Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Top Gun: Maverick

145791013

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I did get a rewatch of the original a few days ago before going in and it was certainly a benefit.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    A damn good time. I don’t really care for the original, and honestly this is a significantly superior film. And yet the core is still broadly similar - it’s just tighter, better made and with a much more compelling narrative through-line. The central tension of the planning and eventual payoff of the big mission adds an energy that makes this work so much better. Even the hilariously non-specific nature of the ‘enemy’ here makes the inherently icky nature of a modern U.S. military tale go down quite a bit easier.

    The technology has also come along a lot and allowed for more intense flight sequences than Tony Scott and co could manage. The creep of technology has made so many sequels look worse than their much older predecessors, so it’s a relief to say this is one of the few that looks quite a bit better than what came before. Yes there’s some CGI and whatnot, but the aerial thrill ride is convincing throughout.

    It might not be quite at the upper echelon of the modern action film, but there’s an old-school blockbuster vibe to it that I found endearing and thoroughly enjoyable. It’s a straight-down-the-middle, no-nonsense spectacle: a sort of ‘comfort food’ good time that really feels like it could have dropped out of the 80s and 90s if it weren’t for the occasional smartphone reference and Tom Cruise and Jennifer Connolly having both visibly aged like fine wine.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms



    Last note on the business side of things.. if my audience was anything to go by.. skewing older and not a hugely filled cinema.. I'm not sure this film is gonna make bank.

    There is the June Bank Holiday Weekend coming up. I would say it will be packed out then.

    Will get an idea anyway after this weekend if it's doing OK or not. I hope it's not aflop be sad to see especially with Tom Cruise promoting it but it had been delayed 2 or 3 times so that would not help. People get annoyed or bored of waiting after a while I suppose but the beginning alone is worth the wait.

    My cinema had including me 3 or maybe 4 in it even do the booking seemed so suggest more people had booked. I think it was just the day and time. Suits me. I would have stayed for all the credits too except the cleaning team were in straight away as soon as they started to roll.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Hadn't considered the bank holiday. I assume the good reviews will factor in heavily over in the USA too for the weekend that is in it over there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    By the sounds of it Hollywood is starting to stand up to china if you know what I mean

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    Early tracking indicates this will be the biggest US opening weekend of Cruise’s career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Does this thread presume that people have seen it? I'll put this under a spoiler barrier anyway:


    I saw it in the Galactic screen in IMC Galway. The sound was terrible. I could literally hear people whispering 5 rows back during the loudest scenes. Even if the sound was good, I don't think there would have been much to listen to, the music was really bad compared to the original.

    There was too much Maverick in it from the start in my opinion - too much time watching him perving in that stupid bar. I think the story would have been better if they followed Rooster from the beginning and then leave lots of mystery and intrigue around Maverick much in the same way they did with Viper in the first one. Viper was cool, Maverick was not cool at all in this.

    The last half of the film I thought was very good, it's just a pity it was all rushed to the finish - they could have milked the scenes after they crashed a bit more especially with that attack helicopter (make it more like Behind Enemy Lines). The first Top Gun was all about the MIG and how intimidating it was. The enemy in TG:Maverick was what or who exactly? That cliff face? The enemy was too faceless and unknown.

    Jon Hamm was terrible, I thought.



  • Posts: 8,385 [Deleted User]


    That was fu(king terrible...



    I loved every minute



  • Posts: 8,385 [Deleted User]


    I saw it at a 12:30 showing, yesterday afternoon, in Cork.

    I expected it to be a near private screening but the cinema was over 1/3 full. MUCH more than I've seen recently at the time slot



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,319 ✭✭✭santana75


    I cant recall enjoying a film this much, it is absolutely brilliant. I was never a fan of the original and I think this outstrips that movie by some distance. It gets right into the action and does not let up for even a second, I was never bored. The only negative thing I can say is that there is zero chemistry between Tom Cruise and jennifer Connolly. They could've cut that entire relationship out and the film would still have been a belter. I hope it does well at the box office because its a genuinely great action film.



  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭Big Gerry


    The critical drinker recommends it.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,198 ✭✭✭Murt10


    I wonder how much Kawasaki paid for their product placement at the start and Porche at the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,148 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Dad, Mam and 2 kids here (10 & 7). Fair to say everyone enjoyed it immensely. 2 hours of pure fun.

    Feels like a breath of fresh air - no ridiculous multiverse cris-crosing storylines. Lovely touches of nostalgia. Take it as it is, don't overthink it, just go and see it and park the stresses of 2022 for a little while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Mad good RT score 97% and 99%

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Give the audience genuine, tangible thrills, worth seeing in a cinema, and both they and the critics will say "yes please". It's not rocket science but Hollywood has drifted so far into Four Quadrant, CGI driven mush everyone's acting surprised a moderately competent action film is winning hearts and minds.

    Dr Kermode loved it, unironicallly.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,357 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Two words.

    F#cking class



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,021 ✭✭✭furiousox


    Went to the original in 1986 with my girlfriend.

    Went to TG2 today with the same girl (now my wife)

    We both loved it, some of the dialogue is a bit cheesy and jon hamm is a bit hammy but its just great fun. The aerial scenes are amazing!

    Just give in to it, buy the popcorn and enjoy, its a great night out!

    CPL 593H



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,432 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    150m dollar projected Opening Weekend in the US. 🤑



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,871 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Looks like a critical and box office success



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭Vertigo100


    C’mon Mav, do some of that pilot ****!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Fantastic visuals and cinema experience, I felt some of the G force sitting there.

    The story has none of the heat or real feeling the original was able to capture and suffers as a result. Love interest seemed a cut and paste. All very predictable. Needed that bit of Tony Scott magic.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Fantastic film, really enjoyed it. One of those films which has to be seen in the cinema.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Took a while to get going and cut through the mandatory testosterone amd chest thumping but after that it was a great thrill ride. You could almost feel the g forces and there was real tension for the mission. My only gripe was the tacked on love story which felt unnecessary.


    And I was glad to see the room more than half full. It felt like the olden times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,620 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Well I absolutely loved it. It was the epitome of a proper blockbuster film. Entertaining throughout, a great story that never felt contrived, stunning cinematography, fantastic acting, and utterly mesmerising action scenes. Plenty of heart in mouth moments and genuine threat that kept me on the edge of my seat.

    I heard Tom say that making the sequel was liking hitting a bullet with a bullet and it's clear that they absolutely hit it.

    I can't wait to go to see it again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭KilOit


    Dull macho stuff around the beginning but towards the middle to end scenes was heart-pounding, seriously intense action that made it worth it



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's memorial day weekend over here so everything military is glorious and they've done quite a but of marketing for it.


    I walked into an Applebee's the other night and a life-size Tom Cruise cutout greeted me inside the door.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Muppet Man


    I watched here in a small town in up state new York. Not many in the cinema... but they do have it on ever 30 mins.

    I remember watching the original in the cinema and was blown away by it then. This was a Solid 8 out of 10 for me. Not sure how it could have been better.... although... too much "talk to me goose" for my liking.

    Muppet man



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,050 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    God damn I loved that, people applauded Tom Cruises message at the start (nice touch as well).

    I loved it, it was a great break from CGI balls and had real planes with all the bells and whistles. Some nice laughs and Tom Cruise nailed it. Proper great summer blockbuster movie, I’ll probably go to it again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,050 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Saw it last night, and they did a very good job, I laughed out load at one stage although I don't think it was deliberate, not sure...


    Possible SPOILER...

    When they were flying through the canyon, considering the actual precision strike (miracles) they needed I was thinking, would they say it... and they didn't disappoint "Stay on target" - It was soooo like Star Wars as it was, that MUST have been a deliberate in-joke.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Life size, eh? They could have made an effort 😁



  • Posts: 8,385 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In fairness there were a few shots clearly showing height differentials.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,208 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    So Top Gun 3 with the mistress or going to carry on the tradition?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,827 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Watched it yesterday in the states. All the ads for it pushed me over the edge. Very enjoyable and very much lacks the woke bs which so often ruins modern films. The one female pilot was very believable and slotted naturally into the role without being forced down your throat. Character development was a bit lacking though. Sure, we had MAVERICK and the on-off girlfriend, but beyond that, it didn't go deep and relied heavily on the ground made solid from TG1.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,871 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Breaks Memorial Day Weekend Records With $156 Million



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    It's a fun ride for sure but where the original was grounded well enough in some sort of realism by the end of this one it was absolute fantasyland stuff.

    Still enjoyed it of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭seraphimvc


    Watched it last night in 4DX (the bumper chair with abit of water at cineworld aha, not intentionally, just because that time slot fits us).

    Oh I adore this project so much after watching it. Strongly recommend to watch it in cinema. My whole family enjoys it so this is my new favourite choice for a family movie occasion.

    It reminds me of the 'purer' times back in 90s movies - like people actually put hard work into movies to entertain audience. So ya this sequel ticks all the boxes of a good 90s movie with moderate updates on modern stuff (especially the details and effects). It may be rather overall predictive but all ends up and holds up very well in all aspects (plot, characters, pacing, soundtracks, effects), with just the right amount of cheese here and there. And I think Tom cruise is a better actor this time around aha.

    Thoroughly enjoyable.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's a relevant pic in the Cool Vids and pics thread as to why SPOILER the Kelly McGillis character isn't in the film. BUT, she wasn't even mentioned. Even Meg Ryan/Rooster's mum got a flashback and storyline.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,385 [Deleted User]


    Because her character had zero relevance, to the plot. Would your ex, from 30 years previous, have any impact on current events?



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    And not everyone has access to the Adrenochrome mainline like the Cruiser!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    It reminds me of the 'purer' times back in 90s movies - like people actually put hard work into movies to entertain audience. So ya this sequel ticks all the boxes of a good 90s movie with moderate updates on modern stuff (especially the details and effects).

    The part at the beginning where Maverick is flying the Mach 10 scramjet is real except for doing Mach 10. I do not think that is possible yet. I actually thought it was CGI'd but no when he flys over the cabin and the roof comes of it that is real and was not planned. It was supposed to be tied down and Tom Cruise kept asking this because he did not want anyone to get injured.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,533 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Do you need to have seen or remember the original to watch this ?

    I really don't want to watch the original again, but this sounds like a decent movie without all the cheese of the original.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    It doesn’t hurt to have seen the original just to pick up on a few references and nods (visual and musical nods included). But for the purposes of plot all that really matters from the first film is:

    Maverick’s friend and partner Goose died in an accident during a training mission, leaving behind a wife and son.

    Iceman was Maverick’s rival but eventually they came to respect each other

    Neither film is particularly deep or complex, let’s be honest 😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭seraphimvc


    I thought small amount of the effects we see are CGI ya, but barely noticeable. My brother is a big fan of Ace Combat games and he approved the aerial elements in the movie ha.

    Is a very common problem I see on the average actors in those CG fest movies that I can tell they are acting in a green screen (that took me out of the moment instantly). But all actors in this sequel reactions are so real, and ya the visuals and practical effects look so damn good.

    And ya knowing Tom cruise's obsession on practical/real effects, truly an awesome a breath of fresh air actually seeing so many 'real' scenes in this movie. Respect to the man really and he just might be the last and best action star of the generation.

    I just might actually watch it again in cinema aha.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8 James M. Morales


    Men will stay men, But the girl will be the grandmother.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Saw it last night.. Awesome movie!

    I was initially concerned that it was going to be a straight rehash of the original, but instead it managed to stay faithful to the original but still did its own thing and moved Maverick's character forward.

    Supporting cast turned out to be pretty good as well, particularly Rooster. Jon Hamm was a weak spot though but still passable.

    Flight sequences and cinematography were great thanks to minimal use of CGI. Live action and practical effects will always win over what some art department can generate on their computer. It does take a while to get to the action but it's definitely worth it when it does.

    I rewatched the original over the weekend so would definitely advise that before going to this one.

    Overall a very worthy sequel that is probably the best thing I've seen this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,004 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    Saw this last night and thought it was absolutely brilliant! a must-see in the cinema



  • Advertisement
Advertisement