Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The annual Teachers threaten to strike thread

1131416181926

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Can any of the teacher bashers on here point to any of the other motions put forth at the Union meetings???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,773 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    I think this competency exam is brilliant. Possibly doesn't go far enough.

    I think every professional should take an exam of equivalent level to final college exams every 10 years.

    Exams could be tailored for certain professions if workers have gone into very specialised fields.

    Would weed out the wasters in every sector.

    I like it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭Treppen


    So to recap ,

    Have we all the old tropes in there:

    What about teacher holidays.

    what about the bad teachers.

    What about COVID and teachers weren't teaching.

    What about Europe.

    What about teachers causing the crash in 2007.

    What about the teacher doing grinds and not declaring tax.

    What about that teacher I know through my sister's brother in law.

    Are we done here?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Could I add a couple?

    What about the teachers looking for a significant pay rise.

    What about there not being performance oversight.

    What about the Unions being completely tone deaf.

    What about the difficulty removing underperforming teachers.

    What about teachers thinking that every criticism of their behaviour is a vendetta against the profession.

    I’m sure others will add more, I don’t think we are done by a long stretch, so quite acting like a child.



  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭JayPS 2288


    So the salary you see is what you get? No Gaeltacht allowance? No MSC or PHD allowance? For post 2011?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭JayPS 2288


    Yes, several.

    Does this happen in other sectors once qualified?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭airy fairy


    Not rambling in the slightest. I think some assessment is needed for teachers to see if they can still teach.

    I've had the experience, or more my kids in secondary school, over 6 years, so a long time, where time and time again complaints in written form from an overwhelming majority of parents to all avenues available. Teacher couldn't remember verbs, names, couldn't use media, didn't examine kids and the final two years every single kid in the class had to start grinds (actually suggested by the school) in 5th year and into 6th to cover the non-existent teaching. An extreme cause, but an example of when it goes bad, the bad remains.



  • Registered Users Posts: 342 ✭✭briangriffin


    You forgot the holidays - it's mainly about the holidays.

    I almost hate teachers myself after reading this thread they seem like a right shower of a**se holes



  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭JayPS 2288


    Are the results for specific teachers publicly visible? Or only for specific schools in general? Or are the results truly available to the general public and not just for other teachers to see? If so, where can I see these results as I’d like to see how my old school is faring.


    For what it's worth we have inspections every year and usually a subject inspection every 4-5 years. Results are posted publically too btw!

    Not many private sector jobs where you're job appraisal is published publicly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Genuinely think it's an interesting idea (the broad concept of testing subject knowledge at regular intervals) but do wonder at the admin and costs involved versus the payoff. Its in every teacher's best interests to know their subject areas, not sure how widespread the issue of poor subject knowledge is?

    Then there's the issue of different subject specs. In my own area of English the prescribed texts change annually, makes teachers of the subject stand at a disadvantage as regards their professional competency test. The history course hasn't changed in years so I could sit the exam for that every year.what about teachers of non-exam subjects?


    The inspectorate already assess teaching and learning as part of their remit but a specific assessment of subject knowledge doesn't happen.


    ^^I'm just thinking the concept out. Obviously if it was being considered all the above and more would be considered but because of the limited benefits vs costs I don't think it'd be considered anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,393 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There is no 'extra day'. Schools have the same number of days each year.

    What has regulation got to do with it? Are you saying that banking and essential services shouldn't be regulated or what? Are you hankering back for the light touch banking regulation of the Celtic Tiger years that we're still paying for?


    How does your statistical analysis take account of variable student intakes? The varying abilities, the students with disabilities, the students with great broadband and multiple devices vs the students working of a PAYG phone, the students who go on educational trips with parents or scouts each summer vs the students who don't?

    For some students, getting from a D1 to a C3 is a huge achievement, taking hours of work and support and engagement with parents. For other students, getting A2 or A1s is routinely expected, when they have a teacher or lecturer in the family at home.

    How will your statistical model handle that variability of inputs?

    These aren't widgets. They are people.

    With any performance management system, it is important to watch for unintended consequences. The system you've proposed puts the teacher's future employment in the hands of the students. If they take a grudge against their teacher, it wouldn't be too hard for a bunch of students to conspire to get poor results and get the teacher fired. This would particularly easy in a non-exam year.

    There are no discretionary days or extra days. All schools have the same number of days.

    Teachers don't control the school calendar and don't get to make extra weekends. Boards of Management make those decisions.

    Where exactly did the teaching unions say the calendar was 'set in stone'? Can you provide a link to this please?

    Hyperbole and fliball go hand in hand.

    You have all the choice in the world, as pointed out above. If you don't like how things work here, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out as you head off to exercise your choices. See how green the grass is on the other side.

    Great to hear I can use bitcoin now. How do I get my salary and buy my groceries in bitcoin now?

    You can chop and change all you want with phones and banks and utilities, but it's just a different provider screwing you in a slightly different way at the end of the day. Your concept of choice seems very restricted.

    Teachers don't control school building budgets. Try getting onto your TD or Minister if you want to change that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Reports are available on the Departmemt of Education website but it's not great to navigate. If you google "whole school evaluation" or "subject inspection report," and your school name they should pop up. Schools routinely publish them on their own websites also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Jesus, I've read it all now. So on the one hand, our education system tells us that it's possible for all students to be graded using a common metric (leaving cert, junior cert etc) but on the other hand it is impossible to do likewise for all teachers?

    Not even is it impossible, but don't even bother trying to consider the notion? Surely there is some basic metric that allows us to separate the wheat from the chaff and to roughly grade the quality of the grain? It doesn't have to be precision engineering, but it could certainly weed out the "piss poor" ones as you called it. In most other professions, or at least in the private sector, they manage to assess their staff and reward the good whilst creating personal improvement plans for the bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    But all students don't sit an exam using a common metric. Students have subject choice, level choice, some do alternative programmes such as L2LP and LCA. Some don't sit exams.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Andrew, again, statisticians work on far more complex studies than the questions you pose. Not all questions have binary answers, no doubt the method used would factor in the variables you are concerned about. All teachers have students with varying degrees of ability, few have all good/bad, so analysis of results should not be an insurmountable task. I suspect overcoming inertia in the profession for anything approaching performance related reviews would pose more of a challenge.

    Saying that enough students would conspire to intentionally do badly in their LC to punish a teacher they don’t like is a new level of paranoia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,393 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Students do a common exam. That's how they are graded on a common metric.

    Teachers don't do exams. That's why they're not graded on a common metric. And if they did do exams, they would be graded on their knowledge, not their teaching skill.

    Principals manage the performance of their teachers all the time. They don't need the lads from Boards to come along with some faulty algorithm. Principals do this every day and every week.

    All teachers don't have students with wide variations. Teachers in schools in better off areas have students with far greater access to resources, and to grinds of course. How are you going to judge a teacher who has a bunch of students doing grinds with an external teacher, something they probably don't want to declare to the school or anyone.

    Principals manage the performance of their teachers all the time. They don't need the lads from Boards to come along with some faulty algorithm. Principals do this every day and every week.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Principals sack bad/underperforming teachers? Can you give any indication of how often that happens each year?

    And I doubt Boardsies will be choosing the statistical method. If standards in teaching are raised, perhaps students would not need grinds.

    Linking affluence to academic results is a fair point, and hard to disagree with. Statistical analysis would show past results in that school and if a teacher consistently falls below what would be expected, the school should be able to move that teacher on. Again, the teachers performance should be under review, if the students are better and the teacher is failing them, there should be no entitlement to continuing underperformance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭airy fairy


    I don't think principals examine or even look at their teachers performance from one year to the next. In my experience, all teachers covered ass. Plain and simple. As I said, in my experience.

    Teachers should be assessed. Not in the results they get from their students, but their own knowledge of subjects they teach, proof of their ongoing training because they all seem to have 'training days'....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,393 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You seem to think that sacking is a good thing. If schools are sacking teachers, that is evidence of poor recruitment practices and poor performance management practices. Have we not moved on from the days when the only measure of performance management is sacking?

    I've no idea of overall numbers, but I've served on two school boards, and seen how decent principals routinely manage performance of their teachers. It happens every day.

    And if you think grinds are evidence of poor teacher performance, you know very little about how things work. In many cases, the root cause of poor academic performance is nothing to do with the teacher's performance. The root cause is that the student isn't really that clever, or doesn't really apply themselves. In middle and higher income areas, you'll often find that the parent's response is to throw money at the problem and arrange grind or grinds, which don't solve the underlying issue at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,393 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What is your experience? As a student or a parent or what?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    But there are certain core subjects that all students must sit (unless they get a note from their mammy/doctor/whoever).

    In the case of teachers, I'm sure we could do likewise and come up with a common set of competences that all staff must meet and then tailor accordingly for their niche areas of speciality. There's no sense in grading the music teacher on their woodworking abilities or their grasp of the French language if they have no responsibilities in those areas. It's not rocket science. It'd be even easier at primary level. I'm not even suggesting that the teachers sit exams - I'm sure the inspectors could feed in with a continuous assessment process.

    Your reluctance to even consider the topic makes me think you have something to hide. I personally request a 360 feedback from all peers, subordinates and superiors every year so I can learn from the positive and negative feedback. I reckon many a teacher would benefit similarly.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Sacking is not a good thing, but it should be the consequence of consistent poor performance after efforts have been made by the Principal/Dept to improve it. If you go back to my earlier posts you will see that I did advocate the PIP type management used in the private sector.

    Again, statistical analysis would not focus on an individual student’s intelligence, nor indeed one year. It would however highlight consistent underperformance within the parameters of the study. If nothing else, it should draw attention to the teachers performance and if it can be shown to fall below what would be expected, then I see no reason why initially an effort is made to improve performance, and if that fails, the Principal/Dept should have a mechanism for removing them which isn’t arduous.

    Incidentally, how did the Principals you saw manage performance, and did you ask the Principals what they would do if performance hadn’t improved?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    I get feedback from my principal and the inspectorate and colleagues, and informally from students and parents. I've already said I think it's an interesting idea, but one frought with difficulty for very little gain.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What would happen to you if you ignored all that feedback?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,496 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Well before I go I will vote for Sinn Fein and see what they can do about the current sh1te thats gong on. Same goes for you if you dont like your salary feel free to joing the other teachers on the 5 year hiatus from their job in Dubai. You can get paid onto Revolute and pay for your groseries. You pick and choose peoples words and leave out what blows your argument out of the water, your an awful gobsh1te no point talking to you. You wont be getting any pay rises as the money is simply not there. So I will just ignore you. You focus on trying to bait and re arrange what people are saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    I wouldn't end up in that situation, but as in most workplaces my direct manager, the principal would probably bring me in for discussion/ reprimand as the case may warrent.


    Edit: links to full procedures involved if you're interested in the various steps/stages

    https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/0742dd-disciplinary-procedures-staff/



  • Registered Users Posts: 342 ✭✭briangriffin


    Are you actually saying that the teachers should sit the leaving to see if they'd pass?

    You realise it's not collect 5 crisp wrappers and become a teacher? All of your teachers covered ass, what does that even mean?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I’m sure you can see the point of the question.

    Just in case, what are the implications for a teacher who just doesn’t care about the feedback/discussion/reprimand?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Think we cross posted, I edited my previous post to add detail. I've attached link to the full set of procedures involved. What I initially described is what would be referred to in the documents as the informal stage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 342 ✭✭briangriffin


    I've heard it all now,

    You do realise there are whole school evaluations carried out by department of education inspectors that are published and incidentals from the same that happen every 2 years, then you have the 4 inspected teaching practices over 3-6 weeks where and 4 years of teacher training covering the actual pedagogical approaches etc



Advertisement