Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

Options
1114115117119120163

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Being frivolous is at times a reasonable pass time when ideas won't come. the choices with old naval ships are Scrap, Sinkex, or maintain as a museum reflecting as much as possible her original usage. The first two choices would be costly because of preparations required to sanitise the ship to international safety requirements, often by a specialist compant with reputation in the field.

    In the case of Museums afloat, it is done widely in USA. I was alongside USS CASSIN YOUNG WW11 1943 destroyer in Boston navy Yard. The P31 should be brought up to her 1984 configuration and restore her hangar, Flight Deck and Operations room, even in mock-up, for showing people around. Berthage would have to be behind gates with a secure lock up by night. The ship would need a knowledgeable team of personnel to run the daily public visits and give necessary guidance and spiel with a suitable instructional film.

    In the Boston navy Yard the USS Constitution and Cassin Young have assigned naval crews and a c.o. and even run social do's such as meetings, retirements, and weddings.

    Conversely a USS Carrier was retired today after 50 years service world wide. Eithne is only 38 Y.O. with 12 years to go!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    You are leaving out the continuous costs of a museum ship, that even US states are struggling with, for example the concerns about the material state of USS Texas, or the recent near loss of USS The Sullivans, closer to home there was that RN minesweeper that sank a few years ago, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Bronington_(M1115)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,240 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    She is not unique enough nor has she enough history to be a museum ship, she would not draw a crowd.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    She might make a decent flotel for the offshore energy industry. Excellent accom throughout the 3 decks, fully fitted galley serving 3 dining spaces via dumb waiter and 2 independent engineering spaces. Most of all a helipad for crew transfers. The Caley system that was added to it early in the 21st century is an industry standard already in the offshore industry, so all that would be required is replace the boarding RhIB with enclosed daughter craft.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    It is obvious that any choice will cost money. There are many intangible assets such as persuading public opinion as to the value of a navy, plus the opportunity to boost Naval enlistments. The Bronnington, a wooden CMS, is a particularly vulnerable ship being planking on aluminium frames. They need continuous maintenance, the one I was on was drydocked annually to maintain her glass fibre cloth glued to the hull to restrict salt water leakage.

    Most countries preserve parts of their history, including ships, aircraft, motor cars, etc. P 31 built in Ireland and is the last ship to be so built. First NS ship to cross the Atlantic. Countries don't struggle with costs if the choice is considered appropriate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,467 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Hold on to them a little while ,( till after they've beaten the Russians ) and offer them to the Ukrainians ? ( Obviously not as warships - just patrol vessels ) , they've a serious shortage of hulls and lack of time ,as well as plenty of engineering skills ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    They would be incredibly vulnerable to anything the Russians had.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 Brenatron100


    I think it's far more likely that after this current War, the Ukrainian Navy is going to find its way to the possession of about a dozen Aegis destroyers, don't you?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Not likely imo. The rebuilding of their navy will be decades and they have never operated ships of that size. The focus for them is likely to be Army and Air Force first along with rebuilding their economy. Given their success with ASMs and drones I expect they will be the focus of their sea defence for sometime to come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,467 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    You couldn't send them into a warzone no, as it currently is - but soonish there's going to be a need for armed patrol boats - and I wouldn't be surprised if Ukrainian engineers were able to upgrade eithne with their own kit .. might be worth offering them - before we scrap them ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    The Turks are in control of Black Sea entrance and are not allowing additional naval Forces enter the area of conflict. As regards Museum ships it may be that upper harbour Cork will be permanently cut off by a proposed bridge at Ship Street Cork. Usually Museum ships are drydocked for maintenance work at an agreed intervals. If the upper harbour is unavailable say around Blackrock then choices are limited.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,467 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Where's ship street ? To the uneducated ? ,

    I don't think there's any real chance of eithne being a museum ship ..although it gets called out everytime the navy retire anything -

    Although if somebody can come up with the funds and run it as a bar/ restaurant/ club/ whatever I'd hope they'd get support to get it a decent mooring..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    A lot of similar tonnage is being scrapped in Turkey currently, there is a ready market for these old (and sometimes not so old) ships. They make fabulous razorblades...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Lots of different points of view on this one. Can't make up me mind! Either throw a pile of miney at it and get it back into Tip Top condition for another 10 years service or else sink it is what I reckon. Understand the nostalgia of those who served and it would get the navy another decent ship on the cheap to supplement the new MRV and tide things over until that comes floatin over the horizon.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    No need to dither, best just to get on with it.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭thomil


    Regarding Ship Street, I think there's a bit of confusion there, as that's the street connecting Penrose Quay with Alfred Street & Lowewr Glanmire Road in Cork. That part of the river is already well fenced-in by bridges.

    I think ancientmariner is referring to one of two proposed projects in the Docklands. One is a fixed-height bridge designed to take any future light rail line from the new southern entrance of Kent Station across into the Docklands. This bridge, if it ever gets built, will be permanently fixed, making much of Horgan's Quay, Kennedy Quay and Albert Quay unusable to moor anything larger than a currach.

    The second project is the Eastern Gateway Bridge, a proposed bridge linking Monahan Road with the N8 near Tivoli. This one might be a fixed one as well, though I have also seen some designs floating around for it to be a swing bridge akin to Samuel Beckett Bridge in Dublin. If the Eastern Gateway Bridge is built as a fixed-span bridge, then it would basically close off the entire river west of Tivoli.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If were not going to scrap Eithne we should donate her to a friendly africian or carabian nation



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Whatever about the Eastern Gateway, the fact renders of the light rail fixed bridge showed yacht's happily sailing upstream. These people have a total ignorance of what the waterways are for and how they work other than providing a nice view for cyclists, walkers and tenants of the apartments they'll build on what was once a workplace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It’s to avoid such a situation that she’s to be scrapped, after the issues of the P20s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Sorry folks the actual street is WATER STREET where you come off the N8 and turn on to it's line along the Quay front. The Bridge is to go straight across to the Quays between ESB station and Ford's old assembly plant on the South side of the Lee. It would have to be a swing bridge or all the quays to the west will be closed off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Couple kms south of st lucia!

    Also dont write when your at traffic lights



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    I always called that portion of sea and islands east of mexico the Car-rib-eee-an. It was only when I travelled on a cruise liner of a company bearing that name did I realise it is actually ca-ribb-eon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    There have been recent Ministerial comments proposing to put numbers on Budget increases for our post Commission/Ukraine Defence Forces. I hope we concentrate on Defence Capabilities i.e. weapon systems, suitable platforms, personnel numbers and usable reserves.

    From a Naval point of view this does not mean that getting to sea in any obtainable craft is an answer. Building small craft with no purpose is a missed opportunity. The Finns have placed an order for 12 small missile craft at a cost around 30m Euro. With a population of 5.5m their Navy is something to be emulated for it's design to meet tasks in most Naval fields.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Better copy their tax rate too



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And bring in Conscription as well if you want to emulate the Finns. Not too mention the slight difference in geography.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Good idea! Get the unemployment rate down a bit!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    They have a culture of serving their state.


    Ireland has a culture of drink. I can't remember being on any military course that didn't revolve around getting rat-arsed at the first available opportunity.

    The Finnish people, having faced invasion in Living memory, know what it means to protect your state. Meanwhile ours are caught between tales of men in overcoats armed with just a pistol and a home made grenade chasing first the brits, then anyone who disagreed with them, out of Ireland, and the nonsense notion that our proximity to the old enemy will in fact protect us should someone else invade. Meanwhile the suggestion that a mature debate on neutrality is required is dismissed as "FFG trying to sell our children to the EU Army" or some similar nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Our own vulnerable geography is constantly being demonstrated not least by the "exercise" of Moskva and other members of the RU Fleet prior to RU preemptive attack on Ukraine. Providing Capital and recruiting policy is a matter for the Government. A worthwhile Service will attract personnel if there is a correct amenity balance throughout the Forces. For instance Married Quarters, school incentives for those joining up, trade training opportunities, appropriate pay rates, modern billets with amenities, schemes to commission from the ranks.

    We must equip at sea with vessels with an obvious naval capability based on search, acquire, and strike where necessary at long range, We must not allow useful kit such as primary search radar to be binned, or the use of flight decks impaired or repurposed. Acquiring vessels with little naval purpose must stop. Fishery and police duties should be done by an assigned FP unit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Just to clarify, I'm suggesting a Patrol/Fishery squadron within the Naval Service. It is within that unit that seamanship, ship handling, and close interaction with other vessels occurs. If we acquire vessels such as MCM, ASW, Missile Strike, they should do Defence duties and work where possible with other similar groupings. All vessels should undertake "Show the Flag" trips when opportune for State reasons.



Advertisement