Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

I know one is thousands times less than the other, scientists know this too, it has already been posted.

You haven't posted it! Neither has anybody else. You just keep saying that the fatality rate of the vaccines shows that 40k deaths is an implausible figure. Well great, tell us what the fatality rate is and prove yourself right. You appear to be unwilling or unable to post this fact you are so certain of. Once again.

You want to refute this, which means you need to bring more than your imagination to the table.

Says the poster who wants to refute the 40k number with the vaccine fatality rate, and yet has brought nothing more than their imagination to the table. Once again.

When you are told numbers you fall back to pedant mode without offering any alternate (or just miss the relevant data entirely ;)).

But you haven't posted any numbers. This is becoming quite the pattern. You don't actually post any figures, you just claim that you have posted them and then accuse me of being pedantic when I point out that you haven't actually posted them. Once again.

I am not asking you to prove my numbers. They are not my numbers. I had made no comment whatsoever on this point, but nonetheless I was asked did I agree if the number was plausible and I said I did.

For whatever reason you chose not to contradict whoever originally posted them, but chose to tell me that my opinion on the plausibility was demonstrably wrong because "The CFR for vaccines is nowhere near your numbers"

But oddly enough you don't appear to know what the CFR for the vaccines actually is.

Correct, I don't know what the CFR for the vaccine is, which is why I am asking you, as you do claim to know what it is.

But you are not prepared to state what it is. Very odd behaviour.

The obvious explanation is that you don't know what it is and are talking out of your backside. Once again.

I have ignored some of your questions either because they are silly or you are deliberately misrepresenting something or somebody.

I have not made a claim and refused to back up that claim when asked. If you think I have, quote the claim I have made and refused to back up, and I will address it. You get annoyed when I do not back up claims that you say other posters have made - that's ridiculous.

astrofool claimed that my opinion that the 40k figure was plausible was demonstrably wrong because "The CFR for vaccines is nowhere near your numbers"

All I am asking is that he shares this knowledge of what the CFR for vaccines is. It does not seem like a big ask, assuming he actually knows what this is and it is not just a figment of his imagination.

You've also dodged my question about why you are not asking your fellows about the source for their number.

I haven't dodged your question because I cannot answer it or whatever else you think I am up to. I ignored it because it is silly.

It is a silly question because the only reason I ever commented on the 40k figure was when you asked me did I think it was plausible. As far as my participation in this discussion goes you are the source of this figure. I don't really care where you got it from, you asked me a simple question and I gave you a simple answer.

That simple answer was I think it is plausible. If you'd asked me 50k or 60k, the answer would have been the same. The source of whatever number you asked me is irrelevant.

Getting shirty now that I am not interested in the source of this number is just silly, and a total waste of time - mine and yours.