Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1114115117119120190

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    They've countries who'll carry on buying Russian stuff and watch carefully to pick up a bargain on the fly, and won't stick their necks out to condemn their evil.

    That's not really "allies". Allies will actually risk something for you.

    More self interested amoral observers. Even China the Great Friend isn't doing much as yet (not much more than India say) for all the partnership guff and the rhetoric in support of the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Nazi Germany produced the Tiger Tank, had an impressive industrial capacity and top-rank scientists and technicians, nearly beat the Allies to a jet airplane design and anticipated Western aircraft designs by many years in the Horten flying wing and Triebflugel. Wow! They were great lads, weren't they? Gotta love those Nazis!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen


    "Ukraine as a country has signed no agreement obliging it to be neutral."

    Its in the founding document of the state. I've shown you this.

    There's nothing more to say. Its impossible to argue with someone who wont acknowledge historic documented facts when shown them. I see now you're basically just a bit of a chancer. Enjoy your ignorance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,955 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Ukraine as a country has signed no agreement either with another sovereign nation or legitimate international authority obliging it to be neutral.

    Whatever declarations were made by 'state soviets', they are not an international agreement, and are entirely superseded by those such as Budapest - unless referenced therein, which they were not.

    Ukraine has not violated the Budapest agreement. Russia repeatedly has. That is the truth of the matter. Anything else are Russian lies and propaganda.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    We'll join the club along with Micheal Martin, Finland, Canada, Sweden, France Germany, Rumania, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Britain, the USA, Poland, Japan, Italy, the Czech Republic, Greece, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Belgium and plenty more....Nazi sympathizers all. Several of those states had the misfortunate to be under the boot of REAL Nazis in the Second World War....so they can see Nazism, or something as near as makes no difference when they see it. Several of those countries suffered under BOTH the Nazis and the Soviets so they have an especially acute perception of what despotism is like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Angela Merkel has said she was against Ukraine joining nato because she didn't want to stoke tensions with Russia!

    Is Angela Merkel a Putinbot? Is she a Putin apologist? Is she on the Kremlins payroll???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,955 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    (a) No

    (b) Yes

    (c) Couldn't rule it out

    More likely she's an appeaser. Easier to sell out Ukraine and keep the cheap gas flowing than take a stand for democracy in Europe. Had it been left to the likes of her, Eastern Europe wouldn't be in EU or NATO, but would now be getting the Ukraine\Georgia\Donbas treatment from Russia. When your run down your own military and got rid of your own energy security, you cannot make such a stand, you have to appease.

    At least Chamberlain had the excuse he was balancing off against multiple threats in Japan, Italy and Germany and was massively increasing military spending should a showdown have to happen. Merkel has none.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,522 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    She supported appeasement of Putin, and we see how that has turned out. If Ukraine had joined NATO starting in 2008, it's very unlikely Russia would have invaded, or annexed Crimea, or proxy invaded the East of the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,641 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    She did, but in fairness she thought integrating Russia into the West would reduce any military threat and make a Cold War impossible.

    She backed the wrong horse of course, but Putin becoming more hawkish, belligerent and isolationist over the last 10 years was largely of his own doing and could hardly be said to be her fault. Relations with the West were pretty good up until 2014 but then Putin started to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle



    Nice try, Dohn Joe. I'm starting to respect you. Someone from Russophobia-camp recently said that Russian military is disadvantaged:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119165386/#Comment_119165386

    Most of the "investment" is stolen by the kleptocratic organised crime called "Russian government". That's why we see what we see in Ukraine in terms of military performance.

    I would seriously doubt Russian tactical nuclear capability as well. Putin made a huge mistake by exposing the shambles that Russian military is...

    If the Japs or Chinese were expansionist they would have stricken Russia easily now (in the East which is poorly defended). Thankfully for Russia they aren't. Turkey is definitely watching though.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    This is not true. Oh, yeah - here it is customary to say: "This is an utter lies!"

    Did you ask Ukrainians? They wanted to keep working and live their lives without EU/NATO. Then Ukro-gov explained them during last decade that they should want to join NATO and EU. That was not funny, poor Ukrainians believed in this, while the reality is that nobody among EU govs wanted Ukraine to join. Poor, weak country, no infra - would be sucking all the juices from EU economy like Greece, and even worse. Just like now, during the war.

    Corruption of Ukrainian even worse than in Russia, everything is just stolen. People are poor to zero. Now they are paying their utility bills, which takes 40-50% of their salaries.

    If Europe or NATO wanted to stop this war, they'd let Ukraine to join quickly, and would threaten Putin with NATO nuclear weapon. What happens instead?

    Repeating again: Ukrainians of freed regions are happy that Russian army came and freed them from Ukor-nazis.

    Go and ask Ukrainians from LNR and DNR - if they're happy or not. Just look at the queue of people in Luganskaya region, to get their Russian passports:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMkaJePSs2I

    The reality is that unfortunately a big part of Ukraine will become Russian territory soon. Just accept it as a reality.

    P.S. I don't support this fact. This is painful to see of how it happens. But you must be blind not to see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Ukor-Nazis. A country with a Jew as PM is Nazi. A country that Ukrainian Jews and other Jews abroad support is Nazi. A country where Gay people feel more comfortable than they do in Russia is Nazi (but Russia isn't). A country with over a score of parties represented in the parliament is Nazi but a country where one man has either ruled alone or pulled the strings for 22 years ISN'T Nazi. A country that runs ''filtration camps''(nothing like concentration camps of course..nothing to see here, right ) ISN'T Nazi. A country where you can be arrested for holding up a placard with nothing written on it, or a quote from the bible or the constitution ISN'T Nazi. A country where soldiers have chatted on the phone about how they tortured prisoners or casually shot people down ISN'T Nazi.A country that threatens the world with nuclear annilhilation on a daily basis (even Hitler didn't start talking about destroying the world until 1945) ISN'T Nazi. A country where journalists undetaking investigations inconvenient to the rulers die in ''accidents'' or street muggings ISN'T Nazi. A country that sends secret agents abroad to murder enemies with lethal nerve agents and poisons ISN'T Nazi (Actually that reminds of how the OGPU specialized in poisons and had a whole department devoted to the craft...good to know the old skills haven't been neglected. Traditions are important, eh). A country that that is busy deporting people by the thousands to Siberia (yet another good old Russian tradition, well practised not only by the Soviets-acknowledged experts in the old livestock train carriage business-but by their forbears the Imperial Russians) ISN'T Nazi


    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    Mother of God, so much anger in a single civilised European man...

    Do you have a family, bro? Why are so angry living in successful European country? I bet you can't even perceive my words without thinking that I'm sarcastic. But I'm not.

    I'm not a bot, but I'm really enjoying with Irish people - they are kind and welcoming. That's why I'm also surprised if you're a real Irish - I simply didn't see Irish with so much anger.

    I have a couple of Irish friends already, which is a big luck I think.

    Why I don't want my kids live there, in Russia? Because, firstly, I'm not Russian, so my country of origin is different. :)

    Also I did live there for some time and saw the system from the inside. It's not perfect, but it's not that bad how you're painting it from your side. Putin is a super-smart idiot - that's true (yes, and this is the problem when a KGB person is really smart, and then becomes a president!) But he is smart, so they're doing pretty good things, developing businesses. The educational system is disputable (though some people don't think so, and they're glad) - starting from 5th grade it's not an education IMHO, it's just a kid's torture with loads of facts, and old soviet-minded teachers. Higher education is really good. This why the world loves Russian mathematicians and programmers.

    But there are also very smart people, really intelligent. I really regret that world doesn't know and gets infected with Russophobia without knowing who normal Russians really are, especially of intellectual professions.

    So why am I here? Because I really like Ireland. And I'm really grateful for meeting such beautiful country with such kind and cheerful people. It's not a heaven, there are some disadvantages. Teenagers are allowed to do really nasty things - and they won't be punished. They simply don't respect people. This is not the case in Russian-speaking countries - there is more respect to elderly people from teenagers, especially in such regions like Chechnya, South Osetia etc. Irish educational system is really-really weak in most schools, so we hire tutors here. The taxes are SUPER high. But all in all it's not that bad.

    TBH, I'd live normal life in almost any country starting from Ural mountains and western.

    It's probably only you, who was born in Ireland and not happy with his own life, growing and cherishing anger against evil Russians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    Why do you ask, dear? Did you see what the war is at all?

    Also, stop coming up with these fun ideas like "They came to steal a washing machine on the $10M tank". Just stop it, dear. Try to ask something more appropriate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    Explaining only one time. Only for you.

    Sorry I was sarcastic, but it simply looks like you're trolling, because you're asking such questions just like you don't understand. Or you're trying to make me angry? If so - it's not possible, man. It would be really funny to get angry at letters on the monitor. I'm not getting angry at anyone here.

    First, Russia - is NOT my country. Okay? If I'm saying anything positive about any country, this doesn't mean I'm standing for it. In any nation there are good people and idiots (for simplicity). And that explains everything.

    Intelligent people (and those are the smallest group), middle level and, well, the rest. "The rest" - most of them are pensioners and those who are listening to propaganda etc. The middle and intelligent class - who see what happens, and using their own minds. It's hard to make them just believe the government like here in Europe. Here people simply tend to believe whatever they say. Intelligent Russians are a bit different. But those are a small group as I said. And unfortunately most of them don't have any gov-impact.

    Well, pretty the same as here, in Ireland and in any other country.

    Next. Russian gov is driven by security forces people. Putin is KGB, pro-Stalin guy. That's clear. And the methods the same. Unfortunately people lived in USSR for 70 years, 3 generations of "The rest" (the biggest population) people are used to such kind of government, and simply don't perceive any other kind of it.

    BTW, pretty the same picture with Ukrainian people. So their mindset is actually not compatible with yours, and they can't be ruled by western principles. Why? Well, because they still have the same Russain-like-mindset, as they were in USSR for the same 70 years. That's what civilian Euro people simply don't understand (but EU gov does) - one doesn't simply integrate Ukraine into Europe. And, well, they have pretty same tendency to kleptocracy, committing atrocities daily etc... Sneaky west set the slavic nations on each other.

    And it'll require pretty much time until these type of people will be replaced with new visioners. But they will come.

    Is that clear now?

    Okay. Go ahead with your trolling and anger again...

    Post edited by SomewhereInTheMiddle on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,522 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Yeah I understand that, the notion that enough trade makes war unfeasible. Unfortunately it didn't factor in the ego of a dictator.

    Not reading much of this thread anymore, it's become a sluice for the "just don't reply to them" serial offenders and god knows what some of these new accounts are. Switching back to the other one.

    Extraordinary image of the front line, looking more and more like WW1 with lines of trenches, slow moving artillery and grinding gains/losses.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    She's someone who needs to justify her own catastrophic failures. How else is she going to do it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If Ukraine had joined NATO starting in 2008, it's very unlikely Russia would have invaded

    Russia would likely have invaded Ukraine in 08 if Ukraine joining NATO was on the cards then - it doesnt justify their actions but it is one of the main reason Russia is invading, and it had been called out well in advance by several well respected diplomats over the course of decades. NATO expansion eastward is a red flag to Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Field east


    It



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    why has Putin committed his whole military to Ukraine opening up to NATO unprotected paths direct to Moscow and st Petersburg?

    Source on that claim?

    If Russia has nukes which it will use to bomb any attackers of its soil then that also throws a spanner into any claims of being afraid of NATO

    At some stage in the future there may be active defenses that intercept nuclear weapons, and every nuclear power is very aware of this possibility. Sure the US had nuclear weapons too, it didnt stop them drawing a red line at the USSR having missiles in Cuba. Nuclear weapons are a powerful deterrent but not the be all and end all. A nation cannot relax simply because they have them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,420 ✭✭✭✭josip


    That hasn't turned out very well for the cretin in the Kremlin now that Sweden and Finland have applied to join.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I agree, it hasn't. Regardless, expect espionage and frosty relations between Russia and Finland going forward if they succeed in NATO membership.

    Post this war, it will be a decade of very poor relations between Europe and Russia (and its friends further east). We were warned by western diplomats for decades that NATO expansion eastward would be a "red-line" and that the Russians perceive it as an active threat - so this result was not surprising. Nor will the cold war-lite state of affairs for the next decade or more be surprising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    So you have no source saying the Russians have left Moscow and St Petersburg undefended? Right

    There is no contradiction there, the point is that no country can relax because at some point in future the means to intercept nuclear weapons may well exist and they will simply be taken out of the equation, its for this reason the Russians (and the US and other "powers") all still consider territory and proximity to hostile neighbours as strategic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Field east


    How come that Russia has threatened Ukr/ the world that ‘ all hell will break loose’ if Ukr is starting to think about/ making efforts to join NATO, yet Finland and Norway have their applications already lodged with NATO and apart from a small few expected comments from Putin, there has been total silence. So why the VERY DIFFERENT responses?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    Sorry, but you sound just like typical Ukrainian, who drunk with Ukro-propaganda.

    Because you're painting everything into black-white colours, and seems you don't want to widen your mind just a little bit. Also you firmly believe like last hundred years Ukraine was a separate country and a great nation made out of different material than Russians (seems because of that there are so many Ukro-Russian and Russo-Ukrainian families in both countries, lots of relatives and others). Finally, so much hatred to all the Russians and blind proudness with Ukrainians.

    For this reason, the Ukrainians (not just "Ukraine") will face the hard fate of deep complacency with their "nation" in future decades. This trait won't let you raise your country as you described above.

    And Europe and the rest of the world will see what Ukraine really is.

    Sad...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,420 ✭✭✭✭josip


    In this post it looks to me that what you are doing is reflecting. Every characteristic you apply to the Ukrainians, is actually what the Russians are actually doing. Have you watched your own state TV lately? Or is that more Ukrainian propaganda?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    An estimated 75%, not 100% not undefended Moscow and St Petersburg.

    Also if you had read my posts I explained that the threat of NATO on their border is less of an imminent threat and more of a long term threat - the real threat is when nuclear weapons are widely interceptable. So while they will keep pushing with hypersonic missile technology, eventually the defense mechanisms may catch up with them and then the nuclear deterrent is no longer a deterrent. If at this stage they have NATO on all their borders then they are in real trouble.

    So why the VERY DIFFERENT responses?

    I dont know, my direct line to the kremlin has been cut off by sanctions so I cant ask for you. 🙄

    Maybe because of some historical attachment to Ukraine, maybe because strategically Ukraine is much more of a vulnerability than the Finnish border. Also its Finland and Sweden, not Finland and Norway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    I would like to learn your opinion first - why is it so? I'm sure you won't be able to explain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭glen123


    Ukraine has  oligarchic system of its own. Poroshenko is a prominent oligarch. The man behind Zelenkiy's presindency is Kolomoisky (you can read on Privatbank saga and how it's all linked)

    Russian set up looks painfully Soviet Union type (I cannot look at these old faces swollen from the drink sitting nodding to every single Putin's word) , and while Ukrainian set up sort of looks more modern (young faces in the government, newly elected president after each election and this is because people are so desperate, they are prepared to vote for anything as long as it's smth new that maybe, just maybe won't be as corrupt), differences are still minimal when it comes to the overall picture in both countries where an average citizen is concerned - wages are poor, standards of living too, corruption is through the roof.

    I also agree with SITM - Crimea and the East of Ukraine are gone for good now. Not only because there is a lot of support for Russia there (only recently Alex Crawford of Sky News was interviewing people in one of the basements of Severodonetsk and people were refusing to leave - they were waiting to be freed by the Russians and a man crying of how he was called by a Ukrainian soldier a "separ", short for separatist) but also because of the anti Russian language moods in the West of Ukraine getting re-activated with the new force as well as growing opinions amongst the population like to hell with Crimean and Donbas - they are traitors, etc, let them go to mother Russia, we don't need them.

    I am a Ukrainian from the West and this is what my lads (we are talking about educated people, teachers, etc) had been saying even before the big war started on the 24th - to hell with Crimea and Donbas. Not only they are saying this between themselves, they are spreading this around, in their work places like schools, universities - places where you can easily influence other people, especially, younger generation.

    Nothing justifies what's happening right now and for me personally what's happening is very sad, but it's not just Putin's fault for sure even though I blame him first.

    As for Crimea, having been on holidays there many times as a child and teenager, I also studied with the group of about 30 in the 90s - they came from Crimea to my university in the West. They were pretty different to us and the whole 5 years they stayed studying they struggled - they kept together as a group and only made friends with those that spoke Russian to them but they never really became part of our large student community and even after 5 years, they never learnt Ukrainian properly (only basics that they would use to buy goods in the shop). The minute they got their degrees, they went back to Crimea (not a single one stayed in the West). I've zero doubts that every single one of them voted to become part of Russia when the Referendum took place, especially after 5 years in my city (in the 90s nationalists were regularly flooding our main square with their anti Russian and pro Bandera slogans which was probably scary for an average Russian speaking from the East to watch). And this is younger generation we are talking about. Older generation is even worse when it comes to support for Russia and the return of Soviet Union. After all they are ethnically Russian.

     



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,959 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Is there anyone on this thread who thinks that a nuclear exchange is unthinkable?

    That the development of hypersonic missiles is making this moreso.?

    This is madness.Even an exchange with NK could be a global catastrophe


    Why are nuclear possibility mongers not just locked up for their own and our own good?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭myfreespirit


    I'm sorry but much of what you wrote is incomprehensible.

    What on earth does this mean?

    "For this reason, the Ukrainians (not just "Ukraine") will face the hard fate of deep complacency with their "nation" in future decades. This trait won't let you raise your country as you described above."

    On the substantive point you made about Ukraine (at least this is what I understand you were addressing):

    It is true that Ukraine only gained independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union; nonetheless it is a sovereign state which has the right to choose which alliances it joins, without the threat of war from it's more powerful neighbours.

    Do you agree that Ukrainians have the right to choose the path for their country?

    Слава Україн– Glóir don Úcráin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    Hold on, sorry, but you've not finished. You said above: "Intelligent" Russians.

    What can you say about the Russians themselves? Are they silly? Bad? Evil? Stupid? Elaborate on this please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    If NATO were the concern, the 2022 invasion of Ukraine wouldn't have happened. NATO was "brain dead" according to the French, Finland & Sweden weren't joining, & Ukraine would never have been allowed in given its disputed borders with Russia etc.

    Invading (the rest of) Ukraine changed (and was always guaranteed to change) all that - which the Russians would have fully understood (they aren't stupid).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭myfreespirit


    Thank you for this informative post, it is interesting to hear a Ukrainian perspective on the horror that is unfolding there.

    I fear you may be accurate about the loss of Donbass and Crimea to Russia, what is more worrying is that the occupation has taken vast swathes of territory in the east, along the Sea of Azov, and along the Black Sea. It is probable that Russia will no relinquish these gains either. Moreover, the Russians will likely try to take Odesa and surrounding areas as well.

    All very pessimistic, I know, but the seizure of land is continuing with no end in sight.

    Do you think that Ukraine will survive as an independent country after this horror ends?

    Слава Україн– Glóir don Úcráin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen


    My god man. A quote from an "unidentified U.S. senior defense official" in the conservative National Review is the opposite of evidence. it is pure narrative affirming propaganda. Are you aware of how biased your sources are or do you just whack them in there hoping no one notices that they are written by the Pentagon?

    Russia has over 1m soldiers and 2m Reservists. Do you honestly think there are 2.25 million Russians in the forests outside Sievierodonetsk?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭myfreespirit


    I don't believe that a nuclear exchange is unthinkable unfortunately.

    All I can hope is that, as Sting (The Police) sang: "I hope the Russians love their children too"

    Слава Україн– Glóir don Úcráin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The Russians will not come close to Odessa. At best they hold they lands they currently have east of the Dnieper, along with Severodonetsk/Lisichansk. They will not get as far as Kramatorsk either in the east.

    If they manage to close the encirclement around Lisichansk (which would take months more at this rate), thats about it. After that they dig in or negotiate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭glen123


    Yes, ironically it's the East that will suffer and not the West of the country where all the nationalists and Bandera supporters are. On the other hand, there is nothing in the West that may be worth going after for Putin and it'll be impossible to control afterwards.

    Question however for many, especially vulnerable like pensioners and especially in the East is when this European prosperity is going to happen. People's incomes vs low prices were at its manageable (as sad as it is) under Yanukovich. From 2014 onwards it has all become one big mess. You see, us in the West - you'd struggle to find a family there that doesn't have someone working abroad supporting the rest of the family and this set up goes back to 90s. As a result, for many living there it isn't that hard to be wanting to become part of EU, be very vocal about this or that when once a month they get a chance to collect their additional income at the Western Union outlet sent to them by their parent working hard in the EU.

    On the other hand in the Donbas region - in the first 20 years of Ukraine's independence you'd struggle to find a Ukrainian from there working abroad in Poland, Czech, UK, the US. They were all working locally driving the economy and probably had little time to be thinking about EU, etc. They were more interest in cheap utility bills and better wages.

    This is how different the two regions are - we've been working (legally or illegally) in the EU since early 90s, they haven't. We think once we get into EU our teachers will be on 40k+, they are not so sure.

    Older generation on both sides of the country, especially now, just wants a decent life, decent healthcare and I doubt they care under EU or under what else this happens. My mother's pension is 120$ per month. She broke a hip. Under free medical healthcare she was offered to be put into plaster and go home and die. This is what happens if you don't have $3k cash to pay for the operation. I am afraid, I may not live to see the prosperity one way or the other.

    Everything should have been done to prevent this war from happening but very little was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    I didn't put quotes around the Intelligent word. So are you saying that Russians are not intelligent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen



    I didn't quote any claims from Russia. That would lack integrity. I would never quote anything from Russian sources as they have an agenda and a narrative to push just like every other belligerent in the conflict.

    And you didn't back up any assertion. You basically posted a link of the que cards from Blinkens morning press conference's in March.

    Honestly Dougal, this is very basic stuff. Do you think there are over 2.2 million Russians running around the forests of Ukraine? If you don't (and I hope you don't) then the "evidence" you provided is obviously nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭glen123


    It will survive as an independent country, I am sure. The problem is if it looses all the valuable territories and access to ports, what is it going to be like to live there?

    In the year before the war nearly 2 million (if I remember correctly) left Ukraine to work abroad (mainly in Poland where wages aren't great). Now during the war even more left. Many will not return.

    People in the West of the country haven't felt yet the real impact of the war (life goes on as normal there with weddings, parties etc). In 6-12 months time when they start feeling the effects of what's going on, they may start leaving the country too.

    I struggle to see EU taking on such a liability and accepting Ukraine as a member. They'll keep helping financially, of course, with half of the money going into the pockets of our corrupt politicians and we'll go back to continue living like before the war but with way less territory.

    I'd love to be like Arestovich guy (Zelenskiy's advisor) who every evening in his Youtube interviews is winning the war, but even if we do, is there a person or the willingness to bring the two parts of Ukraine together so that they could live together in peace and mutual respect for their cultural and language differences? I don't know such a person. Surprisingly even Russian speaking jew Zelenskiy (who only learnt Ukrainian right before the elections and never bothered with it before) didn't think it worth giving it a go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen



    "In 2010 the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) estimated that the Russian Armed Forces numbered about 1,027,000 active troops and in the region of 2,035,000 reserves (largely ex-conscripts)."

    From:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭glen123


    Support in Kherson would be apprx 50/50. It's a farming region, pretty self sufficient. They may just decide to get on with their lives and not bother to try and breakout from under the Russians. I'd imagine at the moment they are simply busy working as it cannot wait until winter))



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 SomewhereInTheMiddle


    🤣 Broken CD-player?

    I've explained that already. I told you - "Explaining only one time. Only for you". Remember? Please find that message and re-read. I've carefully explained my vision regarding this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,959 ✭✭✭amandstu


    @correct horse battery staple

    That would be nice.He would suffer the fate of Caesar's enemies - the People's general /sarc.

    Unlike his apparent hero Bony the First it would be Vlad the Last(twinned with Ceacescu let us hope)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭bobowen


    What an unidentified general in the National Review claims Russia has on paper and what Russia has in reality is very different.

    Russia is slowly taking town after town while the Ukrainians throw what's left of their poor conscripted soldiers into the front line. Once Lysychansk is surrounded in the next week or two you will see a very different conflict. Zelensky is gambling a lot of men on a doomed defence of this town.



Advertisement