Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1341342344346347808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    From an economic perspective its tennant new entrants that are getting hammered. This has serious implications for competitiveness and the housing sector could well be killing the golden goose its feeding from.

    I would imagine that the increasing financialisation of the sector, little regard is given to this as its all about bleeding the asset, increasing its value and offloading it to the next fool before it all collapses.

    One thing about SF policy is they were trying to lure long term investment funds who are attracted to stable markets that are less exposed to boom bust market policies



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Yes I agree with you in terms of rent, but the ERSI Model (Linked Above) I am talking about is about how they calculate the housing inflation for Owner Occupied Housing and they do it by using this Rental Equivalence Model. My problem is the way the model is constructed as it was previously 2/3 long terms rental >5 years and 1/3 new rentals (prior to the pandemic and it actually according to their report validated and tracked the real shelter inflation quite accurately). In the last 6 months most people returning back from WFH and abroad are entering the new rental side as opposed to the long term low rents. This means that the weights for calculating (3/4 new 1/4 long term more like now) this inflation are wrong and hence downplaying the rate of shelter inflation in Irelands overall CPI figure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Stats can be more about determining the narrative than giving you picture of what's going on.

    If inflation in the USA was measured the same way as it was in the 70/80's it would be double its current reading.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    Figures on CBI site (who publish this quarterly) show as at December 21, 19.4bn of lending had a fixed duration of 3-5 years, 10bn was fixed 1-3 years, 2.2bn greater than 5. On the floating rate side, 17.1bn was tracker, 13.5bn was SVR, and 2bn was fixed up to a year. The 3-5 year fix has been gaining popularity the past 2 years increasing from 10bn to 20bn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm on year 5 of a 10 year fixed rate mortgage, it was clear at that time (4.25years ago) that QE needed to be stopped and rates gradually raised. It was done but the central banks panicked when it crashed the stock market, despite the economy being in rather healthy state

    Given where we are now, I think it would have been much better had they persisted in 2018 or at least not reversed and accelerate in the opposite direction. That would have halved the asset price bubble they are now trying to unwind in much more precarious economic conditions



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    The similarity with circa. 08 is that there is currently a crisis brewing where people are getting poorer. The reason why this is, is different to circa. 08 of course as today it is from high inflation where cash is not going as far in our day to day lives. However, in terms of a safety net for people, unlike after 08, QE can't be a solution to resolve the issue of a lack of cash in people's pockets because excessive QE is creating the problem that needs to be fixed!

    Which translates to a very quickly receding tide of liquidity and no replacement water to come in and keep all the boats in the harbour afloat. The central banks actually have to take a backseat and let the chips fall where they may; it's important that everyone has their own nest egg (ie savings) for the bumpy ride that's coming. The zombie companies will be taking a bath as will the hyper inflated valuations of certain assets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 44 dubh laoch


    I thought this was a good article written about Ronan Lyons, Daft and today's rental figures:


    https://villagemagazine.ie/donkeys-led-by-lyons/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    whopper headline anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Back above 12,200

    Myhome

    Property for Sale in Ireland - 12217 Results



  • Administrators Posts: 53,754 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think it's a pretty average attempt at a hatchet job. I guess Ronan Lyons is perceived as an easy target.

    It is somewhat amusing that this article goes after Lyons yet bemoans the fact that Orla Hegarty, a known twitter crank / conspiracy theorist, is not given enough attention.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Have to agree, he can't account for the stuff he can't account for but surely daft.ie asking rental values are a strong indicator of where the market is trending.

    Meanwhile

    the leader of the party responsible for high rent prices says rents are too high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭jj880


    You have to hand it to Leo. He looms out of the crowd as the most sociopathic of all sociopaths in the Dail. He couldn't give 2 sh!tes about people struggling to pay rent in this country. Now we're gona have to listen to more of this sickening nonsense the closer it gets to him taking over from Martin. Hes a low life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Daft only shows the asking pirces of the ones advertised.

    The average is going up because cheaper rentals are leaving the market to be partially replaced by much more expensive new lets.

    It makes no sense anymore to get into providing rentals. It also makes no sense to buy a former rental with the rent locked to let.

    It makes no sense to keep a property you are letting with the rent locked below the market rate and no way to even meet inflation. Lots of work, risk and pain for too little gain.

    The only new rentals that come on the market will be those which are not rent locked, so that the market rate can be charged for them, increasing the market rent too.

    So you have the cheaper properties leaving the market. More expensive ones coming on. The people who used to rent the cheaper ones now have to rent the new expensive ones because there is less supply. Average price of rentals shoots up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,571 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Ive seen some signs that things are starting to cool off.

    A house near me has been reduced by €35k asking price. It was listed for what i consider a high price but I wouldn't have been surprised if it had gone to that price after some bidding the way things have gone over the last while.

    Another house couldn't hit the sales target the seller wanted and it was returned to rental. It wasnt a mad amount that the seller was looking for.

    Both houses in the semi D family home pretty standard suburban stuff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I wonder if this is the rentals coming on stream , properties for rent have gone to an all time low. Looks like more landlords running for the hills due to the ridiculous laws in this country



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Was at a furniture store ( branch's in all the main cities) last weekend and got in conversation with the manager. They are expecting a difficult year, many orders have been cancelled due to escalating costs of works on renovations. There scaling back the renovations also.

    If homeowners are feeling the pinch imagine what the growing renting demographic are experiencing

    Amazon making a loss is an eyeopener

    Growth in retail in the US was significantly less than the rate of inflation, yet the growth was spinned as a positive. Same with job numbers viewed as a positive but a significant drop in labour participation rate



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    It would make sense for landlords to sell rented properties that have a historical low rent to homeowners and then buy a new property that wasn’t previously rented out so that they could rent at new market rate and not be restricted by the rent pressure zones….Not to sure if this loophole exists but if it does it will push up house prices and should be closed to bring some sort of stability to rents and house prices



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    I think if any landlord has been broken enough to have to sell their current rental, they are not going to be buying another one ... ever :)

    Nice little collection of selling and buying costs (solicitors, EAs, Stamp duty and what have you) in there too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    And let’s not forget CGT but if the rental difference is large enough it would make sense assuming that they can find a property that they get a half descent yield on



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,571 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I know of two people due to start their own build this year that have pulled the plug a while.

    The risk of starting a project that you are already maxed out on budget wise having 20-50% price increases on some materials would stall any prudent person.

    Also price is one reason and probably the biggest, but uncertainty of supply is also a factor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 368 ✭✭keoclassic


    And its not just individuals who have stopped. I know of 2 large developments that have stopped for the moment until price's stabilise. We had intended to build but were refused planning. Even if we got the planning, we would now not be able to afford to build what we had drawn up initially. An increase to the tune of 60-70thousand on a 228sqr mtr build. Insane. This whole thing is a fiasco. Government need to start rezoning lands, and reducing the massive tampering that they are doing in the housing market. Reducing hap and pri ces paid for social housing would be a big start! maybe let the rest of us have a chance of getting g what social occupiers are getting..........and guess what.! ..... We'll even pay for it ourselves!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Unless you are planning on storing an airplane then why the need for such a large house? If you cut it down to 150 square meters that is still a fine size house and you would save yourself a fortune.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,571 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    If the government reduce hap then the people in those houses will have to pay more, and they are generally a lot of the working poor who work but dont earn enough for their own place



  • Registered Users Posts: 368 ✭✭keoclassic


    That's correct yes. Then, rents are too high. Reduce hap and rents will follow. Same for housing, try bidding against the council and see which side you come out on. Inflation of assets and rents directly through current policy. I know its not the poor that are to blame, its the policy of our current government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,571 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Reduce hap and the tenant has to An make up more shortfall.

    rents wont drop because supply doesnt exist to allow tenants to move to find a cheaper place or have their landlord reduce their rent to stop them moving.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭fergus1001


    I have been told that two concrete suppliers and block makers are going onto a 3 day week because of lack of activity


    Things are cooling off, only the foolish left in the market now



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Two houses near me in galway for sale, one listed at 400,000 just gone sale agreed for 540,000 the other listed at 395,000 bidding has reached 500,000 both are in need of work and both were previously rentals. Both are only on the market about 3 weeks.

    There are a lot of empty houses around the place when you walk through the city some in the fair deal some in probate. But I get the impression that some landlords are sitting on property to see how high rents will go they don't want to be tied in now at lower rents now if they continue to rise. A lot are availing of the 90 days short term rental while more work they can get simular money in 90 days as they would renting out for a whole year.

    The other issue is landlords have a fear of renting with over holding. Bad tenants are too well protected, 2-3 months is a reasonable time for an eviction not years. We have pushed for a more professional rental marked for tenants while it has been a disaster in terms of cost and availability it generally has improved the standard of rental stock. The only way to improve the situation now is to see how we can improve things for landlords so they will bring properties back to the longterm rental market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Fair point to some degree. I was a landlord briefly. When the tenants decided to unilaterally pay less, I felt I was being robbed and then realized there was almost nothing I could do about it. 6 - 9 months would be a more reasonable compromise.

    The problem is there is nowhere for people to go that cannot pay rent. We're a failed state in that regard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    I still maintain there will be a tribunal looking into ABP in 10-15 years time, these stories are getting ridicoulous and have even moved beyond the initial Paul Hyde farce.



    An ABP board member granted planning permission for a 493-unit scheme to a developer that hired her architecture firm to design another of its developments.


    She did not disclose her 33 percent holding in the firm, which she co-owns with her husband.


    Oakmount, Press Up Entertainment co-owner Paddy McKillen jnr’s property development group, is one of FKL Architects’ clients. Oakmount engaged the architecture firm for the design of its 48-unit Pinnacle development in Mount Merrion, Dublin 4.


    The ABP board in a 12 April meeting last year voted to approve the development.


    Fagan didn’t disclose her shareholding in her annual declaration to the board. Planning legislation however provides that only an interest in a business “which relates to dealing in or developing land” should be declared.





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭combat14


    hap up is only artificially driving up rental and property prices and encouraging many not to even bother looking for work

    time for a major over haul but no political appetite



Advertisement