She-Hulk - Disney+ (***Spoilers***)

Wrongway1985 wrote: »

...And with that doubt sinks in :pac::pac:

Josh Segarra joins

Tatiana Maslany is a terrific actress could be really good

Yeah looks that way especially showing Bruce in his Professor Hulk form.

Maslany is fantastic in Orphan Black to which was critically acclaimed, not sure how she is underappreciated by the critics since? she's not exactly been prolific in her roles after that show ended.

Her legs definitely looked super skinny. I'm surprised they didn't at least go with a muscular body double for some of the She-Hulk body shots. Obviously they are in a tough position if they are going to have Jennifer using her original body rather than having her remain as She-Hulk the majority of the time, as she has tended to for most of her comicbook history. But an actor with the stature of Frankie Adams would have been a better fit for the Hulk aspects.

unless there are nips I wont be able to suspend disbelief

Haven't seen Perry Mason but doesn't appear she is a lead more part of the main supporting cast but willing to accept she is.

I didn't say she wasn't a capable working actress since but 3 indie movies with no significant promotion just isn't the trajectory I'd have assumed for her.

On investigation the voice roles one stems from the same universe (relatively successful) but the other has already been cancelled after just one season.

All-CGI confirmed;

Superhero landings! 🙂 How can I not remember any big jumping like that since the Bana movie?

There must have been some scenes of big jumps in the MCU before now right?

Plenty of them in Ragnarok. 😁

Iron Man is surely the biggest culprit.

think i'll pass

I adore that Tim Roth is back. Great casting it seems, but the CGI seems dodgy and tbf it's starting to rack up complaints for the MCU as a whole, not entirely baseless.

eg.

Completely unrelated to this I'd watched several seasons of Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law recently. This is not that, but if people are interested it's basically the same tangential premise, superhero attys for superhero clients, except birdman was an attorney for fred flintstone, the jetsons, and everyone else you could think Hanna Barbara had a hold of.

I wouldn't worry about the quality of the CGI work. The show is still 3 months away so no doubt they are still refining it. There have been may times in the past that the trailer for a movie has been criticised for having ropey looking effects but the fact is they are usually still refining the look right up until the last minute. I'd reserve judgement until the show is actually broadcast.

I don't even mind if the CGI is bad as long as the story and acting are good and Tatiana Maslany certainly knows how to act.

My reaction was that they were moving Hulk from Movie budget to TV budget.

Visual effects seem to be tiered and my impression is that TV shows have to use them sparinginly compared to films. Many, I think, figure out story tricks and such not to need to use them for chunks of time. That can be good for a show like if a big special effect tech/powerup or something comes along and saves the day at a last minute. Likewise.. when one comes along and moves a baddies plot along to make em more ominious or powerful than seemed previously.

The CGI has always been ropey in places but it's never taken away from anything cos the content ,story etc is enough to keep me engaged , you bring up Thanos but in the same infinity war we saw a bruce banner head floating free flow in the Hulkbuster armor lol