Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

Options
1118119121123124163

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    P51 just came out of a Mid-Life refit, P52 in the middle of same, but it seems their hull plating is not as thick as what was used on the P20s so it may retire from service not long after the end of this decade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,467 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    😁... Could we settle for modern enough ? They'do the job they were designed for ,and what's wanted ...

    I don't think you could call p60s ultra modern ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    They don't really though. They are Offshore patrol vessels, designed in the knowledge, less than a decade ago that they would be the sole naval presence for the state in Irish waters. They lack the ability to monitor airspace or sub-surface, and their armament is limited to manually operated heavy machine guns and an automated cannon, which is remotely operated from the bridge. Yes we got more hulls in the water, but little else in terms of capability. Their engines are more efficient than what came before, but also take up about 30% of the space in the Hull.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    So the 9 ship navy will consist of 4 OPV'S 4 IPV'S and (probably) a fairly toothless MRV (AKA grey painted car ferry with a 20mm gun up front).Not a very impressive line up IMO. What about a frigate or two or a couple of corvettes so that we have something a bit more threatening to send Jonny Russian packing if he comes prowling around off the west coast? And for overseas operations?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    The design of the MRV has not yet been confirmed, never mind it's teeth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    2 Frigates, 1.4 billion yoyos. Good luck selling that one Jonny Irish.

    These days a Corvette is just a Frigate with 10% less displacement anyway, because the old hull capacities to carry heavy naval guns are no longer relevant.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    That's true Do...but I have a horrible premonition that the selected option is going to fall short of being a war fighting machine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Of course it is, we won't be fighting any wars. Even with investment and expansion, the Navy's capabilities will be limited to being able to see and 'paint' air, surface and sub-surface contacts in Irish territory and areas of responsibility. Weaponry will be almost exclusively defensive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If the Orla and Ciara go the philipines will the 76mm be left in place or would they navy take them off to keep as spares for parts or replacements?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    If its a govt to govt deal, they will be left in place.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not necessarily.

    In any case, the Government of this State should be very reticent indeed to deal with a corrupt kip like the Phillipines led by a scumbag like Bongbong Marcos - especially concerning military assets.

    I'd sooner see the two ships towed out to the deep Atlantic and sunk for target practice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    I think you screwed today



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 BrandyRebel


    With le Eithne officially decommissioned, which ship is our flagship?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,442 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    P61, Beckett, I believe.

    It's a moot point anyway, it usually represents which ship carries the officer commanding the flotilla, on exercise or operation Eithne used to have accom for senior officers aboard, and a person holding Rank of Commander was i/c, instead of Lt Cdr for all other ships,but in effect, any of the current fleet can be flagship, as each have identical comms and accom.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Very inventive of the cash strapped Iranian's...




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Have you seen some of the Russian ships in the Black Sea recently, Land SAMs strapped to the deck…



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Lets play who wants a west coast Naval Base

    Your 3 choices are

    1) Galway

    2) Mayo

    3) Donegal

    https://connachttribune.ie/galway-could-become-west-coast-base-for-new-expanded-irish-navy/



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Galway City would not be a good place for a base. The Docks are very small and don't afford the separate secure space needed for a naval station, let alone any quayside facilities. Even if they could avoid local property costs by placing support facilities at Renmore, it would be far less than ideal.

    My choice would be Killybegs. Plenty of room, scope for whatever support facilities are needed and investment for the local economy from personnel and purchasing consumables.

    Add it to a new station in Dun Laoghaire and its an excellent geographical spread.




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,240 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Galway is not suitable at all, killybegs is not either unless you plan on extending the pier, which given that there is a run already would make for poor berths in poor weather unless you are incorporating a breakwater. The pier in it's current format already has boats queueing to land at busy times. As well as boats waiting to get to the pier to land you have cargo ships waiting to get in to take the frozen product away and make room in the freezers or it all has to shut down.

    If there is a large windfarm to go west of Ireland killybegs has the deep water berths, large pier area for the building of those to be based. Not sure how it would work but I either way I don't see where there is room for a naval base.

    Would there be a suitable site on the Shannon? I can't see many options on the West Coast.



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    The Main requirement for a Naval Port is access at all tides with LWS not less than 10m within the harbour for future flexibility. Galway is a lock in port and unsuitable for that reason. Shannon with preparation and construction has possibilities. Sligo with dredging and new piers has potential.

    Killybegs has added two co-joined cruise piers with 12m alongside at a cost of 50 million. It is a possibility if not congested with liners and Oceanic sized FV's scrambling for space. Whatever the choices it will require a major construction undertaking. What we have we got for nothing, maybe it is time to put our own stamp on Defence. Our biggest problem is heading off official tendencies to consider Defence property and lands as a source of commercial exploitation. Our next problem is to ensure that COMBAT is listed as a mission/task requirement for the PDF and an incentive to acquire the means to do it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Combat? As in open warfighting deployment?

    Thats ridiculous. Even the most ambitious version of the Commission Report is an Army consisting of a single mechanised division for the primary purpose of a reasonable homeland defence and the secondary purposes of deployment of certain elements to peace enforcement as part of a multi-national and multi-disciplinary force. And also a Navy and Air Force to protect the assets and resources of the State, at home.

    Perhaps Europe's greatest Achilles heel of today is that not one nation alone has the ability to fight a physical war. Not Britain, not France, and on the other side as we can, not even Russia.

    Fortunately there is NATO and other co-operative mechanisms, so that no one nation of the West has to fight a war alone.

    And for our part, all this investment is doing is making it possible for us to sweep our own driveway. To live up to a responsibility not to be a weak link in the region. Not to fight a war. Not on our own. God forbid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    I thought France is armed to the teeth



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Depends what your measure is.

    They have 250,000 personnel (including all reserves), 100 odd blue water ships, 250 odd combat aircraft.

    So yeah, its impressive in Irish terms, but their budget is only 1.7% of GDP and realistically those headline numbers could not defend the French homeland of 700,000 sq.kms and 65 million souls in the event of a multi-faceted all-out attack. In actual fact, their deployable infantry strength is only about 60,000.

    Yes they have nukes, but just one SSBN deployed at any given moment and about 60 tactical nukes deployable by aircraft.

    Granted, it is a peacetime posture, but its ability to quickly expand is limited, like any modern Armed Force, where power is based on technology in the field and not souls on the battlefield.

    So there's armed to the teeth and there's armed to the teeth, and politics is the gap. Same for Britain, Germany, Spain, anyone. But for sure, no European State could stand alone in 2022.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I'm not disagreeing with you, but the French were reasonably upfront in saying that they were keeping 3 of their boomers out at sea in the first couple of months of the Russian Invasion, I can only imagine what hell that might have caused their operational plans though.

    But yes broadly speaking no nation, certainly not the EU nations can stand alone, but unfortunately that reality is a bit hard for politicians when procurement comes into play.

    For us, certainly not being a giant hole with nothing really to offer would be a step up though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Absolutely it would. So long as we can keep all the stakeholders on track for that goal. The financial headwinds are about to get very, very tough, all over the globe.

    So tough in fact, that they may precipitate domestic and international conflict of a sort that few Countries are set up to defend. Ironically.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Team of four from Naval Engineering Branch are on site at RNZN Naval Dockyard Devonport, Auckland to give the Lake Class ships a going over.

    - INS Facebook.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Sligo could be an interesting base, It could also act as an expanded joint RDF base.

    Is Sligo port able to let traffic in out 24/7 or is it controlled by tides



  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    If you read in Warships, there is a Q&A session with C-in-C of RNZN, where he refers to rebalancing his Fleet including freighting 2 Lake Class CP's to Ireland. He is also asked about the NZ Navy mission and he lists Combat as the Primary duty with all the other things any navy does.

    We tend in our PDF to concentrate on the visual and some showboat tasks. It's the main reason that the Navy only go to sea, and the Air Corps Fly Logs Missions with snatches of maritime Patrol. Defence is a Combat Mission and Duty.

    we often have taken direct action to stop capability. After the mishandling of Cliona which caused collateral damage on board ship, the answer was to demilitarise the ships as too dangerous, and bin ASW to Gun only. The aviation side got short shrift as did seaborne Air Search radar. We always had competence and somehow it disappeared nurtured by many high up the food chain.

    The 2000 increase is to include minders in Civil Government. How Many??



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,077 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah but the RNZN do go warfighting occasionally. They have the Anzac light frigates, they have relatively recent experience in the Persian Gulf and counterpiracy, they aren't neutral and they are a Five Eyes and Pacific Rim ally.

    Totally different mission statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    An opinion of course but totally against experience where our west coast is the frontline and playground for subsurface and aerial patrols. We had the recent visit of Ex-Moskava in our waters. All defence Mission Statements must be similar if they are relevant to providing a positive response to an attack.

    It is always poor us and everyone else is better at it. We do things in MALI and previously in Jadotville, we must be prepared to expand on that and do things better. Australia and NZ are arming up in all departments because of Chinese Mil. expansion. There is also major Indian Mil. hardware growth and one cannot be sure how they will be alliance wise. The Chinese have developed a containerised missile system that is to be fitted to all their merchant vessels to provide Naval support in time of war.

    We need to be in some alliance, within the EU, and provide assets that are relevant in at least some critical dimensions -- select from ASW, ASM, MCM and AD. for naval capability.



Advertisement