Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
13013023043063071062

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In an effort to speed up the move away from Russian gas, oil and coal, the EU is digging deep, primarily to fund the rapid expansion of renewables though there is a small % going to fossil fuels to assist a few of the countries in a more precarious position.

    An EU ban on coal from Russia is due to start in August, and the bloc has pledged to try to reduce demand for Russian gas by two-thirds by the end of the year. Meanwhile, a proposed EU oil embargo has hit a roadblock from Hungary and other landlocked countries that worry about the cost of switching to alternative sources.


    In a bid to swing Hungary behind the oil phaseout, the REPowerEU package expects oil-investment funding of around two billion euros (£1.7 billion) for member nations highly dependent on Russian oil.

    Energy savings and renewables form the cornerstones of the package, which would be funded mainly by an economic stimulus programme put in place to help member countries overcome the slump triggered by the coronavirus pandemic.

    Von der Leyen said the price tag included about 72 billion euros (£61 billion) for grants and 225 billion euros (£190 billion) for loans. There was a push to fund energy efficiency and renewables.


    The European Commission also proposed ways to streamline the approval processes in EU countries for renewable projects, which can take up to a decade to get through red tape. The commission said approval times needed to fall to as little as a year or less.


    It put forward a specific plan on solar energy, seeking to double photovoltaic capacity by 2025. The commission proposed a phased-in obligation to install solar panels on new buildings.


    The Russia/Ukraine war has done more to speed up sustainable options than any other single event, report or person. Its honestly incredible how much they are throwing at this to speed things up.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Already stated gas has a role to play during the transition period several times.

    I just don't think Barryroe will play any part in it for Ireland, that's all. Not sure why you are so triggered by an opinion contrary to your own but oh well 🤷‍♂️



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Nope. There's a significant difference between natural gas and safe, secure and reliable sources of natural gas. That much has been well detailed already in the discussion.

    And of course everyone is entitled to their opinion. But no one is "triggered" or indeed should be the butt of any other odd suggestion by reason of pointing out that the certain arguments against the development of the Barryroe oil and gas field, presented without backup, really don't stand up to scrutiny. And that's about it I reckon .

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭randomname2005


    A quick question. I have followed this thread on and off for a while and this point you bring up about safe secure and reliable confuses me in the context of everything discussed previously in the thread.

    The investment, if it happens, will be by a private company who can sell the fossil fuels (oil and gas) to whoever they want at the highest price they can get. Ireland have no claim on the resources of a private company, or are you suggesting that the government would take over the company if needed? How will a private company selling oil and gas to the world provide safe and reliable gas to Ireland?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Fair question I suppose and yet one which has oddly enough has been continously thrown about in opposition to the idea that Ireland should acccess its own natural gas resources. Afaik other posters here have already addressed this issue several times. But I'll have a stab at whats been already detailed

    Currently we have two natural gas fields flowing, both managed by private companies. The natural gas resources of both which are piped onshore in Ireland and used to provide essential energy generation here.

    As to a reason why that situation would suddenly change and Barryroe or any of the other untapped natural gas reserves (if it were possible), would suddenly be snatched up and hived off to some rich sheik in Abu Dhabi or similar?

    The logistics of natural gas exploration in the territorial waters of an island off the west coast of Europe, means that type of scenario is highly unlikely with there being no existing piped infrastructure to export / sell gas to other countries. The fact that the UK has its own plentiful (albeit dwindling) stocks of natural gas and plentiful LNG supplies rules them as ready buyers of our current but (relative to them meagre) natural gas stocks. Further afield and the costs of long distance transport to Europe where more accessible sources of gas are readibly available would also make that a highly unlikely logistical option for any private company

    So whilst a private company could theoretically sell natural gas extracted here elsewhere, the cost and logistics of natural gas transport and the fact that all gas fields off the Irish coast require easy accessible onshore storage facilities means that ultimately Ireland is the benefiter of natural gas reserves accessed in Irish territorial waters. That and the government in issuing exploration and extraction licences are ultimately the controlling agent (as we've seen with Mr Ryans shenanigans) on how, if and where such resources are brought onshore. As for prices and being held to ransom - that would in theory at least something the UK could do to Ireland. But oddly enough we rarely see that being addressed.

    Prices for natural gas are currently via the world market and countries where natural gas is extracted make significant revenues in taxation. The addition of facilities for imported LNG also means Ireland would have not one but several eggs in our collective basket and we would be able to purchase gas from a range of suppliers at the most competitive prices.

    And let's say if push really did come to shove in the event of some serious world conflict or other disaster - it is within the remit of the Irish government to nationalise natural resources or holdings owned by a any company either foreign or Irish.

    The last point and the most important one is that Ireland currently requires a safe, secure and reliable source of natural gas for the period of transition to renewable energy generation. Our energy regulator has already highlighted that the UK pipeline no longer meets those criteria. So we can either access and benefit from the stocks we do have or like some greens we can stick out fingers in our ears, our heads in the sand all the while whistling dixie to ourselves. I know which option I would go for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The world is transitioning. It is now cheaper to skip gas and go straight from coal to renewables. Because of Climate change, we're going to leave the majority of the current proven oil coal and gas reserves underground. (the exact proportion of how much is left underground will decide if we can keep the climate habitable for future generations or not)

    In the time it would take to explore and onshore these gas fields if they are even viable, which is far from certain, we should be well on our way to fulfilling most of our transition away from Gas

    Gas does not give us energy security. In fact, if Shell had never been allowed to exploit the corrib gas field, our governments might have been forced to develop renewable wind infrastructure instead of relying on a dwindling expensive, unreliable source of mostly imported energy.

    The history of the Corrib gas field itself is full of political interference and corruption from Ahern's government who instructed the planning authorities to ignore their own planning conditions and grant permission to the project, and exempt the pipeline from even requiring planning permission... For what? to enrich the likes of Shell, and to provide us with.... faux energy security that barely lasted 10 years?

    Short term, corrupt, profiteering off extracting a limited resource with barely a thought for the future.

    If the same 'enthusiasm' was aimed at promoting offshore wind production and Solar, Ireland would be a net energy exporter by now would be looking at a domestic energy industry worth billions of euros instead of having people like you on here demanding that we maintain our reliance on expensive dirty climate changing foreign insecure energy



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    They won't. And it's extremely unlikely that the output would be sufficient to supply Ireland's needs on it's own, so in the event that the UK 'cuts us off' (which is their only justification for even developing this gas field) we'd still be mostly screwed unless we have sufficient energy from alternative sources (renewables, energy interconnectors).

    The benefit to ordinary people from developing that gas field is practically zero, the costs are enormous (opportunity costs, and the environmental costs from delaying the transition to carbon neutral energy)



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The Ukraine war was a catalyst, but the actual work was done by decades of scientific research that has unequivocally shown that we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels for our energy. If it wasn't for that, the energy crisis sparked by the Ukraine war would only be benefitting the despots in OPEC and the chinese and Australian coal industries



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Even the Green party in this country recognise that natural gas is essential to the period of transition to renewable energy generation, with an estimate of 80% energy to be produced by renewable means by 2050 ie a period of approx 30 years. These targets are also accepted in the EU and most every other country in the world. And if we can't use our own gas, then in all good conscience we can't use electricity imported from elsewhere which is produced using gas/oil/coal/nuclear

    Why do you alone think Ireland is somehow the exception to that rule? And are you happy in the here and now to have periods of brown and black outs when the wind doesn't blow and other renewables and or hydro etc simply are not sufficient to keep the lights on?

    How's that going to work? And no the answer at this moment in time is not storage, or hydrogen or any other proposed technology because none of them are yet available on a scale sufficient to power an entire country.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I used to have a lot of time for the Greens a few years ago but these days I am afraid I am finding them hard to like.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    The world is transitioning. It is now cheaper to skip gas and go straight from coal to renewables. Because of Climate change, we're going to leave the majority of the current proven oil coal and gas reserves underground. (the exact proportion of how much is left underground will decide if we can keep the climate habitable for future generations or not)


    in what fantasy world is the above statement true. the massive gas/oil nations are going to drill even more in the foreseable future and its leaving nothing in the ground...please inform me if renewables are the saviour then why are these countries still drilling surely they would be obsolete ?


    norway

    https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/norway-plans-expand-arctic-oil-gas-drilling-new-licensing-round-2022-03-17/

    united states


    saudi arabia

    https://www.arabnews.com/node/2081526



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    A complete load of hogwash, or more aptly greenwash.

    Coal burning for electricity generation by 4 of the top 5 CO2 emitters is responsible for half the world emissions of CO2 and Germany are now racing to join in. Your "now cheaper to skip gas and go straight from coal to renewables" is an absurd laughable attempt at making excuses for those top emitters. The only other explanation following that logic is that you believe that we made the wrong decision in prioritising gas as a transitional source rather than coal because coal is cheaper.

    In the real world those top emitters have, and are further illustrating, that they could not give a fiddlers about CO2 emissions. They are using the cheapest source of energy available to them while we have a bunch of idiots attempting to ban LNG and ignore any sources of natural gas (both actual recognised transitional energy sources) we ourselves may have,(even to the extent of banning any future exploration) while also attempting to ignore that we do not have a secure energy source.

    The rest of your post is yet again just ramblings like the Irish Green Party and their supporters on this magical jump from where we are to 100% reliable, dependable renewable enengy without an iota of an idea as to how we will get there without a secure E.U. recognised transitional source



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I don`t know what is confusing you. Our own energy regulator has said that at present our source of gas is unsecure, and that it is also unsecure under an E.U. directive.

    It will not cost the Irish taxpayer a red cent to develope this field and like every other private company that particular company will be entitled to sell it`s products wherever it wishes, but there is one very large point you may have missed.

    Our back-up to the presently unreliable renewable energy sources is gas, and will be for a long time to come. As we have no other fossil fuel energy plant options with oil and coal burning plants either shut down or proposed to be shut down in the near future, for us the only option, and one of only two two recognised by the E.U. as a transitional energy source, is natural gas. Natural gas comes in two varieties. Either in it`s gaseous state or liquefied for shipment. Unless this company is going to build a facility to liquefy this gas at sea, then it will be coming ashore in Ireland. Now this company could indeed decide to build an on-shore facility to liquefy this gas for sale elsewhere, but why would they do that when they already have a market for it here in its gaseous state ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The E.U. is not the only body "digging deep". The Chinese, Japanese, India, U.S.A. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait etc all are. Even within Europe Norway and Germany are "digging deep" for oil and gas and even the Finns are back digging up peat.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Our own energy regulator has said that at present our source of gas is unsecure, and that it is also unsecure under an E.U. directive.

    If you're going to reference the regulator at least do it correctly

    Also, what have the EU said about this issue? I haven't seen or heard of this being a concern for the EU. Have you any other info?

    Unless this company is going to build a facility to liquefy this gas at sea, then it will be coming ashore in Ireland. Now this company could indeed decide to build an on-shore facility to liquefy this gas for sale elsewhere, but why would they do that when they already have a market for it here in its gaseous state ?

    Per Providences own press releases, they will be going after the oil first and foremost. The gas fields will be tapped when and if it suits them but the oil is what they are after. Maybe that will change in time if they start pumping oil and gas prices stay high, but their primary concern is the oil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Are you disputing what our own regulator said on both our energy security and the E.U. ?

    If you are then I hope it`s more fact based than your posts on the supposed communications between Ryan and Barryroe.

    On Barryroe and natural gas, as I`ve said earlier, so what? For all you and I know, if Ryan ever gets the finger out, they may go for the gas first with a ready made market so close at hand. Either way it`s not as if we are not going to need natural gas for a substantial period of time into the future. Especially with the Irish Green party attempting to ban LNG.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Are you disputing what our own regulator said on both our energy security and the E.U. ?

    Nope, just your description of what the regulator said

    they may go for the gas first with a ready made market so close at hand

    They've already stated they are going for the oil first with a view to possibly going after the gas at a later date. Its literally on their website on the releases I linked to yesterday.

    Either way, it depends on how their next appraisal test goes. It'll either be curtains for them or they'll find something in which case the ball is still in their court to try get investors and an operator to begin extraction of the oil. Current plan is to start in 2026 if the appraisal goes well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Nobody says we cannot import gas from the UK and Norway during the transition phase. In fact, that's what some of us have been saying ad nauseum despite you and others pretending that the UK are going to go rogue and place Ireland under an export embargo.

    I support a direct ban on Fracked LNG, eg, if we were to ever receive LNG in Ireland, then the importer cannot source that LNG directly from fracking

    Importing gas that has come indirectly from a LNG supply that came from fracking at some point down the supply chain, while it's not ideal, we have no option but to accept it, but it's just one more reason why we should speed up the move to 100% renewable energy



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Extreme once every 3 Hundred year heatwaves now happen once every 3 years in India

    We're perilously close to wet bulb temperatures above 36c in densely populated areas




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    So your logic is that we can't use our own gas because of 'reasons' but we can use someone else's including fracked gas and import it?

    Well that's just dandy isn't it.

    And no one is "pretending" btw. The energy regulator here has already detailed that the supply from the UK is no longer secure

    But some people know better and that's just dandy too?

    More haste and less speed and all that eh?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    `Are you saying what I have said is factually incorrect. If you are then say so, otherwise cut out your pointless time wasting sniping.

    Again, so what. It`s not as if we are not going to need gas to keep the lights on for years to come.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    India themselves weren`t too worried about it a few months ago at COP26 when the wording on the final agreement was changed last minute on the use of coal from "phase out" to "phase down"



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    India are more than the psychopaths in the Modi government



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Another fossil fuel company making big investments into renewable energy. Petrobras, Brazil oil & gas giant, moving into offshore wind in a big way




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The market for green hydrogen is going to take a lot of business away from Nat gas by 2030 and beyond

    The European Commission (EC) will roll out carbon contracts for difference (CCfD) subsidies (see panel below) for green hydrogen using cash from its Innovation Fund “to support a full switch of the existing hydrogen production in industrial processes from natural gas to renewables and the transition to hydrogen-based production processes in new industrial sectors such as steel-making”.


    the new REPowerEU plan sets a target for ten million tonnes of green hydrogen to be produced in the EU by 2030, with a further ten million tonnes imported. The combined 20 million tonnes would require approximately 600GW of new wind and solar power, and 200GW of electrolysers.


    Also looks like they'll be ignoring blue hydrogen (uses fossil fuels + CCS tech) with no funding allocated to it.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The growth of offshore wind looks unstoppable at this point

    Heads of government from the North Sea countries met in the Danish town of Esbjerg on Wednesday (18 May) to sign a cooperation agreement on offshore wind development and green hydrogen. They will target at least 65 GW by 2030 and 150 GW by 2050.




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It’s still tiny compared to the $68bn they’re planning investing in sub sea oil exploration between 2022 and 2026

    oil companies are greenwashing like crazy. This is a good listen….about fossil fuel company ‘carbon bombs’. at the same time as publicly proclaiming small (relatively) investments in renewables they are quietly committing billions to traditional fossil fuel projects




Advertisement