean major disruption for the following companies (off the top of my head), with the knock on effects going much further:

    BASF - biggest single private gas consumer in Germany - No Russian gas and production stops in their biggest facility in Germany - effects on the food, pharma, car, weapons .... industries to name a few.

    Evonik - same as above

    Bayer - major player in the pharma and agri industry

    VW, Audi, Ford, Toyota ... all would have delivery issues due to additives and plastics produced by the above companies

    TyssenKrupp Steel

    Georgsmarienhütte

    Take the last two above from the gas grid and the weapons industry would most certainly suffer. Take away BASF, Bayer and Evonik, the chemical and pharma industries would be struggling to produce, this would trickle down very quickly to everyday things worldwide. These are the fine things the German government are trying to balance, being very German about it, no knee jerk reactions. In the background, contracts are being sealed for LNG, Rotterdam and Southern Spain LNG terminals being used to test / balance the pressure in the European grid. Instead of gas being pumped from North to South, it is now being balanced from all directions.

    As much as we all love having a pop at the likes of Schulz, people should think outside the box. Yes the Germans did put themselves in the situation of dependancy on Russian fossil fuels, at the same time they neglected their own military, they have a pension system that is very close to breaking point, their brilliant medical system is suffering due to bad pay and a lack of staff. Add all together and maybe you will be able to understand why they are very careful. Inflation in Germany last month was approx. 7%, the highest it has been for over 20 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,059 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Hence the change in tone and that Russia may 'declare war' now on Ukraine, since they have perpetuated this terrible deed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,422 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    In what meaningful sense is a country that has been invaded multiple times still 'neutral' when it is in a state of war with the aggressor nation?

    Ukraine signed a treaty with Russia giving up its nuclear weapons in which Russia agreed to respect its territorial integrity and sovereignty?

    How many has Russia violated that treaty?

    Leaving those points out is a deliberate and willful misrepresentation. You can use facts woven a manner which is not 100% truthful.

    This is blatantly what you are doing which is multiple posters are calling you out on it.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭ronivek


    The below might explain why there was confusion over whether the Moskva was being towed or not; it appears to show one or more vessels very close to the Moskva sometime after it was hit:




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Not only that, but promised higher pay scales and bonuses' are not being paid either. Also, Family's who sent money to their sons serving in Ukraine are receiving only empty envelopes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228




  • Registered Users Posts: 16,615 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    There is no freedom of speech on privately owned forums, there is a need for discussion, posting about Ukraine being neutral or not with literally no other comments is looking for a reaction from others with absolutely nothing to discuss. It would be as relevant as me winding you up about londongrad and the tories being bosom buddies with the russians and now using Ukraine to deflect attention from their own complete and incompetent failings.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    That's a big fire 🔥🔥 🔥



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,518 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, there has been a huge change of tone in the last 24 hours. Lots of threats to the US and NATO in general and talk of full scale "war".

    The interesting thing though is the Russian public know full well the regime has been lying about what happened to the Moskva. The account the Kremlin gave was so ridiculous and far fetched that that even their own people knew it was BS.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I don't disagree with you but Merkel and the German Govts of the last 25 years decided to hand over the key reins of the German economy to a dictatorship that was openly hostile to Europe, democracy and they personally did well out of it. The German economy profited off of it.


    The problem is that Russia will use the leverage Mutti and co. sold them over all of Europe and against the Ukraine.


    It's better to bite the bullet now, rather than have gas cut off in September.


    The damage is now inevitable, excision now reduces the leverage Russia has. It affords time to adapt. The approach of Berlin is appeasement and minimizing sanction will buy peace today, dead Ukrainians aren't accountable on a ledger.


    Sell your soul to the devil, expect to get burnt.


    Ireland and Europe must force Germany to stop letting Putin threaten the entire economy of Western Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,422 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Part of me thinks the BS isn't meant to be plausible, it is so obviously BS it is a test of loyalty to the regime. 1984 territory.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,097 ✭✭✭threeball


    Maybe this is the special operation they are really referring to in Ukraine. The ultimate grift where they steal every penny available to their entire army. It would be fitting for a country run by crooks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Likewise anyone is free to sit in any thread posting selective "facts" all day long, whilst acting "innocent" about having an agenda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Today also marked the first confirmed use of a Russian strategic bomber directly over Ukraine. These are the ones who engage in "carpet bombing" style attacks like this one shown below on Mariupol.




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,159 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    It was reported early on that another ship was damaged as well as the Moskva. Nothing on this since?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,508 ✭✭✭wassie


    Apart from the younger generation, I wouldnt be surprised if there is a fair degree of indifference given their govts handling of the Kursk disaster 22 years ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 136 ✭✭RedCardKid


    People are always wiser when they look back, Merkel was one of the few politicians Putin seemed to respect and indeed played the go between for Obama and Putin for a number of years. To this day Putin has never failed to deliver the agreed amounts of gas, keeping EU homes warm and industry running. One could also argue, the EU, Irish included didnt give two sh1tes when he was attacking Georgia or other countries which were not on their doorstep so why should the Germans bend over now? What have the Irish government or people sent that the Germans havent?

    To anyone working in the gas industry, it is very clear the Germans are trying to win time to ensure the transition on the dependancy of Russian gas has as as little effect as possible on not only the German economy but also the EU economy. Exiting now would result in huge shortages in all industries, most noteibly medical, chemical and weapons. If steel is not being made in the EU where should the tanks come from? If key components are not available for medicine to be produced ... do you let EU citizens die?

    Your statements prove you have little to no idea of the effects to the EU or indeed world economies if the Germans were to cut gas off tomorrow. You would I suspect also be the first person protesting if petrol was rationed because additives for its production were not coming out of Germany, your car couldnt be fixed or the spare part for the train cannot be made. Before making such statements, go away and think about what is behind them. By all means, force Germany to do whatever you feel is needed, think about the consequences, something you obviously havent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    What is? If you are referring to the SAR image, that's not fire, just the false colour palette chosen to render a non optical wavelength image.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Fiery mutant


    We should defend our way of life to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed, so that any adversary will never make such an attempt in the future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,895 ✭✭✭✭josip


    What would the Ukrainian's expectations have been I wonder when they fire the couple of Neptunes at the Moskva?

    If they've never been used in combat before, then they'd be an unknown quantity. Would they have been happy with a hit and the Moskva retreating further out to sea. Or would they have expected to do enough damage to send it back to Sevastopol. It must have been a lucky hit to cause further detonations and sink it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Again I'm surprised the Russians didn't go this route from the start. Strategic bombers in the form of a load of B52's would be one of the first plays if it were US/NATO involved.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    For more weirdness, I read last night an official Turkish denial that any of their ships were involved or rescued anyone.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement