Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Have people gone a bit madder or has the internet just exposed them?

  • 29-04-2022 3:28pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Until about 20 years ago people wouldn't worry so much about celebrities and what they did. Now you have people going online and fighting bitterly about what JK Rowling thinks, whether she is a homophobe or not. These are people who will probably never meet her, who have no apparent reason to care what she thinks as an individual. There are also people, ordinary working class people, quite genuinely concerned that Elon Musk has bought Twitter. But these people don't ever have to go on to Twitter if they don't want to.

    It strikes me that many people have lost the run of themselves, genuinely think their opinion on people they have never met is important, and see no issue with lecturing other people on the internet.

    There's a huge problem now with people taking offence to things, like Phil Neville making a pretty silly joke, which mocks sexism rather than being sexist, but people still berate him. Read an article by Joe Canning in the IT today, he's still annoyed by a joke a referee made. Like so many people nowadays Joe took an obvious joke as being reflective of a malevolence on the ref's part.


    It's a very peculiar age, you'd have to hope things settle soon. Right now there's a very odd tendency to go out of one's way to be offended, or to at least pretend to be offended.



«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 592 ✭✭✭CrookedJack


    It strikes me that many people have lost the run of themselves, genuinely think their opinion on people they have never met is important, and see no issue with lecturing other people on the internet.

    There's a huge problem now with people taking offence to things...

    Can't tell if you're being ironic or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    We have reason to be worried, if Elon allows trump and people who use extreme hate speech back on twitter it has effects in real life , eg more attacks on minority groups. I can remember a time when there were very few characters who were gay in TV dramas, twiitter is a place where many minority groups have a voice Blm, me too, lgbt groups, yes its true some people are offended by lame jokes but at least people who are racist or sexist will be criticised and have to face public backlash on social media and that's a good thing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,032 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    The internet has empowered them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,810 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I think the internet and social media have given many people the incorrect belief that their opinion on everything is so good that everyone should read it. It’s also given people a way to say things to people that pre social media they’d have never said to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    People who misspeak on Twitter can lose their jobs years later, end up criticised in the media. It’s crazy really, given that everyone makes mistakes. The biblical idea of letting him without sin cast the first stone has been lost.

    The Phil Neville controversy is the kind of nonsense that isn’t even unusual nowadays, obviously wasn’t being sexist, just sending up sexist stereotypes, but still gets criticised to millions of people.

    The political side of social media is a very hard one, and I don’t know how it can be solved. It has definitely led to polarisation and a coarsening of debate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Twitter is to blame. All the ‘activists’ who think that their opinions matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition




  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The irish times is utterly nuts at times,


    throwing slurs about cancel culture and demanding respect just because ,from a demographic that near entirely deosnt read it,......is perhaps a sign of how demented the internet has drove everyone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Does this mean that the likes of Fintan the Toole and Una Mullaly who continue to write for the Irish Times are transphobic?

    Since they haven’t denounced ‘The Irish Times’ and given the whole ‘with us or against us’ thing that the Trans movement has adopted.

    Is Una Mullaly a TERF now? 😏

    Will each get their own thread on here like JK Rowling has?

    Will they be cancelled?

    Interesting times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,619 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I'd say the potential has always been there - people looking for meaning in their banal, fleeting lives is not new. But technology, social media, globalisation and other aspects of modern life just facilitate and amplify it. Social media companies identify and exploit this human weakness and make billions from it.

    These sort of discussions about cancelling etc. make me think about Liam Gallagher's altercation with a (black) paparazzo where he called him a gay boy's f*ggot's arse kebab dick w*nker. That was in 2001 - not ancient history. Hardly any fuss over it at the time, what woukd happen today? There hasn't been any attempts at a retrospective cancelling but then again some people might be "uncancellable".

    Another one I thought of - Killian M2's TV Archive recently posted a clip of Julian Simmons (UTV continuity presenter) introducing Coronation Street and making a joke about camel jockeys. That also wasn't that old, 1990s at the oldest.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,688 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    well, i'm certainly having arguments/debates on topics with people, which i simply wouldn't have had 25 years ago. and prior to then, any i was having would have generally been with people i am friendly with or know in some way, but now it's with total strangers with stupid usernames, so it's a different set of rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,230 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Sorry, but that really comes off as 'won't someone think of the children' type mentality.

    Who gives a shite if trump gets back on twitter. Just don't listen to the guy. Like, he was president of the United States for 4 years spouting garbage on it. The world survived! Lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,230 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    It should be said that there's a lot of opinionated bastards out there. The Internet has given them a platform to moan.

    Before the Internet, what was with, ringing up fm 104? Lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    The internet and social media in particular has given a platform to loonies. While before you may have two loonies talking nonsense on bar stools, they can now link in easily with other loonies, and they can have their own loony twitter accounts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭DontHitTheDitch


    I think it's a bit worse than that. At least if you were a loonie in 'real life' in the 70s, 80s and 90s and weren't completely out of touch with reality you would find most people you socialise with have far less extreme and more diverse views. Now its almost impossible to be the craziest loonie in the room, no matter how religiously you defend your liberal or conservative views there's an army of nutters who make you think you are actually being reasonable.

    I do think that politics and political moralising has replaced religion. You can tell who are the most devout, they wear it as a badge of honour.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,688 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yep, and the extreme viewpoints drive the conversation now, not the moderate voices. and that's both for good and ill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭gladvimpaker


    They do indeed wear it as a badge of honor. I never seen so many devout Clare supporter's in all my life, everywhere you look there's a Clare flag and after their last performance against Tipperary it's looking like they could do well this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,687 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    A lot more people have been given a “voice”, that’s for sure. But another issue would be that on a number of platform the user base has “aged out” a fair bit and seem to be populated by angry lads in their 30s/40s.

    They seem to have inherited a boomer level of fear. A fear of change, people who are different from them and foreigners. These “types” wouldn’t, exactly, be “winning” in life either so they’d also have a lot of internal angry which they then direct at these “others”, and women. I guess they see them living a better life, or getting access to one, that they’ll never have. Well, they could if they spent a bit of time away from the computer maybe.

    Thankfully, you don’t encounter too many of these in the “real life”. Crotchety men banging on about the WOKE (all caps) and evil immigrants. I guess these sections of the internet keep them distracted and off the streets. Sort of like a “Current Affairs” forum for the real world.

    Hopefully, theses areas will continue to shrink and the, more opened minded, young people will continue to drive change, both social and political, while the angry internet “types”, the vocal minority, continue to fade into obscurity, and irrelevance.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭Ceramic


    I think the experience of Twitter can vary a lot depending on when you joined and how much interaction you do. I opened an account very early on - back in the days when Tweetups in pubs seemed like a good idea (you'd want to be out of your mind to do it now!) but it was a much nicer platform back then. It was smaller, geekier and perhaps a bit more like aspects of Boards in some ways.

    If you joined it later, Twitter was already full of trolls, bots, Americans fighting culture wars, Brits who do nothing except rant about Brexit, all sorts of Irish fringe loopers and so on. It's not the nicest place if you can't find people who are decent to interact with.

    I had a couple of bad to very weird experiences of people just going on huge rants at me for no particular reason and it's just made me very cautious about how I interact with the platform ever since. I don't post about any topic that's likely to attract that kind of response and steer completely clear of certain hot topics entirely, including Irish politics actually. If you express any opinion on say Turf for example, you're torn apart by one side or the other. There's no nuance or discussion and I think it's actually extremely bad for politics in general. It's not how Irish politics even works as it's all about finding common ground and forming coalitions, yet on Twitter it's often like they're trying to mirror American polarised, entrenched, two party stuff.

    I've seen horrendous pile ons on various individuals, notably journalists and some politicians. Most of them are fine and can handle it. Some of them can't and end up leaving the platform entirely. I actually know of one person who left a career in journalism over abuse they got on Twitter! They probably shouldn't have but they just couldn't take the 'feedback' they were getting on everything they did. I think it's rather sad to see it happening. It's like some people are forgetting that they're not some remote huge celebrity character ensconced behind layers of PR. They're often a local councillor trying their best. You might not agree with them, but dehumanising them and jumping into some pile on is ridiculous. Also some of the abuse that journalists are getting is just shocking. You don't have to agree with everything they write. That's sort of the point. They play devil's advocate with topics, explore polemics, may have opinions you don't like and so on, but now people just seem to feel free to send personal attacks. Everyone wants their own cozy little bunker and anyone who disagrees or isn't in exact alignment with them is the enemy.

    The other one I'm seeing a lot of is people who I would have had a lot of time for in the past who've become self-righteous, smug w@nkers who can't see subtly at all anymore. It's weird. I've just seen them instigate and participate in pile ons on various things in ways I wouldn't have imagined in the past and it's often driven by seeking approval / likes / RTs. I don't think everything has two sides, nor do I think some people don't deserve to be called out for their behaviour, but this isn't the kind of stuff I am talking about. It's more like piling onto some blandly centrist politician for no particular reason etc. I saw one guy getting torn apart for describing Macron as a centrist ffs while just describing the French election results! Apparently he was a 'corporate shill' for doing so and the 'correct' term for Macron is 'hard right' (rolls eyes).

    Social media has positives, but it has huge negatives too and I think we're beginning to forget that barely a bit more than a decade ago it was something most of us didn't use, but now we're behaving like's indispensable and can't be moderated.

    Personally, I think if Twitter gets really rough, I'll just make my account private and stop interacting publicly anymore. It would be sad to dump a network of probably 14 years worth of contacts, but I'm not going to waste my time interacting with bots and crazy stuff.

    If Musk removes all the moderation entirely, I think Twitter will just become a cesspool. There were 30 million new accounts setup since his sale was agreed in principle, so it just shows what's coming.

    He talks about it being 'the town square'. It's not. Town squares are moderated by the fact that people have to live with each other in a town and there are social implications to throwing abuse and opinions are varied and nuanced. Twitter allows people to just throw abuse with what they perceive is a distance and join networks of people with narrow opinions that are actually scattered all over the world. That's quite literally the polar opposite to a town square.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,976 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I do think media addiction has driven people mad, or madder if you prefer.

    I refuse to be on Twitter, read it or have anything to do with it. It seems very corrupting to me.

    Musk's re-arrangement of Twitter is neither here nor there in a sense. Its already a horrible place regardless of whether it is about to get slightly better or even worse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭DontHitTheDitch


    I too dream of a more kind and tolerant future where people who don't think like I do are ostracised, slandered, ridiculed and excommunicated, living the rest of their miserable, lonely lives isolated and consumed by anger like the dirty rotten slugs they seem to be. Whoops!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Back in the 90s there was a Viz character called Millie Tant who was bascially a pisstake of a woke social-justice warrior, so they definitely existed.

    I think the problem is that the internet has fueled them rather than exposed them - they have the means now to reach such a much wider audience and it's gone to their heads. On top of that, they keep trying to "out-so" each other - who can be the wokeist? Or the most socially aware? Pure ego.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Preferred Roger Mellie the ‘Man off the Tellie’ myself.





  • Twitter has its very nasty moments, and personally I find at times it’s a platform of very irritating virtue signalling. I find myself being drawn into responding, where I’d better off ignore it when I see it.

    However, most of my use of Twitter has been a positive experience. I’m big into aviation, and there’s little controversial in mini chats about airplanes. I’m also learning a lot of tech stuff, and the community of coders is very mutually encouraging and many tips and resources are generously shared.

    I like the instant access to factual news, eg if an earthquake has just happened where I might be headed, I can be prepared. The Luas has been delayed or cancelled, I get to know quickly. I find companies are generally most quickly responsive to issues raised on Twitter.

    If you follow a lot of nice stuff related to areas of interest it can be great. If you are focussed on things rather than personalities it can be a better experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    All good points though if I may make a correction: most of these 40 year old Irish boomers don’t use computers, they do “all their own research” on iPhone 6s’s with cracked screens held about two feet away from their face. The kind of people who say they “wouldn’t bang” the starlet du jour and yet are too vain to adjust to the idea that they have outgrown their XL Tommy “Hilfinger” polo shirts or that they need to start wearing reading glasses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Think you're mixing up two different sub-cultures there!

    EDIT - more than one, actually: "40-year old boomers"...??

    Post edited by Princess Consuela Bananahammock on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Twitter is weird......i see people slating it for being negative/culture wars etc


    But i mainly follow pegigree sheep breeding,travel pages and archelogy (alongside the soccer gif pages)....unless it come up on trending,it deosnt really feature for me


    I guess it all depend who ya follow etc,i wouldnt follow anyone who tweets about war in ukraine etc,like its easy dip.in/out of....but wouldnt invite it into my life,same as these trans issues...whole thing will end toxic as fcuk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,580 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The internet has just enabled more crazies to interact with each other. They now have a platform, an outlet, an audience. ‘Some’ control so….

    facebook, Instagram, bebo or MySpace was never going to give them their outlet to enable their attention seeking goals, and exposure and their false sense of importance, with even added dollops of attention….which is their currency… But with Twitter….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    Frank thinks the whole worlds crazy....




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    I'm not sure I'd refer to people who class themselves as "woke" being open-minded - they have verocity to want things banned simply because they disagree with them, a belief that they are acutomatically right and moral and are just as relentless as the McCarthyists when it comes to trying to bring down people that just happen to disagree with them.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.





  • Who knows he didn’t help set the seeds for what’s happening in Ukraine, but that’s another debate. He certainly caused some anarchy in his own country. 😱



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,687 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    I guess you could say there are “extremes” on both sides, PCB. But, again, it’s nice to see the, more, nasty side of the conservative bunch are the older, more cranky, ones. So, while the younger people are becoming more tolerating, compassionate and accepting the older, angrier, types will be dying out.

    This will, hopefully, lead to a brighter multi and, dare I say, inter-cultural society in the future.

    Have to say, it’s nice to discuss these things with someone who doesn’t “lash out” with sneering, and insults. Most refreshing. But, I must say, you’d want to be careful with that level of discourse lest some turn on you and accuse you, yourself, of being WOKE (all caps).

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Fair enough, but I can guranatee you, I've met plenty of young people who are intolerant of people who disagree with them than and plenty of older who are far more accepting of change and new ideas then the youth.

    You seem to have this conservative/old and liberal/young deivde and there's absolutely no connection.

    And I have been accusedof being woke - recently on this very forum - but only by people who have no idea what the word actually means. I'm not even close to woke and accusations of it are met more with laughter than anything else.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Cancel culture is a myth. People who whine about it just don’t like it when people disagree with their opinions. So much for the marketplace of ideas. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Unkindness and intolerance are far too prevalent these days.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    I don’t know why you keep trying to highlight how you have misinterpreted my previous post. I used boomer as a reference to a particular state of mind, not specifically someone aged between 77 and 60. It’s a well-known alternative use of that word for the past two or three years. I’m assuming that you have been using the English language for that entire time.

    I ignored you the first time because I gave you the benefit of the doubt in presuming you’re not a complete dunce but to my bafflement you keep referring to it. Stop embarrassing yourself and go away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Boomer is not a state of mind, it's a generation of people aged mid 50s plus - if you meant "boomer-mindset" then, fair enough - but in fairness, it wasn't particulalry clear.

    Beyond that, you also made a identified a few chracteristics that were nothing to do with who you implied.

    "40 year old Irish boomers don’t use computers" --? 40 year olds don;t use computers...?? 40 isn't THAT old, be it boomer or boomer-mindset.

    "people who say they “wouldn’t bang” the starlet du jour and yet are too vain to adjust to the idea that they have outgrown their XL Tommy “Hilfinger” polo shirts or that they need to start wearing reading glasses" - is this about the woke or the anti-woke? The first bit says woke, the rest - well, I don;t see how that connects with either group to be honest....

    People who whine about [cancel culture] just don’t like it when people disagree with their opinions - isn't this both woke AND anti-woke? I mean, woke people try to cancel things and don't like it when people disagree with them probably more than anyway.

    So forgive the confusion...

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    I’m not gonna show an ounce of sympathy for anyone who peddled bullsh!t medical advice during the pandemic and suffered the consequences. Nobody has a divine right to stand on a soapbox and urge people to kill themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes in that it is easier for them to whinge about woke, immigrants, gays etc with fellow crazies and like minded c*unts.

    Before that it was just the bar stool or ranting outside the GPO., but the latter is still popular with some.

    Don't even need twitter or any other platform, plenty of examples on here, especially with CA and the conspiracy theories forums.

    The prison forum on the old platform was a good example of their raving, now it is just the help desk and dispute resolution forums.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Your confusing posts, remember? Your incorrect use of "boomer" and the mismatching of various groups.

    Boomer is a specific definition. If you intend it to mean something other than that, I'm not psychic.

    The rest is self explanatory if you want to read it.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    What’s unkind about what I said exactly? Genuine question, what is unkind about being an opponent of people spreading bullshït medical advice during a pandemic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    A mealy mouthed reply.

    Weinstein is entitled to his views and everyone else is equally entitled to tell him to get fúcked. Call it unkind, call it “cancel culture,” I call it consequences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Sorry you never actually said what was unkind about anything I have said. What is unkind about telling covid deniers to eff off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,776 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    In fairness, Weinstein went a little too far in how he expessed his views. Most people are going to "cancel" perverts and sex-offenders.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,606 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    So in other words you want every group that you are a part of or like to be aired and everyone else silenced. Can you give us any example of "attacks on minority groups" that happened as a direct result of hate speech being allowed online?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I want Conservatives liberals, people of various political viewpoints, ordinary average people to be on twitter, I think people who promote hate speech against anyone or ask for violent acts to be committed against anyone to be moderated or blocked from twitter , I don't have any one example of a violent act that's directly connected to a tweet . Donald trump was removed from twitter I think it was maybe to do with speech that was racist or maybe for spreading fake news re implying the election results were fake which maybe led to the Jan 6 attack on government buildings, there's plenty of Conservative politicians on Facebook and twitter

    they are allowed to post right wing content as long as its not extreme and it does not break the rules about encouraging violent illegal acts or racist hate speech or defamatory content about a particular person. I think it's obvious that certain people have been attacked or injured due to extreme content or hate speech on social media, just Google attacks on Asians Jews usa 2021 and you get plenty of results

    You can look on techdirt. Com you'll see articles about how Elon musk does not seem to understand how moderation works on twitter and just saying I want more free speech is not a solution and he contradicts himself many times when he discuss, s this subject. Moderating social media websites with millions of users is a complex process which should be done by qualified experts not just by one person who is very rich who wants to change the rules



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,763 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    It's the algorithms man, and people only getting news from social media feeds.

    If you buy an Irish times newspaper you have opinion pages featuring breda O'brien (right wing/catholic/anti abortion etc) alongside fintan otoole (left wing/Liberal etc) and you can read both opinions or just flick past. On social media, you have have people bitching about both articles, and painting the Irish times as a left wing or right wing rag despite never buying the paper.

    Everyone is in there own little bubble



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 second toughest in the infants


    We live in a funny old time alright.

    Dissent from the accepted narrative is like a cardinal sin.

    People lose their **** if you question what went on during the "pandemic". ( It wasn't even a pandemic. The goalposts of what defined a pandemic were moved a few years in advance ).

    If you question it at all, from a perspective of patient safety, you'll get looked down on and told, eh I'll listen to the scientists thanks. Nevermind the fact that the scientific community is corrupt from top to bottom as result of sucking on whatever tit will fund them.

    A lot of people claim to be liberal and on the good team but shout down any attempt at questioning what we're being fed by the corporates. It doesn't make sense at all but nothing surprises me nowadays. 🤷



  • Advertisement
Advertisement