Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1388389391393394808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,468 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Do you mean a laissez faire approach to the housing market, or to Governing in general? I don’t think anyone can accuse this Government of having a laissez faire approach to property/rental market, if anything their autocratic approach has made the situation far worse as a result of the legislation/subsidies introduced without consideration of what affects it would have, and those it will affect,



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Didn't work out well for the French.

    I'm assuming when you say, "If you can’t have the life you want where you want it, broaden your search, you won’t be the first, nor the last to do so", you're not addressing me personally (as we have a house) but rather the general public.

    Would be interesting to see how your points fare with the various homeless families if the situation worsens. Families that may have elderly parents requiring support, deep roots in communities, children doing exams, parents too old to get an international work visa or families that just don't want to forced out of their own country.

    I suggest you go down to the working families currently being evicted and tell them your great ideas and report back to us here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Eliminate all policies that increase price and push up land prices

    Copy and paste Northern Ireland's independent low cost regulation model

    Introduce a tax that covers the environmental and energy benefits of new homes. The tax would be based on the increasing savings of such technologies. The tax will be no greater than the benefit in financial terms and tied to the home. In effect 0 cost max energy rating.

    Introduction of such measures may put us on track for a median income couple to be able to afford there own home in most areas.

    For people under this income threshold, state build on state land for affordable rent prioritising working couples. The trickle down effect of increased supply eventually benefits all and for the state housing becomes a revenue stream rather than a yearly escalating cost



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭yagan


    I do think it laissez faire when they fail to stop rent farming funds outbid home makers. Plus they actually made it worse by joining in the bidding too, so effectively first time buyers compete against international and domestic funds, and against their own government that taxes them. That would make it worse than laissez faire, we just haven't coined the term to describe it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,468 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I think you should take the time to look up all legislation/Government intervention in the property/rental sectors, you could be the only person who thinks the Government’s approach is “laissez faire”.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭yagan


    Rent funds are still buying whole estates. Nothing is stopping them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A number of posters asked why young people would leave for Canada/Aus/New Zealand to escape High housing costs in Ireland. The answer may well be in the recently completed construction defects report

    The state systems facilitate cowboy builders to build rubbish/firetraps through the use of shell companies. The shell companies are dissolved on completion of the project and the developers are held unaccountable for any defects

    Not only are they unaccountable, but serial offenders continue to operate today, many are "reputable" members of the Construction Industry Federation which through there ex ffgpd politician leader lobby the government for favourable conditions that benefit their industry

    The investigative panel attempted to find other redress schemes across the world that they could model ours on, however they could find none. This is guaranteed Irish problem

    Who would make the biggest purchase of their lives in such a market? Knowingly flouting fire regulations should be classed as mass attempted murder and be a criminal offence. Operators on medical device assembly lines are criminally liable for poor work




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭quokula


    Had my eye on an upcoming development for a while based on floor plans and location. They've just released some renders of the houses and is it just me or do they look unfinished? I wonder if the cost of materials has made them skimp on brickwork to keep costs to original estimates, or is this just the style these days? I think they look dreadful.

    These are large houses in a fairly desirable area so they won't be cheap when they go up for sale.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    On 10-Sept-2021 there were 12,509 properties for sale on myhome. On 22 Jan 2022 there were 10711.


    AFAIK, today is the first time 15,000 has been breeched. Seems to be trending in the right direction.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,482 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Do you have any figures for what they were pre-pandemic?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Sadly not, only started tracking last September.



  • Registered Users Posts: 945 ✭✭✭WhiteWalls


    Do you mean that your neighbour paid double for the same house at the same time you bought yours?


    I find that hard to believe if this is the case..



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    We bought our house about 4 years later. I would have thought that's pretty obvious in the context of timing the market..



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,663 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    James Larkin did emigrate. He was born and raised in Liverpool and spoke with a scouse accent. Ditto Connolly and an Edinburgh accent (something only one 1916 documentary I've ever seen accurately represents)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭Deub


    When I see the size of back gardens in new developments, what will the new ones have? An alley?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭wassie


    They will be marketed as being sustainable and eco friendly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Basically lobbyists are campaigning for lower standards on the promise of cheaper housing, then developers are submitting planning with more units, they then flip the land at a much higher price resulting in lower standards leading to higher prices

    What's that definition of stupidity again?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    The point being that he didn't emigrate again he stayed and fought for workers rights.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I'm so wrong😂 Just shows how useless my history is. The point I was trying to make is that people have historically fought for better rights. Not everyone just leaves as Dav01 recommends because someone else owns all the land/ capital/ etc.

    Perhaps this is a better example.

    Expecting people to leave because the top 1% have 27.3% (2015) of the wealth may not always wash with people, especially if the share of the 1% continues to rise. What if the 1% own 99% of the wealth, do you think people will just accept that? If not what figure is acceptable?


    edit: appreciate the correction and apologies for my completely inaccurate historical reference but can we just leave it at that? This is not a politics/ social forum. I think I made my point satisfactorily in answer to David's suggestion that people f off if they are poor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,468 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    That is not what I said.

    Unsurprisingly, you understand neither the subject matter, nor the context. I said if you cannot get what you want, where you want it, you need to broaden your search, as people have done for generations. You were the one trying to give the history/politics lesson referencing Cromwellian/French revolution/early 20th century socialist rhetoric.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I said if you cannot get what you want, where you want it, you need to broaden your search, as people have done for generations

    I think in relation to housing we are a long way off wants, this is a discussion on people's needs. Wants are way off in the distance, unreachable. People have been broadening their searches and as in the celtic tiger, it was a disaster, so it will be in the 20's



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,873 ✭✭✭amacca


    They might as well make them apartments if the garden is the size of a postage stamp imo.....you could build upwards then


    High density indeed



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭combat14


    Just seen this interesting quote on last housing bubble today:

    "The axiomatic error was that housing prices only go up. I don’t support predatory lending, but many of those lenders were severely wounded or didn’t survive.

    They dug their own graves – a lesson we should all take to heart, including me." Elon Musk, May 2022


    Fascinating quote as China's ongoing property market woes threatens to cause serious upset & potential finacial instabilty there:

    China's property sales are set to plunge 30% — worse than in 2008, S&P says (CNBC 27 July 2022)


    lucky we have learnt our lessons from the last property crash here - its hard for prices to drop when supply is kept artificially low for years on end



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes, I agree, they do look awful. Whoever thought the gable end of a house would be nice as an entrance/front needs a talking too. I guess they may save on space and developer will cram in more houses. I'd imagine the garden is very small?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The idea that people should just put up with the fact that despite having reliable employment they will never have a stable enough living situation to start a family etc, is absurd. People will not put up with it. Either proper long term regulated rental market (unlikely) or populism will win out and we will get more government interference in the market. But the majority will not just suck it up.

    A ridiculous attitude to markets in general also - any market should look to cater to many people at many price points. You can always buy cheaper 2nd hand cars, less luxurious models. But property is basically off limits to a large amount of people. Attitudes like @Dav010 are exactly why the market is as dysfunctional as it is.

    As said long before, Sinn Fein are guaranteed big gains next election - I doubt they can fix things, but so long as they dont actively make things worse like Darragh OBriens shared-equity scheme, developer subsidy scheme, and so on, then its a positive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,468 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Unfortunately attitudes like yours will ensure that people are stuck here indefinitely with little prospect of owning their home. Instead of whinging about the way things should be and hoping someone else will help you, help yourself. Look for a market where your wage will allow you to buy a home. Stand on your own two feet.

    Jesus, I hope you don’t think that SF are magically going to solve the housing crisis, remember, someone has to pay for all these promises they are making, and it is going to be you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭AySeeDoubleYeh


    The fact that you still see this as "whinging" is both hugely disappointing and an indictment on your stance here. You have made your mind up, nothing is going to change it.

    I'm sure if we all gave up our Netflix subs and takeaway coffees we'd be grand, right?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    That gardai, nurses, teachers employed in the capital cannot afford to live there is not a normal circumstance - the minute those people leave and "look for a market where their wage will buy a home" people like yourself will be complaining no doubt

    The market has been massively distorted by years of bad policy to get here - most people recognise that but you seem adamant that everything is great. Do you own your house by any chance?

    Also if you were able to read you would see I said I doubt SF will fix things, however they may stop making the situation worse. Policies from current lot like Shared Equity and HTB only inflate the market, serves no purpose other than to push prices up further. And then the proposed subsidies for developers - to quote yourself...

    Instead of whinging about the way things should be and hoping someone else will help you, help yourself. Look for a market where your wage will allow you to buy a home. Stand on your own two feet.

    I think this should apply to developers alright



Advertisement