Dublin Pride ends media partnership with RTE over Liveline's Gender Identity discussion

Jesus.

You are all over the place my darling.

You have no opinion on whether other genders (apart from the two you hold so dear) are made legal. That was your stance wasn't it?

Surely even you can see that if one gender is deemed legal and another gender isn't, that's discriminatory?

We can keep mentioning staticgender, because it is as real a gender as transwoman or transman, but I have a sneaking suspicion you are doing it to (erroneously) make an example of a silly gender you don't recognise.

You also seem blissfully unaware how that weakens your position. Can you tell me I what way believing some in static gender is more or less absurd that claiming a biological woman is the same as a biological man and should be treated as such?

It's actually **** insane.

No opinion on genders being discriminated against?

As a parting gift, I will clarify my position so there is no ambiguity (something you and others like you shy away from).

I do not agree that gender self identification is valid or should in any way be legally recognised. It's a personal thing that should have no bearing.

I do not agree that if the law of the land says that gender should be recognised, that other genders, apart from the ones related to sex, are not recognised.

This is discriminatory, unfair and wholly inconsistent.

It's actually an eerily accurate retelling of the emperor's New clothes.

For the last few years we've been told that if we don't accept that a man can be a woman we are bigots and transphobes etc so the general public entertained the delusion so as not to be classed as a bigot, even though they knew the truth that a man and a woman are very different.

The Dublin Pride incident is equivalent to when one person just stood up and said "this is bollocks. The emperor is naked"

The house of cards that is gender identity came tumbling down when the simplest of questions were asked, because there is ZERO rational responses to why a biological man/woman should be accepted as the opposite sex out of anything other then politeness.

And even then, is it polite to knowingly lie to someone?

Gender identification my hole

Its like religion. Personal to the individual. But the difference is, I'm not forced to believe in the TRUTH of Catholicism. I am just asked to respect that that person has their own belief. I'm not asked to accept that their belief is in any way true or else be labelled a bigot.

The truth doesn't matter any more. The creeps and weirdoes have taken over the levers of power. I've already heard from teachers who can't believe the **** they're having to do but not one will actually raise an objection. Find one creep psychiatrist to tell your kid isn't what they are and start messing with them. Tell 7 years olds that they aren't what they think they are. And most of all, being trans is a good thing! Not a neutral thing, it's a good thing! Automatically.

We're in bizarro world already and I'm checking out. I have no interest in bringing kids into this world where thinking that creepy weirdoes shouldn't be talking to kids too young to be left at home alone is a bigoted position.

It's the M.O of these people.

I have absolutely no issue with transfolk defining themselves as whatever they wish. Best of luck to them.

I only have an issue when I am compelled to agree or accept that their delusion is based on reality.

Yet somehow I'm intolerant.

In my experience though, it's only the self proclaimed advocates that are unreasonable.

I actually played a gig this weekend, while not specifically for pride, it was pride "friendly". I got some pushback from someone who found some of my chat "intolerant" (he defined himself as cis and straight) although everyone else was happy enough to sing along and accept it for what it was.

(The offending song was singing YMCA from a straight perspective)