FF/FG/Green Government - Part 3 - Threadbanned User List in OP

Probably because some of them are going to be hit with punitive change for NO gain and missed targets.

Fodder for political feel goods.

Marko, don't bother waiting for a direct reply from me after yesterdays disgraceful carry on.

But just to appease your thirst for answers.

I'm observing the embarrassing semantics. As for the Deal, what Deal would that be 🤔 nowhere near what is legally binding apparently, a climbdown by all essentially, a week of nothingness, a week of farce, another week of embarrassing squabbling. (actually, I enjoyed that)

I agree and yet I seem to recall (not you) how irrelevant some think Rural TDs are, whatever party they are in, independents too.

The Greens 'got' a full 5% less than they wanted of a target that won't be reached anyway, like all the other targets, legally enforcable or not.

Political show pony's IMO. They capitulated on a core policy, same as coalition cannon fodder before them. Ryan was floundering ina sea of platitudes and lip service in his interview this morning, the presenter's closing remaks on the whole fiasco aligning precisely with my takeaway:

'Politically efficient but scientifically incoherent'

And the misrepresentation again. Who do you think this stuff fools Mark?

I didn't at any point say that ' the biggest environmental policy changes done in the history of the state is 'irrelevant''

Now please stop engaging with me if you cannot be honest about what is posted.

COMPROMISE

There's a few interpretions of the meaning of Compromise, here's one

"an agreement or settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions"eventually they reached a compromise"

The compromise in this case seems more like......

FARCE

There's also a few interpretions of the meaning of Farce. This my favourite in the context of the past few days 😁

" comic dramatic work using buffoonery and horseplay and typically including crude characterization and ludicrously improbable situations. They toured the backwoods in second-rate farces"

Regards, Dempo 😁

Seems very odd to me some trying to present this as a good FFGG story, I've honestly very little knowledge of the Agricultural emissions reductions debate but at a basic level of understanding for me anyway, this was no compromise, achieved little and optically looks pretty dreadful, no one happy even those "Who Compromised" IMO

This from the Farmer's Journal no less, a gosh a Female TD, no less 😏

As Verona Murphy said to him: 'It's always somebody else's fault, you won't answer the questions'.

Colm consolidating the waffler immpression.