Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stormont Election 2022

12467

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    It's pretty depressing that the UUP appear to have suffered a bigger hit than the DUP. Danger now is that this further emboldens unionist parties to become even more intransigent and uncooperative. Serious questions now as to whether unionists more widely are interested in power sharing if SF have the First Minister spot, and if they're not, what then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,187 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Good point, I was working from Gavin's spreadsheet. That would explain the disparity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Let's be honest, Unionists would be more than delighted to live with direct rule from Westminster and local Councils only in NI, in perpetuity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,368 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Well it would preserve the union in their minds, but from the videos I’ve seen that RTE filmed of voters, they seemed to want the cost of living issue and other run of the mills issues to be addressed which is fair enough because direct rule or not, those issues aren’t going away in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,986 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Donaldson said earlier that he's not nominating anyone to the post so there won't be an assembly.

    He stressed he had 7 days to inform Westminster if he was keeping his seat there or not



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They probably should have voted for parties not preoccupied with the abstract so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Not looking like a million miles off. Just going by first preference (so a lot can change)

    SF 29

    DUP 27

    AP 15

    UUP 9

    SDLP 6

    TUV 2

    Ind (both unionist) 2


    So near as I can tell 40 unionist, 35 nationalist and 15 neutral but SF the biggest party. However potentially more important going forward is that it is at least 50 for the protocol vs at most 40 against it (I haven't seen Claire Sugden, an independent voice an opinion on it and the UUP seem to flip flop on it).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,540 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Yer man Gavin whatever from the DUP that was on BBC NI earlier, as well as Donaldson both spoke to the UUP & about Unionism in general in very conciliatory tones, no doubt trying to get them onside. Made a change from the usual confrontational style, maybe they've finally copped that its the moderates that they should have gone after, not Jim Allister and his bible bashers.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    SF received 250,388 first preferences, against 184,002 for the DUP; astonishing stuff. Not just on course for the most seats but generally the most "popular". Didn't they also have the same stat in our last general election, gaining the most 1st Prefs of all parties? Colours to the mast I'd never vote for them but one has to tip the hat to what has been a helluva rebrand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Their ground game is peerless, their vote management exceptional.

    I would never vote for them either, but if other parties in both jurisdictions are not right now wargaming strategies to take that on, then they are fools.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Who is this clown on BBC right now.

    SF got 1/4 million and anti protocol got 1/4 so it's a 50/50 split.

    Ya if you ignore all the other pro protocol parties



  • Administrators Posts: 54,126 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Administrators Posts: 54,126 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Gavin Robinson. He is one of the DUP moderates.

    That said, it was surprising to see him so conciliatory. He can be pompous when he wants to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The rhetoric throughout the campaign has been solid. They've stayed the adult in the room, ignoring the Border Poll trolling from the DUP and responding with the mature reflection that now wasn't the time, not with pressing issues today. Which is true: there's a serious cost-of-living crisis and the DUP ranting only ever made them look like cranks, SF like states-people. Not that the DUP have been blown out the water, but all SF has to do now is continue to speak for NI, let the DUP continue to rave. As the saying goes, never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Scarlet for that returning officer who couldn't pronounce Michelle McIlveen, guessing the I and the lower case L looked too similar on her sheet



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yep, and when it comes to the long-term the Nationalists should be happy. I know I know, 800 years etc. but keeping Unionists from unfettered power is the key. Run fairly from London with their massive subvention and we'll see Nationalists continue to dominate higher education and academia (big improvements came once Stormont was shuttered) and become the biggest block in the medium and long term. At the end of the day, as much as people lie about it, the result of the border poll when it happens will have maybe a couple of percent of voters actually up for grabs, it'll mostly just be a sectarian headcount.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Whats the best site for vote breakdown for NI ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Was that the wee limey girl? She made a balls of "Aontú" all day too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Poor auld Big Sammy looking very subdued on BBC

    Edit: was back to himself by the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,043 ✭✭✭circadian


    Sammy having an absolute car crash on BBC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    As ever, the best places to see the detail is the Pol Corrs and academic wonks on twitter.

    Here's the final vote share




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Belfast Telegraph had what I was after with full lists of every vote and round. Its got a really interactive breakdown of where surplus and the likes go



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Gutted i missed it and cant find a vid of it anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The Alliance member on the panel was having none of it. Shot the whole thing down with ease.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I am not sure that he has had an interview that is not a car crash in his life.


    The issue the DUP will have is that they are completely off the wall outside of the green vs orange debate. It will be hard for a neutral party to align with them frequently without alos going off the wall for the sake of balance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Sammy Wilson trying to portray the Alliance as Nationalist just because they don't agree with Unionists all of the time has vibes of the Putin regime in Russia portraying all of their opponents as Nazis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    What was the 8th Count in Strangford for?

    1. Count 1: purpose: first count; outcome: Armstrong elected, Macartney & King eliminated
    2. Count 2: purpose: distribution of Armstrong's surplus + the transfers of the 2 eliminated; outcome: McGivern eliminated
    3. Count 3: purpose: distributing McGivern's transfers; outcome: Smith eliminated
    4. Count 4: purpose: distributing Smith's transfers; outcome: Weir eliminated
    5. Count 5: purpose: distributing Weir's transfers; outcome: McIlveen elected
    6. Count 6: purpose: distribution of McIlveen's surplus; outcome: Harvey elected
    7. Count 7: purpose: distribution of Harvey's surplus; outcome: ????
    8. Count 8: purpose: ????

    After the 7th count I would have thought that Nick Mathison would have been eliminated as he was 46 votes behind Conor Houston. Instead there was an 8th count where he passed him out and now Houston has been eliminated instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 865 ✭✭✭Icemancometh


    I've no idea in this instance, but sometimes they do counts to see if someone can get enough votes for expenses.

    Edit: sorry, I misunderstood you there. No idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭BaywatchHQ


    I don't vote due to my general misanthropy and dislike of individual politicians but if I had to I would have voted Aontu. Maybe I should spoil my ballot sheet at elections. I can't vote Sinn Fein due to their ultra feminist image nowadays and their general far left agenda. I don't really have a party to vote for. It also disgusted me what that Sinn Fein woman said in one of her historical tweets about "looking like a retard". I don't care if she was 19 when she made it, people who use phrases like that aren't what I want to be voting for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Looking almost certain for SF 28 DUP 25



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    This is still bamboozling me. If you look at the total number of votes by each count the number of votes should always be equal or lower in every subsequent round - that's because extra ballots cannot be added into the system after Count 1, but they can be removed from the count in the case where they are non-transferrable.

    Here's how the Total progresses by count (Note: If someone gets elected their vote total = the Quota in subsequent rounds to avoid double counting their surplus votes):

    1. 40,865
    2. 40,550
    3. 40,393
    4. 40,348
    5. 40,300
    6. 40,289
    7. 40,286
    8. 40,423
    9. 39,238


    So in that mysterious Count 8 an additional 137 votes appear out of nowhere and are distributed to the 4 remaining candidates:

    • Nesbitt (+7)
    • Cooper (+2)
    • Houston (+21)
    • Mathison (+107)


    This makes absolutely no sense but it was pivotal as Mathison leap-frogged Houston who was eliminated and Mathison was subsequently elected on the back of his transfers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I looked up the official results site and found a spreadsheet showing the various stages. It explains how the figures add up but honestly it throws up even more questions than answers.

    So, it seems that although Kellie Armstrong was elected on Count 1, they waited until Count 8 to distribute her surplus. They distributed the surpluses of the two DUP candidates, who were elected after her, before they distributed her surplus - that doesn't make any sense whatsoever to me. It does resolve the issue with the extra ballots appearing out of nowhere though - I had assumed that Armstrong's votes were distributed after Round #1


    Edit: I think the way it must work is that her surplus was so small (204 votes) that it wouldn't have been enough, at any earlier stage, to bridge the gap between any of the lower order candidates. Instead they just eliminated them one by one and transferred their votes. After Round 7 the gap between the two lowest candidates (46 votes) was suddenly lower than her surplus so at that point they distributed it rather than eliminating the last place candidate.

    I might be wrong but I don't believe they would have done it this way in an election in the Republic. I think they would have done the surplus and eliminations together after Count #1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,614 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    edit after seeing the answer was on a page I missed:

    No, we would have done the same thing here - you don't merge surpluses with elimination votes and you use the highest amount of votes available to transfer at a time. In this case it was the dual elimination.

    Sometimes small surpluses never get transferred as they could never actually change the result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,540 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Cara Hunter was re-elected, lovely stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    Sad to see so many constituencies with NO Nationalist representatives now, East Antrim, East Belfast, Strangford, Lagan Valley & North Down. especially losing nationalists in lagan valley and upper bann



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    If the non-designated parties are going to gain then it stands to reason that this is going to come at the cost of both nationalist and unionist seats. I believe that it's for the best in the long run that that happens. Having SF with the most seats is also good in that now it's no longer the elephant in the room and just another bridge crossed on the road to Northern Irish politics becoming less dysfunctional.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I was looking at the Belfast Telegraph results where it shows every count. Now, it appears to be counting fractions of a vote.

    That is not how we do it. No wonder it is taking a lot longer to count.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 116 ✭✭Charrychar


    Sinn Fein taking power in Ireland, they started with a few rusty WW2 weapons in 1969 and now they are the most popular party in Ireland North and South.

    Amazing how far they have come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Delighted that the TUV didn't get more than one seat. Jim Allister gets a disgracefully disproportionate amount of radio time on the Nolan show and no doubt will be there on the BBC on Monday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 946 ✭✭✭bricksNDmortar


    What a bloody 2 days. Absolutely delighted for every candidate who took the plunge knocking doors for Caral and GK the last few weeks.

    Continual growth, North and South.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    They transfer % of the votes/surpluses, not actual votes like we do - hence didn't they transfer a "zero" vote the geeks in the BBC I studio were salivating at it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    I think it is bad to not have a nationalist presence in constituencies east of the bann, alliance are soft unionists, did they not designate themselves such once to bail out davey trimble



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands



    This is something I asked before and no one gave me an answer on how votes are transferred.

    In the South, if someone has a surplus, do they count all second preference votes and the distribute as a % of the surplus?

    And how are votes transferred when there are people excluded? Do they look at all 2nd,3rd etc votes of all candidates and distribute the percentages amongst the total votes of the one voted out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,614 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    On the first count, we count the lot and divide by the proportion

    On every other count, they're taken off the top of the stack.

    When excluded, the votes just go on what's next. There is no need to figure anything out, every single paper is moved.


    We do however do fractional transfers for the Seanad vocational panel elections due to tiny electorates - the votes are multiplied by a thousand to avoid using decimal points!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    That seems like a bit of luck involved so, some regions could vary a lot.

    I still get confused. When the first person is eliminated are all second preference votes of those remaining counted and then the votes are distributed as a % of the eliminated persons votes?

    Or is it only second preference votes of the eliminated candidate?

    And if its a % of the eliminated candidates votes, is it % of the total valid votes or is it % of total votes, i.e eliminated candidates votes are excluded



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,614 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    When a person is eliminated, every single vote is moved to the next person down. They are eliminated, the votes have nowhere else to go.

    If those votes were first or eleven thousandth preference, they just move down.

    No % stuff comes in to play. When eliminated, ALL your votes go to the next person down. If there is one.


    Splitting stuff up only applies to surpluses when elected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    The funniest thing I heard from the Stormont Election when things looked worse for the UUP was, would there be any UUP MLA who had not already been leader! ( I think 1/2 of them have been now, Swann, Nesbitt, Elliot, Agnew )

    As it is always a sectarian headcount

    I make it 37 Unionists ( DUP/UUP/TUV/Sugdon/Easton)

    and 35 Nationalists (SF/SDLP)

    The Brexit supporting PBP more Nationalist than say the Socialist Party



  • Advertisement
Advertisement