Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland - lack of air and naval defence.

1303132333436»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Spending at any time has to be relevant. Our history so far, particularly on the Naval scene has been acquisition of ships, some designed for Naval tasks, like corvettes and minesweepers, but all required to "patrol" and fulfil peace time policing duties. Other than P31, which seemed to open up modern capabilities, we continue to opt for patrolling and minimising intervention in Hot situations.

    The Metro in Dublin is a wise spend for reasons other than transport. we may have a major shelter resource for thousands of people in time of danger. The Ukranians are blessed with so much underground facilities well hardened under factories.

    Budgets once assigned should not be notional or deliberately deflected to non-defence spending. Getting back to relevance please don't buy ships or boats for optical or political reasons. Get out your JANE's and look at other Navies such as the Finns, Swedes, Norwegians, Danes, and Belgians. All new tonnage can float and patrol but it must have a Naval deterrent/intervention capability.

    I will be hopefully present, this week, to see P31 decommissioned along with her HOSTAC capabilities and Primary/Secondary radar and IFF, and the loss of 80 or more personnel from the establishment including the skills expensively acquired on overseas courses.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Options is perfectly fine. I corrected error re coastguard/revenue. The point which you missed is that funds that belong to Defence were underspent and the underspend pays for vessels elsewhere.

    The MRV one in number, one, did I say one? Is utterly inadequate to patrol EEZ.

    I don’t see the numbers for a true capacity build up in 500m extra. I see remediation. I see spin. Let’s see first if the political parties responsible for gutting the Defence forces allocate 500m per year. A budget of 1.5 bn will quickly deliver far less than thought.

    As I said, I hope I’m wrong .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    What sort of naval service do we need if we were to invest in grippens or f16s ?

    Is it basically just beckets with a radar system and a small anti-aircraft system for self defence ... And a multi-role vessel (or 2 🤔),

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    You seem to be missing the whole undersea aspect?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Jaysus , are you sure you don't want to chuck an aircraft carrier and a few nuclear subs in there as well . seems a bit ... Ambitious maybe .. again what's the navy for ? .. however I'd agree with designing the future multirole vessel ( s) to be able to be as multi-functional as possible in the future .. wether that's a vehicle deck , capacity to transport multiple Containers hopefully with power supply if needed , or a flight deck/ hanger area or crane ..

    I still reckon a large off shore support vessel could fit the bill as a basic design .. they're designed to be flexible ,and to handle the roughest of weather ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It’s pretty much as basic a navy as you could have with nothing special in the list tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Ok - maybe I went for a bit of hyperbole ,

    So we have 6 opvs currently .. ( and can't crew them ) , at least 4 of those could have a flight deck ,and radars added if desired , (the back of a Becket is fairly substantial)

    We've 2 inshore patrol vessels coming , ( honestly I'd add the soon to be retired revenue cutters to that , even if only for an skua marra ( still a lot better than what they had a few years back )

    We're not likely to get minesweepers , although we could reconfigure at least 2 opvs to be more capable of that role - with a view to being replaced with more purpose designed mine sweeper/ opvs when the time comes ..

    And then 1 or 2 multirole vessels ( it'll probably be 1) ? Would they replace existing opvs

    But ultimately what would 10 vessels do around our coast ? Especially when the new casas come online soon ?

    How many days at sea would the navy want/expect them each to do ?

    Would we be better off focusing on making the naval service more attractive for young recruits , with better accomodation options , better college and apprenticeship options , better work/ life balance and career options beyond the naval service ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Can see the dept of public expenditure giving enough money for two new helis and a pay rise for personal. They will probably clap themselves on the back after.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I cant find it now but when the Aussie navy first took on this yoke to patrol northern Australian waters they expected it to be at sea over 300 days a year , I've no idea how that worked out either ... Admittedly that was patrolling the northern part of a continent ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    What makes you think the Navy should only be operating in our waters? What makes you think two CASAs replacing two CASAs will radically change matters from what they have been given that two aren’t enough anyway?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    2 casas Aren't enough for what ?

    And you're right I had kind of assumed the Irish navy would be largely operating in Irish waters .. although if a vessel were to be used for something like the med mission then great ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    For patrolling our seas, particularly with the potential increase of patrols in the Irish Sea, and as they aren’t true MPAs so again are relatively blind to any subsurface activities. And yeah the navy should be tasked with other operations, there’s UNFIL for example or the EU patrols off Africa that we should have looked at years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,871 ✭✭✭Alkers


    It is timely that an Taoiseach is visiting Ukraine currently, the extent of devastation he sees might go some way to increasing the appetite for adequate defence spending



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Judging by his verbal interactions he was shocked by scenes of wartime destruction. It will have been his first experience of seeing wartime damage. From our side we must encourage making all parts of our PDF relevant to modern warfare. Many MPA's referred to are adaptions and marinized for SW Flying. I'd imagine anything equipped appropriately with endurance of 7hrs plus can do an adequate job. Our ships of whatever type must also be relevant and not just targets. The MRV as well as intended roles must be capable of mothering ships on tasks where resupply is a need.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I’m posting the tweet as it saves typing it out and gives the source simultaneously.


    We will know very soon if they’re going for it or not. If they do there has been a huge U turn. That can only have been brought about by massive external pressure. The price for the Protocol and Biden hanging tough with the UK?

    I have no faith in MM. He is at heart a naive pacifist and close to Home Rule/unionism and his experiences in Ukraine will only reinforce his belief that all fighting is wrong and surrender is the best policy. He will say different of course but I think he has been told by Eastern European states and others that Ireland must do more. The danger is that the more will be focussed on “peace building” and support roles (look at the PESCO tasks today) so that he can claim we’re implementing a LOA2 but gain damn all in capacity for air or naval Defence. That leaves the way open for an alliance and the continued dependency on the UK in particular. Alliances are needed. But the EU should come first.


    The direction of Ireland in the 21st century in IR and Defence will be set next week. I’m leaning toward a version of the above as most likely and fundamentally a fudge.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Time will tell if MM goes the way I predict. Enjoy your banana.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Assuming the government stays in power, December ish, the decisions on the report will be announced next week. That being said, his comments have also suggested the LoA2 area already.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Well next Tuesday if Sinn Fein get thier vote.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    True. December officially. The problem is commitments to spending will have been entered into by him which constrain what can be done elsewhere.

    The deeper problem (I mentioned the DPER problem elsewhere) is what is the underlying vision about the country. Will MM going change much in FF at this stage? Only if there is a strong vision of an independent state within the EU will there be a strong financial commitment to Defence spending. People are forgetting that the DF are the way they are because of the political parties who are now looking at spending more. My belief and I hope I am wrong is a cleverly designed plan to remediate, to increase spending in areas that guarantee a toothless contribution to EU Defence, to increase spending to ensure peace keeping missions for access to UNSC and to enable claims of achieving option 2 (LoA2 in report). Defence has been a soft target for having its budget looted. Politicians will find that a hard habit to break. I hope I am wrong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    You know I haven't a clue. Plus did I spell their wrong. Could it be used to delay a decision?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    That’s what I thought, though it would be fairly typical of the luck of the DF if when there was potentially something finally changing for the better the government fell…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    The no confidence vote is just to rock the boat for the Coalition gov before recess, classic tactic by SF to try have a moan when Dáil resits prior to the early budget. I believe the exiting whip can still vote so the majority is not truly with SF on that as much as the pirates appear to believe but I think it’s just an Opportunistic motion to see what happens. Regarding, LOA 2+ It appears to be the going ahead by the sounds of it but echoing what sparkey and dohville have been pointing out, we are nearly as 10+ years away from achieving anything. It’s sad but it’s true, the current recruitment drive appears to be failing and word on the street is they are thinking of extending the deadline due to lack of interest and hoping the cost of living crisis dies down so they don’t have to increase the salary to take cost of living into consideration.

    One of the senators (a friend of mine) that is on the defence committee rightly pointed out that, how can you try entice recruits when at the same time a certain minister(party is colour) has requested the troops be sent to cover for the DAAs lack off compliance. Aiding the civic power is abused and this a factor in a shocking recruitment drive.

    I am not an advocate for any political party such as SF/FG or FF but as long as the colour party are there and in power, I’m afraid any good ideas for the defence forces is going to be used as a mouse pad or fall pressed against.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,486 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    This was the concept behind the US’s LCSs. Total disaster, being withdrawn from service early. Not least, they would return to base, swap module, then head out only to discover that the tasking had changed, and they had the wrong module installed….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Is that not the same with any system or piece of equipment ? , you send out,or embark vehicle a ,or ship a ,or plane a , but half way to it destination you realize you needed ship b or a different plane , and the one you want is stationed at a different base , a continent or an ocean away . .

    In theory,if your multi -mission ship is based in quatar ,and you need different tech on board , you could fly out a mission cube and the appropriate techs/ crews from anywhere and install it in a hurry ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    So it's not tied to inflation?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indo saying 1.5 bn a year by 2028. Inflation proofed. So over a 5 year period budget will increase year on year by 100 million.

    A good part of this in the lifetime of the next government.

    Defence has not been prioritized.

    Consequences of this: for the final year or two of this govt remediation begins while decline will not be arrested.

    Smoke and mirrors it seems.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I’m leaving this thread now as I don’t see much point and the fundamentals need spelling out.

    No major political party is committed to the state as it is and consequently Defence will continue to suffer as there will be no underlying vision.

    That vision will not be possible until two things happen. First, the Protocol issue is settled either with a UK re-entry to single market, a land border, an away from border border or Ireland accepting a sea border between it and the EU. How long is a piece of string?

    Second, until a border poll is held and won or lost there will be no vision possible for the 26 county state. The chances of such being held let alone won, (the Protocol is actually strengthening the union as NI has dual access) in the foreseeable are nil given that Scotland is agitating for another referendum and no Tory PM will preside over the break up of the UK.

    Which brings me back to the lack of commitment to the state. During 2021-25 the govt has committed to ringfenced spending of €500 million on the shared island initiative. All of which is supposedly about integrating an all island economy and society while two distinct jurisdictions exist. Quite simply Irish politics continues to kick the can down the road and refuses to face BREXIT realities.

    The vision at the moment seems to be to denigrate those who fought and won independence while turning a blind eye to the terrorism that founded NI and to seek to ingratiate with unionism. The Chair of the Defence committee is on the record as saying RIC were “murdered” in the war of independence. So given that what is the vision? It’s clear that the current govt seeks a closer integration with the UK while maintaining EU membership. From all this I believe the vision is to be a Defence dependent of the UK, to apply the GFA to the entire country if reunited as a “shared state” (FFG has floated the idea of unionists permanently in cabinet) and Protocolise the island and retain full EU membership and the status of an independent state at the UN. In short, cakeism.

    The DF will remain as an international peace keeping earner of political brownie points, emergency labour, parade theatre for political spin, and supported just enough to avoid political liabilities.

    I hope I’m wrong and I await Cathal Berry’s analysis of what comes forward but right now if it walks like a duck etc etc.

    Edit: The one possibility of a border poll is that if the Tories realise they will win it and use it to undermine Scottish independence.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    The Occupation up North is a divergence but now is developing potential to crash all agreements , cross border meetings, and shared objectives for common amenities and assets. The Brexit project has given back to Unionism a reason for their leaders, to redline issues and harden their myriad not an inch views.

    We must try to follow an EU related Defence plan and interact more closely with those that do not have anti-EU agendas. We could start by giving all our ships additional AD strengths and consider trialling an ASW system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Assuming with increased budgets, and an intention to stiffen up our Defences on land .sea, and in the air, it is necessary to sketch in some proposals for consideration. Our 6 OPV's need to add to their main gun outfit by adding on 2 single 30mm auto gun systems as 20mm replacements. We can improve AD by adding on central aft a SIMRAD/Mistral missile system ( 4 loaded missiles per mount ) Mistral spares to be carried below decks. Investigate carriage and use of a drone weapon system. Improve radars as necessary. Consider Phalanx systems 2 for MRV and completely assess for other systems allied to containerisation. Ask the question can the MRV keep a small Task group at sea fully supplied for a 4/6 week deployment. Maybe MRV plus 2 OPV's.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Firstly, Ireland should be a neutral country in word and deed. Secondly, we should be a friendly country to all.

    Next, I suggest Micheal Martin and the rest of the cabal appologize to our Russian friends for their beligerent attitide, and ask our Russian friends to patrol our skies to keep the RAF from infringing on out territory. Alternatively, we should stop making an issue of Russia going about it`s business and decline any pretense the UK want to use to infringe on our airspace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The Russians aren’t friends of anyone, not even themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    How much is the Kremlin paying you Komrade? Also is it Rubles or Wodka?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Neutral means neutral so we can't be friendly to everyone, plus how can we be neutral if Russia are patroling our airspace.


    Go back to predicting the doom of the world and a future of trading turnips. Reality 🤔🤔🤔😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Well I disagree. A neutral country should be friendly to all countries. That does not mean taking sides. It has already been established Russian cargo planes passed near our airspace recently on it on route to west Africa, but did not encroach on it. Ireland`s participation in sanctioning Russia makes Ireland a non neutral country and therefore a legitimate target. If anything does happen, I will blame the Irish government and not our Russian friends.



  • Registered Users Posts: 256 ✭✭mupper2




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,416 ✭✭✭Zico


    We're a kind of Irish neutral. Read up on our history a bit to understand that.


    'Legitimate target' is a phrase we're familiar with though.


    The threat from Russia is real and in the absence of our own means we're relying on the RAF and Royal Navy just to patrol out waters and airspace. That Apple money could be used to build infrastructure which would reduce our reliance on their protection.

    We can't even say we're militarily neutral with a straight face right now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    We don’t need “the Apple money”, there’s plenty of money going to be available over the next few years, what we need is a public and political will to address our issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,668 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    What I don't understand, is that of all Euopean nations the Irish must surely understand how it feels like being occupied and dominated by another nation in history. There was probably no other nation in Europe which has been under the rule of another country for such a long time.

    So why constantly underinvest in the armed forces? 6 Navy ships out of 8 not in service and the constant denial of fighter jets for the Air Corps?

    Whether neutrality or not, Ireland needs to do more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Also of course the fact that the Treaty gave naval matters to the RN explicitly (and looking at the minutes if the RAF had turned up and asked we would have had RAF bases here as well), which gave Finance a wonderful excuse to say no to any funding of defence (like when they killed off the first "navy"). After that factor in the state of the Irish economy versus any meaningful/capable capability and demands on Finance for every other bit of spending for the nation and it's not hard to see how the situation developed.

    Not sure how you would have materially changed it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,668 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    It may be that these post 1922 roots are in the Irish civil war? Didn't the British support the newly formed Irish defence forces with guns, other equpiment and even airplanes, and even threatened to invade Ireland, if the Irish government wasn't doing anything against the Anti Treaty forces?

    Whatever the reason, it's not up to today's challenges anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,615 ✭✭✭California Dreamer



    🚨 Breaking: the High Court orders a full hearing into Ireland’s arrangements allowing UK RAF aircraft enter Irish airspace for purposes of defending against security threats - hearings had been sought by senator @GCraughwell on constitutional grounds. @VirginMediaNews



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭millb


    "because the Irish navy has no sonar capabilities" can't put a ship out 12 miles either.


    Russian submarine 'chased' from Cork Harbour by British navy (irishexaminer.com)



  • Registered Users Posts: 263 ✭✭zone 1


    never had sonar in first place DOD only focus was FP



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,022 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The corvettes and Eithne would have had at stages in their lifespan, don’t think any of the rest did?



  • Registered Users Posts: 263 ✭✭zone 1


    really sad state to be honest but thats the DOD for you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    How big a deal would it be to equip the p60s with either a towed aray or sonar buoys ?

    The sonar buoys can feed back to a plane or helicopter , so the equipment doesnt have to be huge , (although no major size constraint on a ship )

    There'd need to be a will to buy ,maintain and use the equipment though ,

    Although in honesty - they were entitled to be there - international waters , as were the british navy -

    The british couldnt really do much if the sub decided not to move ,

    Who alerted the Royal navy that the sub was there in the first place ?

    Its a bit of a game really -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Again, we see another article in the UK Defence Journal describing how the RAF had to send a P8 out off the Cork Coast for a rescue because our brand, spanking new, C-295, was " unavailable ".

    At the end of the article, it is stated that we clearly do not take our security seriously, if we cannot even man and dispatch the very aircraft to which this mission fits and for which it was purchased.

    It is complete nonesence to state that we do not have the money to spend on our military. It is now a case of "We Must!". Even the most cash-strapped countries in Europe can manage to protect their airspace and waters. We absolutely cannot rely on the UK any longer. They themselves are in serious trouble, militarily, and their press are starting to circle the wagons when it comes to helping us.

    We live on what is, and will be in the next conflict, the most strategic island in Europe, and we couldn't even tackle a swarm of drones, never mind a Russian sub messing with the under-sea cables, or a wayward aircraft. Christ, we don't even have a primary radar.

    I visited the Aviation Museum in Shannon recently, to see the remnants of our once-capable aircraft, ( they're all there, from the Vampire, the Fouga to the Warrior and C-172). While there, I met some retired ground crew who worked with the Vampire and the pilot of the vampire that was the subject of the only air-to-air photograph of the type.

    These men were so saddened at the neglect and ignorance of successive governments towards our armed forces. I don't know if its a generational thing. Maybe it's because those in our late 50's lived through turbulent times in Ireland and the armed forces were always front and centre in the news. Christ, I even remember the soldiers in Banks across the country, or the armoured cars escorting the IIE trucks. I even brought Scout Troops to Baldonnel on regular occasions. I don't know what it is, but we need to wake the hell up quickly.



Advertisement