Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 3) Mod Notes and Threadbanned List in OP

Options
1482483485487488554

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Public Service Pension Contributions total 6.5% when including Spouses and Children. Then there is the Additional Superannuation Contribution which rises to 10.5%, meaning on some of their income, civil servants are paying 17% pension contributions. The tax relief at 40% equates to 6.8%, halving this to 20% gives a cut of 3.4%, but not all income attracts the ASC, leaving me with 3% as an average round figure for the effect on an average public servant.

    These are the hidden costs of the Sinn Fein budget proposals, and the rest of their sums don't add up if you exclude these measures.

    I haven't seen their latest u-turn on the issue but again, I doubt the numbers will add up and ordinary people will suffer.

    That @notsocutehoor doesn't know about various SF proposals on pension reliefs is not a surprise. Many people are taken in by the SF palaver.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Came across this today and yes it carries a health warning of it being McDowell with his own pretty strident views on SF but an interesting read nonetheless.




  • Registered Users Posts: 482 ✭✭notsocutehoor


    Then there is the Additional Superannuation Contribution which rises to 10.5%, meaning on some of their income, civil servants are paying 17% pension contributions.

    This is indeed true, if you joined the public service pre 2013 and if your salary is in excess of €60k. Of course what you neglected to mention (presumably forgot, didn't know or possibly didn't suit your agenda) is that if you joined post 2013 your ASC’s rise to a max of 3.5% irrespective of what you earn, and on salaries of €60k or less you pay 3.33% on €25.5k. 

    Edit: As I understand it Sinn Fein's pension contribution tax proposal will not affect any public servant on the average public sector salary, or indeed anybody earning 20% above the average public sector salary, but again of course that wouldn't suit the agenda.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,409 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    ASC starts at 34,500

    The ASC is lower for recent hires, after 2013, correct, these staff are in the new Single PS scheme.

    Staff who joined since 2013 pay ASC of 3.33% from 34,500 up to 60k and then 3.5% over 60k.


    For staff hired before 2013, the ASC rate is 10% from 34,500 up to 60k, then 10.5% after.

    10% of wages above 34,500 is a substantial pension contribution, and bear in mind that is on top of the regular superannuation pension cont.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,409 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    "Edit: As I understand it Sinn Fein's pension contribution tax proposal will not affect any public servant on the average public sector salary, or indeed anybody earning 20% above the average public sector salary, but again of course that wouldn't suit the agenda."


    This is false (presuming you are referring to the proposal to standard-rate all pension tax relief to 20%, rather than allowing tax relief at 40%)

    The 40% income tax rate starts at a crazy low point, 36,800 in 2022.

    Any pension conts made above this are eligible for tax relief at the higher rate (40%).

    There are tens of thousands of workers earning above 36,800, and making pension contributions.

    This includes thousands of nurses, doctors, etc.

    Practically every teacher would earn above this point, or the vast majority of them.


    Mean earnings across all full-time workers is 49-50k, so the typical worker doing a full-time job and making pension conts will be affected by this.

    Here are some data for average annual earnings in 2019:

    Public admin and defence = 50,376

    Education = 44,745

    Most of these workers are in the PS, so most will be affected by this proposal.



    Here is more recent data on earnings, 2022 Q1:

    PS average earnings = 1,020, so about 52-53k per annum, so the proposal will affect any PS on average earnings



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,409 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I have to admit, this SF proposal is clever.

    Most people haven't a clue about tax relief on pension conts.

    SF know they must raise more tax revenue to finance their spending plans.

    But they don't want to look like increasing tax rates on typical workers.

    So how to do it?

    How do you levy more tax on the typical worker, yet manage to convince the typical worker that they won't have to pay more tax? You need to use language like the "rich", "wealthy" or phrases that the proposal targets "gold-plated" pensions (actual SF language)

    You propose something arcane, technical, that the typical worker may not know about, and yet which can raise hundreds of millions of euro, as it will be paid by a million workers.


    Let's take the principal of a school, a very important job.

    I assume wage = 90k, hired before April 1995.

    Pension conts = 6.5% of 90k = 5850

    ASC = (60,000-34500) @10% = 2,550

    ASC = 30,000 @10.5% = 3150

    Total conts = 11,550

    Tax increase is 2310, or 192.50 per month, from that proposal alone, a significant sum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,402 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    As Darragh said today, Sf's arrogance and that of M Lou is indeed something else. Sf's consistent and deliberate objecting of almost every development in Ireland is just something else.

    Hubris aught to strike a tone.... alas...

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭sam t smith


    Sounds like one of those “I don’t vote for SF, but …” type goons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Sinn Fein will only be happy when the entire population of Ireland is without a home



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,488 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    They wasted Govt. time on a spurious confidence vote yesterday while their fellow travelers and trotters banged the same auld drums with faux concern as they read from pieces of paper written by someone else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's just what governments do in this situation. Were the roles reversed a government containing SF would have done exactly the same thing and we'd have had the same trading of insults. Don't mind Gavan most of the time but he's a bit of a drama queen and too much in love with Twitter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,070 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    They 'wasted' Dáil time.

    The government could have avoided extending the speaking time available. They chose not to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Now that you have had your ass handed to you on the pensions tax relief and the hidden pay cuts for public servants that SF want to introduce, maybe next time you won't be so quick in challenging the facts (not crap) being posted about SF. Unless you climb down and admit that you were wrong, it will look like you were just defending SF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is now a big question over where Sinn Fein go to here following the abject failure of their Motion of No-Confidence.

    If the objective was to weaken the government, it completely failed. If the objective was to coerce the opposition, it was a limited success. Most of the opposition parties were on board, but they weren't lining up exactly behind Sinn Fein.

    Sinn Fein are weakened by this in the public eye, wasting Dail time on a motion that was soundly defeated, while complaining about legislation being rushed. Have handed a big victory on that issue to FF/FG. If Higgins complains again this summer about rushed legislation, fingers will correctly be pointed at the stupid MONC waste of time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    I have good money on a couple of stories been leaked to the press on TDs over the next few days.

    SF took a hammering, been shown up to be totally incompetent if people had forgotten. The online reaction proves it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    That is f**king hilarious

    Telling the truth is what hurts SF waffle the most



  • Posts: 2,725 [Deleted User]


    The dollar has appreciated almost 15% in the last year against the euro; there is a war in Europe that is materially impacting our energy supply; we are coming out of lockdown.

    How do SF actually propose to do something radically different, presuming they want the State to continue to use the mechanisms of the central bank and bond market systems?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    They don’t, they are telling people one thing and going around industry telling them another

    They are depending on the voter to not check into anything. First to not check into their budget plans etc, because if they do they will lose vites


    Second to not question how they are going to pay for this magic fairy land they have promised. Again if people look into it they will know it’s just a pile of waffle

    Last but not least they are just lying on a lot of stuff they have no intention of implementing, like that TD salary cut which will never happen.

    The voter with sense will check into all of this before the election


    It is interesting now the online supporters are now attacking the independents, trying to convince people not to vote for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 648 ✭✭✭Irelandsnumberone


    Another fantastic poll today showing the general public are more behind SF than ever before

    Mary Lou's leadership is outstanding compared to the 3 amigos in charge and the recent irish times poll shows this



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel




  • Registered Users Posts: 387 ✭✭shirrup



    The polls say so. If you want to argue with polling numbers, knock yourself out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,402 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    There are a lot of 18-20-year-olds in Ireland who to quote Alfred Pennyworth 'whom just want to watch the world burn'

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 387 ✭✭shirrup


    From memory, the breakdown of the last election showed that Sinn Fein had the largest share of the vote from every age group except the (again this is from memory) 55+ group.

    You might as well stand and throw sugar at those poll results Nigel, it's not going to change the way the wind is blowing for FF and FG, both are in terminal decline.

    Edit. Here is the published results including the vote share from various age groups and demographics.


    All adults.

    18-34 year olds.

    35-54 year olds.

    55 +




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,484 ✭✭✭celt262


    If Sinn Fein got it how long would it take for the voters to turn on them (not the die hard ones the new ones that want change)?



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    More lies. That is not from the general election, it is from an opinion poll.



  • Registered Users Posts: 387 ✭✭shirrup


    Took 100 years for the electorate to turn on FF/FG, so maybe that's the marker?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,911 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




Advertisement