Russia

You do not have to believe me. I am just one cog in the wheel who believes in it. A lively discussion took place on the international Skeptics forum regarding the red/grey chips found in the WTC towers. There is far more technical knowledge displayed there than I could possibly provide. It was a great discussion between both of them. It is well worth reading. Laypeople may find the nano-thermite explantation strange,, but after a time all makes sense when the science has a great deal of evidence to support it. 

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=289588

There is an important to know about the red/grey chips The chips ignite when heated up to 430° C (that is never the case with standard thermite. The energetic reaction here is creating heat that creates Iron microspheres on the end of the chips. Clearly as Jay stated, this is advanced manufactured material. The presence of iron microspheres is very strong evidence the red/gray chips contain the ingredients for thermite. What other materials in the building, when heated to 430 degrees Celsius, would produce pure iron spheres? There is nothing.

Aluminum oxide question) It makes perfect sense, how would you know if you weren't looking for it. When the building collapses, everything goes off in all directions. What is clear the red/grey chips are remarkable that can produce pure Iron from very low heat. Typically, it takes more heat than that to produce molten iron.

Here, what needs to be confronted is that the red/gray chips contained nanoscale ingredients of thermite. However, since the ingredients for thermite are already present, why does the aluminum oxide not remain after ignition? There are a few possible explanations. 

 Harritt and his team believe that nano-thermite was engineered, and so there is likely a great deal they do not know about how it was made. In observing what is happening with red and grey through scientific tests and so on, we learn a lot, whoever made it knows more.  

 The debunkers would be correct in their analysis if nano-thermite ingredients were missing. This is not the case here, so we are left with a mystery as to how the nano-thermite ingrédients ended up in this mixture of other chemicals in the dust collected after the towers came down?.

 In addition, a byproduct did appear, so I must ask, how does 430 degrees Celsius heat produce Molten iron? It is clear the chips contained the ingredients for thermite, disputing waste of time.

Only at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have nano thermites with a similar composition produced molten iron at similar temperatures. Therefore, whatever the red chips and grey chips are not commercially available

Furthermore, Harris and his team observed that an explosive pressure gas was released from the chips after they were ignited. If there is something here, perhaps this would explain that huge mushroom when the structure broke apart and why steel that weighed tons and tons and ended up on streets blocks away. The top half of the building had an explosive volcano, which erupts from the pressure of whatever gas is inside? Although this is unclear, the discovery of the gas is an interesting find.

To me, nano thermite explains a lot about why liquids were pouring out of the towers while it was still burning. The odd steel anomalies that were revealed in the FEMA reports concerning the 2001 investigations, the iron sphere anomalies, the heat in the rubble for weeks, all point to that steel was being melted down before the collapse. 

https://www.us-nano.com/inc/sdetail/593 

Iron Oxide Fe2O3 Nanopowder 

It was a part of the mixture. However, unsure why that matters. Maybe the following link will help? This is the prices in 2020, just imagine what the cost was in 2001. To find this in chips is highly unusual. How much is a can of paint? 

The fact that this is manufactured for sale is another clue. 

There is too much controversy surrounding 9/11. In spite of what they believe privately, none of the big companies will question the official narrative. As part of this initiative, AE911 truth has met with ASCE members, who were shocked to discover how poorly the study was done. ASCE top brass began to threaten members who had shown no interest in the topic before from talking with AE911 truth. This shows that they feel threatened by the movement since they were one of the groups siding with NIST. It will have knock-on effects that will result in more engineers siding with the truth movement as the only way to stop it is threatening expulsion.. The world is a sad one, we fear debating this topic.

There are currently legal actions pending in the UK and the United States to have genuine hearings about the collapses. What makes you fear a lawsuit if there is nothing to this? In court, NIST could simply toss out the 911 truth and get its reputation back. However, they are resisting like hell having to explain their study in court. 

Regarding the Saudis, it appears the families have obtained a video that the UK police had for twenty years which showed a Saudi spy having dinner with two of the 9/11 hijackers. Even after all this time, the images of all the people in the room continue to be blocked. The media is just as complicit in the cover-up, with a short segment on the subject. Why did it take so long for a video to be released? 

See the process in action by watching the Russians versus the Ukrainians. The entire western pro official media has reported on how poorly the Russian forces are performing.They attribute this to a weak army and poorly led forces, forecasting that the Russians would exhaust all their missiles by the end of March.. Even convinced people that the entire Russian army would be forced over the border by summer. By broadcasting shite every night and watching it on Twitter and forum sites, it is quite possible to convince a large number of people to believe in fake news. 

The Russians are presently preparing the eastern battlefield one battle at a time, destroying Ukrainian defenses and leaving nothing but bodies behind (a tragic development). An encirclement has begun, with roads being destroyed and bridges being taken down, enclosing the area within a giant bubble. Russia is destroying them day by day, whereas the Ukrainian army prefers to fabricate a scenario in which a man was aboard MiG 29 and killing Russian pilots by the dozens. They create fake videos of attacks and create false stories in order to boost morale. This is not true, but Ukrainian supporters love it and believe it is all happening.

If you can convince the majority of westerners that Ukraine has a superman army, they will believe absurdities about JFK and 9/11, too. . It's all about what's between the lines. I find that funny, but I see how easily people can be beguiled by media nonsense.

The media, particularly newspapers, ignored a number of issues regarding 9/11. There was a significant amount of political pressure coming from the White House, which led to the publication of only stories that conformed with the official version. After 9/11, there were many conspiracy stories that were never published. As we see in Epstein's story, the NBC channel learned of Prince Andrew's involvement a decade ago but was threatened by the Royal family that it would be removed from a contract to film a royal wedding and take photographs and video. Priorities were set for the royal wedding and the story was removed and saw what happened a decade later

. There has been an increase in censorship as a result of Washington think tanks being involved in internet bans and preventing 9/11 discussions. In the open, free internet, political bias should not be forced upon others. Want stories only depict the United States as good guys. Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit have become the media arms of the United States government policy. As soon as Professor Hulsey published his study, how many newspapers published it?

They sent the study to top networks, but if it were a story about Kardashian ass implants, they would not have difficulty printing that. Finding it strange that a building of this type falls down from fire at freefall for the first time in history, and that a study refuting it was not considered a newsworthy event. For me, there is a blocking of anything that questions officialdom narratives and stuff ends up on alternative websites instead of on the mainstream. It is nothing new for intelligence agencies to use media for their own purposes. (Operation Mockingbird) CNN even has a reporter who did some work on site for the CIA,  Anderson Cooper many more, all part of the plan to keep narratives controlled, 

You are expressing an extreme view by thinking that Russia has nothing to worry about when Washington was sending aircraft loads of weapons to Ukraine years before the invasion began. Playing deaf, dumb, and blind at this point. While Putin invited the West to resolve the Ukraine issue once and for all, the West turned its back on him. It was Zelensky who was led down a dangerous path and he still cannot understand that this was not about his country, but a means to win the new Cold War against Russia. They give billions of dollars in aid of weapons, but do not care about the state of Ukraine, they only care about the Russian military machine being hit, and none of their own boys are being killed. Ukraine and Russia could have lived side by side peacefully in the negotiated deal, however, the weapons are merely a sign that the UK and US have another agenda.

Three of the conspiracies you mentioned involved actual terrorist attacks. One of them was carried out by a teenager. at a school. Comparing it with 9/11 is laughable and a distraction from all the anomalies associated with the collapse and all the evidence found in the rubble.

I cannot take you seriously if you are unwilling to investigate the collapse of Seven. My post 83 went unanswered. Avoiding the topic and then claiming that I am not showing you anything

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058242856/russia/p3 83 post in there have a look answer truthfully?

This website provides a concise summary of each complaint made regarding the official study of the collapses. It displays actual construction drawings side by side with NIST drawings and shows all the elements removed, which are critical and explains why they are important. This website illustrates the mistakes NIST made after getting caught, not just freefall. Reading this, one would have to be pretty closed-minded to not see that something is very wrong with the official narrative. The official narrative gets you in the dark on almost all issues. I have found this website to be one of the best I have come across recently.

Have read all, even entertains you. Have a good night!

https://isgp-studies.com/911-wtc-7-collapse-nist-failure-to-disprove-controlled-demolition-thermate