Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
15405415435455461190

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Who would you pick that brings the "dog" you want to see?

    There are guys out there who love a bit of pushing and shoving etc, but they don't have the quality. It's all well and good picking lads who have the "dog" in them, but they have to earn their place on their rugby playing ability first.

    We tried going down there to fight teams like the All Blacks multiple times in the amateur era, and we ended up losing the fight and getting hammered in the rugby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    there isn't anybody. decades of relying on polite private school centric players has done that.

    JVDF in fairness is devolping a bit of a bite.

    But apart from Sexton and one or two others we are just too nice etc. SOB was and is a big loss on the team and Sexton's departure will finish it imo.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TBF, I think I probably agree with you on this. I think it's a failing at Leinster at the moment.

    I attended a big rugby playing school in Dublin; discipline in all aspects was drummed into us, respecting opposition, respecting referees, not cursing on the field etc, absolutely not fighting with opposition players things like that.

    The other thing was, the big schools don't need to. In the small bubble of Leinster Schools Cup, you come up against poor teams who want to drag games into brawls and you know you don't need to, you'll smash them just by playing your game.

    The problem is it doesn't work out that way as you rise up to the highest levels of European and international rugby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    i say this a private school person myself. and yes i am aware Sexton is one of these guys. but he is a freak. its more the nature of having guys from a mono culture, 2 or 3 similar schools. its a huge bugbear of mine.

    we are sleepwalking into issues.

    imo the players of our old teams lacked lots of things but i'm actually of the opinion apart from skill and belief they were harder and more physical.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    When you are constructing a strong side its like baking a cake or making dinner, you need a combination of a lot of things.

    You need dog but you also need speed, power and just a good rugby IQ but you don't need 15 players who have all these but if you have 2 or 3 player who specialise in 1 and then are quite good in the other areas or in 1 or 2 other areas that can help.


    So in Ireland's case if we can find 2 or 3 player who specialise in each of these area's 2/3 who bring dog, 2/3 who bring speed, 2/3 who bring power and just 2 or 3 who can run the show we will go places



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I am surprised to see Hanson. I think Larmour should have gotten the call. Very poor not selecting Carberry. Seriously, when are they going to let him swim or sink?

    Win or lose, we really aren't exploring different options! This is a big failing in my opinion!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Which is a lesson that hasn't been learnt from previous RWC failings, we keep crying out about how things need to change after every failure yet in the end what does change?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I wish people on here would stop conflating what a few overexcited posters on boards want with what the actual wider supporter base want, or certainly what the players themselves want.

    This idea that everything is utterly broken and we have to tear it all down and start again is a complete fallacy. I personally would have brought Coombes into the squad this week, and I'd like to get a closer look at O'Toole and Timoney at this level too. I wouldn't have started Sexton because of the concussion concerns.

    But the idea that we need wholesale changes is nonsense, not least because we don't have an extensive amount of quality to replace players with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Carbery got 50 minutes last weekend. They need to win this next match to stay in the series. Selecting Sexton is a no-brainer if he's available.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I agree with this! But surely, Sexton should be stood down! Carberry needs to earn his way if he is to be our 10 going forward! No better place than NZ. Why not start Conan? Have Coombes on the bench? Doris has been poor. He's been poor for a while. O'Toole? Surely he's earned a chance? I don't see why a couple of inclusions would not benifit Ireland going forward!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    The issue with this is we don't know how much talent we have because most aren't actually tested against quality opposition. We just assume they aren't up to par without ever finding out the truth. Giving players a run against tier 2 nations or against tier 1 nations when we are 30 points up isn't testing a player. Obviously there is always the exception that proves the rule but overall its an issue we have always had.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On this point I think we just see this entirely differently. For me, guys who struggle at a URC level or who aren't shining at that level do not warrant inclusion into the highest form of test rugby, just to see if they might possibly be able to hack it.

    Obviously some guys are in tougher situations, where they can't always elevate themselves above the performance of the team, but I do still generally believe that a right to start a test match at the highest level has to be earned.

    I'm saying this as someone who has said multiple times I would have made some form changes this week; including potentially Coombes, O'Toole and Timoney in the match squad, and starting Carbery at 10 because of concerns over Sexton's health. Also, if not for the unfortunate injuries to Hume and Baloucoune then I absolutely would have wanted to see both of them start test matches here in NZ.



  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    christ thats what posters are talking about basically. who the **** said anything about wholesale changes.

    people just pointing out building depth narrative was a clear lie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    People give out that Irish players are rarely tested in back to back games so are untested by the time of the WC where it becomes a necessity. Surely this is a good way to get them used to it?

    There's some changes I'd have gone for myself but it's not an inconceivable selection.



  • Registered Users Posts: 262 ✭✭VayNiice


    Might i suggest you tune in to Crufts instead so?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    But alot of the young players aren't struggling at this level. What we do in Ireland is we "test" our players against Italy,USA,Japan and maybe off the bench against a tier 1 nation if we have the game won already...they don't learn anything and then struggle to make the step up. The reality is nothing any young Irish player does at URC level or CC level will prove that they are ready for test level, what these levels show is the potential a player has to step up, once they show that they should be brought in especially if we desperately need assistance in a position.

    We just a culture of conservatism and that is reflecting in our selections. Its nice to put our heads in the clouds and make up convenient excuses but these excuses will be badly exposed at a RWC and the lack of preparation will get the result it deserves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Prop shortages are hardly surprising when one considers:

    1. The peculiar height and weight required to be eligible for this career.
    2. The job description.

    Its like an activity at the other end of the spectrum, female gymnastics: the number of people with the necessary physical requirements and motivation is vanishingly small.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, I don't think that's the case. Guys who showcased exceptional ability (Ronan Kelleher and Dan Sheehan two relatively recent examples) were parachuted virtually straight into the test team at the highest levels. Sure, Rory Best's retirement was a factor, but there have been numerous examples of guys who've made the leap straight into the test side.

    I think Nick Timoney had an exceptional season, and probably deserves a crack, but he's unlucky in that one of the few guys who had an even better season than him happens to be the guy he's competing with in JvDF.

    Guys like Harry Byrne & Craig Casey for me are in that latter category, where they haven't as of yet demonstrated exceptional ability to justify being parachuted into a test team. What works for one player doesn't necessarily work for everyone else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    And like I highlighted like with everything in life there is always an exception that proves the rule, Kelleher is one of those examples and even then how long did it take him to become our first choice hooker? + 15 months... when he clearly was a better hooker than Herring but as expect the reason given by fans which proved my point is Herring is better at the basics, ie less likely to screw up, rather than Kelleher who gives us the best impact.

    And now how will we ever know if Timoney is up to it at this level? When people ask why we don't have as much depth as we like well this is the primary reason why, we let 1 or 2 players hog all the minutes regardless of how well the alternate is playing. Coombes is another laughable example, only in Ireland would a player like Coombes be nearly 25 and still yet to be tested against a tier 1 nation, such an Irish selection!

    They shouldn't be parachuted in, they should be selected on the bench or gradually brought in. Continuing to test them against poor opposition in scratch sides is never going to show what they are truly capable of or answer the question as to whether they are ready to make the step up.

    Whether you like to admit it or not we are just a very conservative rugby nation and saying otherwise is just putting you're head in the clouds.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Kelleher made his Irish debut just after his 22nd birthday, which is pretty young for a front row forward. He's been a mainstay in the side (when healthy) since then. I don't see how you are using him as an example here, as to most people he's clearly an example of Farrell actively backing youth.

    On Coombes, yeah he's probably a little unfortunate not to have picked up more caps at this stage, but he really only became a regular fixture for Munster from the 2020 season, and as good as he's been, he's effectively lost out to Caelan Doris over the same time period. Doris is actually 5 months younger than Coombes, so it's not a case of an older established player being backed, just a judgement call by the coach, which is his prerogative.

    Whatever your views might be on Doris' recent form, it's hard to argue that if you look back over their respective careers that Doris hasn't been the superior player so far on form and performances at this point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Because he was clearly Ireland's best hooker yet it took him over 15 months to become a starter for Ireland...and the reasons justified for not starting him were the typical conservative reasons usually given.

    So its been 2 years, we spend that 2 years crying out for a powerful forward who can get us going forward and yet we continue to leave Coombes out of the team? How will we ever know what Coombes is capable of at this level if he never plays, we are actively reducing our potential depth by leaving players like Coombes out.

    I cant argue because Coombes never bloody plays! And talking about being inform is irrelevant because Doris isnt on form.


    Simple question, are Ireland conservative yes or no?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, I don't believe Ireland under Andy Farrell have been overly conservative in selection.

    In his time in charge, he very quickly elevated guys like Ronan Kelleher, Caelan Doris, James Lowe & Hugo Keenan to the Irish side when it was evident they were up to the level required. He has also been proactive in switching Andrew Porter back to loose head.

    He identified Jamison Gibson Park as the scrum half he needed to suit his style, when JGP was still second choice at Leinster. He has picked guys like Jeremy Loughman & Kieran Treadwell who aren't first choice for their provinces because they evidently suit the game plan he's trying to instill.

    On this tour, 5 players have pulled on an Irish shirt for the first time, including guys like Joe McCarthy who has played very little rugby at a senior level, but shows a lot of promise.

    He has shown an inclination to pick on form where applicable, as is evident in his dropping and recalling guys like Peter O'Mahony and James Lowe.

    He has given debuts to Dan Sheehan, Ronan Kelleher, Tom O'Toole, Ryan Baird, Gavin Coombes, Caelan Doris, Nick Timoney, Craig Casey, JGP, Harry Byrne, Ciaran Frawley, , Mack Hansen, Hugo Keenan, James Lowe, Michael Lowry, Robert Baloucoune, Caolin Blade, Fineen Wycherley, Paul Boyle, James Hume, Eric O'Sullivan, Shane Daly, Billy Burns, Will Connors & Max Deegan. That's 25 new players, plus the 5 uncapped he's brought on this tour.

    What he hasn't done, is go for the kind of chaos theory approach you seem to be pining for, of just tossing guys into the wolves as soon as they show a modicum of promise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭Shehal


    I rest my case.


    Like I've said, there are always exceptions in every case, its a fact of life.

    And a question how many of those 5 played against NZL...0, it's another issue, we test our players against teams that aren't equivalent to what we'll be playing in a big RWC match. How is playing the Maori's equivalent to SA in a pool match, France in a 6N or a big QF against NZL or France? What did we learn from that game that tells us they can make the step up against these teams and in any case we arent going to see the best of these players abilities in this match up as they are playing in a scratch side, you learn what these players are capable of by putting them in the first team against good test sides. If they play badly against the Maori in a mess of a side they get shat on and if they play well the argument is "its the Maori"...its a no win situation.

    And of that list how many have been tested against quality opposition? Its the same approach Schmidt had, cap them against a bunch of farmers and think that means they are ready to play against the best teams in the World...obviously NZL in NZL is probably the great challenge in World Rugby but if we are going into the autumn this year against even SA or Australia we need to be seeing these youngsters playing against that level of opposition, just capping them against Fiji and not seeing them against until Italy in the 6N is a complete cop out.

    No-one is saying throwing a kid in who shows a modicum of promise but I'm sure throwing in Coombes for instance into a big test match isn't asking for too much...If we have a weakness in a certain position that's the time we should be pushing the boat out and take afew gambles rather than pick journeymen who will be nothing other than just that like Ed Byrne for instance...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But this is exactly the point I made. You seem to be suggesting some sort of chaos theory approach; of just dumping guys into the most difficult environments straight off the bat and thinking it'll somehow help our depth situation.

    My point to you was that he has should a willingness to do it where he thinks their abilities warrant it.

    There are other players who haven't earned the right to play at a higher level; it's that simple. If guys aren't dominant at lower levels, you aren't doing anything for them or for Ireland by dumping them into situations where they'll get ruthlessly exposed and found out.

    That's exactly the kind of approach Ireland took back in previous eras; on some of those extended tours and there numerous stories of the damage it did to player's confidence and development.

    You ask "how is playing the Maoris the equivalent to playing SA in a pool match" and obviously no one is saying it is. But the point is, if a player looks badly overmatched and not up to the level of the Maoris, there isn't one scintilla of evidence to suggest he'll be ready for a much higher level.

    This is all obviously a huge significant problem for Ireland, as I before, it's our most critical vulnerability by far. I've posted threads on this before (one on Where our professional players come from), and I think until we solve this problem we can't realistically compete to win RWCs. But you don't solve this problem by just taking a scattergun approach constantly, throwing in guys who aren't ready yet or who might never be ready to a higher level.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On another point; is all of this extensive back and forth that seems to be happening across roughly three different threads at the moment about Gavin Coombes / Caelan Doris?

    Because while people seem to be suggesting there is some greater malaise going on here, when asked what specific changes people want to see, they typically only provide a very small handful of examples.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't see where this mystical "dog" has a place in modern professional Rugby. Maybe to gift your opposition a few cards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,471 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Do you know who has plenty of dog? Kendellan. See Ulster's first try in the URC QF for reference.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,594 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    We saw last weekend what being a "dog" did for Darcy swaine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    Farrell has made big calls. but he clearly has a defined team in his head now and its blinding him imo. Look at Englands side for a test they basically need to win. Jones dropped Vunipola before, AF would never do that i imagine. you name alot of debuts there. some of them given in nothing matches. so utterly pointless. got to look beyond mere facts.

    Many of those guys demanded selection and the alternative was dross. Kelleher picks himself if he's up against HErring.

    Stander retired so the next in line again is an obvious enough call.

    and there's nothing mystical about dog, bite, bollock in any sport. the Irish players to a tee are ultra professionals, competitive, hard as nails etc. but they are all lacking a bit of bite. nothing to do with cards. its just the nature of the mono culture that Irish rugby has fostered. In particular Leinster. and not necessarily on purpose. dog is the way Sexton reacts or talks to the ref the way he carries to the line, the way he hits standing up on any player.. i played in Mary's with him and the man is a physcho on the field. thats what dog is. its the way Furlong kicks in the carry like a mule. thats dog. VDF in fairnes seems to be building an edge to his game. Dog/bite could eb a striker standing on defenders toes, sledging etc.

    Ryan is the very definition of not having it, despite being a colossus at times. he would never do what POC did against Clermont/Cudmore. some players just don't have it and unfortunately in the current generation lots of our players don't have it. Healy had it, i don't see the same in Porter. its a product of not playing enough games outside the bubble imo.

    its better than talking about irelands lack of big men. we've always prodcued big men and still do. we just don't use them. Coombes will be another big Costello distrusted and taken for being too obvious.

    IRFU and Irish rugby are the smartest guys in the room, world class, team of us. They do it differently alright.

    I predict Saturday will be one of the biggest wake up calls for Irish rugby. i think we will be blown away in the first 30 minutes unlike last Sat and we might get back into it. People will then cheerlead that and we'll have the same posters arguing how AF and Irish rugby isn't conservative when the same team is picked for the third test, even though AF insisted the tour was about building depth and Schmidt himself gave tests in tours to both Jackson and Carbery.



Advertisement