Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1333334336338339808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    True but ring up and when asking about a lot of the older stock if you put them in chron order on myhome they are sale agreed/sold. Its really frustrating



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Remember chatting to a polish chap who grew up in a massive set of apartment blocks.

    One block was social housing.

    If memory serves they had soccer pitch, tennis court and forest beside them.

    He loved it. Very different from the dystopian apartment blocks we have here that are simply very hard on kids as they have little or no amenities nearby. Dublin may be great for craic and nice people but the resources for families are appalling.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,502 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Apartments are always more expensive to build than houses. The deciding factor is usually site cost. If the site costs is high it makes apartments viable to build.

    That is why 4-5 story apartments are not viable in larger towns or some urban areas. You have to factor the area around the apartments as well into the footprint.

    In general we do not have area in urban setting to compensate for lack of a back garden and a common area or roadway at the front of a house. Because of Irish weather (we are a quite wet country) you cannot be guaranteed a lot of days to hear off with the bikes or the pram for a few hours and not get wet.

    Most apartments are designed for a couple or a single person. Again high build costs in Dublin discrimate against apartments. The fact also that the complete structure has to be finished before you start getting your funding back is a deterrent.

    A builder would want a higher margin on am apartment block because of the risks involved. As you go up in the number of levels the extra building costs rise expodentially.

    Our problem at present is getting units build especially in Dublin. How we do that is the question. The state owned a lot of land in Dublin. It should be releasing some. As well there is an amount of brown field sites zoned industrial which should be redesignated residential but a number of left leaning councillors have this daft idea that we can attract industry back into the city

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    It’s not nonsense if there is a small pool of workers with the same demand for jobs wages rise. If wages rise house prices rise.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Demand for jobs is elastic too, and as it becomes harder to attract new hires here in Ireland there will be less and less new job announcements, with more investment going elsewhere in Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    A builder would want a higher margin on am apartment block because of the risks involved. As you go up in the number of levels the extra building costs rise expodentially.

    Our problem at present is getting units build especially in Dublin. How we do that is the question. The state owned a lot of land in Dublin. It should be releasing some. As well there is an amount of brown field sites zoned industrial which should be redesignated residential but a number of left leaning councillors have this daft idea that we can attract industry back into the city.

    Its true building costs naturally increase as you go higher, but not exponentially. In fact, with repetative floor plan designs, signficant efficiencies in both design & build can be acheived as you go up.

    Or what is known as high-rise. But the Irish aversion to enacting sound planning principles curtails the development of such. We simply dont do tall buildings in this country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If tax was the same across Europe yes…but it’s not so jobs unlikely to elsewhere in Europe



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Mine has rented every apartment they could get. Even rented houses and apartment of our own staff. And still are adding to that. As well as allowing people already working from home to work from home long term.

    Now when someone comes from abroad to work for the company they are getting their first few months accommodation free and will get an accommodation allowance to pay it themselves after that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    The higher you go the more has to be charged for maintenance and facilities to the owners. People in Ireland dont want to be paying €5 - €10k per year on top of buying the apartments. Ive been in apartment complexes in other countries that have swimming pools, cinemas, party rooms, meeting rooms and lots of maintained park style areas around them. That doesnt happen in Ireland. Well it does in one or two places, but if you look what the landlord has to pay monthly for them then you will see why the rent is so expensive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    People in Ireland would rather buy apartments in Bulgaria than in Dublin!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    Thats why you build highrise. More apartments to spread the cost. €10K in mgmt fees for a reasonably well spec'd apartment is very unlikely. That kind of money is limited to luxury builds.

    There is clear demand for highrise in this country. Planning, not management fees, is what is stopping many developments progressing from a concept into a feasability stage in the first instance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    SCSI reports posted here before show that it actually costs more per apartment as you go higher.

    Once you go beyond ~5 floors high the cost per unit starts to increase dramatically, meaning its less financially feasible to build high rise than low rise. Clearly something wrong in this country that this is the case, but thats the reality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,502 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Building design in housing estates is repetitive as well. However you go higher you need more and higher specification steel structures in the building. As well you need higher specification concrete. Add to that more space for utilities and lift shafts. Labour to get up and down costs extra. Pumping concrete up to a 3-4 floor high building is easy compared to going ten+ levels high.

    Take building a 4 level block of 60 apartment. If the next 4floors cost after that costs 10k/apartment extra in specification this cost is added to all 8 levels of apartment. You will have to reduce apartment size accross the 8 blocks for to add lift shaft and utilities. But in reality the building cost is because of the extra 4 levels and is maybe 25-30k per each of these apartments.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I see the priority as getting people out of tents not facilitating corporations to keep wages low.

    A pause on non EU/Ukraine immigration for 6 months to a year would give breathing space. Companies might even welcome it as housing supply would get closer to meeting demand in that time.

    We'll have to agree to disagree.

    Post edited by mcsean2163 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    As I said, yes building costs naturally increase as you go higher, but not exponentially as you said.

    Costs increase, but some of this is offset through economies of scale, again in repetition of design and construction. Its just how the whole high-rise model works. I appreciate your example and you make valid points. But it is not like for like as your example is essentially a mid-rise building. The economics are different.

    For starters it would have a much larger footprint compared to a 40 storey building with the same floor plan going straight up for the majority of floors. The 35th floor can have nearly same floor area as the 12th. Both structural and services design is different and can be quite a lot more expensive. But over many units it can become cost effective to the point where a return on investment can be made.

    Are you suggesting that it is not economically feasible to build high-rise in this country?

    I would suggest it very much is so. As @JimmyVik alluded to above, there is demand for this type of product. High quality, city centric apartments and there are developers who want to do this.

    And I am not suggesting this would cure our ills in any way. But it would all add to supply.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Once you go over around 20m from surrounding ground level with vehicle access a ladder from a fire engine can no longer reach an apt window to rescue or spray water so the building ends up with sprinklers/dry riser, a fire fire fighting stair core & elevator with powered smoke ventilation backed up on a generator - the costs increase massively but all these services aren't explicitly laid out in Irish regulations its local fire officers that have gotten very strict since Grenfell are are basically saying "I don't care what the regs say, this is what I want" and you can't really argue with them.

    Plus obviously the additional costs of foundations, glazing and structural requirements as you go up in addition to needing cranes, high rise scaffolding etc

    Even trying to build a 3 storey house triggers additional fire regs these days.

    The most cost effective housing units ive seen are 3 storey blocks with 3 apts per floor all fed from one central staircase - this bypasses a lot of expensive regulations



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    There isnt the demand you think in Ireland for it though. Part V takes care of any demand you might have for people paying luxury prices. They just wont pay it if they are not surrounded by people who also paid for that level of luxury. So those people will all go for nice big houses instead.

    Then you are back to building the poverty spec for the apartments in the high rise, but with much higher service charges for the tenants who will not be able to pay them, even if they could pay the high rise increased cost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    Thats the problem, know one knows what the demand is.

    Lets me be clear here. Im advocating for removal of height limits in certain areas such as central dublin for apartments controlled by good planning policies and design guidelines.

    If we dont do this, we will never know what the demand is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    We should service a brand new city. Allocate all the high rise you like in it, but plan it properly and connect it properly with proper planned infrastructure before you start building. The problem in Ireland is too many people saying ah sure just throw it up and see what happens.

    Start a new city from scratch and do it properly. None of this building and then not bothering about all of the other stuff that should be around a community.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,502 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    @iColdFusion pointed out some of the issues. You over rate the repetitive savings. These decrease expodentially while the cost per floor rises expodentially.

    The other factors is that design and engineering specifications at planning stage are much dearer per unit that ordinary houses due to its specialist nature. It's only on sites where the site is much more expensive than building costs that apartments are the only option

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    I think that idea has merit and definately worth consideration. There are plenty of examples world wide of this. But if we cant even manage underound rail to connect our Airport with the city centre, what hope do we have for any such visionary project by our political masters.

    But there are plenty of opportunites here now to improve what we have. Im a fan of the idea for relocating the port northwards, creating a new employment opportunities for the likes of Drogheda. Then redevelop the docklands into a space that supports a mix of community focused development, including high levels of social housing reserved for essential workers (Gards, nurses, teachers etc) needed to run our cities, not a playground for the rich.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    Again, is your point that it is not economically feasible to build high-rise in this country?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,412 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Maybe just maybe the market is softening a little, and there appears to be a lot of storm clouds on the horizon, lots of talks about a recession.

    Interest rates to rise in July according to the ECB

    US Fed rates to rise aggressively

    Even the Australia RBA has risen their rate for the first time in 12 years, and are looking at putting their base rate up to 1.5% by the end of the year, up from 0.1%

    The Kiwis and Canadians have been at this a few months longer than others, and property prices have fallen on the back of it. These are different markets for sure, but worthy to add to the conversation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,579 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    But even if the cost to build per unit increases as you go up, the land cost per unit is surely going down and would offset this..?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Has that always been the case?

    I ask because the article claims that 9.2% of commercial activity relating to shops and offices is less than 1/10th of what it was ten years ago. Which indicates that ten years ago shops and offices accounted for 92%+ of commercial activity while commercial residential and other commercial only accounted for less than 8% of activity.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,755 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Does Ireland still have a dual aspect requirement for all apartments? This must also make things more expensive to build as it must surely impose serious limitations on floor plans?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    They could start with that underground to the airport and then keep going out the same distance from the airport again to a large greenfield site. Start the new city there after that rail line is in.

    MY employer opened an office in Dundalk a few years ago. They closed it a couple of years later and relocated everyone to Belfast and Dublin because they just couldnt get people to go to Dundalk for work.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Our apartment regulations are taking the piss on a few fronts, % of apartments needing dual aspects, ratio of lifts to apartments.

    The guidelines are very strongly anti north facings too

    None of the apartments per stair/lift core, or minimum sqm per bedroom regulations apply to built to rent developments though, which explains their popularity. Same goes for shared/co-living accommodation, no Part V

    No wonder most people dont buy irish apartments!



Advertisement