Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Donnelly forces Paul Reid out.

  • 27-06-2022 9:25am
    #1
    Posts: 0


    Muppet 1 - 0 Highest Paid Public Servant

    The HSE has been trying to close A&E in Navan Hospital for over a decade (and Donnelly has loads of reports on his desk explaining why it's unsafe) but a spineless populist politician with a postgrad degree in dog grooming or somesuch believes that he knows better than his medical experts.

    So are we looking at a shameful victory for populism over solid medial advice?

    Or is it an elected TD with a democratic mandate correctly pulling rank over a stroppy public servant - and to hell with the consequences?

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21


    One less cowboy in town.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Actually, the cowboy remains seated at the cabinet table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,558 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    the medical experts that preside over the systematic mess that is the HSE?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Medical experts do their job with the resources that they're allocated. It's managers who mismanage the HSE.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,375 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    By definition the elected TD is always correct in the sense they are there to deliver the policy of the country based on the democratic process and setup. That policy may be wrong from an information perspective but ultimately that's their head on the block as well in the next election accordingly by the voters (I got no opinion really on the issue per say).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,605 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Since it's know a medical decision but an administrative one, I'd say it's Muppets: 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 466 ✭✭Madeoface


    Pulled a massive salary, didn't change anything in the hse. Spouting guff from day 1. Still claiming 'private sector experience' when he was actually in telecom eireann as a boy and merely stayed on when it was floated. Leaving the hse organisation in a better place or worse off?

    Floating off on a giant pension. Spoofer.

    I don't think the minister is much better but I think some new blood, perhaps with a medical professional background will be good for the hse. Who knows, sure Robert Watt might try his hand here now lol....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,059 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Funny, Watt was the first name I thought of as a replacement. He'd like the moolah too, provided it is more than he gets now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭macvin


    so the OP has some personal issue with donnelly and also does not understand what is actually happening at Navan hospital, so blurts out some bs so that he can give himself the feeling of pissing on his leg (warm feeling- but nothing happens)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ujjjjjjjjj


    The muppet show continues apace.....



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Presumably you're one of the many savants who opts to go running to his local TD's "clinic" whenever he's feeling under the weather.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Both Donnelly and Reid are stuck with managing a badly-designed system: heavily subsidised by the taxpayer and largely free at free at point of use, like the UK NHS in these respects. Continental European health services are largely insurance-based (social insurance mostly), and seem to avoid our horrendous delays for treatment. Until this nettle is grasped, no point in slagging off Reid or Donnelly.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Why do public hospitals run car parks? Why do public hospitals look for VHI (or other health ins) when they offer no services for their charges to the VHI? Why do they deliberately leave low priority patients wait for hours in A&E instead of offering a call back when they are likely to be seen? Why do they keep patients in A&E for extended periods waiting, when they could be let go home with an appointment to return (in the morning, say)?

    Any experience of A&E is of a very badly organised service, where patients are not the centre of service. Maybe, high priority gets dealt with expeditiously, but outside of those - well ....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 466 ✭✭Madeoface


    I couldn't agree whatsoever with that get out of jail card. They are / were supposed to lead the system and change it. Why else was Reid paid 400k plus, to say he can't? What did he push to fix it, including funding model?

    The easiest option was to appear on TV every day during covid quoting stats that any junior bureaucrat could have done, instead of grasping the nettles he was supposedly paid for.

    Why did all around him quit too? Poor dears...in the immortal words of Paul Calfe, he was a bag of shiate...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,201 ✭✭✭amacca




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭asdfg87


    I expect Paul knows full well that the HSE is unmanagable so he got the opportunity and who can blame him, he got the opening and said i'm out of here. I expect the salary he got in the last few years means he can fully retire if he chooses.

    I do not think the HSE can be fixed until the admin and front line are separated, of course the admin in hospitals needs to stay on front line but general office management practices as in private sector needs to be the way forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,333 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    There's a mindset in the PS to do nothing, A public servant said to me lately if a young fellow had his job he'd be destroyed. Nothing'll be improved they don't give a damn



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think the problems in the HSE remind me of a very old joke.

    A car full of tourists asks a local at a cross road as to how he is to get to (tourist spot). Local looks up and down the four roads, stokes his chin, thinks a bit and then announces to them 'Well, if it were me, I would not start from here!'

    The HSE is not a good place to start reorganising it if the aim is a modern efficient health service. It needs to be broken up (it already is broken) and the new health service built from the smaller bits.

    Look at how complex organisations like supermarkets and airlines operate and pick the good models from them.

    A list of the things to look out for: Good efficient computer systems, unified throughout the organisation. Simple management structures. Well designed logistics so needed supplies are always available as they are needed and purchased centrally or locally to minimise cost of purchase and distribution while guaranteeing availability where needed. Standardise major ticket items and make maintenance a part of the management of these items. Make sure speciality roles are covered - airlines need pilots so always have enough, and airlines also take aircraft safety utterly seriously as no-one will fly in a dodgy airline with 'incidents'. Complex organisations need to keep their complexity to a minimum, as doing so allows a huge reduction in operating costs and a huge improvement in efficiency, and promotes good outcomes for those it serves.

    Do any of those points look as if they exist in the HSE?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭horse7


    Glad you said in telecom and not worked there.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 jcon




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Quite a Few Medical experts are infact at the Highest management level within the HSE including sitting around the CEO"s desk (just saying) 😉

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Would they be the same medical experts who recommended that an unfit for purpose A&E Department be shut down? If so, how do you reckon they feel about a clueless, balding halfwit overruling their expert recommendation purely on the basis that it may help the Government to save a couple of seats in the Meath Constituency?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    O I'm not getting into this argument, just pointing out there's medical experts at the very top of the HSE

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭rock22


    I'm not sure I want to get into a discussion about the health service because i think we could be here for ever But...


    @Sam Russell said "The HSE is not a good place to start reorganising it if the aim is a modern efficient health service. It needs to be broken up (it already is broken) and the new health service built from the smaller bits.

    The health service was broken up. The HSE was formed because 'every commentator' ands politician agreed that iit needed to be united into a single organisation.


    @Sam Russell Look at how complex organisations like supermarkets and airlines operate and pick the good models from them.

    In comparison to the health service, these are not complex organisations. However the health service does take a lot of practice from the airline industry, such as accreditation and quality control. ( I am saying they are not complex organisations because they have only a small limited number of processes, i.e. to sell an item or to move a passenger from a to b. The care pathways in health care are much more complex, varied and interconnected)

    @Sam Russell A list of the things to look out for: Good efficient computer systems, unified throughout the organisation. Simple management structures. Well designed logistics so needed supplies are always available as they are needed and purchased centrally or locally to minimise cost of purchase and distribution while guaranteeing availability where needed. Standardise major ticket items and make maintenance a part of the management of these items. Make sure speciality roles are covered - airlines need pilots so always have enough, and airlines also take aircraft safety utterly seriously as no-one will fly in a dodgy airline with 'incidents'. Complex organisations need to keep their complexity to a minimum, as doing so allows a huge reduction in operating costs and a huge improvement in efficiency, and promotes good outcomes for those it serves.

    Just on the example you list, would you unify a computer system which controls an MRI machine and a computer that manages patient admissions? There are multiple complex interconnected computer systems in the health service all doing different diverse tasks. Many don't even use proprietary operating systems. The truth is there is no simple system suitable for each task in the health service. However I fully agree with you that well designed logistics, standardisation and reduced complexity are all goals to aim for. In fact i think the HSE has been working in those areas.

    Politicians like grand overarching plans and nothing would please them more than to break up the HSE . So that in twenty years they can then united it all again. At each step they will double the size of the administration, That essentially is what has been happening since Michael Martin was minister. ( Does anyone remember all his plans, glossy documents given to every staff member of the health boards and Terry Prone produced videos. It must have cost an absolute fortune. )

    as I see it, what is needed is a shift in focus onto service delivery and away from management and organisational structures. When that has been done, for example with the cancer strategy, the service has improved and delivery has been much better.

    For all his sins, I do think Paul Reid has been focussing on the service delivery area and he has impressed me.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think that all computer systems should be standardised. Not all computer systems should be the same, but the same task should be done be the same system. Payroll, admissions, medical records, appointments - all the basic systems used throughout on each site.

    Your dismissal of supermarkets and airlines as not complex operation under measures them. They need to be large, have extensive management systems, and demand extensive logistics and finance systems to support them. Both are highly regulated and require reactive management. Airline delays equate to the trolley count.

    Every large business has its alligators that prevent or delay the draining of the swamp.

    The old health boards were a disaster in themselves subject to endless political interference, and amalgamating them into the HSE could have worked, but it just made it worse and raised costs, and reduced efficiency. [Remember PayPars?]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭rock22


    @Sam Russell ""

    I think we will have to just agree to differ.

    Certainly the HSE can always be improved. But to implement a new organisational structure will put real health delivery back another 20 years. I am arguing that stick with the organisations we have, make them better where we can, and focus our efforts, and finances, on service delivery. Make that more efficient with more frontline staff not middle managers, and reduce waiting lists. Amalgamate services where it makes sense, Create specialised centres, even if only one in the country and patients have to travel for certain procedures.

    Splintering the HSE will have management and the politicians focused on structure, promotions, bonuses etc. with the frontline staff forgotten about until there is another crisis. And focusing on service delivery is mainly what Paul Reid and the board of the HSE have been doing. But what we have now is politicians, who are worried about losing votes, wanting to interfere in what is clearly a management and clinical decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I don't think Donnelly could manage to break wind let alone force Reid out. There's been a pattern of conveniently timed departures from the HSE and DOH.

    Paul Reid was inept from the moment he got the top job and inept throughout the entire pandemic, in essence muddled his way through, using spin, spoofing and bluster and was lucky in some respects he had a small cohort of people in the background who knew their Jobs and actually over saw the Pandemic response. He was also fortunate and despite the brazen contempt shown towards front line staff , they stuck at it and under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

    He has now lost a few who essentially propped him up and anyone looking at the HSE press conferences throughout the pandemic (which would rival film launches) could see how utterly clueless he was.

    He claims he's no plans for the future, I laughed at that , but I'm pretty sure a book is on the cards , rights already purchased. Paul Reid will be fine, thank you very much.

    Donnelly on the other hand, we'll I'd çrash the site if I was to list off his howlers.

    Honestly, at times when I look back , I come to the conclusion we got through this pandemic relatively OK despite the Tragic lost of life and impact its had on 10's of thousands, I shudder to think if we didn't have some brilliant people in the background holding Donnelly and Reids hands , were we'd be.

    Spoof, Bluster , BS and spin is all these two offered, Good riddance to one, hopefully the other won't be to far behind the exit door.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭screamer


    The issue with HSE will never change, a huge juggernaut ploughing away over unionised, over paid and over staffed in the wrong areas and over worked in the important areas. Consecutive health ministers have been unable to effect any reform. So choo choo all aboard the gravy train. Poor front line workers have my sympathy they deserve better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Most ministers have never bothered. The last one to try with very, very mixed results was Harney. Donnelly is really a meddler, second rate and has never been in command of his brief. Hopefully, his tenure will also be coming to an end in December. I wouldn't go too overboard on the praise of frontline staff, they too are vested interests and have played as much of a part in the state of the HSE as everyone else.

    As to the thread title, three years of hell is far more of a reason at the core of Reid's departure. Questions over genuine government commitment to Slaintecare is also a likelihood but I think it's just being personally exhausted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The reason that patients are not sent home is due to risk. The patient could present and describe symptoms of an illness that would result in low priority treatment but actually be high priority.

    Send them home and they get a turn an hour later, then it is on the triaging nurse.

    You can't send someone away until they have been fully assessed by someone that is qualified to assess.

    The issue with a&e is that there are a lot of people presenting that do not need to be there. A&E was empty during COVID because those seat fillers were not there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,279 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    This all started many years ago when the Health Boards were scrapped and a monster called the Health Service Executive was created. It's been a monumental failure.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Sorting a complex organisation is next to impossible, but improving it is difficult but doable if it is tackled by a competent leader driven by a passion to improve the system that (s)he is in charge of improving.

    That competent leader could be at any level and the aim is to improve the system, but needs support from above including resources. Such people are in short supply, and are generally not driven by money - their passion is to get things right.

    Whether the HSE is broken up is moot, because the health service needs sorting any way that works. Many of the problems go back decades, if not generations. Harney attacked the excessive pay of consultants - now we have vacancies all over the place in nearly every speciality. Micheal Martin replaced action with reports that resulted in inaction. Education of doctors was frustrated by the universities need to attract high paying foreign students resulting to too few Irish students. Irish students were not required to work in Irish hospitals/healthcare.

    Start with the acute hospitals, and get the waiting lists down to a manageable level. Giving appointments for many years away is just nonsense. If the patient can wait many years, then the treatment cannot be that serious if is not that urgent.

    Fund GPs properly because at the current rate 50% will be gone within a few years.

    Whatever way it is solved, the solutions need to start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭rock22


    @Sam Russell , Yes I think we are broadly in agreement.

    Interesting , the term "Acute Hospital". Our hospitals were generally called regional or local hospitals. Then about 30 yrs. ago the DOHC started calling the bigger hospitals "acute hospitals" with the obvious idea that only acutely ill people should go there otherwise they should be treated by GP.s Of course no resources were put in place, or indeed any policies, just a change in title, and not even that officially, just the DOHC and Minister started to refer to these hospitals as acute hospitals.

    Just a couple of points. Many people are waiting for years for life changing treatment, not because the treatment is not needed urgently but because there is no service available. GP's are not employed by the HSE but are essentially small businesses.

    @Dempo1 wrote "Paul Reid was inept from the moment he got the top job and inept throughout the entire pandemic, in essence muddled his way through, using spin, spoofing and bluster and was lucky in some respects he had a small cohort of people in the background who knew their Jobs and actually over saw the Pandemic response. He was also fortunate and despite the brazen contempt shown towards front line staff , they stuck at it and under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

    He has now lost a few who essentially propped him up and anyone looking at the HSE press conferences throughout the pandemic (which would rival film launches) could see how utterly clueless he was."

    Dempso1, have you anything to back up those statements? Perhaps I have missed something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Yes, check the news going back over the past 2 years, you'll find all you need to know about the shambles the HSE is, Google will suffice but lots of archive info on various news sites.

    I'm actually being generous when I say ineptitude 😉

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 846 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Public Hospitals don't run car parks, they tender out such.

    Clinical staff don't look for VHI, admin staff may or may not (some hospitals are worse than others, esp. SVUH).

    A Hospital can't send a 'low priority' A&E patient away without being seen because of liability issues due to breach of care. This is also why they have to perform a battery of tests and keep patients under examination even if clinical indications are that such aren't needed ( e.g. https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/family-settle-case-over-medical-care-of-mother-26-with-brain-tumour-1295808.html or https://listonflavin.ie/settlement-of-fatal-claim-against-connolly-hospital-and-beaumont-hospital/ and it's similar in the UK e.g. https://healys.com/2018/11/26/brain-infection-boy-sent-home-by-ae-department-wins-5-25-million/ )

    You state that your experience of A&E is of a very badly organised service but you didn't actually state anything that is badly organised about it - what in God's name does Eurocarparks running a hospital car park have to do with an A&E?


    ...and this is why discourse on our health system is pointless. People with no clue and lots of emotions have very strong opinions.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 846 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And this is another example of why we can't have a proper discussion.

    You made several specific claims about the CEO, when asked if you have anything to back them up, you replied with "The HSE is a shambles".

    There is a shocking level of disconnect between:

    "The HSE is dysfunctional and not fit for purpose" and "Paul Reid personally treated frontline staff with brazen contempt" yet you think the former is evidence of the latter.


    I think Paul Reid chose to leave because he sees an easy out without having any personal long-term reputational damage for failing to turn the HSE around so I'm certainly not a defender of his, but you should be genuinely ashamed at your contributions. Our education system is good enough that you have no excuse for the nonsense you posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Fund GPs properly because at the current rate 50% will be gone within a few years. Whatever way it is solved, the solutions need to start.

    That's what Slaintecare is supposed to do.

    "Sláintecare sets out a high level policy roadmap to deliver whole system reform and universal healthcare, phased over a ten year period and costed.

    Sláintecare details reform proposals which, if delivered, will establish; a universal, single-tier health service where patients are treated solely on the basis of health need; the reorientation of the health system ‘towards integrated primary and community care, consistent with the highest quality of patient safety in as short a time-frame as possible’.

    Sláintecare has five interrelated components: population health; entitlements and access to healthcare; integrated care; funding; and implementation."

    Donnelly published an updated action plan earlier this month.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    This is not a debating society I'm afraid, posters can if they choose to refute my claims which I'll say again, the HSE is a shambles and was led by someone who was cleary out of his depth

    Riddle me this, how about you list off the achievements over the past three years, shouldn't take long.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    @[Deleted User]

    The point about carparks are they are a revenue stream for the hospital, whether they directly run them or not. The charges are way out of reasonable for the patients relatives, who may spend a large percentage of the in-patient's time in hospital visiting them. Think of terminally ill patients or those in ICU. It is the revenue stream I am complaining about.

    A relative was in SVUH and was on a drip. An admin came along with a VHI consent form, which was refused. A nurse then came over a ripped the drip out which still had 50% to go, and the patient was discharged. The public hospitals should be prohibited from looking for VHI consent for patients - if, and only if, the patient actually requests to be treated as a VHI positive patient should they be moved to a VHI basis. Clearly, in most cases the treatment is exactly the same - no private room, no private consultant, etc.



  • Posts: 846 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's still not evidence of 'A&E's being a badly organised service'.

    Hospitals tendering car parks is not a 'point' in support of A&Es being a badly organised service.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭rock22


    So again, No prove to back up anything you say. It is not up to anyone to disprove you allegations.

    Unfortunately, the level of contribution from you turns what is a genuine discussion into nothing more than a slagging match.

    Listening to the contributions, on radio, from Reid and the minister, it is clear that a row was brewing around authority, responsibility and demarcation between the CEO of the HSE and the minister. That is a row Reid was not going to win. His choice was to stay, taking responsibility when things go wrong but having his authority constantly overruled by the minister, or move on to pastures new. He choose to move on.

    @Dempo1 "Riddle me this, how about you list off the achievements over the past three years, shouldn't take long. "

    Managing two crises , Covid and Cibber attack , are surely to his credit. But I am not going to waste time debating with you when you clearly have no facts to back up your outrageous allegations .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,051 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Not at all sure what a cibber attack is but presumably you mean Cyber attack, are you aware at all about how shockingly bad the HSE"s IT systems were, indeed perhaps your also not aware, Paul Reid was warned the HSE was extremely vulnerable to cyber attack as far back as 2019 and in essence ignored the warnings.

    I'm still awaiting the list of glowing achievements by Paul Reid, I'd not expect any such list from Donnelly in fairness.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭rock22


    The article you linked to does nothing to back up your previous attacks on Reid. Let me remind you what you wrote.

    Paul Reid was inept from the moment he got the top job and inept throughout the entire pandemic, in essence muddled his way through, using spin, spoofing and bluster and was lucky in some respects he had a small cohort of people in the background who knew their Jobs and actually over saw the Pandemic response. He was also fortunate and despite the brazen contempt shown towards front line staff , they stuck at it and under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

    He has now lost a few who essentially propped him up and anyone looking at the HSE press conferences throughout the pandemic (which would rival film launches) could see how utterly clueless he was."

    Instead Ms. O'Connor says that "

    To have been a health leader during a global pandemic is an enormous strain, demanding 24/7 availability. He arrived with his reform agenda under his arm to a great level of existing dysfunction, but had to pivot pretty quickly to managing the world of Covid.

    ...

    According to HSE sources trying to combine a massive reform agenda with all the other demands of the job is a virtual impossibility.

    ...

    Health officials also believe the changes in Navan need to go ahead urgently. This is a move that was first proposed in 2009.


    Nowhere does she agree, or come to close to agreeing, with your attacks .

    Finally she said

    But some of the vitriol really is simply too much and does take its toll.

    I think you know that all you are doing is adding to that vitriol.


    Yes I meant Cyber, sorry. Presumably you meant "you're " when you wrote "your"?



Advertisement