Dublin Pride ends media partnership with RTE over Liveline's Gender Identity discussion

Now, referencing your earlier post, there is an example of someone that looks upset, there are even shouty caps too!

The vast majority of these NGOs are providers of healthcare, social care, education, sports and community facilities. No big deal really.

Does it? You think my post (only a few posts after I criticise another for slapping the word biological in front of every other word and calling it science) suggest that someone born male can give birth. I can only apologise as I don't think I said that anywhere.

I'm critical of the usual arguments here. The usual disregard for any sort of fresh thinking or sensible discussion (which is ironic given that the words logic, facts and science are thrown about by people who are either unwilling to accept that they may be wrong about their assumptions or just simply don't understand biology or science at all).

Of course I expect to be further mocked by those in this camp, but that's their ignorance, not mine (but it's certainly not likely to motivate myself or any trans people to engage.. why would they?).

If you are so biased that you need to resort to name calling or can only explain trans people as deluded or mentally ill, then how can you claim to be of a scientific mind? Doesn't really stack up now, does it?

This is a debating tactic.

As ive pointed out many times, supporting the rights of trans women to have legal recognition as women, and for trans men to have legal recognition as men does not commit you to any other beliefs about staticgender etc.

I've answered your questions multiple times and shown how it's a debating tactic that leads you yourself to express contradictory claims about wanting staticgender to be a legally recognized gender.

You've done it already. You have a specific but very faulty tactic in mind:

You are not simply "asking questions" as when the poster replies with an answer you will incorrectly claim that supporting the rights of trans men to be legally recognised as men and trans women to be legally recognised as women must lead to holding a position on staticgender.

This is false and why it's a debating tactic.

Or that somehow, someone born male can carry a child. Or whatever other contortions of definitions they want to get into.

That particular poster isn't even aware of the legislation he is debating. He's never read it and has made some strange false assumptions about it.

I'm not sure he understands that trans men are legally recognized as men.

Indeed. When someone claims to be against gender identity but calls for staticgender to be legally recognized it's probably time to stop debating with them.

No it would be correct to label me as a trans rights activist as all people apart from those whi have dug themselves into ridiculous logic holes would agree that someone who campaigns for trans men to be legally recognized as men and trans women to be legally recognized as a women is a trans rights activist.

Even GC people would happily label me as a TRA.

Your logic hole is absurd.