Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
13813823843863871062

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    For the 10 millionth time, offshore wind is much more reliable than onshore wind

    The 5000 GW is purely offshore wind which can have capacity factors of over 60%. This doesn't mean a turbine produces no power 40% of the time, it produces power 90% of the time but some of that time it's producing less than its maximum capacity

    Add solar and the interconnectors and we have 80% plus of our electricity generated from renewables within 8 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,376 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    When is the first offshore wind farm that will generate power 90% of the time to be built and where?

    What stage of planning/design is it at now?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    You do need to keep up banana. There was a discussion about it on boards. Never could figure out how to use use boards search facility but more here and here. If you dont like those - there's plenty more about the guardians so called independent reporting out there.

    Yeah American style animation is a great source of information for sure 👍

    Yes civilisation has benefited from carbon based fuels. And no one is saying we have to use carbon based fuels forever either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The OECD/FAO report shows otherwise where without subsidies demand for beef and dairy worldwide is increasing and forecast to continue to do so in areas where there are no subsidies. That was the reason the E.U. got rid of the milk quota in 2015 because it was preventing E.U farmers competing in the world market. The E.U were directly responsible for the increase in dairy cow numbers in Ireland.

    E.U. subsidies along with keeping beef and dairy cheap for consumers come with a slew of regulations attached on numbers per acre, environmental issues etc. that keep the number of cattle low. Irish farmers could most likely do all right with those regulations gone selling on the world market by farming more extensively, so the only people most likely to suffer would be the consumer with more expensive product farmed at lower standards. Again, not something the E.U is bothered with when these products come from outside of the E.U.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    And for the 10 millionth time you either do not know what the word reliable means or that installed capacity factor means Sweet F A when turbines are only contributing very low energy due to lack of wind. Either that or you are just waffling on attempting to avoid.

    You cannot design a system without designing for the worst case scenario. It`s the most basic of all basic engineering design principles and for an unreliable energy sources like wind or solar that it the minimum they deliver on any given day. We all know what happened last Winter and Spring when wind for extended periods only contributed 6% or less to a demand at peak of 6,000MW. So the question you are doing your utmost to avoid answering is very simple.

    To go from having the need of over 16 times as many more turbines on shore to ensure 100% reliable source, based on the lowest output from off-shore wind terminals how many would we need to reach 100% dependability ? If you want to throw in solar be my guest on the same principle. But spare me the pie in the sky of storage and interconnectors because the only reliable dependable source from those interconnectors will be nuclear. That is if the French have any to spare when we need it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    you can’t even bring yourself to say Simpsons in case you’d be caught agreeing with the other side and knee capped.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Where are you getting rubbish like "Corrib was marginal"????? Thats complete and utter rubbish.

    And more News for ya - the UK is running out of natural gas and currently imports over 50% of its gas from the international market. Much of that gas is LNG

    Let us not do a fricking rehash of the "wah there's no viable gas in Ireland" bs which has already been thoroughly debunked on this thread. I suggest you read it.

    Ireland has several known untapped viable sources of Natural gas atm. Natural gas here is currently sourced from the Corrib gas field. Which is operated by Vermilion Energy  a Canadian oil company.

    Previously the Kinsale gas field operated by the US Marathon Oil company provided significant reserves of natural gas. With Irelands natural gas fields having provided up to 60% of the countries gas requirements, with the Corrib gas field currently supplying 30 percent of the country’s gas needs

    Two additional reserves of natural gas have been identified. The development of at least one which is apparently being deliberatly stonewalled by Mr Ryan.

    The Irish government does not do its own exploration or drilling. Exploration and drilling licences are allocated to companies like Marathon, Providence etc. The government then receives large amounts of tax via the sales of the natural gas once extracted. A win win situation which means the country gets to use its own sources of natural gas and the government receives taxation which it uses on essential services such as health, housing etc etc

    Tbh the hypocrisy of the idea that importing gas and electricity from abroad as is the case of gas imported or electricity generated via nuclear power from the UK is grand but refusing to consider any such options for Ireland is truely unbelievable



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The only place that LNG is not accepted as a transitional fuel is in your own head and in that of some of the whackier greens.

    The E.U. has negotiated a deal with the U.S. where 19bcm of LNG has been delivered. 80% of what was negotiated for this year alone



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Thanks for the laugh 😅

    I didnt know it was the Simpsons but the accents of the characters did identify it as the US 👍

    Btw yeah I see the sneaky sinn fein reference there. And no I'm not a fan either!



  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Ramasun




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo



    "One of the worst things about the EU is farm subsidies. Beef and processed Dairy products should be too expensive for most people. If people had to pay the true cost there'd be less demand and our emissions target would solve itself."

    Well that complete and utter rubbish for a start.

    The Pie chart below detail the type of agriculture farm supports allocated under the Common Agricultural Policy in Europe to all types of agriculture

    EU CAP Farm spending by sector

    As you see Arable products get a much bigger percentage of the pie at 40% than beef at 18% or dairy at only 4.6 %

    But wtf should only beef and dairy products "be too expensive for most people"? You don't like beef and dairy fine. Don't eat either. However these are foods which are a part of a recommended and healthy diet.

    The principle reason our agriculture emissions here are deemed higher than some other countries is that an important part of our economy is based on agriculture. We produce beef and dairy products for our trading partners in the EU because we can produce these foodstuffs well, as they are suited to our soils and climate. Ditto we import foodstuffs from other EU countries and elsewhere who produce what they produce well such as fruit and vegetables which don't do so well here.

    Two things. 1. As part of the EU, those countries who are food producers shouldn't get sanctioned for producing foods for other EU countries. 2. Irelands highest ghg emissions do not come from agriculture as some would have us believe. That award goes to Energy consumption which accounts for 59% of all Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions 

    Now if you or anyone else wish to make a big difference to our emissions, start by turning of your lights, don't use your phone or laptop and make sure you have plenty of blankers this winter because the bad news is that most of the electricity you consume is not being produced by renewables but by oil and gas because renewables energy generation remains completely unreliable. That way there will be less demand and our emissions target will solve itself



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    But as I showed you that is not how it works in the real world. Demand for meat and dairy products are increasing world wide and predicted to continue doing so. For what other reasons do you think a country that is already supplying 600 million euro worth of beef to the E.U. (while we a a member state are supposed to cut our herds by up to 2 million), is increasing theirs by 24 million. ?

    It`s a farcical load of nonsense when looked at from the point of global emissions, environment and economics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Ramasun


    MUMO statistics show that without subsidies most people can't afford beef and processed dairy produced in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Who are MUMO?

    I've detailed above how EU subsidies are not only provided for Ireland. All EU countries get EU agricultural subsidies . Why you picking on Ireland only?

    Imagine for a second what you've claimed comes true. What you're suggesting is that we shouldn't produce foodstuffs such as beef and dairy (that we can produce well because of our soils and climate) but where any country can produce then cheaper and don't give a flying monkies about emissions or standards or whatever then we'll import that'll and that will be OK? Have you heard about this thing called food security at all? Or do you reckon that doesn't matter?

    Or maybe you wish to restrict certain foodstuffs only to the better off? How the hell do you propose any of that will work? Ban imports as well? Let the less well off just eat spuds - one of the crops we can reliably grow here? We tried that before and it didn't work out well.

    I've heard it all now. We really are getting into green fantasy land altogether now.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    They are already in operation. Hywind in Scotland generates at least some power well over 95% of the time



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    In the E.U. subsidies are not confined to beef and dairy. End subsidies and the price of all foods would increase.

    As I said earlier, for the E.U. anyway, for meat and dairy subsidies come with strings attached on acreage,veterinary standards, traceability, environment, as well a processing at all levels to ensure public health safety etc. Take all those restrictions and rules away and the production costs drop. The amount of profit then becomes related to economy of scale. Increasing catle numbers by intensification, or as Brazil is doing increase cattle numbers with increased acreage by deforestation to feed them. or the grazing of previously restricted areas due to environmental rules and regulations.

    The demand for beef and dairy is there and growing, the recent OECD/FAO report supports that. Where there is a demand people will always find a way of supplying it and making a profit. Ending subsidies will only result in that supply being filled by way of questionable standards and lax public health controls such as we saw with BSE in cattle and CJD in humans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I`m not sure we will be able to grow spuds soon with all the restrictions, bans, proposed restrictions and proposed bans on fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    was that before or after putting 3bn aside for the Ukraine crisis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Surplus generally means more than was budgeted for

    Life isn't worth living without pizza and the odd cheeseburger. The subsidies are worth it



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Perhaps check the internet for the term populism and then reread your post.

    Do I think you’ll do that, 🤔, no because A , You believe covid only gave people the sniffles.

    B You believe Irish ministers can implement change in order countries.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Who explained it an actual expert or a boards.ie barstool xpert



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    @Mecanudo said “ Why you picking Ireland only” — well the thread title is Green policies are destroying this country, ie, Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,376 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Yeah but what is “some” power?

    what’s the minimum the turbines generate as a group so that we know how much fossil fuels need to be on the system to pick up the shortfall.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Yeah you need to be an expert to learn the basics about natural gas and lng 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Do keep up Banana. The proposition was someone wanting to get rid of selected EU subsidies here. Two things about that 1. Thats not a 'green policy' afaik 2. EU subsidies - the hints in the name. Do keep up.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,408 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    load duration curves. Older smaller turbines have much steeper curves. The newest floating turbines produce at least 20% of their capacity more than 70% of the time. Ireland will have 15GW installed capacity by 2030 for a peak demand of 6-7GW

    Combine this with storage (not as much as you think we need), interconnectors and a diversity of generating sources (geographically and technologically) and we're only going to need gas backup a small percentage of the time



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,376 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    15GW installed for a peak demand of 6-7GW by 2030?

    So at minimum wind how much GW do ya think will the turbines be generating?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    says the fella who’s all over the road after ten cans.

    Waiting for an answer to my question about gas.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    How much of this 6-7GW will needed by data centres?

    Wtf data is stored in all these centres ,is it important in life or death situation or is it general rameis the same as discussed here



Advertisement