Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

United Rugby Championship announced, beginning September 2021

12527293031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,742 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    FFP is about sustainability, not fairness. Leinster wouldn't have to change a thing under a ruleset like that.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,110 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    What do you mean what is the fix? I don't think there was ever a suggestion that anything needs fixing, it was just Jackman pointing out the obvious fact that Leinster is one of the most expensive squads in world rugby.

    The implication I assume being that other teams need to take this fact into account when they compare themselves to Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    You can't force players to play somewhere they don't want to live! It's very simple! How many Leinster players ( came up through the system) are playing at other provinces?

    I would think that if players were encouraged or urged to move then it's possible some will move to England or France. Look at the amount of South African players playing in Europe. Why is that? They make a living and are probably on a bigger salary than they would at home.

    Charles Piatau was probably the highest paid player for Ulster when he was with the squad! If there was a cap, would Ulster have been able to sign him? Or for that matter, DDA and Snyman in Munster. Maybe Leinster should not be allowed to sign NIQ's.

    A salary cap in the urc would probably make the league more competitive, but in what way? Would Dragons or Zebre sign lads Like Sheean or Hume? If wages are restricted in the league, why not go to France?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    But taxes are important. If one country has a top tax rate of 48% and another a 40% rate then a salary cap that is equal in both countries isn't fair. The country with the lower tax rate can offer a higher net salary, and hence has an advantage to recruiting players. You can look at Monaco playing in Lique 1 as an example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Nope, I haven't, because I don't really follow any other sports, apart from Formula 1. Which, although it doesn't have a salary cap, does have a spending limit per team. And those 12 teams come from seven different countries and use four different currencies...

    A quick google shows salary caps are far from unusual, though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salary_cap Admittedly there aren't many international/cross border examples there. But the "Benefits" section makes interesting reading. I mean, I'll be buying my season ticket regardless, but as a spectacle, a season where you've won every home league match bar one, fairly easily, and can afford to send a chunk of academy players off to South Africa for two games because you don't need the points, and can also expect to win the league next year, too... well, it's just not very appealing to neutrals or potential visitors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Comparing the salary bill at Leinster to that at any English or French team is nonsense, because the Leinster players' salaries include a LOT of international duty.

    For example, the England players get about £25,000 per match that is paid by the RFU and obviously does not show up on the club's wage bill. If a first-choice player plays 8 tests a year, that's £200k per annum. I don't know what the French guys get but you'd imagine it's not much less.

    So you're comparing apples with spanners and saying the answer is 12.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,110 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't think these semantics have any material bearing on the matter at hand; Leinster is absolutely going to be one of the most expensive squads in the world, and results against them should be viewed through this lens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It would be an expensive squad if you tried to assemble it from scratch for sure. But that sort of overlooks the fact that of the XV that played at the weekend, 12 were developed in-house, neither Lowe nor JGP were prestige signings, leaving only Henshaw as a "big signing".

    It is an expensive squad purely because Leinster turned all these guys into test-level players. It's not an 'expensive squad' in the way Racing or Bristol have expensive squads.

    However, if you split the players income between club and international, as is the case in England or France, then it totally changes the argument. It's not even trying to compare like with like.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,110 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Well yes, Leinster develop them all and this is different to important big contract players.

    But they also pay to keep all the players they develop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's an accounting construct.

    IRFU are paying a huge chunk of the bill and are getting a lot in return for their money. Saying Leinster pay Sexton 800k per year (or whatever it is) is nonsense but that's the argument here.

    If costs were properly apportioned, the "Leinster" salary bill wouldn't be that much different from the other provinces.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I'm confused as to why the salary utilized by Leinster is being questioned? Was Buern having a dig? It's tripe, imo. The union won't allow provinces to outbid another province and that probably hurts the prospective move of players.

    James Cronin was unsatisfied by his offer last season and although Connacht apparently made an offer, Cronin opted to go to France. Why? Why wouldn't Connacht be allowed to offer a better deal than Munster offered? There was interest from Connacht and it didn't work in their favor due to being constrained by a cap placed by the union.

    Are we talking about fairness? Why even get into the finances of Leinster? I suppose it's success and the structure of how Leinster play their Frontline players. If you compare the premiership to the urc what is the salary differential between all sides? What's Zebre and Benetton salary output like? What's Bath paying their mediocre squad? Does everybody get a trophy?

    Leinster produce their own players and yes, they would like to retain them? South Africa develop a serious amount of players and can't keep them! Whose fault is that? A salary cap would even things up in Ireland, at Leinsters expense. Seems nuts to me that a successful province is being looked at for producing the majority of their own players, while supplying players to the other provinces.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    There's always scrutiny of teams that do well. Some people assume it must be because they have an unfair advantage. When the Lions were doing well in Super Rugby there were complaints about the advantage they had from playing home games at altitude. When the Jaguares were challenging in Super Rugby Phil Kearns (?) was whingeing about them basically being the Argentinian national side. When Leinster lost to Toulon in 2015/2016 Leo Cullen was complaining Toulon were "playing by slightly different rules" than everyone else: https://www.the42.ie/leo-cullen-leinster-toulon-champions-cup-2512624-Dec2015/

    When these successful teams drop away then the complaints also disappear.

    I think there's probably an element of projection from those making the complaints. They aren't very conscientious in their application to their own work, and see cheating or bending the rules as the only way their competition could get ahead of them.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    anyway......


    i think its a sign of a successful season when there is so much at stake going into the last round of fixtures. Only 6 points separate 2nd and 8th positions, which means loads of possible permutations left as to how the league will finish up, and more importantly, who will secure that valuable second spot in order to get a home semi final. Theres currently 5 different teams who can feasibly come 2nd.

    Ulster play sharks with the winner guaranteed a home QF and the looser (most likely, depending on stormers winning) having to play away


    my forecast for the run in


    LEINSTER 63

    MUNSTER 60

    DHL STORMERS 60

    ULSTER 59

    CELL C SHARKS 57

    VODACOM BULLS 54

    EDINBURGH 54

    GLASGOW WARRIORS 51


    QFs

    Leinster v Glasgow

    Munster V Edinburgh

    Stormers v Bulls

    Ulster V Sharks


    SFs

    Leinster V Sharks

    Munster V Stormers


    GF

    Leinster V Munster



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Chad Shy Nitpicker


    GF

    Leinster V Munster


    Yes please.


    Also looking forward to some proper NH v SH games with full teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Also looking forward to some proper NH v SH games with full teams.

    This!



  • Registered Users Posts: 101 ✭✭tvpc




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I’d say it’ll end up:

    Leinster

    Stormers

    Munster

    Ulster

    Bulls

    Sharks,


    Guessing all home wins from quarters up to and including the final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I like that Keohane guy. The other fella doesn't add a lot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    They don't have a salary cap at all. They have a budget which is controlled by the WRU in the main. That they don't have as much doled out as Leinster gets (allegedly) is down to the Union whose annual income is far more than the income of the IRFU.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Chad Shy Nitpicker


    The WRU take in more money than the IRFU?? Where does the money come from?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Quick google search for 2020 says they made €93,000,000 compared to €81,000,000 for the IRFU.



  • Registered Users Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    Well done, you've found the IRFU out, blown their caper with Leinster. The smoked salmon socialists will be yours for breakfast.

    Now, tell us what is the relevant market and what anti-competitive conduct/abuse has been committed? In your answer please refer to specific violations of the provisions of Articles 101-106. Thanks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,558 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Usually with a salary cap system there's also an allowance for an agreed number of marquee star players to be exempt from the cap so you would probably see a better spread of the top Irish internationals around the provinces than at present. Leinster for example might decide to designate Furlong, Lowe and James Ryan which could create the opportunity for the likes of Van Der Flier or Henshaw to seek a payday at Connacht as they'd have the capacity to pay them more in a designated slot than Leinster in a cap slot.

    Personally I think movement like that would be good for the sport in Ireland and help create four competitive teams rather than a rigid pecking order based on a provinces population.



  • Registered Users Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    The URC has been a great tournament even if Connacht have had a bad season. Looking forward to next year.

    Hope Ulster do the Sharks tomorrow and, yeah, Munster have spent enough time in SA this season - let them get a home quarter final!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    You're still punishing Leinster for being better, producing better players etc. Why would VDF want to play for Connacht or Ulster or Munster? Why should Leinster be broken up to help other provinces? It makes no sense. How about the provinces produce their own players?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 101 ✭✭tvpc




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,508 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    How are Connacht getting MORE money in this salary cap scenario?

    If the idea is to reduce the total amount available for wages for each team how does that allow Van Der Flier to earn more by moving to another province?


    I understand the point about marquee exemptions but that doesn't really add any money to their budget, does it? It just lets them spend it differently. And if Leinster are not allowed pay Van Der Flier what he's currently earning, why would Connacht even offer him more than that as he'd have no bargaining power if his current club is forced to cut his wages when his contract is up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭connemara man


    I'm guessing the logic is with a salary cap you'd have to effectively scrap the central contract system so all that money would then be spread among the other provinces, which would increase the budgets for everyone including Connacht



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Because marquee players are outside the salary cap. So van de vlier would be a player paid from the salary cap at leinster but would be a marquee player for connacht so they could offer him more.

    Connacht would have a higher amount available for wages than allowed by the salary cap.

    I personally think that a salary cap is a good idea. However players that are brought through the club shouldn't have their full wages counted, perhaps only half. So ringrose would be a home grown player for leinster and hence only count half his wages, but henshaw would count fully. Players like sexton would have to be worked out. It would reward clubs for home grown players, and wouldn't force players to move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭Blut2


    If van der Flier couldn't get a financially competitive contract from Leinster due to them being restricted he wouldn't move to Connacht, he'd move to one of the higher paying French teams that actually compete in Europe. Top tier players want to play with other top tier players on the best possible team.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,508 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    It's hard for me to understand this without figures, even made up ones, but say VDF was on 350k currently and the salary cap came in meaning when his contract was up for renewal Leinster could only offer him 250k. Does the current IRFU rule about provinces not outbidding each other go out the window?

    Let's say it does, and Connacht have a free marquee slot for VDF. They offer him 260k. VDF now has a choice of a lower salary in Leinster, a lower salary in Connacht or try to get a move abroad. He's not going to have much leverage either way, he can't force Leinster's hand, Connacht know they don't have to offer him 350k or even 300k. Or maybe they do as there's a breaking point between salary and silverware and familiarity and comfort that will make him choose to leave. What do the figures look like if Edinburgh or Ospreys want to sign him, assuming Ireland will no longer select him if he leaves? A French club might throw 500k at him, use up one of their non-JIFF slots, run him into the ground playing 30 games a season and end his international career.

    The salary cap, as I understand it, has two stated aims - to prevent rich owners from buying up all the players and making a lop-sided league and to prevent clubs overstretching themselves to try and keep up. Neither of these really applies to the Irish clubs as they have an internal budget they must balance and no vested interest in boosting one province over another (I may be wrong on this and they might well prefer to have one top-class side bringing in CC finalist cash rather than 3-4 QF sides). And if the salary cap is to be URC-wide, I don't see how it helps the Welsh sides who have enough trouble keeping star players in Wales as it is, or the Scottish sides who are unlikely to benefit from their players moving back or luring players from Ulster or Munster or Scarlets.

    All I can see is potentially a further weakened league (if top players move to France), diminished national sides (star players not available for selection), little to no chance of competing in the Champions Cup, unhappy players (less money, more games, no 6N or WC...)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,208 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    I'm not sure if you noticed, but Ulster are not in the Irish market. They're in the same market as the Scots and the Welsh.

    Also, all 4 provinces are directly owned subsidiaries of the IRFU and are largely financed by the IRFU. They're not competing against each other, or anyone else, in any market.

    I'm also curious as to whether you know that there are sporting derogations in many EU laws as sporting rules can't meet these laws.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,110 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yea but not competing with each other is part of the issue.

    There is a reason that the odd ownership structure of rugby clubs in the URC would never be permitted in many sports like football.

    What we have now is a clear conflict of interest and anti-competitive structure, but it's also potentially the only structure that works, even if it isn't great.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,208 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    All the provinces are part of the same organisation. They're not separate entities. While they are competing against each other on the field, they are not competing off the field. They are 80% funded by their parent entity, the IRFU. Professional golfers (what a bizarre comparison) are not teams owned by the same entity. They are all individuals making a living through sponsorship and prize money.

    Are you going to comment on that fact that Ulster do not under any EU regulations? Or does that fact not suit your argument.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Not saying I agree with their argument but the provinces are separate legal entities, regardless of their ownership being the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Am I right to say a Munster TBP win practically guarantees both semi finals taking place in Ireland?

    (Or a regular win, assuming Stormers/Sharks don't win with a TBP)



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Benetton walloping Carfiff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Cardiff are gash! Pure dogshit. Good to see the Italians pulverizing them. C'mon Benetton, put 50 on them!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,155 ✭✭✭OldRio


    URC, last week of the regular season and so much to play for. Not too shabby for the first year of this competition.

    Tut tut you doubters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    62-21 in treviso



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    69-21



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Trivia: last time the current RWC-winning captain played in Ireland?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,208 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Would be better for the league if Dragons and Cardiff were to merge, and Zebre were to drop out.

    Go back to the conference system with 7 teams in each.

    This time,

    Each conference to have

    2xSA, 2xIr, 1xSc, 2xW or 1xW+1xIt.

    Play own conference H&A, play other conference HorA, plus 2 more matches to ensure the derbies get played.

    SA and Ireland’s 2 extra matches would be against each other,

    The lone Welsh team in one conference would play the other two Welsh teams, and they would play one game against a Scottish team or Benetton.

    The Scottish teams would play each other once and then one would play Benetton and the other would play a Welsh team.

    So Benetton would play one Scottish team and one Welsh team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Correct you are. Though I actually meant to say "at club level"

    (Answer is still Jonno though)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    McCaw played in the 2013 game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,828 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Some score for Benneton



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Jean De Villiers came to mind, but he wasn’t captain at the time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Pretty sure it was Johnno, when Leicester played in Belfast in the 03/04 pool stages. (Wasn't that the game on a Sunday which drew a protest outside from Paisley et al?)



Advertisement