Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1152153155157158485

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The longer this fiasco is allowed to continue by the Tories the more and more damage it does to the party.

    I'm frankly surprised that they don't have the required number of letters from the 2019 Red Wall MPs alone. They'll be the first ones to lose their seats with even the smallest of dips in support. If they ditch Johnson now they'll still have half of the 5 year term for someone else to come in and try and steady the ship.

    At this stage though it shouldn't even be about winning that next election - the damage that Johnson is doing is more fundamental then that and it's more damaging to the country and its institutions.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,507 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Those MP's owe their seats to him. They'll toe the line as long as they believe they'll win re-election and no further. Then, they'll pretend to have principles and start talking about integrity and other such things. The 5th May local and regional elections will be the litmus test I think.

    Johnson's situation, of entirely his own doing is one in which deferral is his only move.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,654 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I was disappointed that Starmer did not attack Johnson over his 'lack of understanding' of the law.

    'How many other bills has your Gov passed into law that you did not understand?'

    'You gave no time for the NI protocol to be debated. You negotiated it. Now you say it was not properly understood. Why did you pass it into law and an international treaty if you did not understand it?'

    'Do you actually read the bills presented to the HoC before you pass them into law?'

    Etc. etc. etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Does the PM do any more than sign bills (like the POTUS?) TBF do any of them have detailed knowledge of what they're signing? Not defending this indefensible clown, but I don't think any world leader knows the details of what he/she are signing.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,654 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    That may or may not be the case, but to come out and say he did not understand the bill he proposed is not on. At the same time Mogg is saying they thought they could renegotiate the NI and protocol after it was signed, and if the EU did not do so, they would just alter it to suit the UK, as they did not realise how harmful it was to the UK/NI when the put it into law. Do not forget the NI Sec in the HoC said the UK Gov were going to break international law!

    This is incredible from a country that believes it is a global entity, and a leading world democracy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ah come on now. If they are honest in what they say then the UK PM and Mogg understood the deal and all international trade deals less than posters on Boards understand them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,438 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus



    Yes, absolutely. Westminster is completely different from the US separation-of-powers setup. Government Bills emerge from Cabinet - drafting of a Bill doesn't even begin until the policy which the Bill is to give effect to has been discussed and signed off in Cabinet. When drafted, each Bill goes again to Cabinet for approval before being introduced into Parliament.

    It's then piloted through Parliament by the relevant Cabinet minister, who explains and justifies the policy behind the Bill, explains how the Bill will operate, and deals with opposition questions and objections to the Bill, but he does so on the basis that the policy and the Bill have both been approved by Cabinet, and the Cabinet is collectively responsible for them.

    (There's a different process for Private Member's Bills, which are not sponsored by the government and for which the government has no responsibility. But Private Member's Bills very, very rarely become law, unless taken over by the government.)

    [And, for the record, the PM doesn't actually sign Bills. The monarch does that, when they have been enacted by Parliament, or it is done on her behalf.]



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Can tell the Tories are getting worried about the local elections - they're seeking to distance themselves from either their own national movement or the Conservative brand entirely in the run up to local elections.

    On many ballot papers across the country they will stand as 'Local Conservatives' rather than just 'Conservative' whilst there is at least one MP holding a surgery decked out in green party colours with no mention of the Tory party he's a member of to be seen.




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,652 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Chris Andrews tried the no party branding thing when he was still in FF towards the end here. Didn't work!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,320 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I also remember some local FG candidates doing similar, albeit with a teeny tiny version of the party logo. You really had to squint to find it, looking up from the street to the posters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,074 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Yep May elections are crucial. If the Tories do ok, Boris can point and say "nobody in the real world cares" if not so good then it should be enough for a final push.


    Their ae numerous people plotting and scheming to replace him, but they know Boris will always be popular with the members so they don't want their fingerprints over it as they will have to win a members vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Every time I see a picture of Boris Johnson on this India trip he looks like he is one step away from going full "prince Philip"



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    The article in today's Daily Mail about Angela Rayner is really not a good look. I can't see how that was allowed to be published, it says rather more about the Tory party than it does about Rayner to be honest.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,507 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's the Daily Mail. That's how it got published. Remember this? Bonus points if anyone to the left of these people get upset about it.

    The Tories act like they want to win elections but have no ideas or any clue at all what to do once they do.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭Notmything


    John McGuiness in Kilkenny has a tiny FF logo on all his literature/posters, but off topic so apologies.

    But surely noone would be fooled to think "local conservative" ≠ "conservative party" ala Johnson's lot?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,320 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Reese-Mogg continues to endear himself to the civil service. No great surprise this walking trope can't get his Victorian mind around working from home but the passive aggressiveness is a bit much.




  • Registered Users Posts: 32,660 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Its a seriously crappy distraction piece to take attention away from the fact three Tory cabinet MPs are being investigated for sexual misconduct.

    Not to mention....


    The daily mail is an absolute homophobic, xenophobic, mysogonistic rag, it is a mouthpiece for the Tories.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Ah yes, that makes sense now, a load of cabinet MPs are being investigated for sexual misconduct, so lets write an article about Angela Rayner saying basically that perhaps these people are being encouraged by females of the house.

    Nothing like a bit of victim blaming. Sick.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    For those that haven't seen it and refuse to visit the DM website, this is the article...


    Post edited by Seth Brundle on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,406 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That's appalling, even for a rag like the daily mail



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,406 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The official PR line is to denounce Raynor in the same sentence that they denounce the Mail. Classy as usual

    Bit like 'as much as I despise paedophiles, they death penalty is a step too far'



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,320 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I dunno, seems appropriate Dorries could only parrot Johnson's line like a good little toady.

    This sordid affair is timely as, having invoked Thatcher's leadership in the Brexit thread (and her struggles as the first female PM), things haven't changed all that much - at all really - that women in politics aren't still sexualised and objectified to a scurrilous degree. And of course it would be the right wing rags at the centre of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The mad thing is to a sane person they surely read that as " the man who is in charge of one of the most powerful countries in the world is so incredibly useless that he can't do his job in the vicinity of a skirt ". This is a "wartime" PM who is susceptible to any attractive woman who is in the room.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,320 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The truly depressing aspect is how some women themselves choose to justify these kind of repulsive double standards; similar to how, what was it, 54% of white female voters in 2016 voted for Trump.

    I always pause from sharing LBC, cos phone-in stations likely pick the more viral-friendly callers ... but listening to this (older sounding) lady try to square the blame on Rayner having the nerve to just sit there with her legs uncrossed is enraging. Does make you wonder what kind of life she has led - and how there aren't THAT many cultural steps between this kind of leftover Victorian shaming of women ... and the Taliban.




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The Times are running a story about the Sue Gray report being so damning that Boris will have no choice but to quit. However, the report won't be released just yet...

    Might it be a plot to build up the Gray report so that the outcome of the police report is ignored? Alastair Campbell might be on the money here...




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,507 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There really is no room for debate within the government. Recall Sunak playing the "any criticism of my wife's financial interests in Russia are misogyny" card not long ago or Isabel Oakshott defending Stanley Johnson's groping? Johnson has selected his cabinet based solely on loyalty and compliance. Nothing else. Everyone has their price.

    I think people are willing to tolerate appalling behaviour from politicians if it means that people they despise get it worse, in your example being non-white immigrants. Depressing but that's identity politics.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,638 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    The Mail are not backing down on this and are now claiming that the speaker calling them in is a threat to free speech. Seems they are now trying to play the victim.

    Shouldn't be surprised that supporters of a morally bankrupt government are also morally bankrupt themselves. Honestly I don't know what they see to achieve with this. Also isn't Sarah Vine the wife of Michael Gove?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Meanwhile stuff like this barely registers on the news index. P&O have already admitted breaking the law over firing the workers which carries a penalty of an unlimited fine. They've failed safety inspections on multiple ships and this time they got lucky the breakdown didn't happen during bad weather.

    In Japan there's 10 people dead and 16 missing after a company with a bad safety record used what may have been an inexperienced captain.

    But Boris & Co. are creating distractions on the basis that a week is a long time in politics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's still baffling that Angela Rayner is even on the Labour front bench.



Advertisement