What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

I believe her legal team also released a statement the next day after people were questioning some of her details, that she stands by the testimony she made under oath. If she did realise she needed to change or amend any details, I believe she's able to do so in writing to the Committee.

The lack of self-awareness is something else. So much so, you'd have to assume it's trolling at this stage.

Lack of knowledge on the subject ✅

Lack of engagement when challenged ✅

Dissappears for long periods of time✅

strawman arguments when actually does engage ✅

"It's actually cult like behaviour to believe lie after lie after lie" - I hope the irony isn't lost on people here. Well played.

Yeah, I have asked many many times where the line was. EACH TIME I said something like "We just want to know where the line is. We won't even reply/debate your response" and the response 100% of the time has been silence. 100% of the time.

What we DO know is that:

• Serial sexual assault is NOT the line
• Monetary Fraud is NOT the line
• Insurrection instigation is NOT the line
• Lying is NOT the line
• Election Fraud is NOT the line
• Cheating is NOT the line
• Homophobia is NOT the line
• Racism is NOT the line
• Support of white supremacists is NOT the line
• Support of nations hostile to the US is NOT the line
• Support of dictatorships hostile to the US is NOT the line

We KNOW this to be true because he was been proven to have done ALL these acts (Even their precious fox is now saying so) and his ... fans still support him.

So, long story short, there is actually no line.

It's true, and it's very stark when it's laid out in those bullet points. Crazy times we're living in.

Well he DOES have a history of flip-flops.....

And the GQP are of course on the attack - at least one of their stalwarts was drooling over how attractive she was and that's why she was chosen. Jesse "Racebaiting old asians in Chinatown NYC for fun and profit" Watters piled on to whoever it was the GQP dug up (Gregg Kelly?) to do the drooling:

Speaking of swallowing bullshit. Why do you chose to believe someone who's posting on an unregulated social media site over someone who's testifying under oath and at risk of being charged with perjury?

Has any Trump lawyer ever been paid? 😂

Seriously Brute, this has been explained already. She did not testify that it happened, she testified that that is what she heard. That is not hearsay as she was there to hear the conversation. She is not relying on the account of someone else, which would be hearsay, she is recounting what she heard

Second, this isn't a court of law. It is a process to try to uncover what happened, so that if a court of law is needed it can be done. So your call that it wouldn't be accepted in a court if law is A) wrong but B) irrelevant.

She said this under oath, Trump, Meadows, Jordan etc have all refused to state under oath. She has created the possibility that she is in trouble if found to be lying. Why would she risk that? And why won't Trump et al go under oath to tell the truth (as you believe it to be)?

And hearsay is the most common objection? Where did you get that piece of data from?

As for credibility, Trump has consistently touted the use of violence. And we are well aware that he did see himself as the top man, answerable to no one (it is legal just because he is POTUS for example). HE has no respect for the secret service - he chose Putin over them which tells you all you need to know about what he thinks of them, thinks the military are useless (he knows more than all the generals). So it makes perfect sense that when faced with a possible route to grab the POTUS prise, and being overruled by this secret service operative - who he believes are all corrupt and working for HC - it is entirely reasonable to at least consider that he would attempt such a ridiculous move.

Even then, Trump isn't being investigated for trying to grab the steering wheel or trying to grab an agent. If that's proven to be false, fine. It's a headline-grabbing, but ultimately irrelevant, detail.

It's the fact that he was demanding to go to the Capitol with a large mob to protest and likely disrupt the certification of the election results, following months of trying all other measures possible to overturn the election results, which is important, and no-one is countering that point.

Ok maybe he did do it, but he didn’t mean it!

Ok he did mean it, but it wasn’t illegal!!

Tell me you've never seen a trial without telling me you have never seen a trial.

That's. What. She. Did.

CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: When I returned to the White House, I walked upstairs towards the chief of staff's office, and I noticed Mr. Ornato lingering outside of the office. Once we had made eye contact, he quickly waved me to go into his office, which was just across the hall from mine. When I went in, he shut the door, and I noticed Bobby Engel, who was the head of Mr. Trump's security detail, sitting in a chair, just looking somewhat discombobulated and a little lost.

I looked at Tony and he had said, did you f'ing hear what happened in the beast? I said, no, Tony, I — I just got back. What happened? Tony proceeded to tell me that when the president got in the beast, he was under the impression from Mr. Meadows that the off the record movement to the Capitol was still possible and likely to happen, but that Bobby had more information.

So, once the president had gotten into the vehicle with Bobby, he thought that they were going up to the Capitol. And when Bobby had relayed to him we're not, we don't have the assets to do it, it's not secure, we're going back to the West Wing, the president had a very strong, a very angry response to that.

Tony described him as being irate. The president said something to the effect of I'm the f'ing president, take me up to the Capitol now, to which Bobby responded, sir, we have to go back to the West Wing. The president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. Mr. Engel grabbed his arm, said, sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel.

We're going back to the West Wing. We're not going to the Capitol. Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel. And Mr. — when Mr. Ornato had recounted this story to me, he had motioned towards his clavicles.

LIZ CHENEY: And was Mr. Engel in the room as Mr. Ornato told you this story?

CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: He was.

LIZ CHENEY: Did Mr. Engel correct or disagree with any part of this story from Mr. Ornato?

CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mr. Engel did not correct or disagree with any part of the story.

LIZ CHENEY: Did Mr. Engel or Mr. Ornato ever after that tell you that what Mr. Ornato had just said was untrue?

CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Neither Mr. Ornato nor Mr. Engel told me ever that it was untrue.