"Green" policies are destroying this country

Back to the scaremongering again. Please clarify how many indians or pakistans deaths can be directly be linked to climate change. I guarantee you that on the ground in the above countries they dont give a fiddlers about eamon ryan trying to save the planet

Mayebe get a dictionary and inform yourself

Scaremongering:the spreading of frightening or ominous reports or rumours.

Please inform me of all these climate change deaths in asia? you seee thats the problem with the greens, they just throw out some made up bullshit and expect no one to challenge it. Your comment was an attempt at scaremongering a frequent green tactic.

Another piece of information and a fact for you... the beloved green agenda is as much concerned about human rights as Qatar are.

Utter stupidity from the EU and state governments that kowtow to them. You missed the important piece from that article.

Food shortages will get MUCH worse into 2023, and we will see major power failures this year across Europe. You cannot run an electrical grid on random energy, the operators are creating a complex, expensive unreliable grid. The ECB can only issue more debt, the cost of debt is rising, they can't fix the broken supply chains that are causing shortages and leading to rationing through prices, the EU and ECB combined will make living conditions worse.

• Traders warn of looming global diesel shortage
• Home heating oil and commercial diesel supplies capped in Ireland as demand surges
• Energy and fertiliser price rise likely to cause long-term issues for farmers, Teagasc says
• Price of your takeaway could soon cost a lot more, Dáil committee hears
• Covid pushes national debt up to €236bn
• Ireland needs to tackle ‘zombie’ companies, says leading law firm

You can see from the above there is not just one single major problem from that list we must deal with, climate is not among them. Everything we do requires energy, climate legislation and taxes are a problem that forces up the cost of living because they restrict energy consumption and production. Examine that piece of paper that then Taoiseach Enda Kenny signed in Paris back in 2015. Read up on the ratchet mechanism of the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). The policies derived from this when combined with the above must negatively impact us over the next few years and will become a lightning rod for severe disaffection across the European political system, not just in Ireland. There are already the yellow vests in France, there have been strong protests from farmers in the Netherlands and Germany. In this country the implementation of Green policies derived from the INDCs combined with the cost of living rises due to supply shortages may well see a backlash from rural voters in particular, since the social and financial impact of these Green policies fall more heavily on people who don't vote Green, the voters will punish their partners in government and vote independents and SF over FF/FG.

I did and yet again the result was you do not have a clue.

This LFG you talk about is natural gas liquefied, and contrary to what you posted, and which I have shown you, there is no shortage of natural gas in either Qatar or the U.S. In fact the E.U. is in negotiations with the U.S. for supplies of LNG which they now view as a green energy transitional source.

Based on your inflated price for an LNG terminal of 1 billion, 3 proposed off-shore wind farms will cost 10X times that and like their on-shore cousins have shown, will only produce when the wind is blowing. How much and when would depend on how strongly. That is the reason we need either or preferably both LNG and hopefully Barryroe. Both of which the Green Party muppets are determined to prevent without a single viable alternative.

Hell I even sorted your worries about pipelines. As to your heartfelt concern for violations of human rights in Qatar, with you not being pushed about the same in China, again you are either very misinformed or it was just something you threw in disingenuously because it suited your narrative.

Extreme weather attribution is mostly fodder for tabloid headlines generated by computer modelling and is not evidence of climate change. The underlying motive for weather attribution studies does have a nefarious purpose seen in litigation cases and openly admitted as such.

Yet more hyperbole by people caught up in the imaginary world of the climate apocalypse.

If you look at the last 100 to 150 years since climate data began to be recorded widely, it has been remarkably stable and benign. Even taking into account the last ~13,000 years since the last major glaciation ended, climate has been stable. Having said that, the little ice age lasted ~500 years and had much more destructive climate that what we have now, we would be in very bad shape presently if the climate conditions of the peak of the little ice age returned. Can you imagine a year without a summer due to temporary volcanic forcing happening today how much a big reduction in agriculture crops with ~7 billion people to feed. As it is there is a man made war between Russia and Ukraine that is already having an impact on availability of food.

If we look further since the last glacial advances ~100,000 years ago, that climate would be catastrophic to modern civilisation. Expecting that natural variation in climate to be stable and benign is not the default position for how climate works. We advanced over the last 150 years because of very benign climate (and abundant fossil fuels leading to the industrial revolution) and if natural variation changes for any reason, then our troubles are here to stay no matter what the CO2 level is. Thinking that reducing CO2 levels will somehow guarantee natural variation stays stable is a fools errand. The climate is always in transition from one state to another over short seasonal time scales to very long time scales, and the proper answer should be how do we adapt to whatever Mother Nature throws our way. If we continue to believe that we can now tame the weather and control the climate long term, then we are delusional.

If those actresses really want to explore a dystopian view they should try a world where the energy they are allowed consume is determined by their social credit score.

If you cannot express whatever relevant points you believe it made, or are just to lazy to, then why would I waste my time listening to it ?

Especially to humour someone who refuses to answer anything they are asked.

If that podcast agrees with you that Qatar and the U.S. cannot supply their own domestic needs for natural gas then, it is as incorrect as you are. Even the most basic research will show you that