Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1257258260262263334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn’t know the CW Games were happening until Dorries made her gaff.

    Have given up watching BBC and UK channels is probably the reason.

    Happened by osmosis rather than any conscious decision over the last few years. Only realised how little I watch a while ago. As somebody interested in a wide range of sports, I was rather shocked to not know the games were on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The US don't want to join either but funny enough no one ever chastises them for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    It's not news anywhere until tonight's opening ceremony! I mean, I'm sure there are articles popping up, but it's not even getting as much coverage as even The Hundred, of which I've seen more ads for! Imagine, the only thing I came across all week was about Canadian athletes not turning up.

    Lack of knowledge of what exactly?

    If it makes you feel better to think that just under 50% of the population of the Commonwealth Nations will be tuned in, then more power to you.

    But it's fanciful. I guess it'll be covered on news bulletins as wall to wall :sar: as Glasgow, Gold Coast and Delhi were. Will help if the lavs don't work I guess. 🤷

    Anyway, enjoy the Games. If it was on in the back garden I wouldn't watch it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Like yourself, I barely knew it was on until I saw that article about the Canadian athletes.

    Also like yourself, bar the odd time I go too far up on the remote, I never really watch BBC or ITV anymore. And I also only realised how little I watch them in the last year or so.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I wouldn't have known if I wasn't sharing a hotel in Birmingham with Commonwealth athletes. My interest was confined to trying to guess as many flags as I could (not many). If this is the foundation of the UK's claim to be a world leader, the Brexiters must be desperate indeed.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    Hardly surprising you don't wish to dwell on the commonwealth, Ireland's willing and profitable participation(most notably in India and the West Indies) in building the British empire must be an uncomfortable fact you would like to airbrush from history.

    Only problem is francie,Britain(and other commonwealth nations)have moved on from empire and the commonwealth is an organisation for peace, prosperity and democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Britain has moved on from empire?

    Are you having a laugh?

    I have to say, I do love it when we get given history lessons from subjects of the Mainland. It's almost like they seem to think our knowledge of our own history is as pockmarked as theirs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭yagan


    There was a commonwealth meeting in London in the month after the brexit vote and the consensus was that trade with would decrease as the GBP weakened. The post brexit vote drop in gbp had already seen members seek buyers in other markets to make up the shortfall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I wouldn't bother. It's clear from all this waffle about "willing and profitable participation" in empire that he is just another one of these posters who will just say anything.

    Call it whatever WUM, troll, bad faith poster. Bottom line is you wont be getting intelligent or rational conversation.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Utter nonsense. Ireland was conquered and colonised.

    The Commonwealth is a necrotic construct that'll fall apart within a decade or two while little Englanders at the top of the Tory party pretend to be leading a world power. If a country like Barnados feels like it can boot out an unelected head of state, how long before India and Pakistan follow suit?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Point of order, Elizabeth Windsor isn't their head of State. Both are republics.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I see. The Commonwealth is even more rickety than I thought.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,515 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Ireland withdrew/got removed in 48 (although we'd long ceased being an active participant) when we declared ourselves a republic, as this was against the rules at the time. You had to have the monarch as head of state. This rule got removed a few years later when India was in the process of becoming a republic, as the Commonwealth didn't want to lose such an important member (a jewel in the crown you might say).

    Since then most members have declared themselves republics (all/most of the African ones anyway) and very few have the Queen as Head of State now.

    Interestingly some countries like Gabon & Rwanda who joined recently were never colonised by the Empire, so clearly they saw some merit in being part of it. And some who left have rejoined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,307 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Willing participation? This list of uprisings against British rule over the last 500 years must be fictitious then......

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irish_uprisings



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Enlightening to see that some in the UK still look on Ireland as being a bit of an adolescent pupil or child; whitewashing history about its role in The Empire rather than act with a degree of self-awareness at just how toxic (to use the modern parlance) the relationship with Ireland truly was. Very strong echoes with previous user who used to take this exact same tack.

    "commonwealth" - if ever there was a misnomer for an obviously lopsided institution, it'd be this one.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I feel like the commonwealth only exists because it's just easier for a lot of countries to stay than leave. The desperate championing of it by the little Englanders belies the role it played in helping to keep the UK in the EU in 1975. Ironic now that they're looking to it as some sign of Britain's leadership given that they've just discarded perhaps the only justification for its existence.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    I don't understand why the commonwealth countries stay. Does it give them priority in anything worldwide? Can people from, say, St. Kitts and Nevis migrate freely to the UK, get public assistance and jobs? Why do I think I already know the answer to that is no. Is there other economic benefits or subsidies going on? Again, I doubt it's significant enough if the likes of Barbados are leaving. If the bigger economies like Australia would go, it'd probably snowball.


    Plus, there's already the Olympics. That's enough international sporting teams to support I'd think. Whole thing is symbolic and looks like just places for the Royals to go on attractive photo shoots. Might just add a few more flower shows in the UK for all it benefits anyone.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't think it does. I think it's just a case of the fact that it would take political effort to leave it for no corresponding gain.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No issue accepting the history of this island Frazer. I physically work to perseve aspects of it, like planter castles, British built heritage. No airbrushing here.

    I fully accept there were those who partook in colonisation and imperialism too and that there are those who regret our independence.

    I have also noticed, as stated that British outreach is fading for me, I genuinely didn't know these games were on until the DOrries gaff.

    I fancy it is the same for many in Ireland. You cannot pursue a policy of isolationism and then be surprised when nobody notices something you are doing from outside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,515 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    For those who say that countries remain in the CW through inertia, it's worth pointing out that countries who left have re-joined, and countries who were never part of the British Empire have joined. So clearly they see some merit in it and it's thriving.

    Ultimately it's not something we should over analyze I guess. The French equivalent has more members, shares some members with the Commonwealth and also has many members who were not colonized. It doesn't have a big sports event though so it's less visible.

    Organisation internationale de la Francophonie - Wikipedia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    We're an observer to the OIF



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,515 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Cheers, I genuinely didn't know about there was a FR equivalent of the Commonwealth Games - every days a school day around here!

    I just think, for whatever reason possibly historic, we make a bigger deal out of Commonwealth membership than it deserves. That because we left there is something wrong with the countries who are still in it, and we are waiting for the time to come when they see the light like we did and decide to leave.

    Ironically, having typed the above sentence, I see similarities to the UK attitude to the EU. They thought once they left that logically other countries would also leave.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,722 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Can people from, say, St. Kitts and Nevis migrate freely to the UK, get public assistance and jobs?

    Come on now. The UK were part of a union where they left and one of the main reasons was a fear of being overrun by foreigners - mainly the eastern european white variety. What makes ya think the UK have some agreement to allow non whites from far flung corners get in without issue?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ireland is kinda unusual though as we were split with one part very much still a member of the empire so Commonwealth membership is wrapped up in Unionism (both the NI type and the D4 type). It is all a bit overblown with people on both sides and I've been accused of being some sort of IRA neanderthal because I would rather we didn't join (get the same sht because I still like to see England lose the soccer).

    Also in peoples minds it is linked to John Bruton waffling on which isn't great for the cause either 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 876 ✭✭✭reslfj


    Can people from, say, St. Kitts and Nevis migrate freely to the UK

    The UK were part of a union where they left and one of the main reasons was a fear of being overrun by foreigners

    St. Kitts and Nevis population 53,000 - very unlikely to overrun anything.

    Such small countries needs friends in this world, and being under the Queen (if only symbolic) and member of the Commonwealth looks much better to me than all alone. It's very difficult to get enough qualified persons out of such a small population to run a modern state.

    "The British dependency of Anguilla <population 15,000> was historically also a part of this union, which was then known collectively as Saint Christopher-Nevis-Anguilla. However, Anguilla chose to secede from the union and remains a British overseas territory." /Wikipedia

    Though only marginally different in practical terms, Anguilla's may well be better choice.

    Lars :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,194 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One wonders what condition the Commonwealth would be in had the Queen passed away around 20 years ago - I suspect her remaining on the throne for 70 years has been a big factor in it surviving.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'd say we'll find out soon enough what happens without her. I can see a lot of states slipping away from it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There are two separate questions.

    1) Head of state being the UK Monarch. This is purely symbolic because the Monarch has no effect on the operation of the colony.

    2) Being a member of the CW. This is little more than symbolic since it is not a trade bloc, nor is it a alliance. It is probably best described as a dining club, where every so often, the heads of state get together for a fancy dinner in one of the states. However, it gets little publicity outside the state hosting the dinner.

    I doubt it will survive the passing of E II.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,194 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, Charles is not popular and lots of stuff on social media in the last day or so about William not exactly being a wholesome character.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭newport2


    Agreed. You can see in places like Canada and Australia that there is a great deal of affection for the monarch among a lot of the population. Without her, I can see a lot of the incentive to stay dying out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,194 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, I think she was the glue that held it together. She's been the head of state for seven decades, a phenomenal amount of time. When she passes away, all bets will be off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Well there weren't a lot of other job opportunities in Ireland (except in the north-east, if you were the right religion) but we all know why that was.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Strong chance Australia will be a republic within ten years.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I see there is some misunderstanding on what the Commonwealth is and I wasn't up to date with some of the information either and I wonder if there are some merit to joining it. There are no real legal obligations and you do not have to accept the Queen as head of State and the meetings of the Heads of State is a good opportunity to meet with other leaders. I doubt that is a bad thing.


    You cannot run from your history and there are countries within the Commonwealth that has had just as hostile history with the UK as Ireland as the Empire was not a fun club at the time.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,429 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    But we're already a member of a bigger and better club - namely the EU.

    Do we really need to join the Commonwealth as well especially given the attitude of the CW mother ship to said EU?


    And I do agree about not running from ones history but sometimes it's just as important to leave the past behind.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    What benefits are there? A large friend like the UK would always be helpful but 2022 Britain is neither that large or that trustworthy a potential friend IMO.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Unless there's some positive economic benefit, why bother? It's not a military alliance, it's not a trade alliance, it's not a political alliance, just occasional parties and a meaningless sporting event that largely proves nothing about the state of sport in the participant countries, unlike the Olympics (both good and bad I admit.)


    And Britain's gone off the isolationist deep end. Why tie up with them? The countries in the Commonwealth were all started as UK colonies, or others that were eventually conquered by the UK. Who needs them in your history?


    I think it dissolves once the Queen is out of the picture. Maybe they still have their sporting event every 4 years or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    When ER II dies the UK itself is reasonably likely to fall apart, nevermind the Commonwealth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Wasn't there a plan/hope to turn the Commonwealth into a trade bloc to compete with the EU? Which would rule out us being a member.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    You can't run from your history, but equally you can't ignore it and its effects.

    The effect on us psychologically as a nation rejoining would be massive. It would cause massive political ructions. Absolutely insane prospect.

    Aligning yourself with Frank Feighan, John Bruton, Charlie Flanagan and Conor Cruise-O'Brien is not something one should ever want to do.

    Post edited by BonnieSituation on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    With the UK no doubt at the top of the tree. I wonder would America be invited to join?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,603 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I doubt it. The Americans did more than anyone else to topple the British Empire by insisting on full sterling convertibility in the Empire. The fact is that the Commonwealth is a club of mostly poor countries. Even if it weren't, there was no realistic obstacle to the UK having both. They could easily have gotten some sort of fudge with the EU via incorporating EU regulations into the Commonwealth market.

    Instead, we got Brexit.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think that question answers it for me.

    When Keynes (the economist) returned from the USA following WW II and attempting to negotiate the financial ruin facing Britain (which was bankrupt from the war) was asked 'Are we going to be the 49th State of the Union?' - his answer was (reputedly) 'Unfortunately, No!'

    I think the UK is more likely to become a state within the USA rather than the USA to join the CW. Perhaps Brexit was the forerunner to the UK joining the USA.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Between that and the brief, and admittedly quickly dropped plan to merge France and the UK in 1940, there's a lot of instances where UK Sovereignty was a very debatable thing, very much up for sale.

    Wonder how realistic that would be: what wheels would have to turn for the UK to be absorbed into the American union.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think the massive debt that the British Empire had at the end of WW II (mostly owed to the USA) and the amount of crap the USA would get dealing with the Empire and the many colonies that were in revolt, or soon would be, would all mitigate against Britain joining the USA as a state.

    I would have thought the provinces of Canada would be easier to absorb, except the Canadians would never agree to it.

    Perhaps after de Gaulle said 'NON' the first or second time might have been when the UK might have considered it. But then again, they were then tagged 'the sick man of Europe' and had massive economic problems. I doubt that the USA would take overtures from Britain seriously, and would certainly not proposed them.

    Besides, the UK have performed as a USA puppet since WW II anyway, so why would the USA be interested in any other relationship?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    The US won't even allow Puerto Rico or Washington, DC to become states. The UK? rofl


    Sooner see Cuba as a State than the UK. Imagine the hilarity if that happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭yagan


    It's far more likely now that there's be a split amongst US states than any new addition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    I wouldn't agree. There won't be a split, that's just noise. Last time that was tried it got really ugly and there was, good or bad, a real reason for it (and against it.) Not so much this time, it's just nuclear-class whining is all. The States are infinitely better off together.


    Though, Texas could secede, and the remaining states build a nice wall around it and split up families trying to cross over. Works for me. That lone star on its flag really is a review ranking.


    (I think we've diverged from Brexit enough now.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,194 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Which would lead to an interesting realignment of relationships within these islands. You could see Ireland and Scotland forming a good relationship - but then again, a non Tory led England would probably have an excellent relationship with Ireland too.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement