Russia

Because sometimes you both seem to reply almost at the same time during the day, I am wondering whether you are brothers or friends? Nowhere have I ever said I liked Hitler or Nazism, your rubbish about the holocaust is just a broken record of your unwillingness to accept other viewpoints. Frankly, on the other hand, you don't feel ashamed that you support white nationalists and people who think whites-only should rule the world. Why is that? I actually support the Jewish people's right to have land of their own but think they should at least make an attempt to solve the Palestinian issue. Living in a constant state of fear doesn't make sense to me. Don't speak nonsense about me holding an odd hatred towards Jews. Jesus was Jewish and I am Catholic. It makes no sense to me to dislike my own religion. Though I do not attend church regularly anymore, I still adhere to certain moral principles associated with the Catholic Church.  

Regards stuff on Russia

A lot of media coverage has been paid to the Russian nuclear threat. It is hostile, frightening, and sometimes blustering. That is what happens when you have an undeclared war with Russia and begin spending billions of dollars to maintain the conflict. Zelensky may have come to terms with the fact that he cannot win, but his supposed allies want their country to keep fighting until it is no longer practicable. There is something sad about seeing the West willing to sacrifice a country for its own desire to defeat Russia. This kind of TV content should not be taken lightly.

As Putin himself has stated, any troops or attacks on Russian troops will be met with force. He was ignored, last time I hoped they would understand that Putin has a tendency to mean what he says. It is really down to the west now as to whether it is worth having WW3 over it. At this point, no one is putting a stop to the war, fueling a prolonged conflict, and the British and US leadership have not contacted Putin directly to negotiate. This is a very scary time for the world, as neither the Russians nor the west will back down. In my opinion, the outcome will not be pleasant for the world if the major goal is to defeat Russia and there is not a compromise in sight?.  

In relation to 9/11, I never definitively determined Silverstein was involved, I am certain of the controlled demolition, the suspects, whom I speculated about, but I cannot be sure if I am correct about who it is. Based on the theory proposed by NIST, freefall is not possible. Put forward a new theory instead of avoiding my post from 83 and claiming I didn't show evidence for controlled demolition. Don't expect you to do so because you already know there isn't freefall, so that negates the NIST hypothesis regarding the way the building collapsed. Are you scared of looking honest in front of your debunker friends? Nobody is stepping forward to assist you here, as they too are aware of the NIST model's absence of freefall.  

Despite the fact that Silverstein was Jewish, has very little to do with it. He could have been Catholic, Protestant, or any other religion and still be involved. It does not matter that he is Jewish. There is evil in all religions. Why would you exclude anyone? You do not seem to comprehend that there was a controlled demolition of seven building, meaning that every person with the authority to place men inside these buildings is a suspect. Again, the Jewish origins of Silverstein are irrelevant, as he can be ruled out in court of law, for that is the purpose.

What part of the Mossad was involved in JFK? I don't remember this 

It is irrelevant that Mossad is an Israeli intelligence agency. Focus should be placed on motives and agendas rather than attacking religions. Indoctrinated with the belief that the Jewish race is the target of everyone who believes they might be responsible for 9/11. If you can provide me with evidence that Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, or Pakistan did it, I'm willing to go there?? Currently, evidence indicates that seven was brought down by controlled demolition. Who could have done such a thing? 

The first people to be arrested on 9/11 were not Arabs or Muslims, but Mossad agents who were looking suspiciously at the first tower from an apartment block during the early hours of 9/11. Police were contacted by the woman but they had already left by the time they arrived. A van was pulled over later, and inside were Mossad agents working for the front moving company. There was also the story of Israeli intelligence posing as art students in New York, it was a big deal in the news. Whatever Israel was up to seemed to be a big deal. No, they are not the only ones who could have pulled it off. However, you should keep an open mind about it. You have not yet gotten past the controlled demolition part of it. All your thoughts are focused on the Jewish angle here due to this.  

Last post,for the night,   

What you fail to understand throughout the entire process is that NIST went from denying Freefall for seven years to finally accepting it as fact after being exposed by a truther at their own conference. Changed the draft paper and they had a new response in the final paper., When I speak of freefall, NIST acknowledges this fact. Truthers versus NIST differ in that truthers claim the connections and columns gave away instantly after a controlled demolition. The NIST, on the other hand, states that freefall was a gradual process that took place over a slower period of time.  

There was never a stage one as NIST asserts that the truthers are correct and NIST is incorrect. The NIST stage one makes no sense because the model has already collapsed after 2 seconds, and there is still a sequence of failures taking place inside the building on the west side. The statements made in their final report are not reflected in any of their actual models.

In order for stage 1 to be correct, it would have taken place before the building collapsed, not two seconds after it went down. Since the model shut off prematurely after 2 seconds, that's odd too. NIST never allowed the model to collapse fully.

There is no other explantation here. Freefall was caused by fire or demolition, can only be this.. 

What you are even talking about. How else could the collapse of seven be explained? Could you elaborate? Many people in the truth movement are of the opinion that a nuclear device or a beam from space blew up the towers. I don't entertain it myself

Nanothermite is the best explanation for tower collapse in my opinion. Consequently, it explains why there was very high temperatures in the debris for weeks, why there were large amounts of iron microspheres and eaten away steel found, and why hot liquid flowed from the gaps of windows before the towers came down. In addition, the presence of nanothermite rather than explosives simplifies the explanation for the collapse that occurred after the planes had struck. It takes a long time to go from steel to steel columns, placing explosives. Therefore, I believe a small group or cell would have been able to accomplish this task with military nano-thermite.. Nanothermite, which is found in the dust of the WTC, explains a lot.

Building seven was more conventional not sure what type of explosive masking techniques they used, it is possible that fiber optic cables were used, as they are expensive but having a faster response time would be beneficial (that is only speculation, which is something debunkers dislike)

What is not in dispute is that freefall occurred, and what caused that freefall is the key to understanding the collapse on that day. 

Here is what you see below after two seconds, as the building begins its descent.

Considering the steel members are still buckling, what is causing the freefall? When does it happen?

Again simply don't understand eight floors collapsed fully all the way from the green to the red zone. Otherwise, the building would not be in freefall as a whole section on the west side is offering resistance. This isn't complicated stuff.  

Get evidence and avoid answering me at all costs. The building fell for two seconds. This is NIST model at 2 seconds. Can you not see why NIST is wrong?

While the left side of the building had been gutted, the west side's top half is still buckling and crushing the lower half. This should be noted. It is impossible to freefall over an eight-stories unless every side has been gutted. This is science. Late i am off to bed, enjoy. .  

I post something on the internet for all time. I did not mention 9/11 and doubt I would have received a response if I had. I do not think it's appropriate to do so in public.