Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1155156158160161259

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Is it as bad as Northwood residents who actively objected to a bus being routed through their estate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,709 ✭✭✭jd


    When was that? The latest SHD applications had observations made by residents that it should be a condition of any planning permission given that construction should not be allowed start until Northwood Management come to an agreement with the NTA re the E1 terminus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Plenty of people work in the Phoenix Park too! ;-)

    Also, I would say, slightly tongue in cheek, that the recent furore over parking in the Phoenix Park also lifted the lid on a large group of people for whom walking from the 46A terminus or Heuston is a bridge too far.

    But coming back to reality, I do believe that re-routing the N2 into the Phoenix Park makes a lot of common sense. The Park is a major traffic generator, and having the N2 run through it would improve access to the Zoo and all the other amenities that that Park has to offer, with connections to all of the rail lines. I would suggest that improving access to amenities such as the Phoenix Park is an important aspect of developing the public transport network in this city.

    As for the section of route that would be altered, I think that to be fair, it would be adequately served with the 37 along Blackhorse Avenue and the O along the NCR and Infirmary Road, so re-routing the N2 isn't such a big deal as you might think.

    It's the connectivity that the N2 brings that is key in my mind particularly with the rail network.

    I don't think putting forward an example of a very low frequency, stand alone non-integrated and poorly promoted shuttle bus service is much of an argument. That bus service was doomed from the start.

    I really do think that integrating the Park into the city bus network using low emission electric buses is a positive thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    That shuttle route was too long, and fares were too steep as for such a local route.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,687 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Note that the Phoenix Park Shuttle was originally every half hour but was cut to every hour due to low passengers.

    As has been previously said it was very poorly advertised and had no real proper connection with the bus network. They really made a great effort with the livery though!

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/cityswift/28455843340/in/photolist-KmxCQC-Kbz7hs-LW7omH-NyBFih-29nZLut-TWBsZv-2aBJQdW-VCzbwR-bo5NLD-29rRG8y-Qk2zTb-nQo64G-HATfmY-HxBmwP-HxBk36-4YyqGH-GJbWdS-HATd6A-PhqdRo-NX39zU-2gXcb4D-NWeuGw-Ng4vr4-PskM3w-PsVUQs-Pupb42-PrebDj-2nq5drF-UQiTZK-PreaG9-2axby4t-eFDbro-VnZaYW-853kby-PoZSpF-KH4dFy-Up2VNi-V3qc2f-bsJexS-9Q2hCS-JcCtN8-VCzStV-RJU4pb-f79GKm-bgPF44-pBuSwo-UkWYcA-9Q2cq7-ccCXzY-9PYoGc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭thomasj


    Am hearing that the N4 is starting to pick up more passengers now .

    Has been picking up more passengers following the St Anne's concerts and in general people getting on after the DART at killester..

    A lot good feedback



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    My point about the previous Phoenix Park service was in relation with the talk of the OPW introducing their own separate park specific bus service rather than the talk of a regular service route serving the Park.

    My point was that type of service has already been done why would it be a success a second time around. Not to do with the introduction of a regular service route which the N2 would be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’ll allow the G Spine access High Street from the Quays when it launches in August.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    What's the point of the cycle lane going down the hill. Surely it's the up hill direction that you need to have a cycle lane.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Going down Santry Lane today, I spotted that the bus stop outside the hazelwood student accommodation had a KL01 route included beside the N6.

    I wondered what it was and some digging turns out it’s a keelings retail bus. Found it somewhat odd it was marked on the stop head. Are other private business buses also included (I’m thinking the buses out to IBM/Intel etc)?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,346 ✭✭✭markpb


    Arguably those bus routes are providing a bus service and the passengers will need to know where they can board. Adding a route plate to a TfI bus stop beats another pole and another sign being installed into the footpath and adding to the clutter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Keelings and IBM routes are (bizarrely) licensed commercial bus routes as opposed to private hire services which you would think they would be.

    So, arguably they are open to anyone to use them.

    The Intel shuttle from M3 Parkway is a private hire.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    What would be the fare and what would happen if you turned up to board one?

    In the same area, when you go on the TFI app, the Crowne Plaza to Dublin Airport bus shows the departures. They used to take non hotel guests as passengers when express bus operated the route for €2. But they don’t anymore.

    Is this a fully licensed service too? Could you argue that you should be allowed to travel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You’d have to ask the operator that kind of question.

    I can’t see the crowne plaza shuttle in the list of licences anymore. Presumably it’s now a private hire and shouldn’t be on the TFI app.

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/commercial-bus-services/view-list-of-current-licences/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    The bus lane is a cycle lane - not saying it's a good idea but if they put a separate cycle lane southbound, then they have no space for a cycle lane northbound, this way they can say they've provided cycling "facilities" in both directions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Saying that you've provided cycle facilities in both directions isn't the goal, making cycling safer and easier im both directions is. DMURS and other standards are clear on this, if there's a choice between a cycle lane on one side or the other, gradient is the decider and that hill is a mo-fo. The NTA have applied this logic elsewhere, for example the prussia Street section of the blanch corridor. I would not fancy cycling up that hill on front of a double decker bus and I'm sure bus passengers wouldn't want me to either. Its certainly not going to achieve any modal shift because no novice urban cyclist is going to attempt it.

    Also not a great start for the new g spine which should be standard setting instead of crawling up wine tavern st behind cyclists.

    There's another major issue that bus connects faces, the quays haven't had any enhanced bus priority measures, and there are no plans to



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Is there an actual hierarchy? I personally feel safer going fast downhill in a cycle lane than slower uphill in one. If you encounter something dangerous like like some debris on the road, at least you can swerve in a cycle lane. Less likely to be an issue at slow speeds going uphill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I agree, putting lanes on uphill sections should the priority, but I'm suggesting that may be their reasoning for this design.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It's easier to do at speed similar to cars. You can slow your decent with your breaks.

    If cyclists have to use the uphill bus lane they will delay buses and it'll be too intimidating for novice or weak cyclists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭Brian CivilEng


    I gave the N6 a try. Just missed one, but the next one came 7mins later, so no 17a style half hour waits there. However, other than that for my journey east of Santry it was just the same old 17a with that trundle through Beaumont Hospital. I know the hospital needs to be served but surely there is room for every other bus to by-pass it without ruining the timetable too much.

    For my own Airport to Raheny journey, the 16 to N4 to DART route is still 10mins faster than the 16 to N6 to H1 (or walk) option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    If every other bus bypassed the hospital you would ruin headways for the rest of the route - two buses would then be travelling together and then there would be a large gap before another two buses.

    You have to have a standard routing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭Brian CivilEng


    Yeah, would need to be a whole other route entirely. Shame, but the hospital needs to be served and it is not well designed for bus access, plenty of places where buses going the opposite direction can't pass one another.

    I reckon it may be possible to get off the bus on kilbarron rd before the turn into the hospital, walk to the stop after the hospital and catch the previous bus. At the very least you'd be getting back on the bus you got off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Now imagine the amount of traffic there once the A1 gets introduced :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I'd remove ramps in that Hospital Road section where buses go between the Beaumont Hospital stop and Kilbarron Road, and make the stretch of the road buses only. Ramps currently slowing down a lot. Another option is to make the circular one way traffic around the hospital campus. A traffic would flow better but probably would add a few extra minutes...

    Just the whole location of the hospital around the residential houses and away from main road is very inconvenient. I'd probably do a shuttle bus to the main bus stops without a need of diverting the main buses through these roller coaster roads which made me sick I once took 17A.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unfortunately transport infrastructure around Beaumont just isn’t good enough and any frequent bus through it will face problems. The Coolock side approach has been terrible traffic wise since the 17a start going in. The Beaumont side that the 104 uses currently is a good bit better. Then when you do get to the stops you’ve buses delayed behind people parking their cars with the hazards on for ‘just a few minutes’.

    I think the powers that be have started to acknowledge this with its new routes. The 17a has essentially been shortened as the N6 - should at least improve reliability. The A1, L82 and the 8 will all start in the hospital so only one potential pinch point there rather than 2 if you’ve a bus going in or out. Can see problems with the D4 however.

    The most laughable thing of all is that a decent bus Lane sits on the Oscar Traynor past Northside shopping centre unused all day except for a few peak 27b’s into clonshaugh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,544 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Dublin Bus has said on it's website that it's to cut 3 departures on the X27 t/t & 1 departure on the X28 t/t on Monday the 13th of June. They say that it's due to low demand for bus services during the peak time.

    Services being cut from the X27/X28 are listed below.

    X27

    07:10 - Celbridge to St. Stephens Green

    07:30 - Celbridge to St. Stephens Green

    17:06 - Leeson St. to Celbridge

    X28

    17:30 - Leeson St. to Celbridge



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Noticed alot of the bus stops in my area have their heads replaced by Green/Yellow ones and the poles repainted yellow don't see what's the point on this if every stop is going to be replaced by a new one over the next few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    It's the same for the GAI stops all around south Dublin, heads replaced and timetables replaced (only for the poles though, shelters still have the old TFI-style timetable)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Funny thing about the 17.30 X28 is that it's supposed to depart pretty much in tandem with (1 min after) the 17.15 ex UCD - and although the 17.30 is scheduled to arrive at terminues before the 17.15, I can see why it'd be relatively empty based on just that city centre section's timings!


    One of the massive problems with Beaumont is - or at least used to be! - the car park queues in the morning. Looking at the 104 timetable ex Clontarf, while the 7.47 would get stuck in Shantalla Road traffic, the 8.50 was almost invariably bound to lose time in Beaumont Hospital because of the queue of cars waiting to get into the multistory car park. Could easily reach 10-15 minutes lost because of cars coming in from both Beaumont and Coolock sides.

    As somebody who commuted on the 17A from Coolock to DCU for the better part of two years however - yes, Beaumont Hospital can be nausea inducing, especially since DB drivers were less... restrained... on those corners there.

    It wouldn't be so close most of the time, but it would end up in a 5-15 pattern (where there aren't running time changes anyway!). I usually would assume about 2m30 or 3m to get in and the same to get out, so that's 5-6 minutes that'd be cut out of the route.

    Of course I don't approve of the idea either! ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The problem with Beaumont and Connolly Hospital is public transport access seems to be very much an after thought. The roads are not wide enough wouldn't surprise me if it's caused collisions there too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Yes that's true shouldn't have been too much of an issue with the N4 though as it's not too different to the 17a which was Harristown operated when DB had it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    It was over 3 and a half years ago that the 17a was handed over to Go Ahead though, so that argument doesn't exactly stack up...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    It's not surprising. It was planned really badly. The 67X which those buses replaced used to go from Maynooth to Belfield/Leeson St via Celbridge. The X27 and X28 now terminate at Salesian college rather than Maynooth, which is infuriating as it over halfway between Celbridge and Maynooth, so why not go the whole way to Maynooth. They are also terribly times. I've often seen three X buses to Celbridge literally directly together in the evenings, and then no further buses for another half hour. I don't know why the timetabling for the X25/X26 and X27/X28 are so poor, but there are massive gaps in services and then two or three buses scheduled to run in tandem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    The X27 and X28 now terminate at Salesian college rather than Maynooth, which is infuriating as it over halfway between Celbridge and Maynooth, so why not go the whole way to Maynooth.

    Why have Maynooth traffic mix in with Celbridge traffic to begin with, when these Xpresso services are meant to be set-down only in the suburbs, so they're not meant to be bringing anything towards local connections there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭thomasj


    On a n4 tonight heading towards blanch. Packed to the brim with revellers coming home from Raheny



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 434 ✭✭baingal nancer


    The N4 is becoming a very frustrating bus to be on with all this stopping at random stops for 3-5 minutes, they've obviously made a balls of the timetables



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    They will iron out, just need more time for observations and more data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,338 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Twice now I've seen 2 N4s heading towards Point Village bunched up together at Killester - once at lunchtime, once in the evening.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    When I tried it out between Clontarf Road -> The Point on the bank holiday Monday last week, there was bunching evident - seen 2 Blanch bound buses passing by Westwood in the ~5 minutes between me leaving the station and getting on the N4 heading to the Point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Don't see it being a big problem when a frequency is every 10 min. Easily can happen due to traffic conditions. It would be bad if many buses be like that but just a few once off examples is very usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Yeah hardly something to be worried about too much. If it was one bus every 30 mins and there was bunching then I'd be concerned but at every 10 mins hardly surprising happens everywhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    We need proper orbital and radial bus corridors that are effectively enforced and can deliver reliable journey times at all times of the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Good luck with that on much of the proposed S2 and S4 routes. It’s going to be a very tall order!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I have to say that I’m becoming increasingly concerned about the levels of cancellations or curtailments that are taking place, and it raises the question in my mind of whether the rollout of the new network should be put on hold until the bus companies can staff their operations adequately.

    This morning four GAI route 18 departures in a row eastbound are cancelled, and that happened one day last week too. Three Dublin Bus route 15b departures in a row were cancelled last night, and I’m seeing numerous cancellations or curtailments on cross-city routes every single day, and it seems to be getting worse.

    Bus Éireann have multiple cancellations in Sligo again today and most days - the 458 doesn’t seem to ever have a day without buses being cancelled. Their Athlone service has a whole load of cancelled services too.

    GAI have also the usual plethora of cancelled services on their regional 120 & 126 routes.

    All of this is down to driver shortages, which I can understand to a degree as it’s across all industries.

    But it makes NO sense to me to be expanding the network when they can’t staff the existing services. It’s this lack of reliability that will put people off.

    Should there be an emergency timetable put into operation across the PSO network that is deliverable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Not to mention the potential recession on the horizon...


    IMO they should probably start reducing the frequencies on certain underperforming bus routes. The L58/L59 instantly pop up in my mind, from the couple of times I've been in them the most amount of passengers I saw was around 5.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think focussing on the here and now is what’s needed - not what might happen.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement