Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1157158160162163485

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,652 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Wandsworth also gone Labour. Some of it not the lowest council taxes in the country are those councils, with matching non existent service provision.

    edit: the absolute lowest



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Another council that also has some of the poorest in the country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Tories just took a battering in the first Scottish count released which was a massive stronghold.

    Tweeddale West (Scottish Borders) 1st Prefs:

    Con: 28.1% (-15.7)

    SNP: 26.2% (+1.1)

    LD: 22.8% (+6.1)

    Grn: 16.4% (+11.7)

    Lab: 6.5% (+2.1)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I suspect the Green vote will mostly go SNP. Scottish Independence seems to be the one big difference between the Greens and LDs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Labour have gone from 0 councillors ever (est.1974) in Worthing to level on 17 in the last election to control today.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Tories actually managed to take a council from Labour in the middle of this mess. Harrow has flipped



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Seems to be a lot more protest votes in England, especially up north and in the Midlands than anyone was expecting. If you look at the various polls reported over the last few days, nobody thought the Lib Dems would gain as much as they had. Shocking to see Labour down by more than the Tories in those areas too.

    There is really only two parties votes that matter in general election and a vote for the Lib Dems and the Greens is going to be a vote for Boris Johnson, especially considering the fact that the Lib Dems have form for propping up the Tories.

    Labour's problem is in the midlands and up north, sadly it seems that the attitude of 'He got Brexit done' still prevails in many of these areas in terms of Tory popularity, it seems that it is all that matters to these people, which tells you the state of politics in the UK.

    It's a bad night for the Conservatives but it could have been worse so no worse than a bad night. For Labour it's a mixed set of results, they've done well in the South and particularly in London and made some progress in the East, Scotland and Wales. But if they have any hope of winning an election they need to do far better in the Midlands and the North where their performance was poor.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Some interesting observations in the graphs in this tweet

    Namely

    • The more likely to vote Brexit, the less likely you are to ditch the Tories
    • The more likely you are to be a grad, the less likely you are to vote Tory.

    Not surprising really as it goes along the lines of other votes we have seen in the UK over the years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So much of this is so incredibly wrong. General elections have nothing got to do with these votes as people like myself might vote green in a council election because they might have a chance but be solid Labour In a GE. Votes for Lib Dems usually steal from Tories not Labour so that's wrong.

    The Lib Dems always do well out of Tory slumps and this was a big slump so forget the could have been worse crap. As for the "red wall" the idea that Labour need it is antiquated just the same as SE England will never vote Labour.

    Sky put this at an 80 seat GE drop for the Tories and BBC 116 seat drop but of course the "could have been worse" and Labour "need to do better" gaslighting begins in earnest



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Now that Starmer is being investigated by the police in Durham, is there possibly a card or two he could play here?

    Could he come out and say that if he is found guilty he will resign?

    • If he does get found guilty, he's painting himself and the party out of being one of principle and of standards and integrity. This would make the Tory party seem even more out of touch and also leave Johnson in a rather precarious position, as Labour could point to the fact that they owned their mistakes and take responsibility for them, whereas the Tory party and Johnson doesn't.
    • If he isn't found guilty, he can just carry on and say that unlike Boris, he was prepared to take responsibility, but he hasn't been found guilty, but that Johnson should now do the decent thing and resign like he was going to and show he has the same level as integrity that Starmer is showing.

    Obviously instead of resigning he could put things to the vote of the Parliamentary Labour Party for example, but thinking about this situation, Starmer resigning may not be the best outcome for them. The best outcome for the Tories really would be Starmer being found guilty and carrying on. It'll just mean people paint both of Johnson and Starmer as bad as each other, which is better for the Tories than to have a leader hanging on no matter what when the opposition have took their medicine so to speak.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I acknowledge that in these set of local elections the Lib Dems have book votes away from the Tories, I'm not doubting that whatsoever. That's not always been the case in past GE though.

    I know that the wishy washy appetite of Labour to Brexit meant that Labour voters traded their votes for Lib Dems in the past as a proper remain party. There were also some more centrist voters as well which would never vote Tory, but also felt they couldn't vote for Labour under Corbyn. I know many people like that. Maybe it's just the circle of people I work with, socialise with and am friends with, but that is generally where they would position themselves. The above analysis still continues to show that the Tory party are strongest in the highest leave voting areas and the Lib Dems are doing better in the least leave voting areas.

    I'm not quite sure why you feel I am gaslighting because I voted Labour in an area that was previously Labour and I hate the Tories with a passion, but the simple fact is the last poll I saw on Sky suggests that the Tories will just about be ahead on seats in a GE and it would be a hung Parliament. To get a Labour majority Government Labour are going to need to improve in the North and the Midlands, they're doing well in the South and in London, totally, but the North and the Midlands are going to need to fair better in a GE to get a majority Labour Government. I know the Tory seat count will collapse, but the UK needs a strong Labour government, not a weak one, and to get a strong Labour government they need to fair better up North and in the midlands.

    I'm not saying that you are wrong and the voting patterns you see might well be reflected in many parts of the UK in terms of Tories lending their vote to the Lib Dems, it's just from my personal experience I've known far more Labour people to do it. I hate the Tories with a passion, I'd rather vote for anyone but them, so please don't think I'm out to defend them.

    Also you're claiming that Labour are doing well, but also acknowledge that there is a lot of votes being lent from the Tory backers to the Lib Dems. What happens at a general election? You would have to imagine that some Tories who vote Lib Dems in a local will go back the Tory party in a general, which would push the seat count up of the Tories. Therefore that means Labour are going to need to get some more seats to be the largest party, let alone have a majority. There's no way they can do that without improving their showing in the North and the Midlands, it's basic arithmetic. I'm afraid you need to take the red tinted glasses off on this one.

    The idea that Labour are on course for an election win right now is rather fanciful. The results overall are fairly good news for Labour and they are heading in the right direction overall, but the job isn't over and they need to use last night as something to build on to deliver a strong, Labour government to reverse all the damage that the Tories have done over the years. The country really needs it. What it doesn't need is an instable coalition of chaos or a minority government. The damage that the Tories have done to the UK means that the country needs a strong and stable Labour Government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    If you vote Labour in a Labour voting area I'm gonna guess you know more Labour voters than Tories so there for you know more Labour people who switched to Lib Debs obviously but Lib Dems are far more likely to take Tory seats.

    Look at the 34 current Tory holds and tell me which ones you think Labour should have taken or turned NOC. Outside Harrow it's all obvious holds and everywhere else is a sht show.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,815 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    That didn't work out well for Corbyn though. It's overplayed in how Much of a motivation it is for the electorate.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,509 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I didn't say it was a motivation for the electorate. Corbyn failed for a host of reasons but ultimately because he was an unprincipled and dismal leader. A good protest organiser, sure but that's not remotely the same as leading Britain's opposition party.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,652 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Alba got zero seats in Scotland. In STV elections.

    Salmond needs to accept his time is up



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Independent Andy Solloway was declared the winner in the Skipton West and West Craven division of the new North Yorkshire unitary authority on Friday after tying with Labour’s Peter Madeley on 503 votes, even after a recount at Skipton Town Hall.

    Madeley literally drew the short straw. Democracy in action.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Labour now the middle class party of choice for voters in Metropolitan areas in England.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Which is great when added to the fact they are also still the working class choice in metropolitan areas



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Noticed that. The local Labour party must have phuckt up badly for that to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    If that was the case, Labour would be on about 70%



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Whilst the notion of fining people retrospectively for gatherings during covid and using resources to deal with it, is completely daft and ridiculous, it would seem that if the police in England find Starmer guilty of any rule break, will mean he will have to resign given his fierce stance on the Downing Street parties.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    As stated up thread, if he was to resign, that wouldn't necessarily work out favourably for the Tories if Johnson doesn't go as well as Labour could paint themselves as the party of taking responsibility for their actions when found guilty and the Tories of the party who don't. This is especially the case if Starmer comes out and says that he will resign before the verdict is reached by the Police.

    Not withstanding that though, it is amusing to see Tories saying Starmer should resign if he said one thing that was incorrect, having spent months backing up their own leader of doing many many more things and much worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,667 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Nonsense.

    Has Boris resigned? no...

    Series of parties...a wine fridge...a suitcase to bring in the booze. Make no mistake it was a culture of rule breaking.

    Versus someone having a takeaway and a beer in a constituency office with a couple of staff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's not the Tories who will look for his resignation, it will be his own party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    That may be the case but Johnson has survived for now. The Tories seemed unwilling to ditch him and the results today aren't bad enough to change that.

    Starmer, on the other hand, has made such a big deal of the Party scandal, that he now appears in deep trouble.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Fools gold in the Tory press tomorrow, as since my earlier post things have got worse for the Tories, looking like approx. 450 losses now and probably will be closer to 500 by the time that everything is said and done. which is far in excess of anything that the Tory press were predicting over the past few days.

    The Mail reckoned that a loss of anything more than 350 seats would be a disaster and they look like they're going to beat that by some margin. All the more amusing is the Mail tomorrow which is now claiming it wasn't a bad night for the Tories (even though by their own metrics it was!), but it's the Daily Tor...sorry Express who are clearly on the kool-aid who believe that it was a better than expected result for Boris, who is now 'back on track.

    I still maintain Labour didn't do as well as they might have done, but anyone who reckons that the Tories did well is seriously deluded. The losses they have struck up are worse than what most commentators were expecting and even the Tory media themselves, so for much of the same media to come out saying it was a good night is laughable. They may as well just admit they're full-on Tory propaganda outlets.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    According to Tory outlet, the Daily Mail, anything over 350 losses would be a disaster, it's closer to 500.

    Not quite sure how anyone objective could consider that the Tories have done well in an election. Literally the Tories biggest supporters have said over 350 would be a disaster and it's way over that in terms of seat losses.

    I know the Daily Mail speak a completely different tune in tomorrows morning, but you know, it needs to tow the party line, which is far more important than actually judging the results based on the criteria they actually set beforehand?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    What are Tory MPs saying?

    That's what matters.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,639 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    So you agree, that if the leader of the Labour Party does something wrong, the party will decide that action needs to be taken against them and therefore does not accept such actions in their party?

    I'm not quite sure that's the point to the Tories that you think it is, because all it will prove is that the Labour party does not tolerate that kind of behaviour, unlike the Tory party, who has literally watched Johnson lie and bluster and do nothing about it.



Advertisement