Russia

It is just a point of fact that this war once again showcased how narratives can be twisted and moved around as well as how propaganda operates. My doubt of history and stuff all playing out here again., Propagandists in the West claim the Russian forces are low on morale, men refuse to fight, the end is near for Putin and his army, tanks are breaking down, and Russian advances in the east are stalled. Russia is doomed to failure. War over for them pushed back by summer. Running out of missiles in March, the list of bullshit is endless.

There is no way that these western propagandists can ever comprehend themselves and are able to explain why all the towns, villages, and cities in the Donbas fell in last week or so in the future.. They only make up nonsense as they go along and have a new narrative.   

Once again, narratives are flawed. I cannot understand how you can claim that Afghanistan was fighting the Taliban when the Taliban are Afghans themselves. If you call it a civil war, that is fine. Afghanistan's Western-backed government collapsed because it was held together by only a force of American troops.  

As far as size is concerned, the Iraqi Army did not have a serious air force from the beginning. How would they stop the western allied forces? As a result, the outcome was very predictable and that is why the U.S. went in, knowing there was no modern Iraqi force on the ground to prevent them from fulfilling their objectives. Iraq's anti-aircraft system was quite inadequate for engaging cruise missiles and stealth bombers.  

To be precise, Warsaw Pact countries invaded. With the Soviets in control,

Who are the Russians? Who in charge at the Kremlin said this would be over in days? Present actual evidence rather than speculation  

Since Western analysts have been promoting nonsense for over a month and now insist they have never said anything that I have already explained to you in the previous post. Again, it is an example of no self-reflection on your part regarding what they said about that operation in the east. The West stated that the operation was a failure, it was stalled, and the war was lost.  Watching what flag wave supporters in Ukraine say, I know what they have been saying for several weeks, even reading threads on current affairs, I find that similar logic has applied there.. They are in denial about the fact that Ukraine will not win. 

Ukraine is doing nothing more than delaying the inevitable defeat while the United States is making it worse by giving Ukraine ridiculous amounts of military assistance. The amount is greater than what Russia spends on defense in one year. Only handing money to the US military-industrial complex to create more weapons (let's get rich from it), and even making war criminals like Bush and others appear on TV to discuss Ukraine, which is a parody,  

Never pushed them out by force, that is untrue. Rather, they retreated. You are attempting to claim that the Ukrainian forces broke the lines of Russian defense in Kharviv, killing tens of thousands of Russians. Repositioned their forces as the taking of Kharviv wasn't part of the plan.. A line needed to be established to prevent Ukraine from approaching from the north and attacking others forces in the east. This narrative is not told in the West.

The Russian army would have only 50,000 men at this stage, while the Ukrainian army would have 300,000 or more believed the kill rate stats here. That makes sense to you. It is likely that the Russians will use panda bears to kill Ukrainian military forces next? A number of Ukrainian troops claim that they lack support in video recordings, the morale among Ukrainian troops is low and morale among Russian troops is very high. There is no evidence of low morale, just a few random Russian soldiers complaining on video. This was woven into a larger narrative hoping that it would be true. 3-1 vehicle loss again no evidence of this all Ukraine stats you're using. At that rate be no tanks belonging to Russia here for offensive operations. .

The politics of the conflict discussed before., 

Good to know Elon Musk is a conspiracy theorist too? What a smart guy, he knows everything isn't as it seems. 

I don't care if it's considered Holocaust denial. You guys have Ukrainian/Nazi denial going on so we're in the same boat on this. 

The Jewish Holocaust was never a topic in any of my threads. Other posters disputed the numbers first. You're doing it on every thread anyway, deflection on alternative stuff is nothing new. My interest is whether history is really what it seems to be. My favorite topics to debate are UFOs, John F. Kennedy, 9/11, and the Holocaust against the Jewish people (denying facts about the Holocaust is considered racist because it's a sacred event). I don't think any significant changes have been made to the Holocaust event by changing the numbers or doubting how many people were gassed. You guys can't have that deep of a discussion anyway. 

 The Jewish population in Europe between 1933 and 1939 is the same, at 9.5 million. The period occurs when the Nazis are coming to power and Jews are emigrating to the United States, South America, and the Middle East. German Jews emigrated in almost two-thirds, according to official statistics that time.. It's simply impossible that there were 3.5 million Jews left in Europe at the end of World War II just based on German statistics, let alone the rest of Europe. There is no historical basis for the notion that 6 million Jews were murdered by gas or shootings. 

It's weird when people say the real war didn't affect the Jewish population. Polish cities were heavily bombed, and a lot of Jews ended up in the Soviet occupation of the eastern part of Poland in 1940, because Poland had the largest Jewish population at the time. It's hard to get reliable numbers on how many Jews were killed here. As the soviet union was invaded, Poles and Jews all ran deeper into the country to escape. The six million figure is given as gospel but it's just not.

Terrible things happened in Jewish Polish ghettos and Germans massacred Jews. I believe it all happened. 

Did the Germans build gas chambers to kill Jews and other people? It's something I've thought about a lot. and changed my thinking on it. While the Germans didn't leave anything behind to prove their crimes, there's evidence they transported Jews on special trains to camps in the east and they never came back. Also you have the survivors who never saw their parents or siblings again. That's not something to ignore. Missing millions of people is the best proof that something sinister and evil happened at these camps.   

I don't mind being called a holocaust denier since I didn't take part in anything or murder anyone. Well, at least I'm changing my opinion and way of thinking. You guys can't even accept the fact that Ukraine has a Nazi problem.

The guy responsible for massacring Jewish people and Poles for the Nazis during WW2 s inside Ukraine was recently made a national hero. 

  wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera

Israel is well aware of that.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hundreds-of-ukrainian-nationalists-march-in-in-honor-of-nazi-collaborator/

What makes V Day the biggest event in Russia? There are 20 to 30 million people who got slaughtered by Nazis in Russia and you think they're going to let Ukraine create Neo Nazis battalions to fight them, get some perspective

It is a fact that no official documents have ever been found at these camps that provide us with complete information about what occurred within. As you mentioned, witnesses gave detailed descriptions of what took place. The holocaust is largely based on these accounts. You can deny that but just fact, by the end of the summer of 1944, the conditions at the camp deteriorated. The inmates weren't being fed and the disease was out of control, so many people had to be buried in the ground. The camp was operating for a long time, and witnesses are telling us this all happened, and whole families disappeared agreed. There are so many people missing that never turned up again when the Soviets liberated the camps, so the stories around gas chambers should be considered historical fact until proven otherwise,. 

Western foreign policy is not rosy, that's why. Why can the west get rid of foreign leaders and nothing happens? Destroyed Syria, Iraq, Libya, all pretty rich countries by regional standards, for what? Because the leader at the time didn't support you?

There's a difference between what the west is doing and what Russia is doing. Russia protects people who need protection from another nation that's suppressing their culture. Has Putin ever invaded a country far away beyond its borders? As far as I know, never invaded any African or Middle Eastern country. Putin is not obsessed with conquering the west, he just wants friendly east countries to be friendly with his country. He's not like a Hitler at all, seeking global control, thats case only with the United States and UK.. 

The Russian military is doing the right thing and stripping these guys who surrendered in Mariupol. Videos on the internet show the soldiers with tattoos of Nazi symbols on their bodies. Here are two guys' tattoos who just left Azovstal and there are way too many on other men same **** to bother showing.

I've seen the videos there real and you see the same place they surrendered as shown on western TV. West media doesn't show Russian soldiers asking them to take off their clothes because it destroys the narrative that no Nazis are fighting there.

I doubt Russia would care to spend all of this time on a fringe part of the site to debate just a few people. Think about it. If we have a different view of what's going on in Ukraine, it's most likely that we're all working for Moscow then? Okay, whatever.

Spend your time with people who share your worldview, instead of replying to me. Enough posters already to deal with.