Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

Options
1282283285287288402

Comments

  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Madilynn Mealy Rancor


    Woke Consultants Helping Your Business Go Broke!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I find this utterly disgusting.

    I think there should be serious consequences for the journalist and publications that promote this garbage. I for one won't be clicking on any Indo links, they're not getting any ad revenue from me. I wish I could do more than that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,953 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    No point in clicking it unless you're paying anyway. It throws the sub models at you after the second paragraph so not sure where it goes exactly, but I can guess...



  • Registered Users Posts: 206 ✭✭Amenhotep




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,913 ✭✭✭Cordell



    Trachtenberg explains the importance of having an indigenous actor in the lead role

    Silly me I thought that making a good film is more important.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,771 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    They setting the film in the 1700's. I predict it will be sh1te. In the other movies, loads of people with modern weapons were barely enough to take down a predator. Good luck with a spear and a bow and arrow.

    Of course if it isn't successful, they'll do what those who remade Ghostbusters did and claim the film didn't do well because of misogyny. They'll say that the male public couldn't accept a strong female lead. Which is sh1te of course, look how successful the Alien franchise has been with Sigourney Weaver as the lead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,913 ✭✭✭Cordell


    And Predator 2 which is arguably as good as the first one, or if you ask me, the best of the lot, had a black lead. So being diverse i.e. non-white male is not a problem as long as it's not the most important thing. So maybe this new one will be good (yeah, sure) but good or bad the exact ethnicity of the lead should be so low on the priority list that the catering firm is a few pages up. First thing should be to make good film that deserves its place in the franchise (well, this one is dead anyway) and cast a chinese or a asian-indian lead, who cares, that's why films have makeup artists. And don't tell me they didn't use makeup or grading to make their skin look more red than it really is :)

    For reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Midthunder#/media/File:Amber_Midthunder_-_2019_(46801505974)_(cropped).jpg



  • Registered Users Posts: 994 ✭✭✭rightmove


    stopped buying the examiner (yes the paper edition) when the IT took it over. Stopped reading the Indo altogether about a year ago. It gone to pot altogether. Now I really almost get no news.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    No age restriction on transitioning according to this Dr. The child or teenager can for decide themselves she says. Although I do agree that we shouldn't compare humans to chickens. Trans people obviously exist but kids away from drugs and irreversible surgery till they are over 18.




  • Registered Users Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask



    This victim hood seeking is a mental disorder.

    This is the problem when you go down the road of quotas based on immutable characteristics , first it was male v female pay gap, now it's straight v LGBTQAI+++++++

    what next ?

    I am seriously concerned that the average salary of an Australian indigenous woman of colour is not the same as a white male working in silicon valley..... terrible ...


    clown world.


    How about we just look at people's qualifications and merits ?

    There is no point comparing some white straight lad that is working as a hedge fund manager in the docklands v some gay barman in the george ... I mean for FUXAKE !!! this is basic stuff!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 994 ✭✭✭rightmove


    When I started work we were told you cannot discriminate. A persons sex or gender or colour was irrelevant if they can do the job. Everybody i know pretty much agreed with this. Companies stayed within this boundry for a while but now its a month of women are amazing and gays are amazing. sex and gender and clour are now completely relevant and merit is irrelavant. The best candidate is not the best cndidate anymore and I think this is the worse discrimination of ALL



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    How the flying bejaysus did you manage to keep reading the Indo for that long?

    It is absolute shytye for years now.

    And the SINDO has been absolute muck for years with a magazine that isn't fit for use in an outhouse.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    This doesn't inspire any confidence. Trust your doctor, seek proper medical advice not misinformation on Twitter.....trust the science ....F*ck me like

    https://twitter.com/HSELive/status/1534946424877510658



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,420 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    They're not wrong, though a lot of people in the comments don't seem to know that trans men exist and are women.

    I wonder if the language used in a campaign would have any effect on awareness among the trans community at all though....



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,913 ✭✭✭Cordell


    I wonder, is the urinal etiquette that has been established for generations still acceptable today, or is it considered homophobic?



  • Registered Users Posts: 994 ✭✭✭rightmove


    never mentioned the SINDO. Stopped looking at that when they wrote an article about your man (corrupt politician) from west dublin with russian links and made up most of the story it seems.

    The indo I stopped looking at online so now I have no news source

    BBC journal.ie IT, indo, examiner, guardian seem to all have sailed on the woke seas and I am not a daily mail type either. Seems that I am in news purgatory.

    The worst is rte (misandist and woke) because I have to pay for something which I cannot ever recieve the signal for and I dont want to watch it anyhow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭dorothylives


    It's gone well beyond offensive at this point and is just plain dangerous. I don't understand it at all. It's as if being a woman is a dirty thing these days. It's gone too far and it's only going to damage trans people. I don't understand why there isn't a backlash from trans people calling out this nonsense, because I honestly don't think that most trans people feel this way and support this stuff.

    It feels like Organisations pushing it as far as they can. It's like Calvin Klein's latest underwear advert with a woman with a new born baby. She's had a double mastectomy and has a beard now obviously on lots of hormones and the other person in the photo is a man who has transitioned to female so, the baby's mother is his father and his father is his mother. Why wait until you've had your breasts removed and your body pumped full of hormones before getting pregnant.

    Where to even fricking start with this horse ****? How can anyone possibly take this crap seriously. Why would a woman who believes they are a man go through all of that only to then decide that they want a baby and continue to live like a man after the birth and the HSE has now jumped on the bandwagon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 239 ✭✭ErnestBorgnine




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,101 ✭✭✭archfi


    The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the revolution.

    The Entryism process: 1) Demand access; 2) Demand accommodation; 3) Demand a seat at the table; 4) Demand to run the table; 5) Demand to run the institution; 6) Run the institution to produce more activists and policy until they run it into the ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    They have for some time now. Recall the Cork based NGO that started a campaign to rid white Irish gays of their racism last year, who claimed Irish white gays refuse to have anything to do with especially Asians as a rule.

    When I fist entered a gay bar in my late teens many moons ago is was apparent to me (and everyone else) what a great leveller a place they were. In that in one bar you'd have for example rich, well off, some famous people mingling with with 'ordinary' working class people. So no matter what your social class or any other class, you had a bar where you had a socially diverse mix of people unlike you'd see in most 'straight' bars. The image the 'activists' give of gay society as in your tweet is the downside version of what I've experienced iRL.

    All of this is orchestrated by a specific bunch of progressive Leftist lgbt activist antagonists, the same people who in recent months have been claiming that homphobia is on the rise in Ireland (see Darren Kennedy Newstalk), have claimed a certain author is homophobic, have claimed that Lesbians are being attracted in restrooms (see lgbt forum) because straight women thing their trans women, etc.

    In a thread in the lgbt forum where recent reported homophobic incidents, all in Dublin, were reported, all I asked was one simple question, i.e, why weren't we given a physical description of the perpetrators in any of them. That was met with accusations of racism. The latest Dublin based incident, where yet again no physical description of the perpetrators was given, and I questioned that before the GNC redaction, turned out to be false, or at least never happened as reported by GCN news. Maybe something happened but not as reported.

    So what is going on here is a clear case of lgbt activists making stuff up. Cantankerous divisive full of their own importance internet armchair lgbt activists, making stuff up to stay relevant in their own micro social group. Those types of self appointed spokespeople for the wider gay community do noting but cause division, and if they think they can use this board to carry out their activities unhindered they can think again. There is no safe space for progressive leftist lgbt activists on this board, not while I'm around anyway.

    Post edited by AllForIt on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,420 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure




  • Registered Users Posts: 823 ✭✭✭Liberty_Bear


    This is all in danger of going up their own hole (pun intended). Discussions recently on forums where if you are not into trans men or black men then this constitutes transphobia or racism. Attacking people who state it as a preference. People are entitled to be into what they are into. The premise for the argument o twitter there is more or less the same as saying that if you are not attracted to women then you must be sexist or misogyinist. Its all absolute bollix



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Bizarre isn't it. On the one hand you'd be lambasted for not treating a trans man or woman as you would any other woman or man but at the same time trans is a very specific label that the mob cling to. They are cannibalising themselves at this point and I think (hope) the hype will die down with social media becoming more regulated and fragmented over the coming years so one or two platforms won't dictate the social issues of our time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    The whole wage gap thing is utter bollox 99% of the time...in my social circle of 8(4 m/f)...

    The top 4 earners are the women, also were I work, the top 5 earners, 3 are women...

    If you look at the checkouts in Dunnes & Tesco it's typically disportionally women...men and women tend to do different jobs...

    In my job everyone starts on the same wage(for the same job), weather male of female...

    The issue with the wage gap, is actually more an issue with parental rights/leave



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,471 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Apparently wags is now a disrespectful term.

    Only in use for 20yrs or more, and I'd say the wags loved to hear it themselves.

    But now it's another term thats out.


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61788094



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I have a policy on this thread of not referencing Gender ID issues as they tend to derail this thread to it's detriment, but I have to make an exception for this headline that had me in fits of giggles.

    Scots should be allowed to change gender ‘as many times as they like’

    Scholar says that SNP’s proposals should be less strict as people ‘change their minds’ about whether they are male or female"

    Scots should be able to alter their legal sex unlimited times throughout their lives because some people repeatedly “change their minds” about whether they are male or female, an expert has said.

    Prof Sharon Cowan, an academic from the University of Edinburgh’s school of law, claimed that some transgender people had a “shifting sense” of their identity and that a proposed overhaul of gender laws should be widened to accommodate the group.

    The SNP wants to allow Scots to change their legal sex by signing a declaration, and lower the period in which someone must live in their “acquired gender” from two years to three months, before a further three-month “reflection period”.

    The current requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria would be scrapped, although under current plans, anyone making a false declaration would face a jail sentence of up to two years.

    However, Prof Cowan, who specialises in feminist and queer legal studies, claimed that the safeguards were unnecessary and there was no reason that a person’s sex should be “locked down” for life.


    The proposals by Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP will allow Scots to change their legal sex by signing a declaration CREDIT: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

    “In my research, I have found a certain degree of flexibility in people’s sex/gender identifications across their life courses between being cisgender, transgender, non-binary or gender fluid,” she said, in a written submission to MSPs.

    “It seems unnecessary to enforce upon people a permanent administrative categorisation that does not acknowledge this. Those who want to remain in that sex/gender will do so, and those who do not, will not, regardless of such a legal declaration.”

    She added: “I would be wary of initiating a provision that risks criminalising or penalising those who apply for recognition who do not live according to society’s perceptions of their ‘acquired gender’ or who change their minds or about their sex/gender.

    “I do not think there should be a fee for changing the marker on your birth certificate as there is no fee for having it initially recorded at birth, and this record might be wrong.”

    A Holyrood committee is currently scrutinising the proposed reforms and will call Prof Cowan as a witness on Tuesday.

    ‘Unworldly and foolish’ proposals attacked

    Critics of the proposals fear that the changes, if they become law, could be exploited by male sexual predators who could make a declaration in an attempt to gain access to women-only spaces such as prisons or changing rooms.

    There are also claims that they could impact on women’s rights in fields such as sport and the workplace.

    Susan Smith, a director at For Women Scotland, a campaign group which opposes the changes, said that Prof Cowan’s submission “encapsulated the nonsense and the leaps of logic required to sign up to gender ideology”.

    She added: “Prof Cowan’s idea of allowing multiple changes would be a gift to those who have cause to conceal their identity.

    “We are sure a professor of law is not intent on aiding the criminal community to run identity rackets, but a moment’s reflection should have told her that is precisely who will benefit from her unworldly and rather foolish proposal.”

    Gender dysphoria referrals soar

    The Royal College of General Practitioners in Scotland also raised concerns that family doctors are struggling to cope with an influx of patients experiencing gender dysphoria, particularly children.

    Patients referred to one of Scotland’s four gender identity clinics face waits of up to 40 months for an appointment and some have bought puberty-blocking drugs themselves from the internet.

    There were 559 children referred to the specialist Sandyford clinic in Glasgow in 2019, compared to just 37 in 2013.

    “Our membership tells us that GPs often feel it is outside their area of competence to undertake assessment or treatment for patients with gender dysphoria,” the submission from RCGP Scotland said.

    “Furthermore, a major issue facing this area of healthcare is the significant lack of robust, comprehensive evidence around the outcomes, side effects and long-term consequences of treatments for people with gender dysphoria, particularly children and young people.”

    I went to the trouble of signing up for a Telegraph sub just in case there's some tabloid style sensational journalism going on here. Make your own mind up. That's the whole article. I would think what Professor Sharon Cowan says there is the biggest own goal of an argument one could possibly make.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,319 ✭✭✭✭thesandeman


    I read through it assuming it was a Waterford Whispers article.

    Can somebody PLEASE get it to Joe Duffy's attention.

    @[Deleted User]

    😉



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock


    After a couple of tweets I had to stop reading. Truly horrific.




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One of the latest examples of the nonsense that is "people who menstruate"!



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement