Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Texas School shooting 19 children and 2 adults murdered

Options
1131416181951

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's just a lobby group so a monthly newsletter and swag I'm guessing. Last thing I heard is that more niche and extreme groups have been replacing them somewhat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,306 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Surely it's feasible to have 3 members of the local police force on rotation five days a week, armoured with the same military grade stuff these losers wear carrying out these shootings, armed with the same weaponery too, providing security outside the schools in the district. Even if it required an expensive recruitment drive.

    It's not like the sight of a gun everyday would spook kids over there either- go to any tourist attraction or federal building and the security is noticeable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,464 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,069 ✭✭✭McFly85


    A quick google shows about 12 elementary schools in Uvalde, assuming you’d want 3 in rotation per school then it becomes a significant undertaking, and you’d probably need to include middle schools too, so I’m not sure it is all that feasible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,207 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Its ludicrous that an 18 year old was able to go into a gun shop and buy 2 AR-15 rifles without question.Even if they had a system where such a purchase required having to have it approved by the local police who would be entitled to ask the 18 year old what he was planning to do with the guns.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,617 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    What I think is absurd is the argument that the real issue here is that there is something in the American psyche, something in their society that moulds people in a certain way, or isolates/rejects people in a certain way, that makes them simply more susceptible to this kind of violent indiscriminate attack.

    Now, I'm not saying that's not true, perhaps it is true. But if it is the case that it is a society containing/producing people with a particular disposition towards mass shooting, surely that makes the case for limiting access to firearms even more pressing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    You'd think so. But the gun nuts in the US fight hard to make even that illegal. Cops in Texas are not entitled to ask anyone why they have weapons. You can walk down the street with the gun on your belt and cops cannot legally challenge you about it.

    And the political system has become so polarised, that the gun nuts will resist any attempt to regulate access to guns (especially if you're a white christian), no matter how small or simple. That's how far beyond saving they are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,010 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Obvious?

    Granny Delta force?

    An no, that was the opposite of obvious whatever that is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Leaving aside the fact that the idea that police need to patrol schools should ring alarm bells in any sane person's brain that you're going the wrong way, ultimately the issue here is money. Everything in the US is about the shakedown, local police forces rely on revenue-generating activities to maintain their powers. Actual police officers in schools would require a payment from the school to the local police force. And public schools in the US are badly underfunded and being continuously defunded, so they don't have the money for this without taking it from kids' educations.

    In this small town, the police force will make a big show for a couple of weeks about keeping the schools secure before they eventually get redeployed to activities that generate revenue. Everything about the US system is a dystopian mess. We're only a couple of years from police forces being sponsored by the biggest business in town and putting their logo over all the police equipment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,283 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    People on here need to understand that these school shootings and mass shootings ingrain the second amendment into the gun freaks even more. It should have the opposite effect but it doesn't. You are literally wasting your time debating them and we are probably wasting our time talking about it. It's 50 years to late for that country to implement any type of meaningful gun control.

    It's been said before that if nothing happened after Sandy Hook then nothing will happen now.

    It'll happen within the next month.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,464 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    A quote from an article about the massacre. Lest we forget, the Border Patrol Tactical force are an elite SWAT team.


    The specialized, SWAT-like team known as the Border Patrol Tactical Unit struggled to breach the classroom door and had to get a staff member to open it with a key, a law enforcement official who requested anonymity told the Associated Press.

    Big, tough, trained SWAT team can't open a door.


    So, remind me how the Social Studies teacher with her semi-automatic pistol is to hold off someone armed with military-grade hardware? Supposedly the local police stood around outside while the shooting was ongoing until this SWAT team arrived. Perhaps for as long as 40 minutes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,010 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There was 3 members of the local police force there.

    An Uvalde school district police officer, who worked at the school, saw Ramos emerge from the vehicle carrying a rifle and wearing body armour, according to Erick Estrada from the Texas Department of Public Safety, who was speaking to CNN.

    The officer "engaged" the suspect but was unable to stop him, Mr Estrada said. Two more officers from Uvalde Police Department also attempted to stop Ramos but were unable to do so, and called for back-up



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,136 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Trying to pose the question 'why these happen' is utter nonsense when it comes to mass shootings in the US. The reason they happen at a rate far higher rate in the US than anywhere else in the developed world is due of the availability of guns. To try start from any other point is just not living in reality - whether it will ever be politically possible to change that is a complete different discussion.

    As for arming teachers or spending more money cops, it is again a complete distraction for any wild solution that isn't facing down the true cause and tougher solutions to really help with the problem. In this situation there were three trained law enforcement officers onsite in a town that spends 40% of their budget on the police. An untrained 18 year old managed to get through them and kill all these kids. The dozens of well trained and armed to the teeth 'hero' cops who arrived then just stood outside for nearly and hour while the shooter was in the school actively killing children, ignoring pleas from parents to go in to save them and holding parents down who were trying to go in themselves unarmed because the cops were too scared to do their job.

    The well trained and armed cops couldn't stop the shooter but you think giving a handgun to Suzie the Home Economics teacher is going to make a real difference? Living in a complete fantasy world.




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    Feasible maybe. But the point is this should not be necessary. Arming people to protect children going to school should not even have to be a consideration in civilised.

    And anyone who thinks of such measures first instead immediately going to gun control measures needs to take a good look at themselves frankly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,087 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Exactly. The Republican solution to gun violence is to arm everyone. Their way of thinking is that if everyone has a gun, nobody will misuse them for fear of being killed themselves. So their solution to the gun problem is simply "more guns".

    This has hit my wife hard. She's American and moved to Ireland about 7 years ago to become a teacher here. She told me on our first date that one of the reasons she left the US was that she was very conscious of the fact that someone could pull out a gun in her class if she was teaching over there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There were multiple police and armed and trained security officers there who couldn't stop him

    The bullsh1t from the NRA and people blindly parroting their talking points is not going to protect US children from being murdered by a psycho intent on going on a rampage

    The proposed cure could be even worse than the disease. Having heavily armed guards on high alert constantly around schools looking out for kids and adults who will be concealing their intention will mean that there will be false positives, twitchy security guards will shoot innocent people, people will be wrongfully accused and detained and targetted for 'looking suspicious'

    Militarising primary schools is unbelievably stupid, and why? So that adult babies can continue to have their toys, and the most evil industry on the planet can continue to make billions of euros in profits selling the guns that kill tens of thousands of Americans a year



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,010 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    So the cops stood around and even found time to taser a parent as the active shooter slaughtered kids.

    But but but but more guns.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    40 minutes the good guys with guns stood around alternating between playing with their dicks and arresting parents of children who were being massacred.

    40 minutes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    So, remind me how the Social Studies teacher with her semi-automatic pistol is to hold off someone armed with military-grade hardware? Supposedly the local police stood around outside while the shooting was ongoing until this SWAT team arrived. Perhaps for as long as 40 minutes.

    Because as we can see from this thread, gun nuts would rather propose zero-effort solutions that don't work rather than medium-effort solutions that are very likely to work. Because they don't want the latter to potentially infringe on them. It's all about the mé féin, fvck everyone else.



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I dunno. We're here talking about how useless the police were outside and about the fact the killer barracaded himself in a room and killed the teacher and kids. Seems like a decent argument for a teacher being armed if they wanted to be.

    If the guns aren't going to be gotten rid of, and the police are uselessly standing outside tasering parents, what can be done during a school shooting? Feels like you have to choose police or not police, and it's clear people aren't choosing police.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,287 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    And now the police are being criticised for not allowing parents into the school and getting shot too. Obviously they couldn’t let anyone in and risk even more casualties.

    Reading up on the killer it is little surprising that it had to come to a violent end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    One of the kids in my sons 6th class primary school got expelled this week for consistently escalating bad behaviour, started off just being bold and disrespectful, ended up stealing computers from the school and selling them, fighting and screaming racial abuse at a girl in his class, totally unprovoked. The kid was completely out of control and is obviously suffering some issues either mentally or in his home environment.

    I'm glad the chances of that kid having access to an assault rifle are essentially zero in Ireland, because if I thought he had access a military grade weapons at home, I'd be genuinely worried about whether he might turn up at the school some day to settle some scores...



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No, they're being criticised for doing **** nothing. We're told the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Well there's a bunch of "good guys" doing nothing.

    And if their procedure is to wait until a gunman has had enough time to massacre just about anyone in range then I'm not sure it's the most sensible policy.



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    People will be calling for them to be defunded again next. A lot of posters here simultaneously want no police, but also want more of them on patrol in schools.

    Schrodinger's police force.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,136 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I'd argue that attempts that were made to solve the problem while avoiding facing the root cause due to groveling to the gun lobby has probably made things worse rather than better.

    Practically every kid in the US consistently is subjected to school shooting drills right from an extremely early age (many offices do too when kids leave school). This can then build a school shooting as an option for those who are twisted enough to become shooters and the easy access guns makes the whole thing straight forward



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Onion has summed up the reactions, as usual. Video online shows police restraining parents from entering the building while shooting in progress. Police waited 40 minutes to an hour before entering. Reddit discussion shows Supreme Court ruling that the police are not there to protect people.

    The solution starts with the reality you describe and the reality of police in the US



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Think you may be mostly mixing people up there, they'd tend to very much fall into 2 different "camps".

    Most of the people calling for a bunch of armed guards in every school are just low-level trolling. In 'merica it's a handy way to further undermine any kind of state-provided service. If you haven't seen the nonsense (past their usual tbh and pretty sickening) on Fox since the shooting they've been banging on about how kids should be homeschooled or privately. They'll throw in the security thing knowing if it comes up later on they'll need to fund it. Then starts the "They want us to pay money because they can't keep our kids safe" "See the state can't do anything" ****.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,136 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You're completely making up that group of posters.

    What we do however continue to see are calls from right wing politicians for 'good guys with guns' when in this exact situation there were plenty more 'good guys with guns' and they were worthless.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's exactly the one I was thinking of. On what power or authority (or principle) were the cops detaining people? As you said, it's the law of the land that cops have no duty of protection (obviously not to the kids) to people. Do Texas have cops with basically unlimited power?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    The Republican solution isn't to arm everybody , including children. Stop lying. As it is schools are gun-free zones , meaning nobody is legally allowed to carry. The Republican argument (not mine) is an armed teacher may have been able to stop Ramos before he took 19 lives.





Advertisement