Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russian warship, go f**k yourself!

Options
13940424445117

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    Problem is the unlike minded countries which should know better but are just blatantly going against the rest



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's what secondary sanctions are for. As Dubya once said, you're either for us or against us. If third countries want to support russias actions in Ukraine I'd leave them twist in the wind too. Some people call this the second Cold War, but for russia the first Cold War never ended. China is another threat, and I use the word deliberately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Not contradicting it in the slightest, as I wrote the wakeup call was there, but European countries (not just Germany) didn't respond to it adequately. I also remember commentators at the time stating how Europe needed to do a full disconnect from Russian gas (myself included) and being lambasted for being "hysterical". Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Now we are playing catch-up and racing to do 8 years of disconnection in 1 or 2 years.

    I agree, the German decision-making has been horrendous, I'll be impressed if Scholz survives this year. Of course, in a way I do in a way understand it, they wanted to build an economic relationship that would transcend politics/history, however Putin going from predictable autocrat to unpredictable totalitarian despot threw a spanner in the works.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The Chinese just pulled out of a half billion dollar oil deal with Russia citing sanctions. Indeed the oil market is more flexible than the gas, but it's not an automatic shoe-in. There's also risks to the Russian oil industry (getting backed up to the well heads, which took them 30 years to recover from) plus the global price of oil can also go down.

    As for the overall sanctions and restrictions and withdrawal of foreign companies and economic isolation and reduction of energy reliance they are very much hurting Russia. I could nearly write a short book on it by this stage. We've just had the Ru central bank head admit they are running out of resources to prop up the rouble, the next 6 months to a year are going to start getting quite funky over there, the Russians are already taking action to hide economic metrics so they can attempt to conceal this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,694 ✭✭✭jaymla627




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭YellowRattle


    Wouldn’t be so sure about that.

    China is guilty of genocide against the Uighur people but that doesn’t stop people from doing business with them.

    Folks have no problems buying Chinese products. An inconvenient truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Oh big time, talk about burning every bridge possible and then some.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    True, most people I know are critical of what's happening to the Uighur people, but none boycott Chinese goods because it's too much effort. Likewise it wouldn't be a big voting issue for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Don't have the time to go through the assumptions in all those models but I doubt they have the complexity required to take into account the logistical and infrastructural problems.

    That is where the costs and shortages will really start to spiral before bringing the economy to a halt if there is a ban brought in without adequate time for alternatives.

    But doing it over several years becomes pointless. As it gives time for Russian energy to find a home and a large part of the war will have already been funded by Europe at that stage.

    Best thing we could have probably done would have been to get Nord stream two opened and at least we would have probably been getting more gas for the same money then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Ah lad ya can't come in with "Don't have the time to go through the assumptions in all those models" and then add a "but" to dismiss all those models with your own thoughts and opinions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Could take a solid week to go through all the ones quoted in the document. If you have that time on your hands please do go through them and summarise how the logistical problems of getting alternatives to where they are needed are modelled, how much potential is there to actually buy spot as a big portion will be contracted out and be unavailable, while there is not extra capacity for lng production for example, so how much do we have to pay to price poorer countries out of the market even more than we are currently doing



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,670 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    First of all the EU is not doing it over several years. They intend by this time next year to have virtually weaned ourselves off Russian gas . E en if we reduce our gas and oil taken from Russia by 50-60%, Russia will have no home for that for 1-2 years,even if they do by then.

    Next Russia will have lost it best customer for gas and oil. Of anyone thinks that India and China will pay the prices the EU pay they are deluded.

    Even at that it creates another problem for Russia. Now the pipeline must go east with extra risk involved. It also changes the balance in Russia where more economic power is switched to the Asian part of Russia

    China has already other issues on its hands. COVID is still a live issue there. There own vaccines obiviously have not got the effacy of those developed in the west. It look more and more like it is not interested in upsetting it largest market. If it takes gas and oil from Putin it will drive a hard bargain.

    This is all predicated on Putin still being in power in 2-3 years time. As they day a day is along yime in politics

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭roosterman71




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,694 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Out of sight out of mind re the Uighar issue, in the West, the cccp seems to be on a suicide mission with its refusal to relent on it'd zero covid policy,

    The media is solely focused on the Ukriane issue at the minute, and it's reverberations on the world economy and supply chains, but what's coming down the tracks with shortages of everything and anything you can think of not been able to be sourced from China is just as serious



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As regards no one in particular. A lot of the cribbing about trade boycotts or sanctions is related to me feinism and not "but russia can sell to someone else" arguments. Like you allude to, China and others will possibly buy, but at knock down prices. Should secondary sanctions be applied, that third nations desire to buy will be tempered by "what will it cost us". What the West holds in terms of access to technology shouldn't be scoffed at.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    That's a pity, in that case, for the time-being I'll have to stick to the economic analysis from the European Central bank, Oxford Economics, Deutsch bank, Goldman Sachs and all the rest of the literature by the German Council of Economic Experts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's not a "wobble", we have the largest war in Europe since WW2, on the back of a pandemic and heavy inflation

    US/NATO troops can't enter Ukraine because if that were the case, it's US soldiers shooting at Russian soldiers and that's WW3

    As for the EU reducing it's reliance on Ru energy, I don't see any reason to doubt the estimates. Putin has effectively declared war on Europe, even if peace were called tomorrow, there's no way back with him in power. If you are cynical about the switch, okay, but it can be tracked this year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The EU has implemented a ban on Russia coal, that's effective this summer. Oil can be sourced elsewhere. Gas is the issue, but for example Finland, which imported approx. 70% of it's nat gas from Russia estimates they will be fully off that this year. They are leasing an LNG terminal with Estonia to make up for the short-fall.

    The key issue here is really just German gas. Since the war started they've reduced reliance on Russian gas from 55% to 40% presently. To get that 40% right down will take until around 2024 at current estimates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Nothing will be sold to anyone, the facts are self-evident. In terms of cutting reliance on Putin's Russia, after Georgia and 2014 it was a question of if, now it's only a question of when.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Energy prices are high, ergo Russia is getting more revenue, for now. Keywords: for now. Keep in mind that LNG terminals aren't built and operational overnight, that said, as the year goes on, countries should start to accelerate away from Russian reliance as they find alternatives.

    Russia can supplement coal/oil by selling elsewhere, but they won't automatically receive the same revenue, and as we've seen, the sanctions are already impacting oil deals with China.

    Gas is the tricky one, but it cuts both ways, harder for Europe to cut in a short period, likewise it's hard for Russia to switch to alternative customers (gas requires a lot of infrastructure)

    The EU says a two-thirds reliance drop this year, coal gone by summer, oil by winter. If we hit those metrics we are on track.

    "You have posted at length that Germany and and Europe could and should cease trade right now."

    I posted that technically it's possible but would incur a substantial hit (relatively speaking) e.g. if Germany cut tomorrow, then it's economy could expect a GDP contraction of 1% to 2% (and a few hundred thousand job losses)

    Should they do it now? Idealistically yes, but realistically it's more likely to be phased out rather than ripping the bandaid off



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    German oil embargo could happen faster than end of year, in fact, depending on the deal with Poland, it could take just days




  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭YellowRattle


    As Russia launched its invasion, the US gave Ukrainian forces detailed intelligence about exactly when and where Russian missiles and bombs were intended to strike, prompting Ukraine to move air defenses and aircraft out of harm’s way, current and former US officials told NBC News.

    That near real-time intelligence-sharing also paved the way for Ukraineto shoot down a Russian transport plane carrying hundreds of troops in the early days of the war, the officials say, helping repel a Russian assault on a key airport near Kyiv.

    Thats WWIII lads. No need to worry about fert prices anymore.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭alps


    Keep your fuel tanks and more full from here on..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Gas 5 times what it was last year, fertilizer e1000 a ton, diesel near e2 a litre n could be scarce in the winter apparently. Ukrainian refugees to Ireland will cost 3billion next year putting rents and house prices even higher, and the euro getting weaker by the day.

    Are we all sure that the bad guy is losing? Doesn't seem like it to me



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Whether he is winning or losing, it's the global cost of this war. Regardless of what happens, the next year or two is going to be very expensive, possibly hitting those in developing countries harder than ourselves



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    No possibly about it. We'll whinge and moan about prices, but we have the means to pay. The millions who struggle to put food on the table are banjaxed. And it could be closer to home. Thinking here about all the food banks and the poverty running rampant through the UK at the minute



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Inflation is a little more complex than that. We could also be looking at recession. Fossil fuels controlled by countries has never been an ideal situation, if anything "good" is to come out of this it's to underscore how much we need to wean ourselves off them



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    The whole thing is a joke. Poland cut off from gas this morning for refusing to pay in rubles. Price of gas jumps and more gas (at the higher price) sent through non polish pipelines to make up for it.

    The answer is to flood Europe with as much gas as possible Russian included. All we are doing is creating conditions that will keep gas prices very high for the medium term which will more than make up for reduced volumes of Russian gas being bought by Europe IF the EU can actually manage to reduce dependence anywhere near what they are saying they will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,694 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Bought another 1350 litre diseal tank here, and am working of the theory that when ones empty, it gets refilled immediately, and work away from the 2nd one then and do the same with that tank when its empty, leaves us with circa 5 weeks of diseal on hand at all times, was a nice cheque to write out when getting both the tanks filled two weeks ago but it's one less thing to be worrying about going forward



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭148multi


    Putin only saving face, Poland was going to cut gas off at the end of May anyway.



Advertisement