Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dole 'summer bonus' .. are they for real?

Options
1121315171827

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26,977 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I do agree with the numbers and yes there is an issue with LTU, I just feel there's a number a causation elements to this issue, which many countries face.

    I don't know much about the construction sector and those numbers are high, I'd just say this the term construction encompasses many different rolls, but yes numbers high.

    Just something else to note on the overall numbers. This few remaining PUP recepients, I believe it was around 40K, maybe higher transitioned onto to live register in March, many had been made redundant, laid off, not all were on it for the full term PUP was in place, many of those who transitioned are at an age were possibly gaining employment could be a challenge and there's also a cohort on the over 65"s JSA payment too.

    Again, I'm not disputing numbers just delving a little into them.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    You can look this up, and it is consistent across countries in Europe. Long term unemployed consist of approx one-third of live register. This is true of Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic, Denmark and Ireland etc etc. So I don't know how one can say it is high relative to other countries. It's simply not true.

    We do not have a long term unemployment rate proportionally out of line with peer countries, in relative and particularly in absolute terms.

    And what's more we definitely have less of an issue with this than countries with structurally higher unemployment like Spain and Italy and to a lesser extent France. And also with youth unemployment which is chronic in many countries across the bloc, but Ireland is a high performer.

    I don't know why this is, but the right in Ireland constantly want to invent a situation where they're trying to convince Ireland has a unique long term unemployment problem, when the reality is the scale of it is actually rather small, and is consistent with the wealthier EU countries.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well first off, I never mentioned booze and fags, you did.

    Secondly, someone of 'the right' saying we should stop giving money to rich people and give people free childcare instead is not of 'the right' IMO.

    Thirdly, like clockwork...

    Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, co-author of the report Dr Karina Doorley said: "The main take away is that there is no one best option for reducing poverty, and it's likely that a mix of options will be required.

    She added: "So many families who are in consistent poverty are those with children, so very sadly children are more likely to be in poverty than adults.

    "So increasing female labour force participation could reduce the consistent poverty rate so it could move, we estimate, 75,000 people out of consistent poverty. And this effect is quite large because mothers have an employment rate of less than 70% compared to more than 85% for fathers".


    I wonder what free full-time childcare would do for these people? Or maybe just give them a summer dole bonus and they will be happy with that and shut up?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,660 ✭✭✭storker


    Doesn't bother me, and I pay a fair wedge of tax. Dole money gets spent in the economy and a great deal of it will find its way back into the public coffers by way of VAT and income tax. If it's spent on booze or fags, an ever great portion of it comes back to the exchequer. Sure, some people do elect to live on welfare, but the vast majority of those aren't rolling around on beds covered in cash, cackling gleefully. They're spending it. Dole money isn't burned in a fire; it circulates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,977 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Is you mate Walter Mitty by any chance as I call bull on those 'stories'.

    If such a scheme for free TV's existed in Australia, can you show me any more information on it?

    If what you said about your mate from Holland, I call bull on it as well.

    First of all the borders were closed in Australia, so the only way he would have got in was that he was an Australian citizen. Maybe he was?

    Secondly, if he did just rock up and claim a pandemic payment, he probably committed fraud and did something illegal, as there were specific requirements to some of those payments. Sure, there was a lot of cash flying about at the time, so I can't be 100% sure what payments were aroun but in my experience, your mate is one of those people who would scam the system where ever he is. But id call bull on that story.

    Funnily enough, I do know od someone on PUP that went to central and south America to travel the place while on PUP. He had a grand time travelling on the Irish Taxpayers dime.

    Anyway, I do know that in Australia, almost all benefits are means tested, so if you have savings or assets or property, you wont get much from the government. E.g. if you have a private pension in Australia, you wont get the state pension on top, you will need to use up your own pension first. They are generally a more practical people. But as in all places, there will be people who will scam the system.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Newsflash, we're at statistical full employment, or as good as it at this stage.

    Isnt it true that a) we are one of the most 'disabled' people in the EU/OECD and that b) we have one, if the highest number of households with no one working?

    It may be the case that we have very low unemployment, but if someone is 'disabled' then they will not show up on that list anyway.




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,653 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    ok marko seeing as you are accusing me of making things up about these tvs and my mate coming from Holland and getting over $20k in pandemc payments then lets do a charity bet of 500 euro..And when I prove you wrong with the evidence you will pay 500 euro to the charity of my choice. You are claiming I am making stuff up so now it is time to put your money where you mouth is.

    Fact of the matter here is you made up claims about Australia that dont stand up to scrutiny. This isnt the first time Ive caught you out making stuff up on Boards, its a pretty regular feature of your fantasist mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Again, you may be surprised at my opinions on this.

    I never ever said long term unemployment is desirable and in fact am on record saying I'd rather the number is zero. But the broader point is that there has been a consistent overstatement of the scale of the issue in the country.

    We need to be mature enough to recognise that long term unemployment will always be a feature of a market economy to a greater or lesser extent. You'll be long time waiting to see Ireland or any other country fully eradicate it. Until then, we have decisions to make with an adult head on.

    And further, someone being able to access employment, and employment that makes sense for their circumstances and that pays is better than subsisting on welfare.

    But the reasons why most people end up long term unemployed is generally not indolence or some nebulous "dem povs are lazy" sentiment. More often, there are mental health, family circumstances or living in a peripheral location factors and sometimes altogether at play. Childcare is an issue, you won't hear any arguements from me on that point.

    If an individual ends up in one of those circumstances, I have very little difficulty in the state intervening to ensure they don't slip into poverty and exacerbate the situation. I'm relaxed about that and I don't lose sleep about it. And the evidence is, it's the right thing to do.

    Many don't care about social cohesion, but you can't put a price on it. I've lived in the US, and if you tell me you want to see the scenes of poverty where people who have slipped through the net are left to rot on the streets, you really are lying to yourself.

    To be honest, long term unemployment is rarely ever solved by the common sentiment on the right, which can be reduced to "get a job you bum".

    Again, I'm relaxed about our current distributive welfare system. I see very little evidence that it generates indolence in excess of peer countries as many here suggest, but there is good evidence it prevents negative outcomes for both individuals and society. And there is an economic and social good in preventing those negative outcomes, much as many would wish to deny it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,323 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...so whats happening with disability services!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    This is predictable. Are we implicating the medical profession in the indolence conspiracy now?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    One thing that is quite different in Ireland is that there is more benefit to being longer term unemployed. So, for example with JSB you will not get the Christmas bonus, you need to be unemployed for at least 12 months to get it (so on JSA). In most systems in Europe the initial payment is related to what you were paid previously and decreases over time. We flip that on it's head here.

    It is certainly possible to design a welfare system that encourages people to remain on it. I think the main disagreement is really whether we are there yet or not. In my opinion, we are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,323 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...but are we truly comparing like for like, are the supports better in other countries in trying to meet the needs of the long term unemployed, in order to make it possible to return to employment?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    What's the bet about now?

    Free TV's for all and pandemic payments of $700 for just arriving into a country? Need to know the definition and scope of your bet. :)

    Im not the person with Walter Mitty friends who get free TV's. ;)



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    No, but how do you explain the numbers? Why is Ireland's disability rate to high compared to our EU counterparts? Maybe we are laxer in giving out disabilities to those who are able to work?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Look, I don't lose any sleep about people on welfare being bunged a double payment at Christmas.

    Central to your post is the notion that the long term unemployed are licking their chops all year at the prospect of an extra 200 quid. I really doubt that that's the case.

    If indeed we have a system that encourages long term unemployment versus peer countries, we'd surely see a proportion of long term unemployed in excess of these countries. We don't see that in the data, it's simply not there. The proportion of LTU is line with the countries you point to.

    There's an argument to be made for people who find themselves unemployed to have payments as a percentage the previous salary.

    Now, hold on to your hat, and this is something you haven't considered. In countries like Denmark and Germany who have this system, the right wing conversation goes as follows "these bums are jacking in their jobs / getting fired on purpose to take advantage of generous welfare." I know so because that's the exact thing I heard from (very conservative) German colleagues when the subject of welfare came up.

    I put it to you we'd immediately see that sentiment take off if we instituted these reforms. Indeed have you considered you might find yourself among them? I guarantee boards would immediately be resplendent with tall tales of colleagues who quit / got canned to go on the Super Scratch.

    No doubt in my mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,323 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...or maybe we simply are unwilling to provide adequate services to try help these individuals back into the workforce?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Haven't really mentioned long-term unemployed really, but you are right that there will always be a small % of them in any country.

    My overarching point was not about them as they are inevitable, but about the people who actually want to improve their lives but struggle to, yet are given cash bonuses as a way to appease them.

    I'd much rather give them services that actually work so it will give them an actual leg up in life, lift them up the social mobility ladder and out of poverty. As I said, free full-time childcare would be a massive way to reduce poverty, but sure give them a Christmas and Summer dole bonus and sure, give everyone child benefit... as if that is the solution when we know its now.

    That's my problem with these stupid cash giveaways they do little or nothing to tackle the real problems people have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,383 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    @Yurt2, you are correct, our LT UNR is not above average.

    1.8% in 2021

    EU average is 2.8%.

    NL = 0.8%

    DE = 1.2%

    DK = 1.0%

    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_40/default/table?lang=en

    So while we are well below ESP and Greece, yes, we could still do more to improve, to get down to German or Danish rates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Can you give an example and a benchmark of another country that does it better?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,193 ✭✭✭Eircom_Sucks


    scroungers 90% of them

    social welfare don't wanna tackle the longterm scroungers , but if you are unfortunate enough to be newly out of a job then they will hound you to get back working

    country sickens me , its the ordinary joe soaps keeping this country afloat and yet get feck all but being rail roaded



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,383 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yes, correct.

    We have had low UNR in the past, yet the highest rates of joblessness in the EU.

    Most of the jobless adults are not on JSB/JSA, they are on DA / CA / OPFP, etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,383 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yes.

    A quick reform would be:

    Social Insurance = Xmas bonus

    Social Assistance = no Xmas bonus.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    It is more and issue of the fairness of it in my mind. Those who until recently have been contributing and have lost their jobs are the ones who should get the bonus. It shouldn't be paid to the long term unemployed. We need to have a culture of wanting to work and contribute, there is value in that and it is needed to keep the whole system going.

    At the moment we have a situation where it is possible that someone who is long term unemployed may be better off than a working family. Someone posted a link to a document that showed 58% of DCC social housing applicants are unemployed and a further 11% a single parents. The focus should really be on housing low income workers near the city. We have an entire apartment block in Dundrum rented for social housing a long term lease.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2




  • Registered Users Posts: 29,323 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i cant to be honest, but i suspect some other countries do a far better job at dealing with the complexities that ultimately cause long term unemployment, im sure theres been such studies done, but i havent gone looking for them yet, but you can clearly see, we re truly dreadful at dealing with these causes ourselves....



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I guess that is why relying on unemployment is not telling the full story. Kind of like how in Irelands case, GDP figures don't tell the full story either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,193 ✭✭✭Eircom_Sucks


    sadly i couldn't be , i have morals and wouldn't see myself sink that low



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,977 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Do you seriously think anyone without Medical, Psychiatric knowledge can answer that question, perhaps their is someone on here who does have such expertise but asking such a generalised question is very difficult to answer.

    But what I do know, a disability allowance payment is incredibly difficult to get, Gaurenteed to be refused on first time application and literally months of under review. Substantial medical reports required along with the support of a GP. Mental health related applications particularly difficult as prognosis very difficult to determine. Furthermore even those awarded face ongoing review but perhaps unknown to some, the payment actually allows the recepient earn some income we're as illness benefit does not.

    I sometimes think people think DA or indeed IP are processed over the counter at local intero centres, they are absolutely not and very, very difficult to get approved for.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Lol. Hero of socialist labour medal with commendation from General Secretary Brezhnev is in the post to you I'm sure.

    What a self-regarding post.



Advertisement