Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to join Nato

Options
15657596162152

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    They would get told that they are being very naughty by all the others who would then close their eyes and pretend it wasn't happening.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,652 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No point waiting until another flag gets raised over buildings and then crying if only we did this and did that we wouldn't be in this position

    And as usual, there is zero analysis of the liklihood of, or logic behind such an event. Its just random screaming "what if someone invaded us!?"

    Who? Why?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    the invading country gets thrown out of NATO and NATO defends the invaded country.

    Or, the invading country goes to war with itself, one of the two.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 Brenatron100


    Greece and Turkey have been at each other's throats for decades over Cyprus and oil rights and what not. Both are still in NATO.

    Both NATO and the EU made grave mistakes by setting up their constitutions and making it possible to leave but not the thrown out.

    Turkey wouldn't be behaving towards Sweden and Finland as it is, if it could get thrown out of NATO. Hungary wouldn't be behaving in the way it is towards, well, everyone, if it could get thrown out of both the EU and NATO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    https://www.radiokerry.ie/news/china-coastguard-vessel-tracked-off-kerry-coast-282020

    Might this be NATO related? China can be a right pillock sometimes as the Aussies can tell you.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks like the swiss are now considering nato membership .

    At this stage ,we will be the only eu state incapable of defending ourselves and no security guarantees from any other eu state



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Because we have zero capability to defend against any aggression foreign or domestic .

    Zero analysis , I'm sure the same was said about Sweden , Finland and Switzerland , countries with advanced military capabilities and defense forces .

    We have nothing bar a few thousand underpaid and under equipped defense forces that many people want to see disbanded for some strange reason



  • Registered Users Posts: 648 ✭✭✭Irelandsnumberone


    Whos going to attack us, Jamie Bryson and the lads



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 Brenatron100


    Anyone. Literally anyone that despises our way of life. To China and Russia we are no different to the US or Britain or France. We are the West. We are a threat to their greed for supremacy and total control.

    And the a island of Ireland is literally a big fat juicy unguarded strategic target in the middle of the sea lanes, sky ways and communications cables between the NATO allies in North America and Europe.

    There is no plausible reason for a Chinese Coastguard vessel to be off Ireland, other than malign intent. It has no other use, its not a science vessel, its not a transporter, its just a platform with sensors and a big gun.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,568 ✭✭✭jackboy


    So if we had a massive navy would we sink that Chinese vessel? China are very far away, if they invade Ireland they have already invaded and defeated the rest of the world. Russia are done militarily for decades. We are more likely to be invaded by aliens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    This can't be right. A Chinese coastguard vessel simply wouldn't have the range to get to the North Atlantic and would certainly have been detected elsewhere before getting to this neighborhood.

    Whoever mentioned the transponder is probably close to the truth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    If we joined NATO we might have to spend money on defence rather than quangos and a legion of managers for our Health service.

    It would be a disaster for the political class.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But if we had real advanced naval capabilities we could track and intercept and deter foreign aggressors in the first place,

    Even without proper fighting vessels we could invest in anti shipping and coastal defense, including radar installations we could also track and intercept foreign vessels carrying drugs



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Ramona Wide Kale


    We will probably spend more money on housing and taking care of the Ukraine refugees that we do on our defense. Its abit ironic since those people are fleeing war for a place of safety.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We usually send more money to Africa which is then used to buy migs and hind gunships than we send to the department of defense for the defense forces.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,652 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




    China and Russia do not "despise our way of life" and we are incredibly different because we are not any kind of strategic threat to them - we are a nothing to them. Nor is Ireland, in and of itself, strategic. Never mind the utter insanity of anyone trying to conquer Ireland without outright hostilities with the rest of Europe - the supply lines alone would be essentially untenable.

    I have no major issue with joining NATO. It is a show of solidarity with mostly like-minded nations and a commitment to defend that. But it is not the difference between 10,000 Chinese marines landing on the beaches or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I feel like the only worse thing than having zero capability to defend against foreign invasion is spending vast sums of money to only reach a level where we still probably can’t defend against a foreign invasion. There is only a realistic level the Irish armed forces can actually reach — so our contribution to NATO wouldn’t be much and our capacity for self-defence would probably still be inadequate.

    The only real material benefit for Ireland would be having the insurance policy of NATO deployment if we are ever attacked — but the risk of that is infinitesimally small. In any case, even if we weren’t in NATO, it’s nigh impossible to envision a scenario where the Western powers would ever tolerate any military build-up of such extent on the European shores of the Atlantic that could be a precursor to an invasion of Ireland.

    Dropping Irish neutrality could be justifiable in my eyes, insofar as we are clearly aligned to the West as well as being full participants in and profiteers of the Western system, but I don’t think joining NATO would be at this stage anything more than expensive symbolism.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's the real issue.

    For a government department to get decent funding, there has to be some sort of racket that can make someone rich. Spending money on foreign weapons and equipment isn't going to do that, so there is no lobby for it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Ireland joining NATO would mean they will be expected to spend money on military hardware, so would benefit those military hardware sellers. Doesn't gain Ireland any useful defensive capability though as it still won't amount to more than the equivalent of a few lads with pointy sticks in comparison to any country actually in a position to make a cross ocean invasion of anywhere happen and for it to stick, which is basically just the USA.

    If the USA wanted to install a new monitoring station in Ireland then there is something to be gained by joining, otherwise it's just and exercise in throwing money away for no good reason.

    I've no problem with NATO, or with Ireland joining. It's just a waste of time and money to do so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @robindch Doesn't gain Ireland any useful defensive capability though as it still won't amount to more than the equivalent of a few lads with pointy sticks.

    Ehhh no



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    What exactly could Ireland invest in that would be of any use against a force actually capable of invading across the Atlantic ocean?

    Yes, by joining NATO Ireland then has the collective defence from the other states, but Ireland isn't bringing anything of use to the table. Or just spending that money on military without being part of NATO it doesn't get Ireland a whole lot and it could be spent on far more useful things.


    Ireland would still be just as weak a spot on the Atlantic side of NATO as it is now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭eire4


    It is very disappointing to see how selfish some of us are. It is ok for other countries to spend money on defense and security but no Ireland doesn't need to as everyone else around us has already spent money on defense and security and well we could use the money for other things. Totally selfish IMHO. The same selfish mentality surfaces with the excuse that it is highly unlikely we would be directly invaded.

    Ireland is part of Europe and most specifically the EU from which we gain a lot. We are not neutral in terms of our belief in democracy and living in a free and open society. We have duties and responsibilities as a member of the EU as well as gaining from our membership of the EU and to play our part in the collective defense of that and not continue to be the selfish free loaders we are essentially right now when it comes to defense and security is one of those duties and responsibilities IMHO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    No - neutrality is of great benefit

    it allows us to not side with NATO on its crusades in Iraq, Afghanistan or wherever the next one is.

    Would we spend 2% on our military? what for? we can't even house our own homeless

    For Sweden and Finland it is a bad move, Sweden will have to forget some of its principles, to placate turkey, they will have to shaft the Kurds (a familiar story) and whoever else the Turks demand. They will have to Ignore the Armenian Genocide or never call it such!



  • Registered Users Posts: 95 ✭✭GalwayMark


    The American House of Representatives recognised the Armenian Genocide


    Check your facts carefully before you make untrue assertions

    As for security in general we really need to be patrolling our coastline, airspace because our European partners aren't going to tolerate this for much longer, frankly they're bewildered at our attitude why Ireland does nothing for its own security yet expects others to pick up the tab.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Ukraine .

    Finland and Sweden won't be doing anything to placate Erdogan , placating one scumbag has gotten us to where Europe is now gearing up for a conflict



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Meanwhile in the not-so-neutral-anymore Northeast.

    Ireland is definitely missing out.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    this is why Ireland won't join NATO, there are too many uneducated hand wringers who, unfortunately, are allowed to vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    Turkey can veto a new member joining! demanding they hand over/extradite Kurdish activists, shut down organizations that support them or just prevent the Nordics from recognizing the Armenian genocide or to withdraw references to it.

    Turkey are still miffed with USA for withdrawing some military h/w deals, and for recognising the Armenian genocide



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    But they need Turkish support (as well as from all the other country's parliaments) to join NATO, so Turkey could block it.



Advertisement