Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

1283284286288289419

Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So you believe that 40,000 to millions is a plausible figure.

    How about less than that?

    10,000?

    2,000?

    Also plausible?

    Obviously if I believe 40k to be a plausible figure then I believe that the lower figures are also plausible.

    Unless of course you are asking me if I think 10k or 2k deaths maximum is plausible. In which case the answer is no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,103 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    So we reach the point where you just can't bring yourself to admit that your source got some basic maths wrong, and rather than admit that you run away instead.


    What's with the tagging hometruths? Is this a tag team? Or did you forget which account you were logged in under?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Well no, it's not obvious that you will believe lower figures as it's possible for figures to be too low.

    You wouldn't accept the idea what 1 or 2 people only have died from the vaccine as plausible, would you?

    I'm asking so you can clarify. If I had assumed you also believed that the lower figures were plausible, I get the feeling you'd be complaining about misrepresentation again.


    Ok. So you believe the range could be anywhere between 2000 or lower and millions. Pretend wide there.

    Which number do you think is the most plausible and why?

    Why do you believe that the higher numbers are plausible at all when you are unable to explain the issue with them that I pointed out (and you of course ignored.)



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    ok, to be clear, I believe 2k and 10k are too low.

    I thought this was obvious as I have previously said I thought 40k was conservative.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I have no idea what number is the most plausible. You asked me about 40k specifically and I answered you.

    i didn’t ignore your reasons that you think this is implausible - you said that in your opinion these numbers are significant enough that they would be widely reported - I replied that this is simply your opinion, and as such we have a difference of opinion.

    in the absence of any concrete evidence or data, that’s all this is - a difference of opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Ok. Why do you believe this when you've no evidence or reason to believe that 10000 is accurate?

    How much would be too high? The conspiracy theorists you were agreeing with claimed millions were possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    And when you were asked to explain why such a high number of deaths due to vaccines wouldn't be noticed or reported, you dodged. You can't explain this, so your opinion doesn't make a whole bunch of sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    No I got mixed up, I was going to ask @hometruths something then got sidetracked because my irrigation system exploded, and it was chaos in the glasshouse, I was replying to you as well and no I wasn't adding anyone to the conversation. but for some reason on my Android I couldn't delete the @username it. If you've an Android try it yourself. It doesn't delete, well I couldn't anyhow.

    My apologies @hometruths



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I’ve told you why - I think these numbers are small in the context of total vaccinations.

    I’ve no idea what number would be too high, I have not given this any thought at all until you asked me did I think the 40k figure was plausible.

    but you seem to be very confident that this is not plausible, and have given it a lot of thought. And since your parameters are so much narrower - 0 - 40,000 - perhaps you would care to share what you think.

    How many deaths do you think the vaccines have contributed to?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    No but you'd love it if I had two accounts and got caught out. You and your goons would be still mentioning it 4 year's later and everytime someone new comes in, you stupid **** will think it's me lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Why do you think the numbers are small? What's that based on? How do you know that they are too small?


    And yes, I am confident that the higher numbers are not likely to the point of being practically impossible, especially if we are to believe that millions of deaths are occuring due to the vaccine.

    If that number of people were dying because of the vaccine, it would be obvious, it would be reported on and action would be taken. If there are 10s of thousands of deaths, then there would be millions of other very noticeable severe side effects as well. If you're suggesting that there's millions of deaths, then there's 10s of millions of cases of severe side effects as well.

    There's no way that experts and organizations would miss this while you and your friends have somehow figured it out based on your own hunches.

    Conspiracy theorists would suggest that this is because of a global conspiracy to cover this up. But I will assume that you agree that this isn't a valid explanation.


    I believe that there has been perhaps only about 3000 deaths on the higher end of the scale directly due to the vaccine (excluding allergic reactions.)



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Fair play to you for answering the question. You think 3000 deaths are due to the vaccine, and I think it is multiple orders of magnitude higher, but I’ve no idea what the figure is.

    A clear difference of opinion. No harm done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cept I can explain where my opinion came from and I can support my opinion with more than my own personal hunches.

    I asked you to explain why you thought the lower estimates were too low. You can't do this. You've no reason at all to claim that they are too low.

    I explained why the higher estimates are not plausible. I asked you to explain the issue. You cannot do this either.

    You are simply plucking your opinion out of thin air must like drunk monkey pulled the number out of thin air.


    Not all opinions are valid just because some one holds them.

    In the opinion of some of your fellow conspiracy theorists, the vaccines make you magnetic.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I’ll happily debate this with you if you’ve got to something to debate other than an inflated self regard for your own opinion, but until then it’s pretty pointless.

    perhaps you can persuade astrofool to share the data that proves 40k is totally implausible and then we’ll have something to discuss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol but I've already explained my points. None of them have anything to do with my "self regard".

    You're just ignoring them as usual because you can't address them.

    I also explained how your opinion seems to come from the "inflated self regard" you're accusing me of.

    What are you basing your claim that the lower estimates are too low on?

    Simple direct question. Answer it please.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    It's an estimation based on assumptions and therefore cannot be presented as proof of anything.

    Why does it bother you where I post? What has that got to do with the discussion here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    OK. So then you believe that the study is wrong and fraudulent again.


    And your dodging the question.

    I'm asking you why your posting here because the answer highlights the central flaw in you position. Your claims are all conspiracy theory nonsense that aren't welcome in real discussions.

    You continual dodging of this answer shows that you know this is the case and you understand why it undermines your position, you just aren't honest enough to admit as much.

    Unless of course you'd like to fall back to the default conspiracy claim and accuse the boards mods of a conspiracy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    I didn't accept the explanation. The fainting happened 20 minutes later and she appeared to deteriorate and collapse too slowly. It's perfectly valid to consider that the vaccine could have caused it. It was a red flag to me.

    I have many other red flags in my list too.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I’ve answered this before and you’ve told me I’m wrong, in your opinion.

    i am saying, in my opinion, they’re too low based on the sheer volume of vaccinations. Out of billions of vaccinations I think 3k is likely to be closer to a rounding error than a total.

    The idea that anything higher than 3k would be such a significantly high number that the global media would be demanding answers is ludicrous, in my opinion.

    for the avoidance of doubt, I am now going to leave this difference of opinion there. It’s pointless continuing it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    I think you have me confused with someone else. My claims have all been backed up with sources. I have presented many sources that no one has refuted.

    Simply raising perfectly valid concerns about a medical procedure doesn't make it a conspiracy theory.

    I never accused the mods of a conspiracy theory. Once again you are maliciously trying to misrepresent me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    You always fall back to childish name calling regardless of what account you have used. Reported for personal abuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    Lol looking back at all the times you've been personal with people, you're an absolute hypocrite.

    But report away.... Calling me out for having multiple accounts, you deserve to be slagged off and called whatever...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,175 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Richard Bartlett and Dr Simone Gold join Joni Table Talk host, Joni Lamb to discuss the Swedish in vitro study that shows the Pfizer jab installs DNA into the human genome.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    I said it before, if you have a problem with my posts then please report them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    No point in reporting anyone here,as we're all grown ups and you might have been offended but I thought you had thick skin to be honest.

    No I'm not really bothered about squealing to the mods. But if you're a squeeler and easily offended maybe you're better off not posting here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Already posted, you again misunderstand it, but that's par for the course here :)

    What King Mob is asking is why you think 40k is plausible, if you have no answer to that, then say so, asking others to provide the answer for you again (when you lack the capability to understand it) is disingenuous.

    You have shown time and again you don't accept others answers, why would anyone bother posting stats for you? Especially when some have been exceptionally patient only for you to throw it back by getting pedantic or obsessive or screaming off on another wrong tangent.

    You have done a good job of getting data posted on how safe the vaccines are however, there is 0 evidence to counter their safety.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭snowcat


    Thats bonkers. The vaccine causes pretty significant side effects that might/could/will kill vulnerable adults. I believe they stopped giving it in Denmark to very frail elderly as it was killing them. There is lots of healthy vaxx recipients here that had considerable reactions to the injection. Several days of nausea, bed bound etc after injection. My own mate who is young and boosted had severe breathing issues after his first injection but has peristed to booster status. 3000 deaths after billions of vaccines would be a statistic anomoly. There is many more than that. The margin of error would be many times that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Ok then. Show your figures of how many people have died from the vaccine. I expect you to ignore the request like every other request for evidence posed to you so far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭hometruths


    What King Mob is asking is why you think 40k is plausible, if you have no answer to that, then say so, asking others to provide the answer for you again (when you lack the capability to understand it) is disingenuous.

    And here we go again - I think 40k is plausible because of the sheer volume of vaccinations - over 12 billion doses administered to over 5 billion people. In that context 40k deaths in which the vaccine is a contributing factor seems highly plausible.

    In your opinion, it is not remotely plausible. Fine, as I said to KingMob, I don't have any problem with a difference of opinion.



Advertisement