Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Father and son die at Isle of man TTs

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Do you think, would these lads still race the bikes if there was never any spectators or coverage of the races?

    Genuine question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Setback spectators from roadside where possible. Allow a few areas where spectators can get right close to action yet still be 100 percent protected via barrier positioning.

    Place large stands on inside of bends where the possibility of biker flying into crowd is near impossible.

    Ban metal crowd control barriers from roadside. There are only suited to control airport queues. Proper secure barriers should be installed to protect both rider and spectator.

    Have no roadside spectators immediately after jumps, bumps or on outside of bends.

    Do not rely on spectators to wave down competitors when accidents happen. It's one of the highest speed events in the world, get their act together and get a good marshalling and flag system in place. I realise it's a long course but you cannot run this without using all available safety systems.

    Undertake a major refit of barrier systems in the large viewing areas where barriers can be easily then reinstalled year on year in a safe manner.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 665 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    I dont care about the spectators when I race, I am fairly sure that's pretty common



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 665 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    You cannot cover half the island in trackcare/barriers. Spectators will climb over stuff, its too big a circuit to fully make idiot proof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    Those proposals don't seem very practical to me , having everyone back from the road or behind barriers

    There's marshals who need to be on hand to flag and residents watching outside their doors

    I don't know much about accidents but again I don't think bikes and sidecars crash on the road as predictably as you expect, they can impact one side and go back over the other direction altogether



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Alkers


    It's quite a safe sport for the spectators I thought, comparatively at least? There has been a few incidents in recent years but in most cases, the facilities were found to have been setup incorrectly versus their own requirements as far as I recall.

    The bikes are getting faster and faster each year and the PPE / trackside safety equipment can't keep up but even halving the speeds again and people would likely end up still dying.

    Re the motivation, Guy Martin explains it as when you've got used to driving flat out at 200mph on a narrow winding country road, everything else is tame in comparison. He reckons him going on a roller coaster is about as exciting as riding a lawnmower to you and me so these guys are hooked to the adrenaline and can't get it from much else!


    Fantastically skilled and brave riders, I like watching it on TV but I've been twice and while the atmosphere around the place is great if you're into bikes, the actual spectating for me gets boring after half an hour as it's very repetitive (although still amazing to see)!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    True but the built up areas could certainly be improved and the mountain etc could be heavily marshalled to stick to specific guidelines.

    Whatever way you cut it, people lined up behind freestanding metal 1m high rails adjacent to the track can only be deemed negligent.

    My original point was that it will take spectator deaths to make changes and that is a pity. Insurers will insist on higher standards when the sh1t hits the fan. I don't know how any event promoter could defend the current setup if the worst was to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Marshall posts are open to the track in the direction opposite to the direction of travel. All motorsport is like this.

    Residents standing on footpath outside their front door is not good enough. Surely they can agree something to prevent random movements of residents during race.

    Re crash predictability, of course bike can came back across road but it's not going to come backwards against the direction of travel for example so a raised viewing area inside a corner is probably 1000 times safer than viewing from side of road after a bend.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lots of bike racing experts on boards wasted posting here.

    Surely go over next year and sort the place out.

    Or maybe not leave those who enjoy it and take part do so.

    Why us it all H&S bull and ban everything these days on a few who dont like something or perceive it's not up to their safety standards.

    Racers aren't forced to race fans arent forced to attend its personal choice.

    So why not respect thats if you dont like it dont watch it simple as that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    How would you feel about a hypothetical compromise proposal whereby they close the road for the racers, but forbid spectators. I'm not asking you about the logistics of that. I'm asking about you, as a racer, who doesn't care about the spectators. You'd still get to race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    100% without question. Nobody involved is doing it for the fame or money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    There is a "community" around it though - no? And those lads would be idolised within that community? That was my understanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    There is but if you take that away they'll still race



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭GavPJ


    Imagine the uproar if horse racing was going to be banned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    You have an event that is basically guaranteed to kill some people every single time it is on.

    But thats ok, because people also die on the worlds highest mountain.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Whatever about the riders knowing the risks and choosing to go ahead and race anyway, that is fair enough, but the "no-one forced the spectators to attend" argument is crazy. That is like like running a dangerous building site, flouting every safety regulation and someone has an accident and dies and you say to the judge at the inquest, "yeah well I didn't force him to work for me, he could have got a different safer job if he wanted".

    Spectators might not know the risks, they might be just casual observers who came up or happened to be in the area. You cannot expect all sorts of random spectators up be aware of and understand the risks. It would be unreasonable to expect them to.

    And as for relying on spectators to wave down riders in the event of an accident. That is frankly preposterous and if that is a thing, then it is a complete and total abdication of responsibility with respect to the race organisers in terms of having adequate marshalling and communication.

    The safety of the spectators and circuit is shambolic at the TT. I think if a bad accident happened and a bike ploughed into a crowd of spectators there would be absolute hell to pay in the court cases to follow and everyone in authority would be steamrolled to hell and back over it and the TT would be either axed or massively cut back in speed, scale and risks.

    • The race organisers would be done for not taking all reasonably practicable measures to eliminate or minimise risk to spectators or the public (wire crowd control barriers on the side of a race circuit ffs) Spectators on outsides of turns etc.
    • The local authority would be absolutely roasted red raw for allowing an event to proceed on a public road (albeit closed) which posed such a danger, and not only that, but allowing such an event when they are a competent authority with respect to road safety matters and allowing it knowing full well that it was a massive danger to the public.

    I think the nature and scale of the TT is such that it would be practically impossible to control it enough and make it safe. It would require an unweildlly amount of marshalling and safety equipment.

    I believe this sort of thing belongs on a purpose build racing circuit where safety features particular to racing are designed in from the outset. Not on a public road network of varyiable quality and age whose primary purpose is as a public road, not a raceway.

    The thing with these things is, it is all fine and grand until something bad happens, and then it is not fine nor grand anymore and the families and authorities go on a witch hunt to blame someone and they will nail everyone they find along the way for each and every failing and non-compliance they can uncover. Well, that is how the Irish HSA work anyway and I imagine the UK HSE would be fairly similar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I'm the last person generally who goes looking for problems or cries health and safety but I genuinely think improvements in spectator safety will secure the events long term future.

    An accident killing a few spectators could likely have the entire event banned but you are all too short sighted to see this.

    In today's world, someone will always be held responsible. I'm sure there is an insurer on the hook somewhere if spectators are injured or killed and they will very quickly withdraw if it costs them money ..... No more TT.

    In F1, if someone dies, every change possible is immediately brought in to ensure that same accident won't result in death the next time. This can be change to car design, circuit design, marshalling or race management.

    In road racing, someone dies and what action is taken? Line up the next bike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    We often hear about the riders who are killed. But what we don't hear much about is riders who are left with catastrophic life changing disabilities which perhaps causes even more suffering and trauma to their poor families who have to straw feed and bed bath them for the next 20 or 30 years.

    I think the riders not only have no regard for their own safety which is one thing, but they also seem to have no respect or compassion for their families who will be either left without them or be forced to put their own lives on hold to provide them with 24 hour intensive care for decades to come as a result of their injuries as a result of their selfish quest for adrenaline thrills.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    I don't see anything about spectators there in the SMS

    I reckon the spectator safety issue can't be fixed really.

    There'd be no end to it if you start implementing piecemeal rules such as no spectators at bumps etc. and would divert massive resources from the operation of the event and rider safety etc.

    As it stands it's the riders that are being killed not the spectators



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    I'd say you'd have to reduce it to a few grandstands or no spectators at all

    Try enforcing the latter impossible



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Some good stuff in that SMS but a lot of it too sounds like window dressing.

    A redesigned winners enclosure? HTF is that going to improve safety? The race is over by then!

    Online training modules for course marshals is a cop out. If they were serious about it it would be in person training with a genuinely rigorous assessment by a independent third party and only those who prove their compentence can be a marshal. The fact that important training is seen as something to be done while sitting on the couch in your jocks half hungover speaks a lot about the attitude towards it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Alkers


    There was two spectators killed back in 2007 and a marshal back in 2005 but other than that I don't see where you're getting this huge concern over spectator safety from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    It is a totally unsafe circuit for racing. You have things like buildings, stone walls, lamp posts, bridge parapets etc all directly abutting the road. Not to mention that much of the track is uncontrolled and given its lengths would be almost be impossible to control to eliminate access.

    The place for this is a purpose built bike racing circuit with generous run-off areas with no hard obstacles and controlled areas for spectators. That would at least give a rider some chance of survival rather than impacting into a lamp post spine first at 200mph before richocheting back out onto the circuit taking out another rider and both of them implanting into a masonry bridge abutment at 150mph.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Yes all true but what you describe is circuit racing which also exists.

    Road racing is mad by definition but any possible improvements should be made to remove obvious risks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭GavPJ


    The term used for buildings,walls, street lamps etc is "the furniture"

    You paint such a pretty picture of an accident. If it bothers you that much, ignore it. :-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    As a famous sports photographer up the north said

    You close the road a few bails of straw and you're racing

    But you can never make it safe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I see a YouTube clip of just after the 2 side car guys were killed. Woman out on the road waving her hands to warn the next competitors. This was in a spectator heavy section also so there was no excuse for not having that area heavily marshalled.

    If spectators are allowed / encouraged to act like that, a less sensible member of the public is going to do it in a way that gets themselves killed at some stage. Or if some hippy types decided to interfere, they are likely to run into the road at any point. I don't see how the event can be run with such lack of control but judging by that sms above, changes are coming slowly although looks more like a paperwork exercise at the minute instead of any real improvements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    I know and I think that is where bike racing should stay.

    The culture around the TT is mental. I just watched a youtube of fatal crash at a place called the Raven pub where a rider still airborne after coming over a jump missed the road when landing and ploughed head first into the gable wall of the pub which is right on the roadside. Paramedics and marshals came out, pulled the bike away and then strechered the rider off the road over to the side road junction at the gable where he fatally impacted hardly 5 minutes beforehand.

    The most baffling thing was, once the paramedics had finished with him, the crowd of probably a hundred or more onlookers gave a round of applause and just went back to watching the race. There were children nearby looking on and everything.

    The whole thing is a bizzare culture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,975 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Don't really follow the sidecars but the 2 crashes were at agos leap this year.

    One of the riders killed this year was at ballagarey which is a well known blackspot.

    Surely they could put something in temporarily at agos for the sidecars and do some reticel fencing at ballagarey. Maybe buy up a gaff or 2 if need be.

    Fair enough there's no dough in Irish road racing but I believe the TT makes a right few quid n they can afford it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,536 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    it's not for you. you have made that abundantly clear.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    There's supposed to be a new issue that particular spot where the sidecar crashes occured



  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭jaykay2


    Your argument is the same as the crazies in America who would rather let children be murdered (regularly) in schools, than impose any restrictions whatsoever on guns.

    I don't know what the answer is regarding road racing like this, but your argument is not as clever as you think it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭GavPJ


    I can see a chicane being put in there for sidecars before a complete ban is called for, for sidecars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    The other thing that could happen is that witnesses to a crash could claim compensation from the race organisers for psychological trauma. Claiming as a witness even though you were not personally involved in an accident and are not physically injured is a well established thing and has happened.

    Someone claiming this could argue that the race organisers did not take all reasonably practicable measures to limit the dangers to particiapants even when they clearly knew that the dangers existed and that there could be ways, albeit costly, to reduce the dangers but went ahead with the race anyway. And that this amounted to neglicence because they knowingly allowed a situation where gruesome fatal accidents could occur in full view of spectators and did not take any advance action to eliminate or reduce that risk.

    If a particularly horrific accident occurred and a claim was laid by a few spectators, it could set a precedent that would herald the beginning of the end for this barbaric spectacle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,536 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The spectators put themselves in that position with full knowledge of what can happen. any claim would be laughed out of court.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,605 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    5 died at the event? RIP


    Some are so passionate about their love for it, hard to stop them pursuing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    A lot of talk about spectator safety and very few incidents

    As pointed out it was 3 riders killed at that spot and alterations will focus on rider safety

    You'd be forever moving the goalposts improving spectator safety over 37 miles , probably why they don't tinker much outside the basics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,372 ✭✭✭bladespin


    100%, absolutely no-one attends the TT by accident.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    Would they always though? You'd have no way of knowing that?

    For example, you could have a family on holiday and they decide to take a day trip to the TT too see the race while they are in the area, but none of them having any particular interest of knowledge of biking, but go just for the experience. While watching a horrid accident occurs and they or one of the children is left very shaken by a gruesome death unfolding a few feet in front of them.

    So I don't think your "ah sure ya should've know it was a carnage fest" defence would stand up.

    And court here, rightly or wrongly, generally view neglicence claims along the lines of

    (A. a person suffered harm or loss as a result of some involvement with someone else, even if indirect,) + (B. that someone else has insurance) = (C. they deserve something at least, even if their own actions contributed somewhat or if the basis of the case is obscure and convoluted)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,536 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    but the court case wouldn't be here, it would be in the Isle of Man.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You can say this from your experience of racing the track I take it?


    Or is it like all other posts here sensationalist for the sake of it with no basis.

    If people want to race let them. Its nobody's business but their own.

    I think golf should be banned in case someone walks past a green and gets a ball I the head then dies.

    Pure boards.ie experts commenting on here while having no experience in the matter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    I'd say at the TT ending the event would come down to public opinion and government decision rather than insurance

    They have the money over there and operate independently of EU and UK

    The original premise I think is just wrong that RR spectators are entitled to safety and there's somehow a method of achieving this at the TT



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh I dont know there is a cohort of people in Ireland now who ruin fun for a hobby.

    This thread is prime example.2 people killed and you have the H&S H&S brigade out in force.

    No one post on her from the Ban brigade who ever raced the track I'll bet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭GavPJ


    It's not an argument, it is my opinion. But hey opinions are like arm pits. Everyone has them, but most of them stink. :-)😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Girl Geraldine


    I know that ffs but the court system is generally pretty similar and if anything negligence civil cases is an even bigger deal in the UK



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,536 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The Isle of Man has a separate legal system to the UK. They're not going to kill a major event on the island over some bullshit claim that somebody somehow managed to attend the TT races with no knowledge that deaths happens practically every year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters




  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    I genuinly dont think it would be laughed out of court at all. Have you seen some of the awards over the last 10 years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭GavPJ


    The legal system in the Isle of Man is completely different.

    No speed limit on the mountain roads. Birching was still in law until 1993 and you can still get sentenced to death there.

    The Queen issues a pardon though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    I keep. hearing this word , sensationalist or sensationalised. 5 humans died last week in 4 seperate incidents , how many death free years does the TT have? It doesnt and isnt being sensationalised



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement