The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 3) Mod Notes and Threadbanned List in OP

You can comment however you want on what vibes you get from my posts, Marine. Much like your post that started this engagement, your, 'vibes' are demonstrably wrong (which is why when asked for evidence, you hand waved it off rather than providing any)

Just to keep everything clear, let's set out the timeline for everyone to see and you can explain how you weren't pulling a bait-and-switch.

1) Poster states that SF are outpolling FF and FG. Note there was no reference to the Green Party in this post.

2) You directly quoted this poster and said that they were WRONG (well you actually went with the made up word disprovement), and that the government parties were polling at 37% and SF were polling at 36%.

3) I pointed out that the original poster was in fact correct, and their post had only referenced FF and FG (who are polling at a combined 33%, which is in fact LOWER than 36%!). You were entirely incorrect with your, 'disprovement'. Whether mistakenly or (given your later post claiming you can do the maths, more likely) intentionally, you responded to a post referencing FF/FG numbers and decided to substitute in the FF/FG/Greens numbers. As FF/FG is not the same as FF/FG/Greens, this was your bait-and-switch.

4) In response to my (entirely factual) pointing this out, you've decided that my post is somehow pro-SF and now you're throwing the toys out of the pram.

The original poster is STILL entirely correct, SF ARE currently outpolling FF and FG combined. I'm calling you a liar because you're trying to pretend that you didn't willfully replace the FF/FG numbers with FF/FG/Greens numbers and then have the absolute audacity to say the other poster had suffered from your, 'disprovement'.

So can you point out anything that is inaccurate about my timeline above, or indeed anything that is pro-SF in my posts, or are you just going to continue with the, 'poor me' card when your BS is pointed out?

There is no way for someone at 18 on 136k to be on less than 10% tax rate in Ireland. So would be interested to see the “quick calculation” you have done to come up with that.

You said that the other poster was wrong when they said SF were outpolling FF and FG combined. This was a lie. SF ARE outpolling FF and FG combined. Fact.

You tried to defend this lie by substituting in figures for FF, FG AND the Greens. This was dishonest.

No spin from me needed. Still waiting for an explanation of how this is disingenuous on my part, what exactly in my presented timeline is, 'spin' or ANY evidence of how my posts are pro-SF.

....you know, the posts where I described them as follows;

That was a enjoyable romp.

So what were you referencing when you said, 'disprovement' in reply to the post that said SF were outpolling FF and FG?

The core points of this post, I entirely agree with. Perhaps I'm mistaken and you weren't intentionally being misleading but rather you misread the original post you were claiming to disprove and now you're too embarrassed to admit that, as your attempts to defend it have gone too far.

If that is the case, I'd be happy to put all aside as a misunderstanding and apologise for attributing your post to dishonesty.... but continuing to pretend that there was nothing wrong with your original post where you're claiming to have disproved something (but now you're rowing back and claiming it was something else you disproved, but for some reason you aren't saying what you disproved and didn't quote the post you were claiming to disprove, but instead quoted an entirely accurate post)....well then you'd just be continuing to dig yourself a hole.

People taking screenshots of each other posts now... I am thinking a few posters could do with taking the weekend off every now and again.

I see this got lost amid the silly oneupmanship over the figures in an opinion poll and the difference between FF/FG and FF/FG/Greens. Totally pointless on both sides, that discussion was.

However, this is more interesting, even if only marginally so. Sinn Fein do seem to have a problem with GDPR. Their online database that was accessible to all members and contained details of voters was one example and this seems to be another. One to watch.

But the biggest SF news of the weekend was this:

This will be very interesting. It also reminds me that in the Mary-Lou/RTE thread, all the Sinn Fein acolytes were telling us that Mary-Lou was the victim and should be believed. I assume that they apply the same logic to this case, and we should all now believe what these plaintiffs say about Gerry Adams.

Or will it be the usual one rule for Sinn Fein, another rule for everyone else.

Interesting analysis on here SF, they are one of the most Pro Russian parties out there in all of Europe.

In fact, they rank 147/168 when it comes to being assertive against Russia.

So, when people say SF, the party and its supporters are soft on Putin and Russia, here is the evidence and proof.

And there are people complaining about Stephen Donnelly on other threads?

What sort of health system is being run in the North under the SF/DUP government? Health is one of the areas devolved to Stormont, so there is no excuse for this.