Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Calories on menus in restaurants

  • 16-04-2022 10:23am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭


    Restaurants, cafes and takeaways in England with more than 250 staff must print how many calories are in meals on their menus, websites, and on delivery platforms.

    The new rule is part of government plans to tackle obesity by helping people to make healthier choices.

    Would you welcome a similar rule in Ireland?



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Wouldn’t bother me either way. I see there is criticism of the move from body positivity and eating disorder charities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    I like the idea. I've seen it in some places like Camile Thai and its a real eye opener. You might be fairly indifferent between two options but knowing the calorie difference can be a useful piece of information.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Beshoff Bros (fish and chip chain in Dublin) also show the calories on their main menu board. In Clontarf anyway.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭Faith


    I find I’m conflicted by it. I’d find it very useful to know personally, as I would like to watch my calories when eating out and it can be very illuminating. Camile Thai is a good example - I would have assumed a Pad Thai is reasonably low calorie as it has no sauce, but it turns out it has over 1000 calories there! That’s very useful to know because it enables me to order something else I might have avoided because I’d thought it had more calories.

    That being said, I definitely have disordered food cognitions so I can 100% understand how it could be a very unhelpful thing for people with or recovering from eating disorders. I also don’t think it would bother anyone who isn’t already a bit obsessed with their weight so I’d struggle to see it as having a significant impact on public health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    It was considered here 5 or 6 years ago but went nowhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,517 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    They should weigh people when they enter and again when they leave, give them a printout of how much extra is aboard, let them decide what workout is needed to burn that off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,004 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    I never look at the calories if given. Spoils my choice so I don't do it when out for a rare enough meal as a treat. And I don't care either even if I notice the calorie count, if I want that particular dish, I'll have it. Too many aspects of our lives are controlled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I eat out once a week and never have I been tempted to make a choice based on a calorie intake per dish..

    eating out is meant to be enjoyed. I’m happy with my exercise plan so I’m happy to indulge in a nice meal without counting calories



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,265 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Personally I find the notion absurd. I want to enjoy a meal out and not be guilt tripping over calories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Would need to be connected to the toilet facilities also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 720 ✭✭✭Lemsiper




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,024 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,422 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    I think this idea would be torture for anyone with an eating disorder and possibly lead to more people being blighted with one.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,249 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    could be merit in having the info available on request.

    on the face of it, i don't really have an objection to being given information about the food being served, even if i might not care.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,422 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,920 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    People tend to have very strong feelings about this. Personally, listed calories definitely have an impact in how and what I order when eating out. My maintenance calories are 1,200 a day and seeing a single dish that will put you over that can be very sobering indeed! I'd tend to be very savvy anyway about the calorie content of most foods but seeing it there in black and white in front of you tends to put manners on you moreso than knowing academically, if that makes sense.

    I can see the arguments both for and against, tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭The Continental Op


    Simply have two menus a standard menu without the calories and another one with the calories on it. Diners get the standard menu unless they request the one indicating the calorific value of what they are eating.

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    I recently saw a screenshot of a menu with each dishes carbon footprint listed. Might have been on this site.

    what will they think of next?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    In theory it seems like a good idea, at least to have it available on request. Is it reasonable to expect every restaurant to come up with the calorie count for every dish? Do you need specialist input from a nutrionist for this? What about specials based on freshly available products?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,920 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    All of the above are reasons why many restaurants are against it. It's (relatively) easy to do for your big chain places serving a highly standardised menu, but your local neighbourhood seafood place where they change the menu on a weekly or even daily basis, not so much. Hence the UK saying only places of a certain size have to do it, but it still tends to cause a stir.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,024 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I can see some merit for lunch menus perhaps but in all honesty, if a person is going out to, or being brought out to Dinner, are they really concerned about calories. People will invariably choose what they percieve as a healthy option, Salads, Fish, vegetarian etc.

    Notwithstanding the Dietry expertise and additional expense, how does an establishment go about assertaining Calories in freshly produced food, obviously it may not be intended to be precise but it would be a cumbersome undertaking particularly in establishments that change menus nightly or regularly. How does a chef assertain how many calories in a Sauce for example.

    I recall in my time in the industry it was being discussed and there was universal disquiet about the idea. It was even a struggle to get establishments list Gluten Free dishes and what was known them as "Healthy Option"

    I don't disagree with the idea but wonder what would the point be and I suspect there would not be universal approval of this idea in the industry.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭The Continental Op



    If we are doing this the UK way then most of your reasoning has been already thought out. The restaurant needs to employ 250 people or more before they are required to provide calorie counts and the items have to be on the menu for more than 30 days.

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,249 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    how big would a restaurant have to be by the time it has 250 people employed anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    It is aimed at restaurant chains.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,657 Mod ✭✭✭✭Faith


    How does a chef assertain how many calories in a Sauce for example.


    it’s not hard to do, there’s tons of calorie tracking apps that can work out the calories in a meal. There are even barcode scanners built in so you get the exact calories for the product.

    Let’s say a chef is trying to work out the calories for a sauce. They add all the ingredients to make a batch of the sauce into a calories calculator app and then specify the portions. The app will calculate the calories per serving. Serving sizes tend to be standard, so you just weigh the ingredients and work them out, add them together and there are your rough average calories for the dish.

    Anyone who uses a calorie tracking app for weight purposes gets used to doing it very quickly. Take porridge for example - weigh your oats, put it in the app. Weigh the milk, put it in the app. Weigh the optional extras, put them in the app. Boom, you have the calories for the meal worked out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,170 ✭✭✭✭the beer revolu


    Whenever this comes up, you always get the argument that, "eating out is a treat" and no one wants to be counting calories.

    But the truth is that many people just want their dinner and are away from home or simply don't cook. I often think that these people are forgotten in many menus.

    People are different and eat out for all sorts of different reasons. Not everyone is "treating" themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,068 ✭✭✭✭neris


    More red tape & beauracracy for the restaurants and responsibility been forced back onto businesses rather then individuals using cop on and taking some personal responsibility



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,487 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    I've never looked at calorie information on a menu or any other kind of food label in my life and don't intend to start, so I don't have any input in that regard. However it's going to be a pain in the proverbials for restaurants unless they only insist on it for chains that can dedicate staff to it as was suggested earlier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah my job involves travel. I've come up with some creative ways to eat healthy while in hotels. Restaurants and takeaways are fine for a treat once a month or whatever, but if you have to eat out every meal for a week, it's very difficult to get genuinely healthy food that isn't miles out of balance for calories.

    Obesity is a pretty big problem and it's getting worse. People tend to way underestimate the calories in food, so I think giving people the choice to know the calories in food is a sensible idea. We do it for most food in supermarkets, so why not do it for food in restaurants? Is there a big objection to calories on supermarket foods on the grounds that it exacerbates eating disorders?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tree


    Honestly, I'd rather be able to get a half portion of things. "this is three bazillion calories, so have a miserable option" instead of "this comes in three or one bazillion calorie portions"



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    I think it's a good idea in principle, and it can be implemented in a nuanced way.

    There are people who just do not want to know calorie counts, or perhaps because of ongoing issues with disordered eating would rather not be made aware... Why not get around this by footnoting calorie counts, as some menus already do with allergens. People need only refer to a small print footnote to obtain the calorie total for a dish.

    Even with changing menus I am sceptical that it's that much work for a kitchen to determine a calorie count for a dish. If I can use a calorie counting app to total calories effectively on a daily basis, I see little reason why with practice a kitchen staff member cannot do likewise. I personally wouldn't envisage anything more than a criteria of good faith and expectation of reasonable accountability for figures put on menus.

    To the general argument that this is a form of social control or hostility by the State, I just don't see it. Consumers would totally retain the right to order what they like and overeat, that would be their choice. It's just offering consumers a form of basic information that can have a real impact on their health.

    We know we have an obesity problem. We know people consistently underestimate their calorie intake and I'm convinced a lot of people experiencing creeping obesity have no real sense of how much of a calorie surplus they are in on a weekly basis. Some people are consuming an entire day's worth of calories in one takeaway meal, a number of times a week. Their general activity levels and diet the rest of the week are not going to necessarily pull them out of that hole.

    Some people who see in black and white the calorie count for a given takeaway option might well make a different choice as a result, which would be a positive.

    I accept there will be a minority of the population who either have an existing disorder or perhaps have a tendency towards one that this type of activity does not help, but frankly I think that's not a reason to proceed if there is a broad positive outcome for the majority.

    When it comes to obesity there are also a lot of people who, on an individual basis, just say their activity levels and diet means than a measure like this would not be relevant to them and isn't something they support as a result, but it's clear that on the whole we as a country are not on top of the obesity issue, whatever people report with regards to their personal success. There's also the rather unfortunate evidence that Irish people consistently underestimate how overweight themselves and their children actually are...

    Post edited by Black Sheep on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    "Scan QR Code for nutritional information".

    Leave it off the menu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Because I dont want or need to read how many calories are on each dish like some sort of weight watchers menu. Fun police ruining everything again.

    If you're worried about calories just scan the code and you'll have it in 5 seconds. Let the rest of us enjoy ourselves. Like, I know the cream sauce has more calories.

    This is mainly aimed at junk food addicts anyway who eat a lot of KFC and Mickey Ds. Thats fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,680 ✭✭✭notAMember


    Agree with portion size options being more useful. A 25 year old 7 ft person doing sports training 4 times a week does not have the same calorie needs of a 50 year old 5 ft tall office working person. So why does the person with a lower calorific meal need to pay full price for a meal they only eat half of. Let them have a small / large option on the menu.

    Having small / large options on food is normal on loads of menus in other countries, don't know why it's not here.


    On calorie counts, I'm sure it is helpful for customers who want to count calories. It does limit creativity in a kitchen, so that's the disadvantage. Mitigated by it only applying to large chains with standard menu's I think.


    And for travel, I travel for work too, and have been found it occasionally wearying to try to get something that isn't a very rich and heavy meal. It's tricky enough with translating, but I'm not sure calorie counts would help, unless there is a standard way to write it. Even on packaged products, sometimes calories are per 100g and you've to do some calculations. Or a "portion" is a subset of what's in front of you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Why are you assuming that there are too many calories in the food? You could look at the menu and see things thst are bang within a normal calorie range for a meal.

    I can't get on board with your desire for willful ignorance being imposed on others. If you want to remain ignorant of the calories, you could not look. Fact is that Ireland is doing pretty poorly at managing obesity with the information we have. We know people underestimate the calories in foods (drastically in some cases). Giving consumers the information to make informed choices is a good step. If you don't want to know the calories in your big mac, just don't look.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    It makes restaurant menus look very fast foodish. Ive no issue with them in fast food places mind you. Im only referring to proper food in nice places.



  • Posts: 5,869 [Deleted User]


    The Brewdog pub in Dublin does that for their beers. Or, rather, how much carbon they offset per meal sold, or something like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's grand. If its just a matter of menu style preference then it's no big deal. And certainly not a reason not to do it.

    It would only apply to relatively large restaurants, mostly chains, anyway. So not a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    You could make the same argument for ingredients. Why put them on the packet? If people cared what it contains, they can go look it up.

    If you don't want to know the calories, maybe don't look at them? Just like you don't look at the ingredients on most food that you buy?

    This need to be wilfully ignorant seems to be more about punishing other people for wanting to be more informed, than it is about making things better.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 3,161 Mod ✭✭✭✭Black Sheep


    I think at times public health measures do require compromises on what people are comfortable with looking at. I'm sure most smokers would rather if there were no health warnings on their cigarette boxes, or the pictures of tumours. There will be the argument that these things don't deter people addicted to cigarettes from smoking, but as someone who used to be a casual smoker on nights out I would say they did occasionally stop me from asking someone from a cigarette. There's people hanging in the balance or open to change who could be the target of messaging like this.

    With calorie counts I would also suggest that there are people who think they "know" how unhealthy a particular option is. But just as people seem to have trouble recognising when they are overweight, we know they seem to be biased towards underestimating their calorie intake. So someone might order a pizza they "know" is a bit of a treat, but if you asked them would they tell you that they reckoned it was 1000 calories (Maybe a little more than half of their recommended daily intake) .... And what if that pizza was actually 1800 calories, as some of the stuffed crust pizza hut options are... I think this could have a positive nudge effect on choices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭The Continental Op


    Genuinely some people don't have a clue what calories are in things.

    I vividly remember going through a checkout and a rather large lady was at the till. Amongst my shopping was a plastic tub of muesli it was one of those ones you could eat by the handful without needing milk. The checkout operator picked the tub up and commented "nice isn't it, I ate a tub last night while watching the TV". I replied do you have any clue how many calories are in a tub of muesli the reply was "no". I looked on the side of the tub and at its weight and did a quick calculation and said five thousand. She was flabbergasted and said she thought muesli was natural and good for you? !!!!!?

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Im all for people being informed, again, QR code. Takes literally 5 seconds to pull up. Keep it off the table. QR menus will be common place here shortly. Standard in loads of other countries.

    Should there be calories on wine aswell? That varies. And cocktails? Whiskeys etc? What about all the soft drinks? Some of them can have more calories than the food.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah. The calories in drinks is easy to quantify. It's already done by the manufacturers. You asked that as if you thought puting the calories on drinks was a big leap. I assumed it was part of this exercise being proposed.

    I'd say if you asked peoppe how many calories in various pints of lager, stout and soft drinks, and how much per shot of various, spirits, you'd find that most people are miles out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd imagine the warnings on cigarettes are much more impactful on young people who grow up and the first things they know about cigarettes is that they cause illness disease. It might have some impact on current smokers but I'd say they have little or no effect on long term smokers.

    That's fine though. All strategy needs long and short term impacts. And I'd say it would work the same for calories on menus. Might have little impact on obese people who habitually overeat, bit would probably have more impact on the children of today when they reach adulthood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,170 ✭✭✭✭the beer revolu


    I, honestly have no idea about calories. I wouldn't even try to estimate what calories are in any given dish - it's just not the way I look at food.

    I understand why restaurateurs would be against it as it means more paperwork and procedures but I cannot, for the life of me, understand why an average punter would object to having more information on a menu. That's all it is. More information - of no interest to me - but potentially valuable to many. Why would I object to this?

    Then you get all these false narratives and whatoboutery. Eating disorders? Really? So, should we remove nutritional information from every packed food item sold? Does this information cause problems for people with EDs?

    Arguing against having this information is akin to arguing against having the ABV listed on drinks - because, alcoholics, imo!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The appeal to eating disorders is classic. I'd bet good money that the same posters who pretend to care about eating disorders would oppose or be apathetic to measures to help people with eating disorders.

    Theres a genuinely fascinating attitude and its pretty prevalent on Boards which could be summed up as "I don't want better, I want what I'm used to".

    I can't see any reason to oppose putting calories on menus as outlined above. It's unlikely to have a huge impact in the short term, but is likely to have greater impact in the longer term. Obesity is pretty serious and will cost the country a fortune so thsy means higher tax in the future. This is one way to address the issue for the future.



  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No harm in the idea. If you don't like it, pay no attention to it. Will it include how much salt the chef fooked in for added 'flavor'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Yeah if were going down that route then sodium needs to be added. Thats a killer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Patsy167




  • Advertisement
Advertisement