Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Proposed club world cup

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    You might be right, but considering the format if implemented this year would involve just 3 English clubs I think it's coming from New Zealand via World Rugby

    Unless the 8 Champions Cup teams are numbered 9-16, the English would be able to target huge numbers of clubs in that section 🤣🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    yep i shouldve mentioned that if the 6N went biennial then something like your suggestion or even just expanded tours would have to happen

    rather than what seems to be being proposed id much prefer something like that and then just have something like the world club challenge in league where the super league and NRL winners play each other every year, alternating countries for hosting and i think its been expanded recently so the runners up play each other too. could be just between the heineken and super teams - 1st plays the alternate 2nd in the semis and then have a 3/4 game along with the final, or could just be the winners of the URC, French, Super and English comps.

    Basically i dont like the format of whats being suggested

    off topic but also think the tour timings should be swapped - NH host in June/July and SH host in November



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Yeah either of your suggestions would be a really interesting tournament in my opinion although without even the ability of the lower tiered clubs to participate it wouldn't be a competition worthy of the word "World" in it's title. The French/URC/English/SR split would also be a more fair split than 7 from SR and 2 or 3 from each of the other 3 leagues

    Have to disagree with your last suggestion though, rugby is a winter sport



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    I'm not against changing things up in the 6 nations but we'll never see it fully dropped in any year because it's the thing that finances NH rugby.

    A European Championship in the November on alternating years to the RWC is workable, there's already a test window there, do something with the pools so it's not just the 6 nations being re-run.The following 20 European teams are in the world top 40 atm https://www.world.rugby/tournaments/rankings/mru

    1. Ireland
    2. France
    3. England
    4. Scotland
    5. Wales
    6. Georgia
    7. Italy
    8. Spain
    9. Romania
    10. Portugal
    11. Russia
    12. Belgium
    13. Netherlands
    14. Poland
    15. Germany
    16. Switzerland
    17. Ukraine
    18. Czechia
    19. Sweden
    20. Croatia

    Germany are currently ranked at 30th in the world, for example, but we will never see them play a tier 1 nation in the next decade, maybe even two, unless a miracle occurs in a world cup qualification. World Rugby could solve this fairly quickly by promoting a European Championship. We'd still keep our November tests (Autumn eh?) for 2 out of 4 years to play SH touring sides, we'd keep the RWC and the 6 nations intact too. It's actually a fairly significant gain for the cost of one set of tests every four years, imo. (I stopped at the 40th ranked side because after that you're drifting very fast into sides where the game barely exists.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    yep that could be a good idea too. i suppose my idea would be combined with a global calendar, so the 6N/NH comps would align with the SH/four nations (theyd have a similar tournament bringing in the island sides and japan. usa canada etc would fit into either the NH or SH depending on which would suit them better) and the summer/autumn tours would be kept, although they would switch around



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Not an auful idea, but the money raked in by the 6 Nations from the RC teams coming to town in November would be lost so I can't see that as being a runner either



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    I dunno, it's usually 2 sold out games and a half full game against the minnow of the 3. If a European Championship was a runner, it's probable we'd either do a deal whereby Irish games were hosted here etc, making up some of the shortfall (Ireland v Georgia would never sell out the Aviva but maybe Ravenhill or Thomond?) or maybe a joint advertising/rights approach?

    I've been thinking about why there isn't currently a European Championship and it's now, 30 years into the pro era, that's there's probably enough minnows to make it interesting. Obviously the winners would almost certainly be from the 6 nations but the football European championship is dominated by 4 sides (Germany, Italy, France and Spain) and no one seems to mind too much. (Interesting is not the same as competitive, I know Ireland will almost certainly lose if we ever make it to the football European Championships, we're not competitive at that level, but we still all watch.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Said it before, but I think it would be a great replacement for the Lions tour years. If they had a Euro competition up North, and a similar one down South it would offer a lot more value.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Would disagree, but it wouldn't have to be a replacement. Could run instead of the usual tours



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    2 sell out games for each of the 6 Nations countries. 12 sell out games in 3 weeks is a lot better than playing 3 weeks of "minnows"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    We have that every year it's called the 6 Nations, the southern hemisphere have a similar competition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    We have a closed off tournament for 6 countries who never or pretty much never play any other European countries outside of the 6 nations. Sport will never grow properly when that's the case. Its same in southern hemisphere. The top 10 cou tries don't play the countries ranked 11-20 near enough



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    In most of those cases, those teams would struggle against an A side from 5 of the 6N countries. So having a development team play against them during the AI’s would probably be a better option for all concerned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 116 ✭✭RAKM


    When are people going to learn? Rugby is not soccer and never will be. Not every country has enough rugby to ever make them better. It will always be in the minority in these countries

    I know Italy beat Wales this year but their record over 23 seasons of 6N is very poor and they are probably 6th best team in Europe. I know Georgia beat them recently but allowing promo/relegation would do nothing for the tournament and very little for the likes of Spn Rom etc.

    I agree financially it may be a benefit to have Italy but replacing them with SA would be better. And yet I guess its unlikely Italy will stand down or be pushed. At most SA will be added.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    I may be in a minority but I have zero interest in seeing SA in the 6 nations. They play horrible rugby (frankly Erasmus deserved a much longer ban for his behaviour in the Lions tour too, imo).

    I don't think anyone really thinks promotion/relegation would work either, tbh, getting a Georgian side (or sides) into the URC would be more beneficial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i hope youre in the majority on that one tbh, if SA join the 6N then the world cup becomes almost irrelevant.

    promotion/relegation should work in theory but wouldnt in practice. italy having to go up and down every second year or so would kill any interest in the game there while none of the other countries are good enough to compete yet either. if scotland went down (which wouldnt surprise me) it probably would kill the game there since participation there seems to be dropping year on year.

    increase the amount of games georgia etc, play in the summer/autumn and set up a tournament between the Rugby Europe Championship and the pacific island sides. maybe even increase the SH touring squad sizes in the autumn and have them play midweek/A games against spain/portugal/romania etc



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Obviously revenue is going to be the determining factor here but you have to take a longer term view too. The game is potentially dying in Scotland and in bad health in Wales, we need more teams and more markets. I don't think the game will actually die in either place but they are in a shocking condition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    We dont do enough to help them. Some would struggle against an A side but as we dont even do that enough how will they ever grow and develop. Many top irish players can go an entire career of international rugby and play feck all games against european opposition outside of the 5 sides in the 6 nations. that isnt good enough to help grow the sport. these sides need more games against us, full strength as well as second/weakened sides otherwise how will they grow and how will the sport grow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Careful what you wish for lads, Ireland not very successful in sports with a global reach! With the odd exceptional individual athletes.

    Let us have our rugby time in the sun!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I’m not sure getting hockeyed by 6N teams would be good for their development. It hasn’t really improved Italy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Ireland is uniquely positioned to help grow the game and at the same time develop ourselves. Creating a B league underneath the URC isn’t shooting ourselves in the foot. What we need is to expand the game and create new markets and invest in doing so.

    Who’s to say the B teams won’t splinter off into pro teams in their own right at some point? An outcome I’m sure the purists will dislike but if it means having 8 pro teams in our country it could bring about a stronger national side. There are all sorts of permutations from growth which can bring about good outcomes if managed properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Again not really much to do with the club world cup but what if we had more 5/6 Nations style tournaments in Europe, the winners of which would go on to a knockout against the 6 Nations winner for a pan-european trophy?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You mean a tournament between the non-6N teams, to play the winner of the 6N for a trophy? So, France against Georgia or someone like that?

    What would the value of that be? The 6N winner would win the game by 40 points every single time.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Considering the Irish provinces are discussing an A league with South African sides, it's pretty weird we can't/won't fly the shorter distances to Belgium or Spain. Not that it's either/or, we could play both SA A sides and the European Rugby Super Cup sides.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    There already is a Six Nations B and Six Nations C. Georgia more or less win the B one every comp.



  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    How did the South African sides finance prolonged periods in the northern hemisphere last year? If that’s possible then Argentinian squads are also in play but I believe setting up a satellite training ground or stadium in their adopted/country of origin might be the way to go. It would expand the game and reduce costs/pains of travel.

    As for emerging countries like Spain, Portugal, Belgium they have a lot going in their favour if they can finance a professional squad. Relative competitiveness becomes less of an issue if they can pay their way and competitiveness will come with a globally renowned league which is shown on TV and time.

    Sure, they will get beatings initially but once they feel their way into the League and learn the nuances of their opponents things will become a lot less unequal. if they can raise funds through support and those players see their future in it on the line they will perform to the standard needed.

    A lot of it comes down to developing the grassroots and if there is a viable league with home support the youngsters will eventually come through.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    I've no idea how SA finance the amount of travel they do, or even the travel they did under the old Super rugby tournament. i remember reading that their flights were supplied by the airlines in exchange for advertising but that might be 20 years ago now, at this stage.

    Anyhow, for anyone interested, there's the list of fixture for the Rugby Super Cup. The competition runs from September to December, it shouldn't be beyond the URC to use the teams for A fixtures in Jan/Feb, imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Simple really... There's money in South Africa for rugby, always has been, always will be

    Not sure what benefit A-Teams are to the game other than to annoy the All Ireland League clubs



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Those teams are effectively siloed away from first tier countries. I know most people have no interest in how good Germany could be a rugby (for example) but it's just a niche thing to discuss over pints really.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    can you explain more about the money in SA rugby? I thought loads of SA players moved to Europe due to the weakness of the rand, and the lower wages there?

    I've no firm view on the merits of A-teams, tbh, the IRFU are trying to set up a A comp with SA sides though. I think we can do both.



  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    The issue is world rugby is a closed shop with zero growth in around thirty years bar Argentina causing a few upsets. I’m not saying relegation/promotion to the 6 Nations is the answer but opening up the invisible barriers a bit would do some good for the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭Itxa


    Growth is an organic thing. You can create money where none existed previously by investing in growth. If money is the final mandate of League organisers then they are closed minded and missing the bigger picture. It’s little Ireland thinking.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    I would go further and ask if the current model for rugby is working at all.

    Of the Tier 1 countries, Scotland, Wales and arguably Australia and (unbelievably) New Zealand are going through crises.

    The club game in England and France seems to be a loss-making escapade for billionaires, the professional game is dying on it's feet in Wales etc.

    World Rugby and a few of its constituent unions are facing multi-million euro law-suits over concussions too.

    On the back of that, imo, world rugby needs to find new markets and new competitors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I'd agree with this, even in the countries where the game is holding its own or growing it's in decline at the level below full professional. Go onto any chat in any rugby country and people are complaining that where their club had 3 or 4 teams in the past, now they struggle to field one or two. That extends to crowds and funding too.

    Rugby is looking at real headwinds from the concussion stuff and from competition with other sports and the amount of activities available to young people these days. Stuff like wading into the trans controversy needlessly and inelegantly just makes the situation worse.

    WR have their work cut out for them to grow the game and even with the attention that the RWC brings every 4 years they haven't succeeded very well, except perhaps for Japan and Arg. Here in the US the league seems viable but it gives very little to the grassroots game as it's almost fully disconnected from the club game and they let the rule about limiting non US eligible players slide after just a few months. It's great for guys coming out of the Leinster academy who don't get picked up but not much good to anyone else.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    The MLR, if it's a success, will inevitably establish pathways in the US/Canada for younger players but those pathways are going to get ever more specialised and remote from the club game, imo, same as here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I'd like to think so but evidence is not compelling and people I now who are connected to the game at a national level are not confident because of the nature of the MLR, dominated by 2 owners who are extremely wealthy and refuse to speak to each other. Absurd pissing contest underwritten by World Rugby. Ironically where things are genuinely exciting is in the women's game, where the club and college level is humming nicely and they don't have a pro league.

    In the men's game there is talk about Glendale(?) joining a South American League...



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    South American rugby is going surprising well atm, Chile beat the US to the RWC recently, which I'm sure you're aware of but others here mightn't be, so joining up in a pan-American competition might make sense for both the US and Canadian national sides and the MLR sides. I don't really follow the MLR that closely, but didn't Glendale opt out or go broke or something? Also, wasn't there meant to be an international Americas/Pacific comp at one stage?

    Btw, for anyone with an interest, here's a cool clip from Chilean rugby.

    https://twitter.com/TeamChile_COCH/status/1553826934429294593?s=20&t=xaS1mPP_-xqISbPkwO_0Jw



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Saw that Chile result, fantastic, though it does also indicate that the the US mens national team is in trouble. The US crowd was abysmal and the venue (in the US home game) was absolutely awful. But yes, the game in SA is coming along very well and there is a club competition involving a clubs from Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay and Paraguay. The Chilean club is the basis for the team that just qualified for the WC for the first time, so its real strides. I believe there was a tour involving a few of those clubs going to Canada/US last year and Glendale (or a team from the club) played against them and are discussing the possibility of a team joining the competition. Its a round robin format so it can work by keeping costs down as teams come and play in the same place in each round. This seems very promising as it will bring a new audience to the comp and give US based players real international experience at the club level.



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Sounds intriguing but surely the MLR sides will be invited in first?

    The structures in US rugby are a mess...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    MLR sides arent going to join any south american competition as theres far more potential for growth just staying in North America. Why go to expense of going to South America when they can stay in US with odd team or two from Canada.

    The structures arent really a mess. Theres a pro league in US with some canadians involved. There was existing clubs with good history in US but it made more sense for pro teams to just create new teams based on citys/states like most other pro sports in US

    There is a pro league in South America with sides from 6 countries involved



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Everything I've ever read about US rugby, including their Union going bankrupt (twice I think), has highlighted there's poor co-ordination across the continent. The MLR is an interesting concept but it remains to be seen how it will bolster US rugby's underage pathways. I think it will, inevitably, be good for it but it's not clear how it's going to interact with the existing clubs and colleges structure, imo. Maybe it's more formalised now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    There is a draft for college players and there is a fairly substantial ever growing age grade set up in quite a few states. Many travel over here to play every year, Quite a few of the pro teams are setting up academies and linking in with colleges and the existing clubs/high schools to tie in players



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Interesting, let's see how it plays out. As I said in one my earlier posts it's inevitable the MLR will establish these routes, might not be great for the existing clubs though.

    The number of potential athletes in the US is terrifying for other countries to contemplate. (Different sports/skillset but for the last Olympics the US had something like 40 male sprinters who'd have been good enough for Olympic semi-final level)

    Anyhow, here's another interesting video on Chilean rugby - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0kH0PWaXPo

    I know Ireland would (probably) put 100 points on them but it's still great to see them come on. I'd love to go and see Munster play Chile, even though it'd probably just be me and 500 other idiots interested in watching it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It had to go this way though. The way to promote the competition to new eyes was to base it on states/cities like the other major sports

    Munster have played Russia/Enesei(russian champions multiple times) in past on a few occasions. around 10+ years ago. Would be bit more difficult to arrange games against chile etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Be a cracking tour tho



  • Posts: 1,469 [Deleted User]


    Absolutely amazing, I've actually gone to a few lower tier home games over the years, serious craic. The crowds are small but really into it. Would recommend it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,867 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    As a Munster man. If Chilean teams are willing to make the trip to Cork or Limerick for some pre season games I see no reason not to welcome them and I would definitely go to see such a game



Advertisement