Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Leinster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread XII (The Byrne Supremacy)

Options
12792802822842851021

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The question of the SA teams making it harder will only arise if they begin to get back a decent number of the players currently overseas which hopefully they will.

    If their squads remain largely similar to the way they are now , then no they aren't going to change the overall dynamics all that much.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I acknowledged in my previous post that the Top14 is a more competitive league and thus they don't have the luxury of resting players. However I'd disagree with the claim that all French clubs don't go "all in" on Europe. Look at the Toulouse teams that faced Ulster, Munster and Leinster and tell me that isn't a club who is seriously trying to win the competition. Likewise the La Rochelle and Racing teams. They want to win both the Top14 and Heineken Cup. They weren't resting players for Top14 games.

    Do you concede that the blanket statement that "French clubs don't care about Europe" is inaccurate?



  • Registered Users Posts: 882 ✭✭✭Lsdrugbyfan


    Wayne Barnes will referee next week’s Heineken Champions Cup final between Leinster and La Rochelle.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,625 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    dunno, i think if you ask the scots and welsh they will say they have already changed the overall dynamics significantly. there will be no welsh team in the URC play offs, and after the QFs most likely no Scottish team either.

    if the other 3 franchises are as active on the transfer market as the sharks have already been, then all the bokke teams will be stringer next season.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,625 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Happy with that. Definitely one of the best refs in the world at the moment. We are also fairly familiar with him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's pretry much what the French clubs do. If they judge they can compete to win one or both competitions, they cut their cloth to measure. If they judge they can't compete in both competitions, they cut their cloth to be as competitive as possible in the competition of theie choosing, which is usually the domestic league.

    I can't fault them for that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭PMC83


    While I absolutely agree with you, I guess its the optics as well. We don't play our best players week in week out to win the league as we don't need to. That's going to irk some rival fans and press, as we are denying their teams a chance to prove themselves against the Sextons and Furlongs. Yes the arguments there that a lot of teams struggle against our second team anyway, but If I was a sharks fan in Durban I'd be a lot more excited about seeing a fully stocked Leinster squad, rather then a raft of players I'd never heard of.



  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭letsbefair


    Can’t believe how Liverpool disrespected the premier league last night with 9 non regulars starting. What a joke of a league. Imagine saving your players for a European final!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think it's a double-whammy for those clubs - Like you say it's easier to sell tickets to a game when you can say "Come see Furlong, Sexton" etc.

    If it was a full bore Leinster team then an opposition fan can say "Well , didn't think we'd win , but it was great to see such a good team play"

    But when Leinster send a shadow side and still win or are picking up losing bonus points there's a second hit in that the fans that paid will think "why bother if they can't even put away Leinsters 3rd's" or whatever.

    It's not Leinsters fault and they manage their resources really really well , but it's not great for the overall development of the league in terms of ticket sales and TV/Advertising revenue.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,651 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Does saying Leinster would be over the salary cap actually translate properly if you took the away how much Ireland would be paying the players for appearances in the way France and England do?


    e.g. England:

    A player in camp for the duration of the Six Nations earned £75,000, about £15,000 per game



  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭letsbefair


    Goalkeeper Alisson Becker and defender Ibrahima Konate were the only men retained from Saturday’s penalty shoot-out success at Wembley, during which Van Dijk and Salah were forced off with knee and groin problems respectively.


    Irish times match report, so it did happen



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭PMC83




  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Not going to drag this any further off topic, but just to point out, the Champions league final is 10 days away, 11 days at the time of the match. Players were not rested in the league for Europe.

    Football is a bad comparison here, it's totally different.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    As an aside, my own take is that these things are cyclical. Generally, how often do we hear arguments along the following lines?

    • URC winning: "Fresh"
    • URC losing: "Under-cooked"
    • English/French winning: "Battle-hardened"
    • English/French losing: "Fatigued"


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,172 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Barnes is a good choice for referee. As is Pearce for the Challenge Cup final. They're the best in the world at the job, I think. They're so good at communicating with the players and laying out exactly why they've made a decision.

    Would have preferred Pearce for our final as I think he lets the game flow a bit more and isn't as sharp to penalise as Barnes. Both are far better than any of the other options though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Thank you!

    When Leinster lost to LAR last year it was because Leinster "don't get tested enough" in their league and LAR are "battle hardened" from their competitive league

    When Leinster annihilate the Top14 and H Cup champions Toulouse, it's because Leinster are "fresh" because they play in a weak league and Toulouse are "tired" from playing in a tougher league.



  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭letsbefair


    It doesn’t matter if they rested 9 players or not. Yes you are right they didn’t rest 9 players at all. Brilliant



  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    That's my point. The narrative changes depending on whether Leinster win or lose. Win, and it's because the URC is too easy and they're fresh. Lose, and it's because the URC is too easy and they aren't "battle-hardened".



  • Administrators Posts: 53,845 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    No, I am saying both statements are valid. They don't contradict each other.

    There's a happy medium where URC teams can involve their top players infrequently in the league, and this allows them to be fresher than their Top14 / Premiership opponents when they meet. But, if this game management is overdone, particularly in the weeks leading up to Euro games, then URC teams run of players being too rested (i.e. undercooked).



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,611 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    I think TRCs problem is that no matter what way you frame the narrative the point is that the *URC sucks*,

    We win - because we are fresh - because the URC sucks

    We lose - because we are undercooked - because the URC sucks


    Leicester (for example) win - because they are battle hardened - because the premiership is full of the best teams in the world

    Leicester lose - because they are tired - because the premiership is full of the best teams in the world


    This narrative is older than time. It was the narrative in 2007 when Contempomi played 19 out of 20 league games and the Premiership had relegation, it is the still the narrative now when Sexy is hardly seen away from the RDS and the premiership is ringfenced. It will always be the narrative. It's the narrative because their press has a vested interest in bigging up their league (because they cover it) and because their press and fans are generally, across the board, proud of their league (and rightly so).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Interesting listening to some of the off the ball interviews over lunch with some of the players. Seems Tommy O'Brien is the fastest player this year and Jimmy O'Brien seems to be there or there abouts.

    Quite a few players referred to Will Connors as being the strongest tackler which I thought was interesting.

    When asked about fitness a few referred to Keenan and Jimmy O'Brien from their 7s days, not mention of some of the forwards, a few of him like Porter and VDF strike me as having huge (almost more rounded fitness).



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭thegreycity


    Munster are in the URC too. They made it to the QFs. They weren't able to rest players for three weeks before the game. Leinster being able to do it is not simply a measure of the URC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,581 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Realistically, would sides like LI or Bristol win in the urc? What about Wasps? To me, they are equivalent to Edinburgh or Connacht.

    What about Stade France or Pau ? Again average teams. The urc has some fodder, Dragons and Zebre. Leinster play these lads 1 time. Leicester play average and poor teams twice a season. Who fears Bath?

    Our system is different and it works. The other provinces may not agree and probably would want more Leinster players. Leinster supply the bulk of international players. The union runs our game, millionaires and billionaires run things in England and France.

    Leinster being over or undercooked makes no difference to me. When the lost to Sarries or LR, they were not good enough. Simple. Rested or not they lost to better teams, no excuses. Salaries didn't make an iota of difference last year, we lost to a better team and deservedly so.

    There's reasons why there's salary caps in England and France. Owners with mad money would hoard the best players and squads, making the league's forgone conclusions. Prior to covid, when these teams were all making money, there was less grumbling. But, since everyone lost money due to covid, no it's an issue? Look at the quality in these top 14 teams! From S.A and N.Z and on big salaries. Leaving the backend of a squad weak. Less depth and less quality. Leinster identify, develop and produce most of their own players at small salaries. It takes years for the likes of Furlong and Healy to make a comparable salary to those overseas.

    This seasons development players will be on minimum salaries. The squad depth lads will be on decent money but, less than what they'd earn in England or France. The whole argument is the same old dogshit every year and yet Leinster have only 1 European cup in a decade. It doesn't hold water.



  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭thegreycity


    [quote]Leinster being over or undercooked makes no difference to me. When the lost to Sarries or LR, they were not good enough. Simple. Rested or not they lost to better teams, no excuses. Salaries didn't make an iota of difference last year, we lost to a better team and deservedly so.[/quote]

    Yea agreed. Similarly I didn't care about the salary cap drama with Sarries the year they beat us. Who cares that they broke the Prem's salary cap? That's a rule from an entirely different competition, it's got nothing to do with being beaten by the better team in Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,106 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    Skimming through the game again, there was an incident in the second half where Toulouse are trying to attack from fairly deep in their own half, Ntamack spots he has Sheehan in front of him and presumably reckons he can take a front row on the outside. Sheehan pretty much matches him exactly for pace and Ntamack has to give up and reassess his options. Sheehan is ridiculously fast for a front row. Was watching Two Cents Rugby (a NZ based rugby channel) the other day doing a ight preview of the NZ tour and he said Sheehan reminds him of a young Dane Coles which is some compliment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah Sheehan is a serious prospect. I think he'll overtake RK. Very hard to know what his scrummaging is like without being involved in the actual teams, but his general play is excellent and with experience, I think he'll be the starter.

    Interesting dynamics at play though. I heard he was always 2 years behind RK at school and in the leinster academy. Back in school and in the early tears of professional career, age matters as of brings size and experience. Interesting to see what happens those things balance out over the next couple of years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Another way to look at this - Connacht finished 12th in the URC this season. I don't think they finish lower than 8th in the Premiership. Possibly higher.



Advertisement