Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Weed legalization in Ireland

Options
124»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Why should something which has caused zero deaths (by itself) be more heavily regulated than something which is responsible for approximately 5% of deaths in Ireland each year?

    I agree it should be regulated, and for smoking (herb or vape) should be limited to certain areas. Also, weed is a psychoactive drug, not a psychedelic. Other psychoactive drugs include caffeine, nicotine and over the counter pain medications.

    @[Deleted User] I agree, I would mainly be growing it myself. Just makes sense with the level of growing tech making it easier and easier. But it is a genuine concern that our lovely Government with their heads up their holes would make it prohibitively expensive via taxation that the illegal trade would easily continue. Won't affect us, we're smarted and would be growing, but most still couldn't be arsed growing so would continue to buy illegally. We need to make sure when it is legalised that we try and not let the Government fup it up for everyone!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    How? In what way? cause that's a rather vague statement to make.

    Well then let me elaborate. I believe that smoking weed regularly changes one personality permanently. I'm saying this because I've seen it happen with a ex-friend of mine.

    I've never met a violent person who was stoned (without being drunk at the same time). Never seen anyone's paranoia manifest in violence. So.. I'm wondering how weed is dangerous to others

    Alcohol at point of use can cause one to be violent. In all the years I've been drinking it never had that effect on me. I'm just not an aggressive type generally. I know it can make me depressed if I consume it regularly. But generally the side effect of violence only happens when one is under the influence, not the hangover day after.

    Going back to my ex-friend as an example case, he has lost his relationship with his mother, his wife and kid, and me. This has nothing to do with his interactions with his relations when he was high, because he wouldn't be doing it in front of them in the first place.

    The negative effect on 'others' I'm talking about, is the result of him changing his personalty to a more insular aggressive (not violent one), when he's not doped.

    That is all obviously because weed is a psychedelic drug that effects your mind, your brain, your personally, your mood, sometimes permanently, and I think all psychedelic drugs are extremely dangerous. Not so much at the point of consumption like alcohol, but afterwards when you come down and after that.

    I'm not saying permanent damage is certain taking it the odd time, but I am saying if one does it regularly the negative effects are even worse than alcohol, because the damage is irreversible. Unlike alcohol where if you give it up you can revert to 'normal', if you haven't fecked your liver.

    Post edited by AllForIt on


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,482 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    How the hell are psychedleic drugs more dangerous to other people than alcohol...?

    Bar anecdotal evidence (and very vague at that) there is no way psychdelic drugs are more dangerous than alcohol.

    I'm not entirely sure I;d class weed as a psychedelic. It can cause hallouncinations if you comsume a lot of it, but that's not the main effects of psychedelics.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Please refer to the points I made in my post before yours.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    @AllForIt Your anecdote is just that. A single example out of the hell knows how many people are smoking it. Yes, some people should not smoke it. Why should I be penalised when I'm ok on it but your friend wasn't. The same doesn't apply to alcohol, and there would be war if they tried. There are more than enough examples of people who can't handle the drink, or it ruins them or those around them. What you don't see is the amount of "normal" people who are cannabis users, because it's still illegal. It's far more than people think, and most likely people you know regularly consume it. It changes a lot of peoples lives for the better but those stories don't sell as well.

    Caffeine kills more people every year than cannabis (deaths from cannabis overdose is still zero). I'd posit Coffee changes lots of people for the worse and they need their fix first thing in the morning and throughout the day. I can tell of a friend who is a monster without it. An anecdote if you wish. Plenty for alcohol. We all have anecdotes.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There are a few issues with anecdote like that.

    The first and most obvious of course is that with anecdote on the internet we simply do not know if it is made up or real. That is why we do large studies on population scales - to ensure what we perceive in single anecdotes is actually borne out in any reality.

    The second obvious issue is a correlation causation error based on one data point on one person. That is from your observation point you think that long term regular use of the drug altered a person's personality. Since you can not run the counterfactual on this you simply do not know it to be true. That is to say - we can not know the drug altered his personality - when it is equally possible that ongoing alterations in a person's personality coincided with, or even led to, drug use. Many make the same error with alcohol for example. We see someone hitting the alcohol and their life descending and we assume alcohol was the cause of the problem. When in fact alcohol was the self medication of choice for someone who's life was already on the way out/down.

    As with many drugs the motivation to take it is very important. If one is doing it to explore new levels or forms of conscious experience - self discovery - curiosity - then this is very often a good thing. If one is doing it to escape or self medicate - then less so. I would strongly recommend you go to a podcast called "The Two Norries" done by two recovering drug addicted people from North Cork. Listen to episode 1 and 3 specifically as this is where they explore the history of their decent into drugs. It's very inciteful and vulnerable and honest.

    Worse I am not as convinced as you are that alcohol is only a motivator to violence "at the point of use". The after effects of it can take hours or even days to recover from. This can lead to all kinds of knock on effects on diet, stress, sleep, work load, social and family engagement and more. Which in turn can lead to effects on behavior, personality, and mood.

    So what jumping on single anecdotes does is misses the big picture that most people, most of the time, engaging with drugs like alcohol and marujana based products are in fact perfectly fine most of the time. Which begs the question then why we need expensive (and clearly failing) laws that penalise and restrict the majority because of the failings and issues of an absolute minority? Especially when that minority are likely to actually benefit from a legal and regulated product. Because your supposed ex friend was engaging with weed in a "take what you can get" illegal underground market. Compare and contrast that to a market where you can go into specialist stores and get tailor made versions of the product. A lot of people think of "weed" as one single thing. But it's not in the same way as alcohol is not. The effects of beer compared to wine compared to spirits compared to cocktails compared to whatever - if you find gin makes you sin or vodka makes you agressive you simply get a different alcohol product which has a better effect on you. How much would your ex friend have benefited from that with weed?

    It strikes me therefore, especially with anecdotes, that much of the arguments against making it legal and regulated are either A) exactly wrong as a regulated legal product would undermine the issue or B) only exist precisely because the product is illegal or unregulated.

    What an anecdote like yours does do - just like anecdotes from the world of alcohol - is highlight that engaging with any drug or pursuit - especially regularly or even to excess - has risks. And we need an educated and mature public therefore to engage with it rather than a nanny state throwing it in the "no no" box because it thinks it knows better like a parent over a small child.

    That link is pretty awful though. I can break it down at length if you want but the post would be pretty long. But there are all kinds of problems in it. Correlation causation errors. Bias and selective citation. Assertions by fiat. Irrelevancies. Over generalizations and simplifications. I can break down any one or all of those if you want. It is neither a study nor scientific. It is at best a biased opinion piece. I would hope the actual thinking on a complex issue like this is much more nuanced in the psychiatric community than this short article would indicate.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well then let me elaborate. I believe that smoking weed regularly changes one personality permanently. I'm saying this because I've seen it happen with a ex-friend of mine.

    Then you don't have a clue as to the effects of weed on a person.

    As for a personality changing permanently multiple times/regularly.. then it's not a permanent change, and secondly, it screams deep rooted psychological problems which are likely related to that persons overall environment, stresses, and the people involved with him. If anything the weed would be the one thing grounding him towards a particular personality type.

    Still.. you have your belief and nothing I say will change it.. although you should do some research on the effects of weed usage, because what you describe isn't that.. It's taking minor/tiny effects and blowing them out of proportion into an extreme scenario.

    I've known many heavy/regular users of weed over the last two decades, and none of them ever showed the effects you describe, nor have I heard of anyone else who would have manifested such changes. TBH the only drugs I can think of that would do what you describe are the truly mind-altering dugs (which weed isn't), that are usually heavily restricted to those with schizophrenia.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,482 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    You didn't make any points - you told a couple of stories. It's purely anecdotal, and I've already said this - is just your friend's experience on weed.

    Now how about you reply tothe question: in what way are psychedelic drugs more dangerous to other people than alcohol?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,396 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I think high functioning alcoholics might delude themselves into thinking that alcohol has no effect on their personality. Least of all when you spend 40 years of your life like my father did drinking half a liter of whiskey every night. I’m sure the violent felonies he racked up were totally unrelated

    (what did he do? Well, as you do when alcohol has no effect on your personality, you attempt to murder your son over a verbal disagreement. That month he spent in jail before the charges didn’t stick is the longest he’s been sober since childhood)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,388 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    Legalising it will make it less available for young people. When I was growing up buying weed was easier than buying alcohol. The weed dealer didn't ask you for ID. It's actually very hard to buy alcohol if you're under 18.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,396 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That's ridiculous when you can grow it without much more difficulty than a Tomato. When it's legal young people will be growing it everywhere, like some of them already do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16 newgrangepets


    B.S. Buying alcohol here is much easier than in other countries (particularly the States). I'm in my 20s but look under-18 I've only been denied twice with real I.D. Meanwhile in America, I'd say half of the time, they've thoroughly scrutinized my passport.

    The most ridiculous thing is that when I was a week from turning 21, the crew on Delta refused to give me the alcohol even though I was almost of age. Never experienced that on any other airline!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Now how about you reply tothe question: in what way are psychedelic drugs more dangerous to other people than alcohol?

    I will reply to your question one last time. You clearly didn't understand what I said.

    I'm saying that negative effects of psychedelic drugs are long lasting, not just at point of consumption. Therefore if one had a family member who undergoes a personalty change that is worse for the family member than suffering a one off violent attack whilst under the influence of alcohol, for example.

    You didn't make any points ...

    Does the above not sound like a point to you?

    You can refute my point all like you, like Klaz did, that's what we're here for, but I am making a point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,451 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I think high functioning alcoholics might delude themselves into thinking that alcohol has no effect on their personality.

    Yet another person who didn't get the point I was making.

    For the last time, I'm not talking about anyone's behaviour whilst under the influence of anything.

    I'm talking about the effects of drugs on ones behaviour whilst one is not under the influence of anything.

    Please someone tell me they understand that point, I'm not going to repeat it again. Klaz got it I think at least.

    Refute it all you like, give me a link to the research, I'm all ears.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I'd still say alcohol is worse in that regard. And coffee to some degree. I'm not sure what you're asking to refute. All drugs have the ability to change people, legal or otherwise. Are you basically trying to say that some people who regularly smoke weed are worse sober than people who have other drug dependencies, legal or otherwise, while sober?



  • Registered Users Posts: 648 ✭✭✭Irelandsnumberone


    Its not very hard at all. Have you ever seen a group of young lads/girls who are planning a few drinks on a Fri night etc ever end up not drinking because they can't buy it.

    Off licence delivery has made it easier to get drink as a U 18 to when i was a young lad



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,482 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    You made the point that psychedelics were more dangerous to others than alcohol. Last post on page 3. At this point, you never specified aftereffects or after taking the drug.

    I asked for clarification, you told me about an ex friend that was worse after taking weed than alcohol.

    I pointed out that this was anecdotal. This proves nothing other than your ex-friend is worse after taking weed than after taking alcohol. Unless I know your friend, how can I comment?

    It's not a representative sample!!

    And if that was your point, then the answer is simple: we stop your friend from using weed and society is safe.

    On top of that, if you're describing psychedelic drugs, you should be talking about LSD and magic mushrooms. As I said before, weed can cause those effects but it's not representative of psychedelic drugs. Psilocybin and THC - the active ingredients in psychedelics and weed respectively - are different chemicals and have different effects on the mind.

    Post edited by Princess Consuela Bananahammock on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,388 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    If you really wanted to drink while under 18 you could find a way. I'm saying it's more difficult to get drink at that age then it is weed. I knew tons of people selling it and just had to make one phone call to get it. With drink, I would be ringing around asking lads to get me drink -so many would refuse as there's nothing in it for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,388 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    Most of the lads growing it don't live with their parents. Most under-18's do. I def didn't have any place I could grow it at that age.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,388 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    I was talking about being under 18 with no ID. Drink is very difficult to get at that age without ID - weed is a lot easier to purchase.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,830 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Professor Nutt et al released a paper in 2009 and scored substances on the harm to the individual and the harm to others from a UK perspective.

    In their work they determined of the substances scored on 16 harm criteria and which included both Alcohol and Cannabis. That alcohol was much worse both to the individual and to society in general.

    That paper is available from the Lancet.


    What criteria are you using to determine that cannabis is in fact much worse, and what are your credentials in this area?



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,396 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    well when it is as legal as a tomato that no longer applies but by young people I assume you meant young adults not minors



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,396 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Chronic use of any substance can affect your permanent physical neuropathy - as these MRIs show


    I couldn’t find a similar one for cannabis. Of course it has some effects but not nearly this striking it seems according to the experts





Advertisement