Wallace and Daly

@MFPM

Given the pair penchant for expensive High Court cases for defamation, I expect we'll see another one given that the journalist has claimed, untruthfully according to you, that CD tried to have her access removed.

Do you think we'll see it? High Court cases aren't cheap but sometimes people might have access to external backers (maintenance is technically not allowed but I'm sure it happens)

BTW, Yurt2, did you get your Nato bonus this month? Mine didn't come in yet. I hit over 400 posts on various media sites so I'm expecting a big one this month. They have been slow enough on paying though. I might switch to the other side if they don't get more reliable.

The pay is probably better on the other side and I would get a few trips away too. And a bit of media exposure on Russian and Chinese TV. Will just have to wait til the next elections for MEPs though.

Barry Andrews MEP, Alan Shatter, Leo Varadkar...shall I go on?

Embarrassing.

Your attitude is really weird.

You support two quislings who are happy to go over to dubious regimes and be given a platform to enforce and legitimize the propaganda of those regimes against Europe and European Nations and people.

And then you complain when their own writings and the media appearances of them doing those things in foreign media, are shown over here.

Lol.

De gubbermint maintain diplomatic relations, as they are required to do, therefore it is fine for someone to go over there and reinforce dodgy regime propaganda against us?

Dishonesty is right.

That is because they don't represent the Irish people. I'm sure a few nutjobs might agree with them. But they don't represent the views of the nation by any stretch of the imagination.

Still shrilling Yurt2...As i said take the learning, accept you've no idea what you're talking about! Now, haven't you some Saudi bombing to cheer on that your NATO heros are financing?

Man, you've really fallen for their shtick. All they do is create an artificial bogeyman and then sure they just blame everything on that bogeyman. Any criticism against them will be responded to with claims about that bogeyman.

Not too far from their hero/master the Putster heading into Ukraine on a glorious mission to save its repressed people from drug addicted Nazis.

Not very from each according to his abilities and to each according to to his needs of you there MFPM if you are the expert on all the procedures for journalists in the European Parliament, and appear to be claiming inside information beyond what is in the article. Fair enough if you don't want to say more and identify yourself or some such so forget it.

I don't watch RT on the regular as I don't want to catch some brain-worms, and I don't use twitter either. If the journalist is looking into Wallace and Daly, why is she obliged to announce all Irish politicians appearing on RT rather than just your 2 heros? If there's a "plethora" you know of from watching RT, and if they are also currently elected Irish politicians of the level of Wallace and Daly (i.e. the current TDs, senators, other MEPs) then go to effort of telling us some of them without the cryptic weasel words.

Or else just say "do your own research" (again) + leave little to work with I suppose. Whatever.

edit: Missed the reply to Yurt2 where you'd named 3 and only noticed it when he/she replied back to you. I am kinda doubtful. Wonder are you referring to "appearances" (?) where RT were covering events involving them (along with the other, more normal, media). If so, not wrong...but a bit disingenuous/dishonest as one might say.

Whether they do or they don't, they tried, which is damning.

As for "her only goal is to damage you" you will have to provide evidence for this claim. The definition of journalism is publishing something someone else would rather you didn't. If what W+D get up to on the international stage damages them in the eyes of Irish voters that is entirely the fault of W+D.

I appreciate most people swallow the horseshit on RTE and BBC and believe the news is fact, but seriously, don’t start regurgitating it online as if you know what you’re talking about. You know who you are.

Here’s a pretty convincing argument from Professor John Mearsheimer who knows a thing or two about the subject matter and which flies in the face of what we’re lead to believe.

https://youtu.be/JrMiSQAGOS4

Watch that and tell me why Wallace and Daly don’t have a point, be interesting to hear. The two representatives we can safely say who aren’t being lobbied by the arms industry directly or indirectly strangely enough. I have read numerous peer reviewed articles which back this professors view, yet I’m finding it hard to find a contrary stance other than in the rags and mainstream news. I’m not a fan of either or any politician for that matter, but facts trump lies and disinformation, and if anyone has previous for that during a war, it’s western leaders and media. Yet here we go again.

There are a few pages now of the same posters shouting others down with little or no facts, just what it says in the paper. What do you think of this professors opinion? It’s the same as Daly and Wallace, are you saying he doesn’t know what he’s taking about?

For the record, explaining is not condoning.